« BACK  |  PRINT

RS

MEMBER DIARY

Obama’s Doublespeak on Single-Payer Health Care Systems

At a health care town hall today, President Barack Obama told a New Hampshire audience that he has never claimed to be an advocate of a single-payer health care system, alleging that his Republican opponents were employing “scare tactics” to derail substantive health care reform.

“I have not said that I am a supporter of a single-payer system,” he said, channeling former presidential contender John ‘I voted for it before I voted against it’ Kerry.

But in August of last year, Obama touted single-payer systems as a promising solution to the ailing health care system at a New Mexico town hall. Eliminating private insurance companies and instead opting for a pseudo-Medicare system with the government footing the bill for all health care-related expenses, he said, would be a more effective means to provide greater coverage than our system’s current iteration.

“If I were designing a system from scratch, I would probably go ahead with a single-payer system,” said then-Senator Obama. “I see no reason why the United States of America, the wealthiest country in the history of the world, spending 14 percent of its gross national product on health care, cannot provide basic health insurance to everybody.”

Evidence of Obama’s open embrace of single payer health care systems dates farther back than 2008, much to the chagrin of the White House’s professional wordsmiths, who no doubt spent hours retooling the president’s message for today’s town hall.

Unequivocally expressing his support for a government-run health care system, Obama said to a crowd of AFL-CIO members in 2003, “I happen to be a proponent of single-payer, universal health care coverage.”

Obama’s evolution on the extent to which the federal government should meddle in the private marketplace of health care coverage is one that speaks to the White House’s justifiable concern they may be losing the debate. Obama and Congressional Democrats are anxious to stem the tide of fleeting public opinion, and both have gone to great lengths to cast their opponents as fear mongers.

House Speaker Nancy Pelosi and House Majority Leader Steny Hoyer characterized the town hall protests as “un-American,” while the DNC suggested critics of Obama’s ever-changing health care proposal are fringe lunatics bent on disproving Obama’s citizenship status.

The insinuation that opposition to Obama’s health care system—which, I’ll add, has become increasingly difficult for the simple fact that I’m not entirely sure which iteration we’re to oppose—is grounded in a citizenship conspiracy theory is no more credible than the notion that Obama would, as Saturday Night Live comically suggested, cut taxes for sexual predators and social deviants. Predators, SNL jested, must be found among low and middle-income families, for whom then-Senator Obama promised to cut taxes. Likewise, the DNC posited that “Birthers,” as they’ve been dubbed, must be found among opponents of Obama’s health care plan because, after all, all Republicans are mentally unstable.

“Where we disagree, let’s disagree over things that are real,” President Obama said today. But the distinction between facts and non-facts has become blurred, not for the critics of the legislation, but for the legislation’s highest profile supporters in the previous weeks.

In the interest of wresting control of the debate on health care from those who disagree over trivial matters, like the president instructed, I will give an example of a fact and a non-fact. A fact: As early as 2003 and as late as 2008 President Obama supported a single-payer health care system. A non-fact: Republicans are reflexively partisan and chiefly stand in opposition to the President’s initiatives for an unsubstantiated belief in his Kenyan birth.

President Obama, if you’re interested in meaningful disagreements in the debate over health care, rein in your allies first. Call off the SEIU thugs and put an end to the hateful “un-American” rhetoric. Then, and only then, come talk about a meaningful dialogue. It also might serve you well to decide if you are in favor of “single-payer, universal health care coverage,” too.

Cross-posted at Skepticians.com.

Follow James on Twitter.

COMMENTS

  • gonzo55

    has been pretty consistent about what he wants to do to the country since long before anyone had heard of him. Like Hitler, he had numerous platforms (speeches, interviews, his own two-volume Mein Kampf) before taking office that he took full advantage of to promote his idiotic policy “ideas”. Much like with WWII and the Holocaust, it’s hard to see why anyone is surprised now that Dear Leader Obama is doing exactly what he said he was going to do before coming to office in nationalizing health care.

  • louisiana

    He’d rather climb a 30-ft. flag pole & tell a lie, when it’s easier to stay on the
    ground & tell the truth. I cannot listen to him, I cannot look at him, without consuming half a bottle of tums. He’s like my own personal bottle of syrup of ipecac. I don’t know how I’m going to be able to survive 3.5 more years
    of this pathological narcissist.

  • greggersmd1

    People such as scientist Stephen Hawking wouldn?t have a chance in the U.K., where the National Health Service would say the life of this brilliant man, because of his physical handicaps, is essentially worthless.

    - Human Events

  • Old_Crow

    they have jumped the shark. I thought Bam was a smoother liar but he must either be very comfortable that the msm has got his back, or he’s losing his touch.

    I actually read the House bill since I’ve had a lot of time to kill on international flights lately, it’s scary (and poorly written).

    The government just doesn’t belong in the health care business.

  • http://twitter.com/_DPunch Erik_S

    A) the general American public is as dumb as his administration thinks it is. That they will buy the explanation (to paraphrase) “oh, they just clipped some old footage together out of context using sophisticated editing software” because “hey, computers made it look like Forest Gump was standing right there with Kennedy”.

    B) his administration can spin enough ambiguity and plausibility that the general public will just throw up their arms and say “whatever, I’ve got a life to live” (it’s happened before) or just get too confused to really nail him down. Ever try to hold down a greased pig? Neither have I, but it sounds hard.

    C) the majority of the general public isn’t paying close enough attention to really digest any information other than what they are being fed at that moment.

    D) his administration and the democratic leadership can taint enough of the “mob crowd” with the stank of “racist”, that others who may be swayed will think twice about following.

    • http://www.examiner.com/x-1597-Charlotte-Law--Politics-Examiner Mike gamecock DeVine

      http://www.redstate.com/gamecock/2009/08/11/would-that-elected-republicans-would-raise-their-voices-in-other-halls/

      So he speaks the “the bill that will be hashed out in the Fall” as if there wasn’t enough hashing out by Dems over the past 6 months since they took power; 16 years since HillaryCare went down or 60 yrs since Truman failed.

      The House bill doesn’t use the words single payor and neither will any bill that passes, so we can’t let that fact be used by the dems to refute the arguments against the bill. The bill does make it likely that private ins cos would eventually go out of business. But even if we never had single payor, the bill stinks.

      more later

    • Rod_Patrick

      he thinks that his flip flops can still go on “unnoticed”.

      It’s like listening to an idiot:

      FLIP-FLOP-FLIP-FLOP-FLIP-FLOP-FLIP-FLOP…..

    • http://twitter.com/_DPunch Erik_S

      If you repeat a lie enough it WILL become a truth.

  • DerKrieger

    that the GOP wants to “derail substantive health care reform.” must be answered. I’m sick and tired of the repetition of this canard.

    The GOP needs to be beating the drum loudly about their free market alternatives to Obamacare.

    • James Richardson

      Capital Hill takes note of Redstate. Use the venue to your advantage.

      If you want the GOP to start beating the drum loudly, then set the tone.

    • Old_Crow

      1. Limit excessive litigation costs (up to $260 B per year). How many Johnny Edwards do we need to support anyway.

      2. Crack down on Medicaid and Medicare fraud. Approx 10% in outright fraud and another 20% of inefficiencies and ‘soft fraud’.

      3. Allow insurance companies to freely compete across state lines. Eliminate the state minimum requirements.

      4. Allow individuals to have the same health insurance tax deductions that companies are allowed.

  • Martin Knight

    Some effort to answer the silly charges against the GOP would also be nice.

    Republicans should take the opportunity at their townhalls (if they’re even having them) to introduce Americans to all this (Hacker, Ezekiel Emanuel’s Complete Lives Scheme, Obama in front of AFL-CIO) and get it all online at gop.com.

    The RNC, NRCC, NRSC, etc. should set up ad production teams constantly churning ads out, uploading them on YouTube and putting them up on their websites with individual Donate buttons below to get them on the national/regional airwaves.

    New media is good but not enough. We need to do both.

    • James Richardson

      The RNC’s latest ad, “In Denial,” was quite impressive, Martin.

      That is not to say that they should not be doing more, but I think lately they have stepped it up a notch.

    • izoneguy

      A: Costs big bucks
      B: It has to be vetted….
      I mean you have to get people’s approval to use their likeness…
      C: You cannot just rip it off of YouTube and produce a spot…..

      The GOP should have a way for people to send high-res clips to them
      with all the releases….

      The left is nortious for ripping stuff off and plastering it on TV….
      They always beg forgivess instead of asking for permission…

      • Martin Knight

        If the GOP went the Swifties’ route, raising funds specifically for running specific ads, I doubt they’d be much trouble in raising enough money to put them on the air. Unlike most of last year (pre-Palin), the base is riled up enough to part with its cash.

        Heck, the RNC may even end up with some money for the bank in the end.

  • 1stRichard

    In a local counter protest deep behind enemy lines in W/Mass I got to meet the supporters of Obamacare and look at what I found?

    Welcome to Single Payer Now!

    http://singlepayernow.net/

    Single Payer Action

    http://www.singlepayeraction.org/

    Heath Care Now Organizing for a national single payer healthcare system

    http://www.healthcare-now.org/

    The ?International Socialist Organization?, heck some agenda?

    ?Local representatives from other allied groups turned out as well. They included Mass-Care/, Physicians for a National Health Plan, Desmond Callan Community Health Center, Franklin/Hampshire Health Care Coalition, International Socialist Organization, League of Women Voters, Mass. Nurses Association, Mass. Public Health Association, Social Workers for Peace and Justice, UAW Local 2322, and the Mass. Senior Citizens Council.?

    http://www.pdamerica.org/articles/chapters/ma-2009-05-28-11-46-45-chapters.php

    Why are these groups not headline news as to the truth of what we are headed toward?

    I was told flat out many times they are supporting HR676 but also support HR3200 as a stepping stone of sorts. In glancing at the two HR676 could be hidden in HR3200 as the two have the similar vagueness.

    Anyway our government was divided by our constitution to have the majority of power in the hands of the private sector and the states ?We the People?. Now we have the government owning the banks to car makers and now they want to do the same with your health. We have inalienable liberties so written in our constitution, we the people and not we the government. Among these are life, charity and much more belongs in the hands of the people and not the government and they were put there for a reason a reason. This healthcare no mater how you put it is a step in the wrong direction.

  • m1garand

    Do these politicians think this is 1909 or 2009?
    Don’t they know that anyone with a computer can pull up the things these politicians have said in the past? But they still tell a bald face lie!
    Obama has aid numerous times that he will support single payer insurance. Yet today he says he never has supported it. What the??