« BACK  |  PRINT

RS

MEMBER DIARY

I Hate and I Mean HATE The “RINO” Label.

Since when did we become the party of ideological purity and personal destruction? I am discouraged when I see good conservatives tag Republicans with the “RINO” label, in fact, it makes me fear that we will fall into the same trap the Democrats did throughout the first half of this decade. 

In 2006, Joe Lieberman was effectively tossed out of the Democrats. This proud liberal and generally good man (though I don’t agree with his politics) was deemed a “DINO” because he supported the war effort. 

Is it cool that John McCain seemed to get a kick out of thumbing the eyes of conservative Republicans? No, it was not cool. McCain could have had more moderate views without going out of his way to turn the knives in the backs of all the conservatives out there from time to time. If you looked at McCain’s overall record, he’s pretty conservative: he’s a fiscal hawk, he’s never voted to raise taxes (though he did not vote for the Bush tax cuts in ’01 and ’03, he voted for them in ’06) and he’s a staunch defender of the troops. To call McCain a RINO over Global Warming and Immigration reform is hypocritical considering President Bush has held generally liberal views on those two issues as well and to say that McCain is next to Satan because he passed McCain-Feingold is also a bit hypocritical considering President Bush was the one who signed it into law. If John McCain is RINO, then God help us ever trying to build another coalition of Independents and moderate/conservative Democrats! 

Now I think hyper-environmentalism is stupid, as I think we need stauncher enforcements of current immigration laws and we need McCain-Feingold overturned, but John McCain and people with his views has a welcome place in the Republican Party I view. 

I hate the RINO label because it goes against everything that conservatism stands for. Conservatism is about individuality, freedom and debate. It’s about federalism, so we recognize that while a Republican in rural Texas would pass the “Jesse Helms” test, a moderate but still pretty conservative Republican candidate in Maine might now. Conservatives should disagree about issues, because we’re supposed to be the side with ideas. We should figure out how to solve them we debate the ideas, take all the best ones and come up with a good solution that become our policies. I fear we’re becoming group thinkers like the Democrats. If Rush, Sean, Laura and Mike say it’s so, it must be so. 

We need to go back to our principles. Reagan was a strong conservative and he was able to win by huge margins because he did not exclude moderates, independents and conservative Democrats from the table. We can call each other out if we’re off track but If we ever want to build a majority coalition like Reagan’s again we need to stop trash talking eachother and stop using labels like “RINO” and get the show on the road arm-in-arm, side-by-side.

COMMENTS

  • RetNAV

    Agree that often it is too quickly and easily flung about and affixed to a currently unfaithful to GOP principles politician.

    Chuck Hagel is one who has often, of late, been labeled a RINO. However, I don’t see him as one, though he went on a sharp departure on war policy the last few years.

    But, Lincoln Chaffee, he was a RINO, pure and simple, would you agree?

    • Jaded

      to conservative principles he abused his position to attempt to undermine the President of the United States in a time of war…..only liberals and liberalites do that. He could have made his argument to the President and on votes BUT no he was reveling in the GLOW of love that the peaceniks etc bestowed upon him….he is simply an idiot! I am not even calling them RINO’s any more I just call em as I see em and that would be the even more contemptable IDIOT!

  • Pingback: joshleguern?s blog ? I Hate and I Mean HATE The ?RINO? Label. ::

  • Diogenes314

    When it comes to the issues that define your party, those that are the most essential, do you show any or do you prefer political expedience? McCain is more of a Machiavellian anyway. He just never realized that Clintonesque triangulation only works in a party that worships power over anything, and to which integrity is irrelevant.

  • joshleguern

    ….that are legitimately labeled “RINOs,” (My Governor, Arnold Schwarzenegger comes to mind.) everyone remembers Ronald Reagan’s 11th Commandment though, yeah?

    My point is we can ask each other questions about why we support policies, but the lynching of John McCain by conservatives in the primary and the subsequent lynching of Sarah Palin by moderates following our loss was just unacceptable and unhelpful.

    The McCain-Palin ticket was a flip-flopped ideal ticket. If McCain weren’t so old and had 2008 not happened a Palin-McCain ticket would be strong. Younger dynamic conservatives on top and reliable, older, wiser moderates on the bottom to back up the younger pup.

  • indym

    I have wanted for some time to write a similiar post but have not had the time. I agree with everything you have said. If the Republican party is to become a majority party again, then it will have to do so with a much larger idiological tent than it has now. I uderstand that there needs to at least be some standard and some loyalty. But we are not all going to agree on everything all the time. Casting out or calling out folks that have a different opinion or elected officials that vote a way we don’t agree does not help the party. I said before that the bailouts were about job protection not CEO protection. Confidence in the economy is important if it is to rebound. Lastly, I would like to say that we have lost the last two elections. We are not the minority party not the majority. We need constructive ideas about party building and economy building if we are to win again. Republicans need ideas on the environmental protection and building the green economy (thats right), trade that is balanced and creates jobs in this country, public and private transportation reform, defense policy that calls for protecting our homeland and defending our interests abraod but holds our NATO allies accountable to sharing more of the burden, homeland security, emergency management assistance, long term debt solving, tax structure, and public education reform.