Jack

I can go and find plenty of examples of heterosexual couples that do terrible things with and to children, what would that prove? Does it prove that anyone, strait or gay should be tested before being allowed around children? It’s a game of pin the tail on the boogie man and you’ve found a good boogie man.

All your example or many more examples that I could provide of really bad things heterosexual couples have done to children would “prove” is that evil can and will be visited on children by adults, strait or gay, not much else can be gained from ether your or my small sample of evil done to children.

I reject your premise that only a heterosexual couple should be allowed to adopt based on this terrible incident which proves not much other than Gene Robinson is a terrible human being and should spend a very long time in prison and never allowed near children. I’d guess we agree on that much.

How is saying that allowing a child to be molested so that gays can adopt a valid representation of SteveLA’s views (or mine, seeing as how my views on this issue align with his)? Here’s a direct quote from him:

“In my view even a same sex civil union home with parents who have been fully vetted by social services is way better place in my book for a child than as a ward of the state in a group home.”

That doesn’t sound like he is sacrificing the children to the homosexual lobby to me. In fact, such a procedure would likely have prevented the man in question from adopting. Please clarify where SteveLA says or implies anything like that. Also, please let us know where he mentions anything about the BSA or the Catholic Church in his post, both private institutions that wouldn’t be affected by a change in adoption laws.

I’m as sickened by this man’s conduct as you, but if you’re going to make the case that this is a byproduct of this man’s gayness, you need more proof, IMO. I look forward to your reply!

nt

publishes books that go into public schools.

Still, I think that it has to be acknowledged that the following liberal gems of argumentation are equally valid: lived in the South while the KKK was still around? That makes you a racist, just like them! At odds with the gay rights movement, like Westboro Baptist Church? I guess that means you hate fags, and so on. Is it fair that the MSM spreads these flawed arguments on as the gospel truth, but reacts with womanly shrieks at an argument like the one that you presented, when they both use the same logic? Not really, but that doesn’t mean that we have to use flawed logic.

Concerning NAMBLA and their sympathizers: if we were living in the alternate universe where I’m the absolute monarch of the US (heaven forbid ), I would have the members of that organization (if we can call it that) watched round the clock, and locked up in a cell that time forgot for the next 1000 or so years. Also, I think that anyone associated with the group should be excluded from being allowed to adopt. Besides that, I can’t justify labeling the whole demographic with that brush. To me, that seems to close to the right-wing extremist” memo for comfort.

Thanks for the courteous reply.

That doesn’t get studied. Did you ever try to look up CDC studies on gay disease rates, health or life expectancy? Ain’t there! These data, also, would be pertinent for deciding “gay rights” policy. For 2% of the population, they swing a mighty big political stick!

the last time around here you came in with some really stupid logic, now I ask you go over to another website where others share your ever changing frame of reference.

BTW, if you were not here for the verbal lashing that some of us gave Mark Sanford then stay out of this. Again, I am being nice, Jack Savage will probably dress you down shortly.

1) There is a possibility that any child may be abused, physically, emotionally or sexually, natural or adopted, straight or gay.

If you’re going to forbid any couple from adopting, the onus is upon those that would restrict to provide evidence that the group in question — in this scenario, gay couples — is more likely to abuse a child.

We know for certain that children growing up in foster care are adversely affected, so that’s the bar we have to meet in order to justify any type of adoption.

2) Who is playing up Man-Boy love? NAMBLA, obviously, but they have been kicked to the curb by all mainstream gay organizations. They are despicable, for sure.

3)