Orange County Republican and California State Assemblyman Chuck Devore has been spreading his message of “life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness” across the Golden State for eleven months now, all with the aim of “bouncing Boxer” from the United States Senate in 2010. And he’s so anxious to see her leave that august body that his website bears a clock to track the number of days, hours, and, yes, even minutes “’till Boxer’s gone.”
But while DeVore is surely among the most tenacious and unswerving candidates vying for public office in the 2010 midterm elections, his campaign has seen only moderate success in translating his attributes as a indefatigable campaigner into support – namely, contributions, with his last FEC filing in July showing only $75,600 in cash on hand in his uphill campaign against Democratic incumbent Senator Barbara Boxer.
In an hour-long interview with REDSTATE, DeVore likened his insurgent, techno-centric campaign to that of then-Senator Barack Obama, and said he anticipates a surge in donations as his campaign further develops its online fundraising infrastructure.
The DeVore campaign is “trying to use new media in a synergistic way to tie together volunteers in a way that had not previously possible prior to the time that Al Gore invented the internet,” he told me, tongue-in-cheek.
In the hopes of affecting the debate on the Democratic-sponsored cap-and-trade legislation, the DeVore campaign launched TaxFax.us, a micro site designed to capture contact information from supporters and subsequently provide a simple, online vehicle to contact their elected officials.
“You’d be surprised how effective faxes into the Capitol Hill can be,” says the website, quoting a Hill staffer. And you may also be surprised how effective DeVore’s fax campaign was.
“We generated over 50,000 faxes into the U.S. Senate over tax-and-trade. Every U.S. Senator got a fax that I wrote,” DeVore said. “I’m unaware of any other person who has run for U.S. Senate who has tried to affect a national issue by generating such a massive amount of correspondence into Capitol Hill on an issue of currency.”
DeVore remains hopeful his unconventional but aggressive campaign will prove catch Boxer by surprise, and said that July was their best month yet in terms of fundraising where he raised over $100,000.
While his campaign’s online strategy would no doubt be music to online evangelists’ ears, I was more concerned with the campaign’s recent missives highlighting former HP CEO Carly Fiorina’s position on abortion – one they claim to be muddled. I wrote last week that DeVore’s abortion critique of Fiorina was wholly without merit, for which a DeVore consultant responded thusly: “unfortunately, it is all too easy to question the depth of Fiorina’s commitment to the pro-life cause.”
Indeed, unanswered questions remained – specifically whether DeVore is of the opinion that Fiorina is pro-choice when the only evidence to that effect are scant blind quotes by “Republican insiders” and not an admission herself.
He was quick to note that whenever Fiorina’s position on abortion was questioned, it was done so in the context of other less than appealing positions she has supported in the past. “You don’t know where she stands on the issues of the day,” he said, adding, “she has no record in anything because she’s never run for office.”
I should have anticipated some obfuscation; DeVore is a politician, after all.
Prior to assuming her position as RNC Victory Chairmwoman in 2008, Fiorina was a Silicon Valley business executive, so I was not satisfied with the tired “lack of a record” response. But upon further questioning DeVore revealed a rather bold assertion.
“I’ve heard from McCain campaign advisors that worked with her that unequivocally she was [pro-choice].”
Such personal reassurances from Fiorina’s fellow McCain advisors have likely emboldened DeVore in his convictions on the matter, but Republican primary voters should not anticipate abortion to overwhelm other salient issues, particularly California’s “bone crushing economic crisis.”
And perhaps providing his opponent with an avenue to escape further criticism if an examination of Fiorina’s past proves she was pro-choice, DeVore said: “What’s going to be on everyone’s minds here is jobs, jobs, jobs, economic development, modern, nuclear power, and oil and gas.”
UPDATE: DeVore has been quite the busy candidate. Ace of Spades’ Gabriel Malor also interviewed DeVore — posting the lengthy exchange in three parts, the second of which was focused on California’s busted budget and Proposition 8.
bs
Caleb Howe
Vladimir
Hopefully you can interview Fiorina next
Neil Stevens Tuesday, September 1st at 2:29PM EDT (link)It’d be nice to see both candidates get some pressure.
Want to run for conservatives? Give.
There Is No Crisis
I’d rather everyone get along, but I’ll settle for everyone united in hating me for being a jerky moderator.
So do I, Neil
James Richardson Tuesday, September 1st at 2:35PM EDT (link)I want to know if there is any truth to the allegation that fellow McCain advisors say she was “unequivocally” pro-choice.
And I want to talk about her voting record, which is particularly troubling to me.
http://www.skepticians.com
You'll never know the truth about whether a McCain advisor said that,
The_Gadfly Tuesday, September 1st at 4:31PM EDT (link)but you might find out what Carly’s position is.
As for me, having only read the postings here on Red State, I put the odds at least 9:1 that she’s pro-choice. You can’t get involved in Republican politics and NOT know that someone is going to want the answer to that question. The easy answer (and the one that helps win Republican primaries) is to forthrightly declare yourself pro-life and layout your creds, which includes your website. The next simplest answer is if you are an abortion supporter, you declare it, make your argument, and let the chips fall where they may. You’re likely to lose the primary, but now always (see Tom Ridge). The problem is when you are an abortion supporter and you try to finesse the answer, which includes not saying anything.
We’ve been called racists enough now that it shouldn’t bother us any more.
-AChance, http://www.redstate.com/moe_lane/2009/11/03/what-men-may-do-we-have-done/#comment-24463
If NY23 was a beat down for Conservatives, what do you call what happened to Progressives in NJ and VA?
inspired by ColdWarrior, http://www.redstate.com/hooah_mac/2009/11/04/ny-23-the-agony-of-defeat-not-so-much/#comment-156
You are 100% right.
Tbone Tuesday, September 1st at 4:40PM EDT (link)Probably one of the least credible credentials in politics is to reference a quote as coming from a McCain Campaign advisor.
Fiorina needs and should be allowed to speak for herself. Then let the voters judge HER credibility.
DeVore does himself no good with that type of statement.
Envisioning when all that is Left is the Right.
Ooh, Carly's pro-choice?
Marcus_Traianus Tuesday, September 1st at 2:47PM EDT (link)With respect to Mr. Devore, if the primary is going to be fought over abortion and whether Carly had anything to do with Iran, He better get comfortable where he is.
Apparently Devore has employed all the usual campaign creatures with their Ouji boards and bewitching chants. Unfortunately for Devore, that approach does not serve him well.
Devore should stick to his intuition, which has brought success thus far. He can throw the other dead weight overboard and win big. Focusing on Boxer early is the best tactic for him.
Fiorina will self destruct all on her own. I always found McCain’s choice of Carly curious and taken mostly as a female demographic play. Carly can talk all day about management experience at HP. However her performance at best was lackluster and that will be evident on closer scrutiny.
This could be a really easy Senatorial win for Chuck if he sticks to the script. Here’s to hoping he does.
“Both of our political parties, at least the honest portion of them, agree conscientiously in the same object—the public good; but they differ essentially in what they deem the means of promoting that good. One side believes it best done by one composition of the governing powers; the other, by a different one. One fears most the ignorance of the people; the other, the selfishness of rulers independent of them. Which is right, time and experience will prove.”.Thomas Jefferson
Contributor to The Minority Report
Chuck can't control the general
Neil Stevens Tuesday, September 1st at 3:23PM EDT (link)Contested statewide primaries routinely favor the pro-life candidates over the pro-aborts. I don’t know why you think that’s such a shocking thing. Wh at state have you been watching? Don’t you remember Riordan v. Simon, for example?
However the idea that he’s going to keep Boxer from talking about abortion just by not mentioning it in the primary I think is silly. Even she isn’t so dumb as to miss that it’s a consistently successful issue for Democrats in this state. This state sadly re jected even a weak, limp-wristed parental notification law even as it confirmed marriage.
So not mentioning abortion in the primary will be as successful as not mentioning the war was in Fawlty Towers. IT’s always going to be there. Our base cares about it. The Democrat base cares about it.
DeVore didn’t start it. Roe invaded Poland.
Want to run for conservatives? Give.
There Is No Crisis
I’d rather everyone get along, but I’ll settle for everyone united in hating me for being a jerky moderator.
Indeed
BlueLandRed Tuesday, September 1st at 5:06PM EDT (link)California is very blue at the moment. Obama beat McCain something like 8.2 million to 5.0 here the Golden State. I think it’s possible that a slightly right of center Republican could beat Boxer. Someone who’s say the political equivalent to our Governator, tho’ not Arnold himself as he’s discovered just how ungovernable our state is and has the poll numbers to prove it.. However, it seems highly unlikely that anyone that appeals to evangelists as a shot at becoming the next Senator from the utterly wacky state of California.
"Blue" isn't really a useful way to think about it
Neil Stevens Tuesday, September 1st at 5:30PM EDT (link)The state is pro-abort. It’s more than willing to elect Republicans, protect marriage, cut taxes, and all sorts of things.
It just won’t lift a finger to stop mass infanticide.
Want to run for conservatives? Give.
There Is No Crisis
I’d rather everyone get along, but I’ll settle for everyone united in hating me for being a jerky moderator.
There's a key point you're missing
Neil Stevens Tuesday, September 1st at 5:32PM EDT (link)You call the state “utterly wacky,” when that’s only true of the coast from LA County up around the SF Bay and through to the Oregon border.
The interior is where the Republicans are, and we’re no different from the Republicans you’d find in Nevada or Arizona.
So winning the primary and winning the general are mutually exclusive things until we can get abortion off the table, and that won’t happen until the Supreme Court finally depolarizes the issue.
Want to run for conservatives? Give.
There Is No Crisis
I’d rather everyone get along, but I’ll settle for everyone united in hating me for being a jerky moderator.
If that's the battle ground
SteveLA Tuesday, September 1st at 8:03PM EDT (link)M_T
You are quite right, if DeVore turns the primary into a look at how good my social conservative credentials are contest and how lousy Fionria’s are, then he may well win the Republican primary, but loose big time in the General. CA Democrats are masters at painting Republicans as extremist in the general election, even if they are not and being seen as a hard core social conservative does not sell in state wide elections in a fairly liberal CA.
Fironia will fail all on her own I think, once her HP record comes out, and she turns brittle on the stump. Best for DeVore to hang back I would think and let her fail all on her own.
Right now people are mad at the CA Democrats in the Assembly and not all that fond of CA R’s who seem to not be engaged on pock-book issues, illegal immigration and the role/size of government issues. There is some anger there, but who knows how to capitalize on that anger.
Weird thing here is that DeVore has a pretty good record on good government issues, yet so far he’s trying to make points on social issues with the base and to some extent on trade with Iran. Maybe it’s a way for DeVore to get noticed, raise some money from the base or something else, go figure.
______________________________________
Competency over ideological purity and litmus tests
For the life of me, I can't figure California out
Marcus_Traianus Wednesday, September 2nd at 2:33PM EDT (link)I suppose the key is to look at why Boxer has won by such big margins in the past and where her vulnerabilities are.
Call me a simpleton, but given she has thrown in with all the big government, fiscally irresponsible-ObamaCare types and those policies are ubiquitously unpopular it seems like a good place to start. But again, I am just a common man and nostalgic about reliability.
Frankly, I would let Boxer bring up the social issues and then rhetorically say “huh?”. Sure, the people of California are suffering under oppressive taxation, record unemployment, ridiculous federal government mandates, wreckless fiscal policies and leaving the state in droves. Meanwhile you want to talk about what?
“Both of our political parties, at least the honest portion of them, agree conscientiously in the same object—the public good; but they differ essentially in what they deem the means of promoting that good. One side believes it best done by one composition of the governing powers; the other, by a different one. One fears most the ignorance of the people; the other, the selfishness of rulers independent of them. Which is right, time and experience will prove.”.Thomas Jefferson
Contributor to The Minority Report
Marcus wrt your last para...
Aaron Gardner Wednesday, September 2nd at 2:52PM EDT (link)I understand what you are saying and you are correct. DeVore needs to be focusing on those issues. In fact he is for the most part. His campaign site barely has any socon stuff on it, focusing instead on the basics like you suggest.
California is hard to figure out. I think one thing that people are missing is that the people of CA have been in some form of mild revolt for some time now. They seem to have finally noticed the bubbling water they have been swimming in. This may be the moment that the frog hops out of the pot.
Having just moved to VT from CO ~ a year ago I was shocked. Gun laws are non-existent here, liberties haven’t really been cut. The people have yet to feel the impact of their votes over the years. I think in this way VT is like CA 8-10 yrs ago.
Now, the people of CA have been feeling the impact for a while now. They stood up to get rid of Davis, moving to the right with Arnold. Still no real results. Maybe the next step for them is the Federal Offices rather than the State offices. I am just positing here, I really don’t know if that is what is going on.
Maybe SteveLA and Neil can tell me if I am close.
Aaron’s Archive
conform and celebrate diversity….or else!!!
I would mostly agree Aaron
Marcus_Traianus Thursday, September 3rd at 8:24AM EDT (link)but it just seems there are plenty of voters stuck on stupid or lethargy or nonchalance or indifference (I am running out of adjectives) out west.
The “Losenator” was a severe disappointment given what he was marketed as and what California got when the box was opened. While I don’t envy the legislature he got stuck with, Arnold could have done much better and stuck to basic principals. Instead he caved, dissembled and threw in with every kook that had a hand in California’s destruction. That severely hurt the image of Republican’s in and outside the Golden State.
I think Chuckie has good instincts and can win. However, I find it disappointing (most recently) he didn’t think before speaking. I simply hope his behavior is not a prelude to the primary campaign.
I also hope Carly doesn’t try to drag him there. If she does, Chuck shouldn’t bite. Negativity is not what people want, especially in these times.
If Devore can stay on message, be articulate, passionate and talk about his ideas he can be a very important linchpin. People want different things from their legislators then what is being delivered today. They want leaders with solid ideals, unwavering opinions, loyalty and an ability to make convincing arguments on their behalf. He can be all those things if he just trusts what I believe are very good instincts and throws any differing consultant to the sharks.
“Both of our political parties, at least the honest portion of them, agree conscientiously in the same object—the public good; but they differ essentially in what they deem the means of promoting that good. One side believes it best done by one composition of the governing powers; the other, by a different one. One fears most the ignorance of the people; the other, the selfishness of rulers independent of them. Which is right, time and experience will prove.”.Thomas Jefferson
Contributor to The Minority Report
A pure smear statement.
Tbone Tuesday, September 1st at 3:44PM EDT (link)““I’ve heard from McCain campaign advisors that worked with her that unequivocally she was [pro-choice].””
Any more of this type of stuff and I am going to write this guy off as another CA, no-name, conservative loser.
Envisioning when all that is Left is the Right.
Like we care what you think
Neil Stevens Tuesday, September 1st at 3:56PM EDT (link)Shall I dig up your posting history re: California?
Want to run for conservatives? Give.
There Is No Crisis
I’d rather everyone get along, but I’ll settle for everyone united in hating me for being a jerky moderator.
If you don't care what I think, don't read my posts.
Tbone Tuesday, September 1st at 4:19PM EDT (link)A helpful time saving tip.
Further, it is really rather petty of you to keep trying to pick a fight with me. As a moderator I would think you would consider yourself above such a thing. I certainly have a greater respect of you than that.
Envisioning when all that is Left is the Right.
More DeVore.
Joshua Trevino Tuesday, September 1st at 9:04PM EDT (link)Gabriel Malor at Ace of Spades HQ has parts 1 and 2 of his 3-part interview with Chuck DeVore up here:
1) Part 1
2) Part 2
It’s well worth reading what he has to say — and what he focuses on — unmediated.
We are but warriors for the working-day.
I plan on posting the same, Josh
James Richardson Tuesday, September 1st at 9:38PM EDT (link)But I’ve been sick for the last 5 days with a stomach virus and have not had the strength or mental acuity to transcribe an hour-long interview. I got a third of the way done (which the above is from) and got sick again.
I will post it to my site and include an update on here, if I’m able to get around to it.
http://www.skepticians.com