<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: There they go again</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.redstate.com/josh_painter/2009/07/01/there-they-go-again/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.redstate.com/josh_painter/2009/07/01/there-they-go-again/</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 04 Dec 2009 18:06:48 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: peg_c</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/josh_painter/2009/07/01/there-they-go-again/#comment-6116</link>
		<dc:creator>peg_c</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2009 15:23:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/josh_painter/?p=1448#comment-6116</guid>
		<description>I have to donate today to SarahPAC. Anyone who can stir up this much slobbering insanity gets my support.

Could RedState stop advertising Morning Joe's book? I wouldn't buy anything by him if you put a gun to my head. He's an idiot and this morning proves it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have to donate today to SarahPAC. Anyone who can stir up this much slobbering insanity gets my support.</p>
<p>Could RedState stop advertising Morning Joe&#8217;s book? I wouldn&#8217;t buy anything by him if you put a gun to my head. He&#8217;s an idiot and this morning proves it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: wordsarepower</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/josh_painter/2009/07/01/there-they-go-again/#comment-6114</link>
		<dc:creator>wordsarepower</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2009 14:11:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/josh_painter/?p=1448#comment-6114</guid>
		<description>she's packin'! :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>she&#8217;s packin&#8217;! <img src='http://www.redstate.com/josh_painter/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Josh Painter</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/josh_painter/2009/07/01/there-they-go-again/#comment-6113</link>
		<dc:creator>Josh Painter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2009 14:03:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/josh_painter/?p=1448#comment-6113</guid>
		<description>and about as far to the left...

- JP</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>and about as far to the left&#8230;</p>
<p>- JP</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bk</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/josh_painter/2009/07/01/there-they-go-again/#comment-6112</link>
		<dc:creator>bk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2009 13:19:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/josh_painter/?p=1448#comment-6112</guid>
		<description>It's #81 in &lt;a href="http://www.nyjobsource.com/magazines.html"&gt;this list&lt;/a&gt;. That puts it behind these that are in the 70s: Country Home, More, Home and Away, Sunset, and Country. I've never heard of any of those five, but I do know about Boys' Life which is #79.

I suspect the only people who read Vanity Fair are those lounging around the Hamptons who already knew from the Times that Sarah Palin was the second coming of Lucifer, just with no brains.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s #81 in <a href="http://www.nyjobsource.com/magazines.html">this list</a>. That puts it behind these that are in the 70s: Country Home, More, Home and Away, Sunset, and Country. I&#8217;ve never heard of any of those five, but I do know about Boys&#8217; Life which is #79.</p>
<p>I suspect the only people who read Vanity Fair are those lounging around the Hamptons who already knew from the Times that Sarah Palin was the second coming of Lucifer, just with no brains.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: djemi</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/josh_painter/2009/07/01/there-they-go-again/#comment-6111</link>
		<dc:creator>djemi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2009 12:49:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/josh_painter/?p=1448#comment-6111</guid>
		<description>http://www.redstate.com/redhot/2009/07/01/photo-sarah-palin-using-her-kids-for-political-purposes/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.redstate.com/redhot/2009/07/01/photo-sarah-palin-using-her-kids-for-political-purposes/">http://www.redstate.com/redhot/2009/07/01/photo-sarah-palin-using-her-kids-for-political-purposes/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Josh Painter</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/josh_painter/2009/07/01/there-they-go-again/#comment-6110</link>
		<dc:creator>Josh Painter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2009 12:25:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/josh_painter/?p=1448#comment-6110</guid>
		<description>All that stuff she does for charities is really being done for her own personal political gain. 

She's evil, I tells ya, Art. 

Downright evil.!

- JP</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>All that stuff she does for charities is really being done for her own personal political gain. </p>
<p>She&#8217;s evil, I tells ya, Art. </p>
<p>Downright evil.!</p>
<p>- JP</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Achance</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/josh_painter/2009/07/01/there-they-go-again/#comment-6109</link>
		<dc:creator>Achance</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2009 10:06:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/josh_painter/?p=1448#comment-6109</guid>
		<description>he has lost interest in her, you might ought to pay attention.  At the National level, I agree; its a hit piece with a bunch of Beltway Eunuchs trying to set themselves up for the next campaign.  That said, as to her governance here and her fundamental "self" in campaigning and governing, I think the guy got it pretty much right: it's all about Sarah.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>he has lost interest in her, you might ought to pay attention.  At the National level, I agree; its a hit piece with a bunch of Beltway Eunuchs trying to set themselves up for the next campaign.  That said, as to her governance here and her fundamental &#8220;self&#8221; in campaigning and governing, I think the guy got it pretty much right: it&#8217;s all about Sarah.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
