Nanny State, 2.0: Britain to Ban Happy Hours


According to the Rob Reiners of the world, banning is always the answer

Per the AP, British
health experts have begun lobbying Parliament to explore a possible ban on happy hours
– designated times for discounted drinks in bars –
to stem the growing “epidemic” of liver disease.

Speaking on the condition of anonymity, a government spokesman said the ban will be evaluated when an independent study on binge drinking and
alcohol-related illnesses is published in the coming weeks. Health Advocacy groups have also successfully lobbied the government to spend $10 million
pounds, $15 million American, on a “public awareness” campaign, and wants stricter enforcement of underage drinking laws.

Of course, low price alcohol facilitates drinking in a casual setting, but the implied suggestion that two hours of discounted prices can account
for, and even encourage, binge drinking and alcohol-related deaths on a large scale is pure poppycock. While pillorying a successful business practice
may be the makings of a Rob Reiner wet-dream, it’s not the answer. Britain should promote a culture of moderation and self-reliance.
Then again, we are talking about
the UK

At least the Irish embrace their inner-drunkard.

Cross-posted at Skepticians.com

Category: , ,

RSS feed | Trackback URI

8 Comments Leave a comment

Apparently no one in the UK reads US history...

Xasteius Saturday, November 22nd at 3:56PM EST (link)

Prohibition is an awful flop.
We like it.
It can’t stop what it’s meant to stop.
We like it.
It’s left a trail of graft and slime
It don’t prohibit worth a dime
It’s filled our land with vice and crime, Nevertheless, we’re for it.”

Don’t leave the party, hijack it back!

Eternal vigilance is the price of freedom.

When I grow up, I don’t want to be Reagan. I want to be Art Chance.
~Aaron Gardner

 

Happy Hours Are Banned In Boston

Swamp_Yankee Saturday, November 22nd at 6:50PM EST (link)

…much to my lament

 

Indeed, other cities and states have bans, too

James Richardson Saturday, November 22nd at 6:56PM EST (link)

But, do you think that has any meaningful affect on liver disease and other alcohol-related illnesses? If so, you’re fooling yourself.

 

Banned in Alaska too. Have been since the '80s.

Achance Saturday, November 22nd at 7:33PM EST (link)

Too many people driving into snow banks and freezing to death on the way home from work. The law here is that they bars can provide no incentives or inducements. So, they can’t serve beenie-weenies, but they can can have naked girls. Works!

In Vino Veritas

No meaningful effect on liver disease

SG_Lominac Sunday, November 23rd at 12:08PM EST (link)

Now it will just cost more to get liver disease.

What the hell is going on out here? - Vince Lombardi

It does effect other things

SteveLA Sunday, November 23rd at 12:20PM EST (link)

SG

Read a few of the Brit papers to look at “other” effects caused by bing drinking besides health.

In the UK they call it hooliganism. Drunks getting “pissed” on cheap booze, pour onto the streets and start fighting each other, and civilians and doing damage to property. I think the ban has as much to do with cutting back on anti-social behavior as health.

______________________________________

Competency over ideological purity

SteveLa

SG_Lominac Sunday, November 23rd at 12:49PM EST (link)

I don’t need to read the Brit papers Steve, hooliganism has been around a while. I remember going to the Meditereanean countries in the 1980s and the wave of binge drinkers from the north on holiday in places like Palma Majorca and elsewhere. Raise the penalties if you wish but I’m tired of socialists telling me what to do.

What the hell is going on out here? - Vince Lombardi

A conservative principle

SteveLA Sunday, November 23rd at 1:38PM EST (link)

SG

Well I take Law and Order as a conservative principle, not a socialist one. If this means restricting the availability of cheap booze to cut back on criminal behavior, I’m pretty sure that would be a conservative point of view. The Libertarian point of view would be against all restrictions, leaving it to the individual, which I disagree with.

______________________________________

Competency over ideological purity

 
 
 
 
 

Leave a Comment

 

Be respectful, or be banned. No Profanity.