After boldly promising to repeal the Defense of Marriage Act and reverse “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell,” the ban on openly gay and lesbian service members, gay voters, en bloc, went to the polls for then-Senator Barack Obama. But following months of concealing their bitter disappointment, gay rights advocates have begun publically airing their grievances with the Obama Administration over its concerning pace of progress on gay rights issues.
Yesterday, amid fears neither of those lofty campaign pledges may be actualized, Human Rights Campaign President Joe Solomnese penned a stinging open letter to President Obama in response to a brief filed by the Department of Justice that defended DOMA’s legitimacy.
Concerned the President does not view gay men and women as “human beings whose lives, loves, and families are equal” to his own, Solomnese mockingly offered to “reintroduce” the LGBT community to their capricious ally in the White House.
After reintroducing gays—as scorned tax payers, donors, and voters—to Obama, Solomnese proceeded to question the president’s commitment to marriage equality for gays. Cautiously optimistic, he asks, “The question is, Mr. President—do you believe that [the brief is] good enough for us?”
“If we are your equals, if you recognize that our families live the same, love the same, and contribute as much as yours, then the answer must be no.”
Gay rights advocates want action, and they want it now.
After having found himself to the ideological right of former Vice President Dick Cheney, no amount of rhetoric, it seems, will rescue Obama from his present malady. But does Obama care?
The exact number of “gay” persons living in the U.S. is quite subjective—some studies arguing one in ten, while others, more accurately, note one in twenty. Gays are, ultimately, an insignificant political group, at least in terms of sheer voting numbers.
The collision of Obama’s shallow campaign promises with gays’ limited ability to affect elections suggests but one thing: Gay outreach and token appeasement will always be subordinate to Obama’s determined outreach to larger identity groups—namely, African Americans, Hispanics, and Evangelicals.
Donors no more?
Strapped for cash with competitive gubernatorial elections on the horizon, the Democratic National Committee announced last week it would host its 10th annual LGBT Leadership Council Dinner featuring former Governor and DNC Chair Howard Dean, Representatives Barney Frank, Tammy Baldwin, and Jared Polis, and Vice President Joe Biden.
According to Americablog’s John Aravosis, the fundraiser is “starting to fall apart over [the] rupture between Obama and gay community.” Citing the administration’s “sickening document,” top gay blogger Andy Towle and LGBT kingmaker David Mixner have both withdrawn from the poorly-timed event.
Scheduled to coincide with the 40th anniversary of the Stonewall riots, the cash-deprived DNC was hopeful the event would emphasize the Democratic Party’s continuing allegiance to the LGBT community. But given its coincidence with Obama’s snubbing of the gay community, the DNC is more likely to witness “Stonewall 2.0” – a pocketbook rebellion against the shallow campaign promises of Obama, and, indeed, the entire Democratic Party.

Being pathologically narcisstic, Obama can't bring
Tbone Tuesday, June 16th at 11:28AM EDT (link)himself to really believe that he “needs” anyone or one political group. He actually believes that “they” have little choice but to support his wondrous self. He first displayed this when he assured early supporters that he could deliver far more black voters than the whites he would lose.
He reveals this attitude often, such as when he acknowledged that all the press voted for him, yet he has continuously insulted the press corps. He insults the military, he insults all those “sweetie” women and he insults our traditional allies.
Despite his delusions to the contrary, people do tire of it. He has virtually no chance of re-election in 2012.
Envisioning when all that is Left is the Right.
He's Not Worried About Them
farstar99 Tuesday, June 16th at 1:21PM EDT (link)They’re less than 6 percent of the population.
All he has to do is get amnesty passed, the illegals will morph into Democrat voters and he’ll win in a landslide.De
That’s been the Democrat plan all along. It’s what Carter did and it’s the only reason the DNC survived the Reagan era.
Clinton did it again, with illegal assistance, and it helped him win re-election.
More dependents, more faithful voters.
He figures he has a lock on the minority vote, thanks in large part to ACORN, so why even deal with the LGBT?
Enter: The Log Cabin Republicans
suzieQ Tuesday, June 16th at 11:32AM EDT (link)There have been a number of leaders on the right (not just Dick Cheney) that have supported LGBT equality. The idea that the left supports gay rights is a red herring only pulled out at election time. It was still disappointing that Michael Steele refused our last LCR invitation. But there is always next time.
“It’s finally happened: Abortion stopped a bleeding heart.”
- Ann Coulter, January 25, 2006
“My concern about the role of the federal government is that an intrusive government, a government that says, ‘Don’t worry, we will solve your problems’ is a government that tends to crowd compassion out of the marketplace, that too often in the past people said: ‘Somebody else will take care of the problem in my area. Don’t worry. The government is here.’”
- George W. Bush October 31, 2000
“Had the decision belonged to Senator Kerry, Saddam Hussein would still be in power today in Iraq. In fact, Saddam Hussein would almost certainly still be in control of Kuwait.”
- Dick Cheney
I admire you guys, I really do
kyle8 Tuesday, June 16th at 4:36PM EDT (link)I know it must be hard to say to most other gay and lesbians that you are more conservative than liberal.
But I still don’t like identity politics. The conservative/libertarian tradition should be to avoid all such identity politics and treat everyone the same.
At any rate, the gay lobby for the democratic party can only deliver money and celebrity endorsements, they are way too small of a voting block to make much difference in the polls. That is why the Democrats treat them like dirt.
“Nothing works like freedom, Nothing succeeds like liberty”
Kyle
Who Cares?
Hera Tuesday, June 16th at 11:53AM EDT (link)Does anyone really believe that Gays will not remain a solid voting block for the Dems? I hope no one believes they will suddenly switch their support to the GOP out of disappointment with Obama. Obama can snub Gays as he snubbed Muslims during the election because they have nowhere else to go.
Hera, I highly doubt we will win over any significant portion of the LGBT community...
Aaron Gardner Tuesday, June 16th at 12:04PM EDT (link)But, I think the disenfranchisement of that community by the current administration can work in our favor. So I say bring the rage.
Aaron’s Archive
conform and celebrate diversity….or else!!!
Yeah, Aaron, just like that rage works with the Black vote.
Achance Tuesday, June 16th at 12:07PM EDT (link)Frankly, nothing we do to try to cultivate any “group” that thinks of itself as a group is going to work for a non-Democrat candidate. The Donkeys have the monopoly on groups and victims. So, I’m in the who cares school too.
In Vino Veritas
Art, I am not saying to court them...
Aaron Gardner Tuesday, June 16th at 12:10PM EDT (link)I am saying that if they get disenfranchised enough to stay home it is a win for us.
Aaron’s Archive
conform and celebrate diversity….or else!!!
They won't; just like the Blacks don't. nt
Achance Tuesday, June 16th at 12:13PM EDT (link)In Vino Veritas
Ok, so my strategy of letting them stew in their own juices results in nothing...I am fine with that..
Aaron Gardner Tuesday, June 16th at 12:16PM EDT (link)since I was advocating doing nothing in the first place.
Aaron’s Archive
conform and celebrate diversity….or else!!!
I'd compare them more to the Jewish vote
AKSteveB Tuesday, June 16th at 2:00PM EDT (link)Gays are actually a fairly well to do demographic group, with more disposable income than most and a higher education level than average. A strong national defense is also in their best interest, we’re arguing gay marriage here, our enemies argue gay decapitation. Just like the Jews, they vote against their own best interests due to emotional identification.
Hell is other people - Sartre
Correct, it is unlikely Republicans will ever win a large chunk of gay voters
James Richardson Tuesday, June 16th at 1:36PM EDT (link)But it is possible, however, that Democrats so alienate the LGBT community that heavy-pocketed donors stop attending high-profile functions, i.e. the LGBT Leadership Council Dinner.
Obama and the Democratic Party need gay donors more than they need gay voters.
http://www.skepticians.com
As I read the main part, I too thought "So what are they gonna do, NOT vote Democrat?"
USNJIMRET Tuesday, June 16th at 12:12PM EDT (link)Like the overall black vote, the abnormal sexual identify ‘victims’ have little choice but vote democratic.
All discussion to the contrary is a waste of time, and resources better suited to use on people who actually have more then their ‘victim’ status as an agenda.
Apparently, Obama's winks have expiration dates, too.
6eorge Jetson Tuesday, June 16th at 11:59AM EDT (link)I'm not shocked.....
JamesonLewis3rd Tuesday, June 16th at 12:25PM EDT (link)…..but I hadn’t realized that Howard Dean and Joe Biden were homosexuals.
Hebrews 11:8
Jeremiah 33:3
Like Moe frequently says...
NightTwister Tuesday, June 16th at 12:28PM EDT (link)Get Connected in Colorado.
Andrew Sullivan must be deeply, deeply...
furious Tuesday, June 16th at 1:03PM EDT (link)…disappointed.
…I’m looking forward to the Giant Paper-Maiche’ (sp?) puppets at the next Pride Parade.
–furious
“I find your lack of faith disturbing.” — Darth Vader
or just plain old...
kyle8 Tuesday, June 16th at 4:31PM EDT (link)batcrap crazy.
“Nothing works like freedom, Nothing succeeds like liberty”
Kyle
what "gay community"?
extirpates Tuesday, June 16th at 4:07PM EDT (link)These appear to be extremely ego centric individuals,
perhaps aggigation of hyper individualistic persons’ but no community