« BACK  |  PRINT

RS

MEMBER DIARY

Leashing Sarah in Four Acts

Much Ado About Nothing

The Anchorage Daily News pretends to be confused about Gov. Sarah Palin’s travel plans. It asks whether the governor will going to New York City and Washington, D.C., this weekend:

The Chicago Tribune’s political blog and others are reporting as fact that the governor is going to be Fox News’ guest at the White House Correspondents Dinner in Washington, D.C., on Saturday.

But it’s not clear if that’s true.

ADN quotes Palin spokeswoman Meg Stapleton:

“The governor may be on the East Coast this weekend to attend state events and meetings. If she is there, the governor may accept one of the standing invitations for dinner.”

The left-leaning McClatchy newspaper then asks whether Gov. Palin will appear at New York’s Alaska House for an Alaska Seafood Marketing Institute event there and take part in NCNA listening tours across the lower 48. Again, Stapleton responds:

“If there is something that she can do that benefits Alaskans or Alaska or allows her to keep Alaskans first, she’ll participate.”

Whenever there is an event which would require the governor to leave the state, we are treated to this sort of political theater. The actors know their parts well and don’t even need to rehearse their lines, so often have they repeated them.

The drive-by media opens Act I by asking whether the governor will attend some event the organizers have – either by leak or outright promotion – let it be known Gov. Palin is invited to attend.

In Act II, her political enemies, those strange bedfellows that are the Democrats as well as the Republicans she has stood up to, whine that Palin is more interested in her national political opportunities than she is in doing the job the voters hired her to do.

Act III is that part of the play where the governor’s spokesperson says that if the governor travels beyond the state lines, it will be in Alaska’s best interests, as Sarah Palin is well-known for talking up Alaska as a source of energy, a producer of seafood and other products and as a place of scenic wonders not to be missed by passengers on the cruise ships.

In Act IV, Gov. Palin either skips the event, citing pressing state business, or attends and makes an Alaska sales presentation a key part of her visit. If she does not attend, the drive-by media, who we remember from Act I, crows that the governor’s aides are incompetent and there are communication problems between her staff in Alaska and her PAC in Washington, D.C. If she does attend and then returns home, Palin is roundly criticized by her enemies for abandoning the state, and some even go so far as to file frivolous “ethics” complaints against her for having the temerity to actually think that as an American citizen, she has the right to freely travel around the country. The drive-by media types then reprise their role as publicity agents for these enemies of Gov. Palin by pretending to take their ridiculous compalints seriously and amplifying them. The play ends on a suspensful note, as the drive-by chorus asks the snoozing audience members whether the governor can survive. The curtain falls.

And so the governor’s enemies and the media play off of each other to keep Sarah Palin on a leash. She cannot go anywhere outside of Alaska or do anything without having to justify the excursion as something which will greatly benefit the 49th State. She and her spokespersons have to be non-committal to keep from providing her enemies with a surplus of ammunition to be used against her.

Some have opined that Mother Nature keeps her close to home by threatening one natural disaster or another, but this is the 21st Century, where all sorts of electronic marvels allow the governor to stay in touch with state officials and direct operations from any place on the globe just as well as if she were in Juneau or Anchorage. It’s all about perceptions. If she is out of state and Redoubt blows its top, the media and the anti-Palin forces will blame every potential death, injury or dollar lost on her, when in reality it would make no difference one way or another whether she were in the state or beyond its borders if and when the incident occurred.

Having had some success tethering Sarah Palin to Alaska, the Democrat wing of the anti-Palin axis has reported to DNC headquarters, and now the tactic is being used against Louisiana’s Governor Bobby Jindal. If it’s successful in the Bayou State, look for it to be adopted in any state with a Republican governor who has a shot at a leadership role in the GOP. In other words, this pitiful play is likely coming to a state capitol near you.

It’s the modern version of “Much Ado About Nothing” and a remake that’s pointless to anyone who isn’t a Democrat activist. The stagecraft is really getting tiresome. The same chorus which sings its sad lament seems to collectively forget its lines every time Barack Obama jets to Hawaii or a Democrat governor goes to another state to campaign for a fellow party member running for public office. But hypocrisy has always been the core value of the party of the Braying Ass.

- JP

Get Alerts

COMMENTS

  • Dan McLaughlin

    to announce the schedule in advance and quash the speculation? I don’t understand why her schedule needs to be shrouded in secrecy and guesswork, that only allows the media to influence it.

    • Josh Painter

      is announced in advance, it simply gives her political enemites that much more time to criticize her for “abandoning” her state and “shirking” her duties as governor.

      I know this sounds insane, but that’s the state of Alaska politics ever since this governor agreed to be a candidate for vice president. What other governors have had “ethics” complaints filed against them simply for sepaking a pro-life dinner or helping out an organization which provides support to families of special needs kids. To file that particular complaint, the anti-Palin axis found a Palin-hatin’ woman who has a special needs child herself and had her submit the complaint.

      These animals are rabid.

      - JP

  • LibRick

    Everyone is fascinated by her. Politicians wish they could get even a crumb of the attention she gets. When Palin speaks about anything it is front page news.

    Palin seems to have it all in front of her. If she decides to run in 2012 and brings a strong message and campaign team, everyone will listen and she will likely suck up all the media oxygen. What Pol wouldn’t want to be in her position?

  • Warrior

    I believe she is the “new face” evryone claims the Repub Party needs. Instead of quibbling about how bad Bush was or waxing nostalgic over how good Reagan was, we need to start coming together over somebody. And I believe Sara Plalin is that somebody.

    The Dems and their leftist media syncophants are frightened to death of her. And that’s one big plus right there. Remember, THEY want the first woman President to be a Dem and will become reckless in opposing Sara P. if she runs, I believe.

    Another plus she brings to the front is that indeed, she has that Everyman (or in her case, Everywoman) sensibility that Reagan had. She speaks the language of the hockey mom. She is not afraid of the leftist media or in awe of them. That’s why they attack her with such gusto.

    Some talking head on one of the morning shows this AM said that Obama was such a good candidate and that’s what matters. And that’s exactly right. As much as I respect John McCain’s service to our country, he was an AWFUL candidate, with that mechanical grin and the robot-like repetition of, “My Friends.” It’s just as well, though, I don’t think any Repub short of a reincarnation of Reagan could have won against Obama.

    As far as political tactics, let’s take a page out of the Dems playbook. They spotted and groomed Obama from the beginning. He has no record to attack, he is calm and well-spoken (but not eloquent,) he is non-threatening and even, in the immortal words of Joe “The Mouth” Biden, “clean.”

    And to top it all off, Sara Palin is a true conservative. She will not succumb to the Siren song of flattery by the NYT as I predicted Specter would on this very website years ago. She will not sit on the veto pen and let reckless spending pass endlessly by. She will not seek the bi-partisan middle nor “reach out” to the other side of the aisle. In short — she has the makings of another “Iron Lady.” And that scares the Dems to death.

  • Finrod

    I would appreciate it if you’d spell Sarah Palin’s name correctly.

    • Finrod

      That was in response to Warrior, above.

      • Warrior

        Sorry dude. My best friend’s first granddaughter is named “Sara” and I’ve been e-mailing him back and forth about her lately.

        I will rememebr in future. Sarah, Sarah, Sarah, Sarah, Sarah,…

  • davo119

    “She cannot go anywhere outside of Alaska or do anything without having to justify the excursion as something which will greatly benefit the 49th State.”

    And yet these very same critics were huge backers of Obama who did absolutely nothing but run for president after being elected to the senate.

    Hypocrisy doesn’t even begin to describe their behavior. Insane, mad and obsessed come a little closer.

  • Achance

    she was going to some seafood show and make an appearance at the Alaska House in Noo Yawk. The seafood shows back East are a big deal here and some delegation almost always goes and Governors go from time to time. I don’t think that’s an issue and her doing something political while she’s there is only an issue to Democrats. If you just look at the McClatchey rag, three quarters of the comments are from Outside lefties, locals rarely even bother to post there anymore.

    The travel issues here with Gov. Palin are that she was fast and loose with family travel at State expense and the per diem for living at home and working in Anchorage rather than Juneau. Then, the trip back east in the last week of the Legislative session raised a lot of eyebrows and some things happened that might not have happened or would have happened differently had she been here.

    For those of you who live in states the size of postage stamps and where you can drive to three states in a couple of hours, it might not make sense that people here pay attention to a public official’s travel and especaially State paid travel. I have two kids in Seattle, the closest point in the Lower 48 for me. If one of them got sick or hurt and I needed to catch the next plane to SEA, I’d be $887 poorer for a coach ticket. From Anchorage, an hour further away, it would be $944 today. By way of comparison, I could fly from LAX to NYC today for about $550.

    • Achance

      and spend the next three days enroute to Bellingham, WA and then drive to Seattle. It’s “only” a day and a half to Prince Rupert, BC, but I got a DWI fifteen years ago in GA, so I would have to post a bond with our Canadian neighbors to assure my good behavior in their great country, and I won’t do that. Plus, it’s a two day drive from PR to SEA if you stop for the night.

    • http://thespeechatimeforchoosing.blogspot.com/ Gary

      Art, I know you aren’t a Palin fan, so I won’t even belabor the point, BUT…..

      You very conveniently left out the fact that Palin has spent a cool million dollars LESS in expenses than either Murkowski or Knowles did at this point in their terms.

      Big picture, she has spent less money than the previous two Governors, on “office expenses”.

      I hate to say it, but only really deranged folks would worry about the money she has spent.

      I know Alaska has some very strange rules, and some odd folks, but even a loon can see she has been better and a heck of a lot more frugal on spending than the last two Governors.

      • Achance

        finally owned up and paid for some of the kid and Todd travel and is just doing an “in your face” about using the per diem rules. Knowles and his whole administration travelled a lot. Murkowski travelled a lot. Hell, I travelled a lot, though not so much when I was an appointee; I made other people travel then. It had long ago ceased to be fun. Neither Knowles nor Murkowski posed themselves as the paragon of virtue that was going to right all wrongs. If you’re going to do that, you’d best be Caesar’s wife. And Murkowski caught Hell from day one about travel, any Republican does. Knowles would send his whole administration out campaigning in the guise of State business and there was nary a peep.

        Actually, I doubt she knew what she was claiming or even made the claims herself on her travel. She’s kept a bunch of congenital ‘crats who represent just about everything wrong with government, and I’m sure somebody filled her travel authorization out for her, she trusted them and signed it – bad mistake. I know I never filled out my own, but I went to the trouble to know the rules and check what the Tech had done.

  • http://thespeechatimeforchoosing.blogspot.com/ Gary

    This crap has gotten very old.

    Until the Republican party all gets a copy of Alinsky’s “Rules For Radicals” and starts putting it to good use, this kinda thing will happen.

    I’ve written about this a lot, and been chastised fro chastising the party, but this is the Republican party’s weak link. They never EVER go to war, I mean real war to protect one of their own.

    Of course now, we all have a bunch of bit players and RINOs who think they can be POTUS, so they aren’t about to come to Palin’s aid.

    If she ware a democrat, and this was being done to her by the mean old Republicans, every single democrat on earth would declare thermonuclear war on the Republicans.

    There would be charges of racism (her kids are part Indian) sexism, and so on. You have all of them flying to Alaska to have photo ops with her, and the President would personally invite her to whatever function was in question.

    And of course, the media would be hammering the GOP for it’s nastiness.

    But Republican’s NEVER come to aid of a fellow Republican. All of them are too busy trying to be on top.

    I agree with Warrior.

    Palin IS the new face of the party. The faster everyone realizes this, and jumps on board for the real fight, the better off we are!

    • Achance

      in going to war for her if she hadn’t built her career on trashing the reputations of Alaska Republicans. She’s your face of the Republican Party, not ours.

    • aesthete

      “Palin IS the new face of the party. The faster everyone realizes this, and jumps on board for the real fight, the better off we are!”

      IDK about anyone else, but I’m not prepared for the coronation yet, and I dare say, neither is Gov. Palin. She’s got potential, and her ability on the stump is phenomenal, but at this point, that is what she is: potential.

      I’d rather she focus on the issues in Alaska. If she can balance the budget this upcoming year and/or make nice with her fellow Republicans to do so, she’s going to be on my shortlist for candidates to support. If, OTOH, she fails at dealing with the issues in AK, I’ll have to call Huckabee on her.

      Regardless, it’s a mute point if we don’t get our act together in infrastructure, organization, and restoring principles in time for 2010, and I’d rather work on building up a Party apparatus that is useful in finding and getting elected good candidates than putting all my hopes on Mrs. Palin.