« BACK  |  PRINT

RS

MEMBER DIARY

Sarah Palin and Bobby Jindal

In my opinion there are three people that can unite all three types of conservatives together: defense conservatives, social conservatives, and fiscal conservatives. The one guy  who could of done it in 2008 and did it for a while was Fred Thompson. For some reason the talk-radio guys were convinced, despite all evidence to the contrary, that Mitt Romney was a conservative. Then you had social cons smitten with Mike Huckabee, a good and honest man and someone who I might vote for, but defintely not a conservative’s conservative. Thompson was a bit of a bore and in 2012, he’ll be 70 years old by time the Presidential election rolls around. 

So there are two very young (too young by traditional Republican standards, but these are different times) candidates who I think have a natural draw, raw political talent, and proven compitence to be successful leaders of the conservative movement. I believe that Gov’s Sarah Palin and Bobby Jindal are people conservatives should get solidly behind. Palin has slight seniority on Jindal, but they are both great leaders who have great ideas. 

This does not mean they’re neccessarily orthodox conservatives in every area. She may have just been echoing John McCain’s feelings, but Palin had said she is in favor of a similar immigration plan to John McCain’s. Some see this as a hinderance for her, but it is actually a great opportunity for the Republican Party. My feeling is she hasn’t forumalted a position on this issue because she does not have the porous southern border problem and she’s so far away from it. I watched Palin as she compassionately explained her opposition to same-sex marriage and how she has tried to understand the issues gay and lesbian Americans go through and approach the issue with sensitivity. This was the best I had seen this issue explained, Palin was principled, but did not project anger or percieved hatred in any way. She could do this with the immigration issue. We need a portion of the Hispanic vote if we are going to be successful in future elections, Palin could embrace the conservative position without the unneccessary rancor of some on the right who have put down Hispanics. 

Bobby Jindal is an altogether different strand of conservatism. Thoughtful, articulate, and educated yet still understanding of the issues that face everyday Americans. Gov. Jindal has completely transformed the state government of Lousiana. Jindal is the only nationally known conservative to have implemented an actual health care policy that seems to be working. 

Sarah Palin and Bobby Jindal are our future, it’s time we start getting behind them now.

COMMENTS

  • jazzycmk

    Very thoughtful post.

    I was disappointed by Thompson’s candidacy in 2008. He took on an entirely different persona as a candidate, rather than a non-candidate doing an interview. As a non-candidate he seemed down-to-earth, approachable, and passionate. As a candidate, he sounded like just another politician, and he looked tired. As you said, he’ll be 70 in 2012 (and frankly, he’ll look far older than that).

    Passion is something Republicans sorely need right now, and Palin and Jindal have it in spades.

    Palin certainly had her bad moments during the election season, and she may have been exposed as somewhat green on the biggest of national stages, but that does not mitigate her political instincts or leadership abilities. The moment of hers that really spoke to me was at the VP debate when she addressed the economic crisis and had the boldness to speak of personal responsibility. She put it in the context of education, as when parents give children their first credit card before heading off to college. That was a daring statement. During the current crisis, most people are looking for someone else to blame, they don’t want to hear that some of the problem may have been of their own making. But Sarah was right, and personal responsibility is a rallying call for most conservatives.

    My only problem with Palin, and this is no fault of hers, is that the media may have effectively compromised her. Even if she becomes a foreign policy expert over the next 2.5 years, the moment she would declare her intention to run for President, the MSM will be breaking out tapes of the Couric interview, and the Gibson, “I can see Russia from my house” comment. Tina Fey may even break her Palin act out of mothballs. I absolutely believe we CANNOT allow the media to engage in character assassination of our most promising candidates, otherwise they will do it time and time again. However, at the end of the day, elections are about winning.

    Sarah’s best place may be in the national office of the RNC where she can go and campaign for candidates. The lady rallies the base. Just ask Saxby Chambliss. As he said, people “just explode” when she walks in the room.

    I’m still learning about Jindal, but what I know impresses me. Speaking of personal responsibility, he took the bull by the horns when Hurricane Ike threatened Louisiana. He didn’t complain about lack of federal help. The buck stopped with him. He is well educated, so the MSM won’t be able to paint him as an ignorant rube.

    I suspect, however, that his age and experience will work against him in 2012. As we all know, experience matters….. if you’re a Republican. For a man so young he already does have great experience. Two House of Rep terms and elected governor. By 2012 he’ll be 41 and will likely be in his second term as governor. But I have a feeling that won’t be enough for MSM. Depending on outcome of 2012, he may be better off waiting until 2016 or 2020 (he’ll still be just 49 by 2020).

    In the long run, it’s far too early to start talking about Presidential prospects. A number of the current favorites will go by the wayside, and a crop of current unknowns will arise. But under any circumstance, we need to harness the energy of the bright young stars like Palin and Jindal.

  • icbm

    I like both Jindal and Palin, but I don’t see how there’s much there to attract defense conservatives, at least not at first glance, than any other conservative candidates.

  • indym

    and I could support both. They are both bright, young and in the right jobs to be in. I would rather have them both in state capitols rather than in Washington DC. Look at what DC did for McCain and Dole when running for President. These are very difficult economic times and if Gov Jindal and Gov Palin can lead their states through these times the National Party will come running or even crawling to them to lead. We need more leaders like these two in the party. My governor Mitch Daniels is also a good leader and effective governor.

  • icbm

    qualifications they have on defense. I’m not saying they wouldn’t do a competent job, but defense seems like the last thing they know about.

    (Your points about their general effectiveness are well-taken.)

  • birdmojo

    The Republican Party hasn’t yet demonstrated that they have learned why they lost in 2006 and why they lost *BIG* in 2008 (the only President who did better was Reagan ’84).

    If they continue to demonstrate that they have no idea why they lost, 2012 will be a “don’t change horses in midstream” election.

    2010 is likely to be a good indicator.

  • icbm

    n/t

  • davo119

    That was Tina Fey, not Palin

  • davo119