Barbour to Hawkeye State


Mississippi Governor Haley Barbour will headline a Republican Party of Iowa fundraiser in late June, fueling speculation the wildly-popular two-term governor may indeed have ambitions for higher officer.

Barbour, 61, will be ineligible to seek another term as governor in 2012, but refuses to speak to his political future, saying only that “You can look for me not to run for re-election.”

He will undoubtedly dismiss the candidate-type activity as inconsequential, as spreading the Republican Gospel, but no politician finds themselves in Iowa — the launch pad of every dark horse candidacy — by pure coincidence.

Considered a highly effective organizer and strategist, Barbour was a key architect of the 1994 Republican revolution as chairman of the Republican National Committee.

In the wake of two consecutive Republican losses, GOP power broker Fred Malek hopes Barbour may yet have some ideas how to recapture the Contract with American spirit. “Extremely sound on policies, clear thinking and the best political strategist” the GOP can boast, Malek wrote on his blog, ranking the governor as the third most likely individual to secure the party nod.

A Barbour candidacy isn’t without its challenges, of course.

A typical party insider, Barbour worked for Presidents Gerald Ford, Richard Nixon, Ronald Reagan, and George H. W. Bush and ran for the US Senate in 1982. In a field of recycled 2008 candidates, voters may look for a fresh, young face – and Barbour, suffice it to say, will be neither young nor fresh in four years.

In 1991, Barbour co-founded Barbour & Rogers, LLC, a Washington, D.C.-based lobbying firm. 10 years and millions of dollars earned later, Fortune magazine named Barbour Giffith & Rogers the most powerful lobbying firm in American.

Though his commitment to limiting the influence of lobbyists in policy making has been questioned after assuming office, President Obama’s campaign opposition to the Beltway’s entrenched interests – namely, lobbyists – took voters by storm.

Barbour’s successful lobbying career will no doubt serve as the perfect backdrop to Democratic operatives’ feigned outrage and monochromatic grainy commercials vilifying lobbyists. Channeling DNC spokesmen, his nomination would be emblematic of the Republican Party’s indifference on issues of ethics and good governance.

In terms of shallow campaign optics, Barbour’s southern pedigree may do more harm than good, and stands to reinforce the notion of the GOP as the party of old Southern whites at a time when many political insiders are looking to find a new voice outside the Republican stronghold.

It isn’t all bad for the governor and former party chief, however.

An elder statesman and talented party spokesman, Barbour has emerged as a fierce critic of the president. His popularity rising in proportion to the intensity and frequency of his attacks, he bluntly characterized Obama’s policies as “very far left.”

Like other 2012 hopefuls Sarah Palin and Mark Sanford, Barbour subscribes to the conservative orthodoxy but unlike Palin and Sanford, stakes the reemergence of the Republican Party as a viable political force on the shoulders of inclusive, big tent policies. A distinction that will serve him well with independent swing voters, were he ever to make it to the general election.

Cross-posted at Skepticians.com.

Category: , , ,

RSS feed | Trackback URI

12 Comments Leave a comment

Puhleeez

drbob1988 Friday, May 22nd at 8:11AM EDT (link)

We need a real conservative…..one with some testicular fortitude (or ovarian, whatever the case may be)

Why doesn't Barbour have "testicular fortitude?"

James Richardson Friday, May 22nd at 9:09AM EDT (link)

In contrast to former Lousiana Governor Kanthleen Blanco, Barbour’s response to Hurrican Katrina was nothing short of impressive.

I’m pretty sure you have no idea what does and does not qualify as “testicular fortitude.”

Moreover, why is he not a “real conservative?” I’m sure you would be happy to know that Barbour was a central figure in preventing the US from adopting the Kyoto Protocol. And you also strike me as the tea-bagging type, so you should know he rejected Obama’s stimulus funds.

If you have the testicular fortitude to explain your comment, I’d be interested in hearing what you have to say.

 
 

Say what?

Dan McLaughlin Friday, May 22nd at 10:17AM EDT (link)

I like Haley, he’s folksy and incisive and a real grownup. He has the problems you identify, which I think are probably disqualifying, plus I’m not sure his record on spending is especially good. But this jumped out at me:

unlike Palin and Sanford, stakes the reemergence of the Republican Party as a viable political force on the shoulders of inclusive, big tent policies

Examples of how Barbour’s approach differs from those of Palin and Sanford, please? You can’t just take a swipe like that and not back it up.

“No compromise with the main purpose, no peace till victory, no pact with unrepentant wrong.” - Winston Churchill

I was about to ask the same question.

Vegas_Rick Friday, May 22nd at 10:24AM EDT (link)

Is it because Governors Palin and Sanford are unapologetic about their conservative positions? Does that mean they won’t support inclusive policies?

Back it up.

“Nothing in this world can take the place of persistence. Talent will not; nothing is more common than unsuccessful people with talent. Genius will not; unrewarded genius is almost a proverb. Education will not; the world is full of educated derelicts. Persistence and determination alone are omnipotent. The slogan ‘press on’ has solved and always will solve the problems of the human race.” Calvin Coolidge.

 

As someone who worked on the campaign to elect Palin Vice President

James Richardson Friday, May 22nd at 10:37AM EDT (link)

I have little problems with her or Sanford, for that matter.

But here’s the distinction between those two and Barbour, which I think is important one: Barbour would put pragmatism before ideological purity and routinely speaks of the need for Republicans to accepts graduations of conservativism.. “For a party that got 60 percent of the vote for president in my lifetime, it is silly to think everyone is going to agree on everything. We are not. In a two-party system, both parties are coalitions. We are the conservative party of the United States; the Democrats are the liberal party of the United States. And within our party, there are going to be a lot of people who are not conservative enough to get elected to Congress from Sugarland, Texas,” he said at a recent Christian Science Monitor breafkast.

In short, Barbour acknowledges the need for Crists and Huntsmans if we’re ever to rebuild the party. I don’t see many of his potential opponents arguing the same.

Well said 55555! nt

SteveLA Friday, May 22nd at 10:41AM EDT (link)

______________________________________

Competency over ideological purity

 

However James there is NOT a NEED for a Crist in Florida...

JadedByPolitics Friday, May 22nd at 10:48AM EDT (link)

that is a wishlist for the NRSC so they don’t have to spend money…the TRUTH is a Conservative can be elected in Florida so they ought to get out of the way!

Whoever has his enemy at his mercy &
does not destroy him is his own enemy

Yes there is

Dan McLaughlin Friday, May 22nd at 12:24PM EDT (link)

As Governor.

“No compromise with the main purpose, no peace till victory, no pact with unrepentant wrong.” - Winston Churchill

ahh Dan perhaps you are correct there but...

JadedByPolitics Friday, May 22nd at 3:10PM EDT (link)

my response was that he was not NEEDED for Senator nor to be picked by the NRSC to get behind because Florida is a Conservative state!

Whoever has his enemy at his mercy &
does not destroy him is his own enemy

 
 
 

on Sanford and big tentedness

asleep06 Friday, May 22nd at 2:51PM EDT (link)

James, this should put you at ease with regard to Gov. Sanford.

“While I do indeed believe in the importance of a big GOP tent, that tent must be built upon a shared agreement on the essentials - including expanding liberty, encouraging entrepreneurship and limiting the reach of government in people’s everyday lives.”
-Mark Sanford

He’s for a big tent, as well.

Of course, the most important point is that in the political reality we are living in, the GOP is not in trouble because we are insufficiently big tent, but because the GOP was hypocritical and didn’t take a stand, policy-wise, for our beliefs. No one’s going to support a party that doesn’t act on its professed values, Democrat or Republican. The hypocrisy is why the entire political establishment is held suspect in the eyes of the general public.

So, I don’t see the point in harping about the need to put “pragmatism over ideological purity” as if that hasn’t been the motivating factor behind GOP actions in the past 9 years. There’s no shortage of that principle in GOP politics today. Really.

Just look at supposed conservative rock star Cornyn on the Florida Senate race and tell me that pragmatism isn’t ruling the day over ideological purity.

I may be wrong, but to me it seems borderline paranoia to be worried about the GOP being insufficiently broad.

Small is beautiful.

 
 
 

Barbour is the sort of right leaning moderate

The_Gadfly Friday, May 22nd at 12:26PM EDT (link)

this paleo could actively support for President if he won the primary. While recognizing the need for more a few moderates in the party, he does not systematically poke his fingers in our eyes the way McCain, Specter, Collins, Snowe, and Crist do.

We’ve been called racists enough now that it shouldn’t bother us any more.

-AChance, http://www.redstate.com/moe_lane/2009/11/03/what-men-may-do-we-have-done/#comment-24463

If NY23 was a beat down for Conservatives, what do you call what happened to Progressives in NJ and VA?

inspired by ColdWarrior, http://www.redstate.com/hooah_mac/2009/11/04/ny-23-the-agony-of-defeat-not-so-much/#comment-156

 

Power brokers had their chance

katesmith Friday, May 22nd at 3:00PM EDT (link)

I appreciate Barbour’s action on CO2 fraud. He has been in an influential position for a long time as have other power brokers and lobbyists. These people were all in a position to know the US was in the business of marketing a huge number of loans to people who had no chance of paying them back. I could have told you this was a bad idea had I known it was going on. The powerful who failed to stop this or at least loudly warn us it was going on cost us our country. At the very least, it caused the trashing of lifetimes of work and sacrifice. Therefore, their power was misused or abused and they should retire from public life in shame. Their days are long past.

 

Leave a Comment

 

Be respectful, or be banned. No Profanity.