« BACK  |  PRINT

RS

MEMBER DIARY

Get Palin!

Is anyone following the money?

Get Palin! That’s Job One for The Left and its media allies, says Gary Larson at Intellectual Conservative. And to accomplish the mission, they have gone far beyond the pale. The governor’s children are considered fair game by the same people who would scream bloody murder if either of the president’s two young daughters were unfairly attacked.

Larson says they will go to the ends of the earth to “Get Palin!”:

Elements of an elitist, leftist, mostly Eastern-based MSM fear and loathe Governor Sarah Palin — all 5′ 7,” 125 pounds of her traditional values, anathema to them. She threatens their collectivist goals, shared by most serious liberal Dems, of more and more dependency on Big Government, dreams of controlling folks, of stopping drilling for oil somewhere (read, ANWR) of snaring still more taxes from “the wealthy” to “spread the wealth” possibly to the undeserving and/or the unworthy.

Their primary fear, I think, lies in Sarah Palin’s possible ascension someday to be the POTUS. Scariest of all to her legion of irreligious media enemies, she is actually liked by most ordinary people, carrying a 60%-plus approval rating in Alaska. It’s a percentage many a politician would die for.

Palin’s all-American outlook (and her envied good looks?), her Reaganesque exuberance, natural optimism, her humble Utah beginnings, her love for the USA and true family values, only stoke the raving fires of madness of the heavy-breathing, Amerika-blaming hard Left.

So their media efforts to put down this extraordinary woman continue today, and perhaps ad infinitum, based on an irrational fear that someday Sarah Palin might just be President of the United States. Therefore expect the attacks, the attention on her and even her family, to continue, at least through 2012. Beyond?

The Left’s media running dogs have most recently seized upon the troubles of two teenagers, playing the story of the split between Bristol Palin and her former finance Levi Johnston to the hilt and then some. An inordinate amount of attention is being given to young Levi, and the buzz from what he had to say before the cameras has dominated the gossip blogs and Leftist nutroots websites for the past week.

All of which led blogger Ron Devito to ask some very important questions:

“Why has no one asked the very basic question of how a job-less teenager drives an expensive truck and travels 4,400 miles with two adults in no better financial condition than himself to one of the most expensive cities in the world? There, he does a talk show circuit in which he engages in a crusade against a sitting Governor and her daughter with whom he was man enough to create a child but not man enough to provide for said child.”

Ask yourself what we have to do here to follow the money. As Ron points out, if we can nail down the source of the money, the motive will be apparent. We may even discover the shadowy figure who first sent down the marching orders to “Get Palin!”

- JP

COMMENTS

  • azaeroprof

    (Since this is a front-pager, I’ll paste the comment I made to Rod’s diary for larger consumption. Sorry if you’ve already read it!)

    If and when the truths about Obama ever become known, I think ALL Americans will be stunned at the extent of David Axelcrook?s influence and corruption. He cleverly stays on the fringe of public exposure, most of us who follow politics closely know who he is, but I?ll bet if you ask the average American, not 1 in 1000 know him. But I?m convinced that he is behind 95%+ of the Palin smears starting immediately after she was selected by McCain.

    He?s EXTREMELY good at what he does (astroturfing) and covering his tracks. All that said, he is NOT a money man. He is an operative. The man pulling his strings is the same one pulling Obama?s strings. The obvious choice for that role is George Soros. He?s got the money and the socialist/totalitarian agenda. I have said in previous comments that I think he, through his many minions, single-handedly donated SEVERAL HUNDRED MILLION DOLLARS to the Obama campaign, disguised as bogus small donations with fictitious names.

    But I think there?s always a chance that even Soros is just a public front for the real money men. If that is true, my bet is on the oil men in the Muslim world. And I thought that BEFORE he bowed to the Saudi king!

    Man, we sure could you some investigative journalists! Too bad they?re all looking in the trash for Levi Johnston?s dirty underwear! (/snark)

    • Praying

      and more and more people are starting 2 + 2 together and coming up with the likes of Axelrod and Soros. The muslin influence can not be denied either – wonder why no one ever investigated all those over seas donations to his campaign fund? These are the powers behind the puppet that is Obama – the man who cannot mutter a coherent sentence without his beloved TOTUS, the man who is everything to all people, and soon will be nothing to everyone. It is sad when an entire group of people gauges their success not in how high they can rise, but in how far they can push down those around them… This is what they have done with Palin, tried to do with Limbaugh, and are doing now with Beck. Pity they can’t fight like real men. No wonder they prefer the Euro-socialism.

  • IJB

    Of “Far Side” fame?

    • Josh Painter

      This Gary Larson is a retired newspaper editor.

      - JP

  • gekster

    I wonder when” idiot looser” will finnaly get “conned into/paid” for saying that Mrs. Palin wouldn’t let Bristol get the abortion the she deserved and is entitled to.
    Ya know, since pregnacy is tantamount to slavery.

    Shes the little sister I allways wanted.

  • mikefisk

    Sarah Palin, like Clarence Thomas before her, is a member of a protected class in society that not only attained their success without slavish devotion to the statist line, but actively abhors it.

    Therefore, to the Left (who use their token women and minorities of privilege as pawns to deflect criticism of their destructive ideas through blanket accusations of “racism” and “sexism”), these people, above all others, must be destroyed. After all, if there are people who are proving that all-consuming government is not necessary to succeed outside of the typical “old white male” paradigm, it damages their ability to use their spokespeople as the tokens they treat them as.

    As a result, those who defy progressive orthodoxy must not be dealt with, but destroyed in the name of the Party and the State.

    • Swamp_Yankee

      Larson missed the most important thing. Lots of conservatives and Republicams beleive the things Palin does. They hate her because they perceive her to be a threat and most importantly because of what you said.

      She delegitimizes their whole existence. She is the female Clarence Thomas. She single handedly destroys modern feminist theory. She never bought into victimization and liberal dogma. She is a product of the last frontier.

      She has a huge family and still is a successful professional. She married her high school sweeheart and is still happily married. She is a “social conservative” and she is still hip and sexy.

      To a liberal, social crusades give their empty lives meaning. Femisnists bought into the line of thinking that they are victims. They are divorced “because they are professional women and their jobs are too demanding.” They never had kids “because they were too ambitious and didnt have time.” They left small town America “because they could only find equaltiy in liberal cities, wher ethere was no good old boy network.” They married metrosexual sissies “because senisitive men are the only real men who will stand by a successful woman and not be insecure”.

      Get it. Palin goes right to their nerves. She is everything they are not. She has everything, they beleive they had to sacrifice to get what little they have. She exposes the fallacy of liberalism and feminsism. She exposes their lives as shams. She never baught into victimization and she has it all and they hate her for it. They are bitter. She undermines their whole worldview; the whole liberal worldview.

      She is as American as apple pie. This is why she is so important to the cause. This is what young girls need. This is what the youth needs.

      • azaeroprof

        doesn’t apply to ALL the libs that hate her, but a pretty sizeable chunk of them.

        • gekster
      • itrytobenice

        Well said.

      • Mike gamecock DeVine
  • TNJim

    Like azaeroprof I also commented on this previously, but in Warner Todd Huston’s “CBS Says Palin Popular ?Despite Latest News,? But Not One Substantive Issue Discussed”. I put part of it in Ron’s blog too but herre ir is in its entirety:

    The bias against Palin will go to extremes CBS hadn’t thought of if she proves to be even a minor threat to Obama?s re-election chances. Same goes for Jindal, Romney, Huckabee, any GOP candidate that might appear to make the slightest inroads against Obama in 2012. As far as Levi is concerned his actions more so than his words put me in mind of a male golddigger. Now I don?t mean to imply that gaining fame as the governor?s daughter?s boyfriend/ fiancee was always on his mind, he may have truly loved Bristol at some point, but his actions here lately just seem indicate he?s trying to gain his own 15 minutes off the Palins one way or the other. If it?s on the plus side fine, if it?s on the negative side, fine too.

    It wouldn?t surprise me a bit if it turns out someone like a MoveOn, a Soros type, or other leftist institution or person is slipping a few bucks his way to go on shows like Tyra Banks? to talk down the Palins. If he really wanted to work things out with Bristol I don?t think he?d be doing this.

    Money?s the most seductive mistress there is.

    • TNJim

      Should read “…here it is in its entirety” not whatever that mess up there is, lol

  • bobojake

    and stop this corupt elcrapo. obama lets Geithner take all the heat for the AIG bonus when obama was the culpert and if we could follow the money it would follow right back to obama.

  • UncommonRight

    I don’t think Palin has Utah roots. She was born in Idaho, no?

    To be honest, I am sort of tired of the Palin family. I liked her as a V.P. pick for McCain, but the constant attacks from the media, the endless gossip and the tireless mudslinging has just gotten ridiculous. She is nearly as overexposed as Obama.

    There are better candidates than Palin to challenge Obama in 2012. And at least with them, we won’t have to spend so much time and energy trying to de-bunk a bunch of garbage.

    I really think the campaign against Palin has been remarkably successful. Overcoming the damage may prove just too difficult for her, especially if they continue to take shots at her every couple of weeks or so.

    • RJD

      There are better candidates than Palin to challenge Obama in 2012. And at least with them, we won?t have to spend so much time and energy trying to de-bunk a bunch of garbage.

      There may be better candidates than Palin and that will be good for the Republican Party if that is true. But they will be lucky to not go through what the Palin family has. It has already begun with Bobby Jindal.

      For Republicans and Conservatives, if our candidates aren’t being attacked – we probably need to dump them as soon as possible.

    • Rod_Patrick

      Please reconsider your position.

      If Sanford, Jindal, Cantor, Ryan or any new republican face shows up and signify their interests or possibilities to challenge Obama, the mudslinging of the MSM will start with full, horrendous force.

      Once you learn their imperfections, try to realize your current line of thinking with Sarah. [Of course, the MSM has already made significant progress with Newt, McCain, Guilliani, Thompson, Romney, etc.]

      Who knows? It can be worse to other newcomers.

      Instead, we should support the Republicans especially if they are “trying” hard to be conservative. And Sarah belongs to that group.

      These days, it’s hard to seat in any government position without your conservative principles being under the attack of the Socialist/Liberal machinery and the MSM.

      Palin who is not the only one under the accusation of being “hypocrite” (I’m referring to abstinence and earmarks.) Actually, it’s the entire conservative movement. For example, our position against the bailout as indicated by our Tea Parties is being read by the liberals and Anti-Bush moderates as a form of “hypocrisy” too. Do you know that the Left is contriving a “newsflash” to announce the list of “hypocritical” gay conservatives? That’s just one of their show-stoppers.

      Having said the above, I am one of those ordinary conservatives asking our High and Mighty Conservatives to please, show some PITY AND RESPECT to our leaders. They may not be right all the time or may not look presidential (e.g. the case of Jindal according to some.) They may even commit a flack or two. But compared to the bunch of the Democrats and Liberals in the WH and Congress, I still prefer them (except may be the likes of Specter and Snowe.)

      Instead, we must reach out and reason with our Republican leaders.. Electing them is not enough. Let us help them to embrace “conservative” solutions. We can try and try until they listen to us and change their ways. Of course, we can always replace them with a better candidate in the next election season but 1 or 2 years seem to be “too late” already, considering how fast the Democrats are changing our form of government and our way of life.

      Our activisms in the last 3 months have made some progress. The usual bi-partisan votes of the Republicans have become more inclined to a nearly solid (if not purely solid) conservative votes (except maybe in 2 legislatiive bills). Lately, even Specter has been calculating his moves whether to side with the Dems or not. We should have been “active and spirited” like this in the last 8 years.

      You know what’s tiresome? It’s republicans killing and bashing their own kind for the sake of “cleansing of fire”.

      Instead, I ask everyone to please pray for our conservative/republican leaders.

      • gekster

        “Instead, we should support the Republicans especially if they are ?trying? hard to be conservative. And Sarah belongs to that group”

        I don’t think Mrs Palin belongs in that group.
        Like Uncle Ronnie, she doesn’t have to “try” to be conservative.
        A true conservative doesn’t have to “try”.
        When I first heard her speak, I fell in love with the natural flow of conservatism that came from her. And the more I heard, the more I liked.
        It isn’t hard when it’s in your heart, like with Mrs. Palin, and not like her running mate McLooser.

        • Rod_Patrick

          I somewhat stand corrected, bro.

          But I’m arguing against the “lies” being spewed everyday even in conservative blogs that “conservatism is dead” and any leader professing to be conservative is nothing but a hypocrite. I’m particularly targeting blogsites like HotAir that accuse Sarah of being a hypocrite and a damaged good.

          In case of Sarah, I’m speaking of her stand on abstinence and abortion.

          I’m flabbergasted by the left’s smear of Palin on abstinence. For me, the Palins are a literal example of why “safe sex” doesn’t work. Bristol, a pro-safe sex teenager, reaped the sad consequence of her belief. She never listened to her mother, who also learned her lesson based on experience (I’m referring to the allegation that Palin also got pregnant out of wedlock.) Safe sex didn’t work well for them as it doesn’t guarantee anything. Both Sarah and Bristol learned that from experience.

          On the issue of abortion, we never fault both Sarah and her daughter, Bristol. Babies, regardless of circumstance, are GIFT OF LIFE (GOD for believers). The greatest moments in my own life were when I saw my children for the first time when they were born. I feel so proud and yet so humbled. Seeing my babies trivialized everything in my life including sex.

          Don’t get me wrong. I have my own issues against Sarah (thanks to Achance and AKSteve – LOL) especially in her concept of “bipartisanship”, the very sin of GWB. But lately I’m seeing some light in the tunnel. She’s starting to make amends with her fellow AK republicans. She’s beginning to realize that her only chance is the support of republicans like her. Her encouraging words with Sen. Murkowski is a good start. I wish her and the Alaskans good luck in these troubling times.

          I like Palin, Jindal, Cantor, and Ryan. I also like the not-so-young leaders like Sanford* (48), Pence (49), and Murkowski** (51) . These four are our future. We should support and pray for them …. THAT THE ALMIGHTY GOD GIVE THEM WISDOM (a much superior gift than knowledge.)

          And I hope that I am wrong in not knowing the “other young conservatives” not yet included in my list.

          *Please note that I have strong issues in his governance of SC but I support his stand on the bailout.

          **We need more Catholics on our side. Lisa is one of the good Catholics. Sen. Mel Martinez is not going any younger. Lisa, along with Sen. Mel, can be one of our speakers to our Catholic brothers and sisters. I’m a baptist but in terms of social issues, I am not so different from the Catholics.

    • Josh Painter

      That’s a meme the left wants us all to believe.

      - JP

      • AKSteveB

        I’m no fan of Palin, ya know that, but yes I agree that we can’t just let conservatives get beaten up. She’s getting terrible advice, there is no winning for her in a pissing match with an 18 y/o. I don’t quite know what SarahPAC is up to, but they’d better hire a few pros.

        • Mike gamecock DeVine

          that said, I do think it was a bad error to let her daughter go all jerry springer

          but

          what is so great about palin is that she is right on all the issues

          and that matters the most to me at this stage and at most stages

          • AKSteveB

            Being right on the issues is only part of it. Being able to execute in a way that advances those issues is at least as important if not more so. One of the reasons Reagan is so admired is because he managed to have both of those (though the execution wasn’t always as good as people think). We’ve had nobody who has combined those two skills at the national level since. It is one reason I have high hopes for Jindal ..though the usual caveat is ..it is waaaaay too early. He seems to have the ideological base and the ability to get it done.

          • Mike gamecock DeVine
          • Achance

            ?Why has no one asked the very basic question of how a job-less teenager drives an expensive truck and travels 4,400 miles with two adults in no better financial condition than himself to one of the most expensive cities in the world? There, he does a talk show circuit in which he engages in a crusade against a sitting Governor and her daughter with whom he was man enough to create a child but not man enough to provide for said child.?

            From the OP.

            As to the rest, I’ve made no bones about how I feel about her.

          • Mike gamecock DeVine

            agree and don’t see them as responding to an 18 yr old

        • Josh Painter

          who are supposed to be on her team who are *NOT* serving her well. On that much, I agree.

          Hopefully, after the legislative session is done with (just nine more days), she will make the changes that need to be made.

          - JP

          • AKSteveB

            Folks here won’t like hearing it, but as far as I can see she was royally used then dumped by the McCain people. She was their attack dog but they didn’t cover her back. She came back here with a lot less political capital locally than she left with. She has then had some unnecessary fights. As a side issue, the AK Republican Party has to get some kind of unity, and while there is blame to go all around, given that she is the biggest Republican voice in this state, she needs to get the ball rolling.

  • Vegas_Rick

    And I think this whole affair is playing out in her favor.

    She knows what “dirt” is out there. She knows who her enemies are. She’s holding her fire and attending to her responsibilities as Governor of Alaska while her enemies are wasting their ammunition.

    I think once Palin’s enemies have shown themselves, and the bulk of the “dirt” has been reported ad nauseam by the MSM, she’ll come out with guns blazing.

    I don’t know if she can lead the country back from the abyss or not, but, if she steps up to try, she’ll have my support.

    As will any of our young conservative stars. If one steps up.

    That’s what I’m waiting for.

    • bobojake

      and the dopes telepromter will be confused.

    • RJD

      The more the MSM continues to attack and “expose” Palin’s peccadillo’s, the more they risk losing the public. At some point, people tune out. This could end up helping Palin in the end by getting this stuff out of the way now (the surprise/shock factor), thus allowing her to get her message out, if she chooses to run in 2012.

      • UncommonRight

        Let me clarify my stance.

        I respect Sarah Palin. I support her politics. I admire her conservatism. And I agree that if a candidate is angering lefties, that candidate is doing something right.

        It’s not so much “another damaged goods” comment as much as it is just pointing out that for better or worse, she is going to have to overcome all the garbage she has gone through in the 2008 campaign andbeyond. (And if you compare her experience to say, Romney, she has a lot more trash to clean up. Maybe had Romney got the VP nod the situation would be reversed?)

        That is going to take an enormous amount of energy. So I wonder if she will be able to overcome the stereo type that she has been cast in, while still being able to present herself as a viable leader. I think she can, but its not going to be easy.

        Whereas, someone else who is not constantly being attacked (and Jindal, et al are not being attacked the way she is – yet.), or rather who has not spent the last 2 years (projecting to 2010/11) being attacked and type cast may be able to spend energy elsewhere.

        But let’s be honest, she is an easy target right now. And the MSM/Axelrod guns are firing at will.

        Hopefully the ammunition runs out soon.

        And not to throw another grenade into the crowd, but I think in the GOP primaries Mitt Romney will beat Sarah Palin pretty soundly.

        But let me clarify once again – we have a nice lineup of GOP contenders that are actually real conservatives. And that is more than we can say about the lead up to 2008.

        • azaeroprof

          if Sarah Palin gets some good advice and plays her cards right, I see her as more like a GOP version of Hillary Clinton. (OK, before everyone goes ballistic over that comparison, let me clarify!!) We in the GOP had thrown so much garbage HIllary’s way (OK, most of it deserved) that by the time she started the 2008 campaign, there wasn’t anything new to throw. This helped her overcome her polarizing personality and actually earn the respect of people who wouldn’t ordinarily support her. She only lost because she ran into a corrupt, relentless Chicago machine with the media and Soros bank account behind it.

          Unless Sarah makes some major mistakes from this point out, the media will have spent its ammo on her. Oh, they’ll still fire, but the armor-piercing bullets will be gone and they’ll be shooting mostly air-soft.

          And there’s no way to prove at this point, but I really don’t see Romney beating Palin in GOP primaries. I like Romney, I’ll work for and support him if he’s the nominee, and as a Conservative Baptist, I have no problem voting for him. But he couldn’t even beat ol’ wishy-washy himself, John McCain. Not even once! Now, Sarah could turn out to be a horrible campaigner for the top office, but campaigning seems to be one thing she’s particularly good at.

          But 4 years is a long time…who knows what the winds will blow…

        • redware

          I doubt it will boil down to just a two-person race although that would be much more desireable than the fiasco of 2008 where conservatives split their votes and handed the nomination to the one candidate they wanted least to win.If however it is Romney vs. Palin,what makes you think the already “socon challenged” Romney has one iota of a chance to beat Palin in even one Southern state?Palin and Jindal are “three-legged stool” conservatives that could unite the conservative community.It may be unfair,but Romney is still perceived as less than principled in his support for conservative positions on social issues,and his Mormon faith is still a political albatross around his neck south of the Mason-Dixon line.I think a Palin-Romney race would wind up a lot closer than you think-with Palin on top.

          • JadedByPolitics

            I will enjoy the primaries and I would like the states to allow only registered Republicans included in the primaries.

          • redware

            conservatively principled Governor, I must unfortunately agree with those that criticize him for being shall we say “charismatically” challenged.Mark does well behind his own “binky” but tends to come across as less than eloquent in give and take discourse.Our other conservatively principled politician,Senator Jim Demint has essentially the same problem,although he just comes across as somewhat boring.Sanford is improving,but sometimes it takes the guy forever to get through a sentence with all the “ums,ahs and detours”.Wish we had a different environment in which our elections were conducted,but like it or not the attention span of the average voter in the sound bite world of the MSM is essentially much less than the time it takes Sanford to get his point across.We have to find another Reagan-it is as simple,and as difficult as that!

        • Josh Painter

          He has plenty of luggage, and his many flip-flops will continue to dog him. And despite all the money he threw at the race, he couldn’t even beat McCain, as azaeroprof pointed out. He doesn’t excite the conservative base as Palin does.

          She needs to continue to improve the way she is perceived by independents and Reagan Democrats. She needs to build a good organization, which a chief of staff/senior policy advisor like Fred Thompson who would kick butt and take names.

          - JP

        • Rapunzel46

          has been shooting himself in the foot and his immigration comments last week didn’t help him with many conservatives… just my 2cents.

  • itrytobenice

    I’d like to recommend.

    The American people are the most manipulated bunch of lemmings in the world. All these years of prosperity have made us fat, lazy, stupid and oblivious.

    Hopefully these coming lean years will cause the morons to start paying attention.

    • Aaron Gardner

      that is like a recommend on crack!!

      • itrytobenice

        I just haven’t really figured it out with out that little button or a share button. I know there is a way, but I’m not up to it yet.

  • Achance

    for Juneau. The Juneau Empire story is here: http://www.juneaublogger.com/updates/?p=1347

    There’s only about two weeks left of this legislative session, so Juneau will be without a Senator as the budget is formed. It’s no great loss because District 4 hasn’t been represented at all during Elton’s tenure and District 3 hasn’t been effectively represented, so we’re little if any worse off without a senator.

  • Next93

    When Al Gore’s kid got his whatsis in the ringer (eluding police in a Prius, at speeds over 90 mph and with a car full of controlled substances), I was one of the people who posted here that I didn’t want to see another politician’s kid dragged through the mud, even if it was the kid of a politician I personally despised.

    I openly appologize. Apparently, that level of civility is no longer viable. Next time one of the D’s kids self-destructs, I’ll be right there, beating on the schadenfreude drum.

    • IJB

      Playing nice has gotten us nowhere.

      Maybe, just maybe, if we start dragging the names of family members and friends of Dem officeholders (and the like) through the mud, they might back off.

      Of course, I tend to think they’re all sociopaths who will stop at nothing, and will gladly throw family members under the bus. If that turns out to be the case, at least we can be satisfied with knowing that we fought fire with fire.

      (And Indy voters will whinge and moan, but they’re all liars – Dems pulling the names of our guys’ families through the mud has totally worked for the Left, especially with Indy voters. So we need to do the same to the Dems.)

      But no more Mr. Nice Guy. We need to go totally nuclear on the other side…

  • nod90

    The exploitation of Ms Palin / Mr Johnson and their baby is the kind of story that gives gutter journalism a bad name.

    It’s an old story. Boy meets girl. Boy gets girl pregnant. Boy doesn’t marry girl. Girl’s family gets mad at boy. There seems to be absolutely nothing newsworthy about the whole affair. Unlike Ashley Biden’s case, no crime is involved. Unlike John Edward’s love child, no public figure was directly involved in the making of this baby. Yet the media’s reporting of Ms Palin’s baby contrasts with their reluctance to report on John Edward’s kid.

    The sad thing is that the expolitation of Mr Johnson and Ms Palin is going to make it very hard for them to ever reconcile, get married and make a proper home for themselves and their baby. This little family will be paying the price for this exposure long after the liberal media has found some other club to bash Republicans with.

    The real story here is the values of the Democratic Party and their media allies which are willing to turn a young couple and their child into political roadkill.

    • TNJim

      ( there is a “t” in there) is exploiting himself. If someone is putting money in front of him he could always refuse it, for the sake of his son, if not the Palins. If the GMA “ambush” and some other news outfit ambushed him again while sitting in his truck is what was happening I’d say ok, he’s being exploited. But going on the Tyra Banks show and the CBS Early Show weren’tt ambushes, so therefore he’s exploiting himself at this point. Now some might say Bristol exploited herself by going on Greta Van Susteren’s show, with the baby no less, but Levi’s turned it up several notches.

  • crux

    Young Levi obviously has no self respect. His 30 pieces of silver will be gone shortly, and Governor Palin’s enemies will have moved on by then, no doubt reviving stories of wolf hunting or what name brand jacket she wore to a snow machine race. Smearing Governor Palin’s children and grand child is only going to backfire. Whoever is paying for Levi’s adventure in gossip TV, is going to close up the purse when he realizes that it is only solidifying support for Governor Palin, and where will that leave the new left wing gossip celeb? Maybe he can try out for the “Bachelor”.