« BACK  |  PRINT

RS

MEMBER DIARY

Something recruiter Joe Biden may have failed to mention

Welcome to the Democrat Party, Sen. Specter

Now, meet your likely primary challengers:

Rep. Joe Sestak, who’s been a prolific fundraiser, is considering defying party leaders and running against Specter despite Tuesday’s hoopla, though he told FOXNews.com on Wednesday, “I have not made up my mind on it.”

Sestak, a second-term House member, is basing his decision on what Specter may do or say in the coming days. Sestak said he wants to hear Specter make his case to Pennsylvania voters about why Specter now should carry the banner for Democrats after representing the Keystone State as a Republican for 29 years.

Sestak released a critical statement about Specter’s switch from the GOP back to Democrat (where he originally started) Tuesday:

“This shows the principle rule of politics: tomorrow is always another day — as today was. This may be good for Arlen, politically; however, two key questions need to be answered. First, after 31 years in the military, I learned that you run for something, not against someone. Arlen has made a decision to leave a race because he could not win against someone. What needs to be known is what he is running for. Second, I watched then-Gov. Clinton and then-Sen. Obama take a leadership position in the Democratic Party and shape it. The leadership that would have been most impressive would be if Arlen had used his role to reshape the Republican Party that he said he had entered when it was a “big tent,” but now is leaving because it has gotten too small. In short, I believe that the principles of what he is running for and his commitment to accountable leadership are questions that still need to be addressed.”

Another potential challenger to Specter is Pennsylvania Board of Education chairman Joe Torsella, previously an aide to Gov. Rendell. Torsella, who has already raised nearly $600,000 in campaign cash, released a statement of his own Tuesday. It doesn’t sound like he’s willing to play second fiddle to anyone, Specter included:

“I decided to run for the United States Senate from Pennsylvania for one simple reason: I believe we need new leadership, new ideas and new approaches in Washington. Nothing about today’s news regarding Sen. Specter changes that or my intention to run for the Democratic nomination to the Senate in 2010 — an election that is still a full year away.”

It will be interesting to see if Rendell can persuade either of the two potential primary opponents to back out of the race. His defection was not quite jumping from the frying pan into the fire, since Specter was certain dead meat if he had remained with the GOP. But the couple of Joes he may have to battle to retain his Senate seat don’t appear ready to go quietly into the night.

Play ball!

- JP

Get Alerts

COMMENTS

  • JoeG

    Being Senator is only beat by sitting on the Supreme court or being VP or President.

    What exactly do you promise someone that is better than being Senator?

  • http://cannedjam.com cannedjam

    Anyway, he didn’t switch parties, he just traded seats in the Spendopublicancratic Party. Explanation in my sig…

    • JoeG

      I believe that you were doing a reply to my above post.

      I failed to convey my concept completely so here’s another try:

      The senior party leaders of the Dem party may attempt to clear the field in the Dem Primary for Specter. The problem they have is making a deal with anyone planning to run. A Senate seat is such a plumb prize that there is very little you could possibly entice someone with to keep them from running. If they think they have a chance there isn’t much that could dissuade someone from running. Any solid Dem does have a chance at knocking off Specter and while all of us wish otherwise they could win the general election.

      They may convince a few big names to not run, but that primary registration is just too much of a magnet. You’ve got to figure every one of the Dem house members from Pennsylvania is going to mull jumping to that seat if no one registers against Specter.

  • Husker
    Several Democrats are furious with Reid for agreeing to let Specter (Pa.) keep the seniority accrued over more than 28 years as a Republican senator. That could allow him to leap past senior Democrats on powerful panels ? including the Appropriations and Judiciary committees.

    One senior Democratic lawmaker told The Hill that the Democratic Conference will vote against giving the longtime Pennsylvania Republican seniority over lawmakers like Harkin, Mikulski and Sen. Dianne Feinstein (D-Calif.) when they hold their organizational meeting after the 2010 election.

    Sounds like a little trouble in Specter’s new Democrat paradise.

  • mbecker908

    And unions pretty well control the D primary in PA. This one will be interesting.

    • Achance

      His vote is immaterial on the substantive question, though he’ll try to pose as some sort of conciliator seeking a “compromise.” Actually, the bill as it is is pretty much like a union’s initial proposal; only a fool would take it, but I suspect it will pass pretty much as is.

      • mbecker908

        sufficient coffee. You’re right, I’m wrong.