« BACK  |  PRINT

RS

MEMBER DIARY

Why Set Up an Exchange Plan for a Law that is Unconstitutional?

Were South Carolina Republican leaders not listening last November? Did they not get the message that the people of the Palmetto state are fed up with the direction in which Barack Obama and his socialist allies in Washington are taking our country?

Across our state and our country, conservatives and tea party members rallied against “Obamacare” last year – and the Republican Party seized upon our righteous indignation by promising to repeal the law and block its implementation at the state level. These promises were among the main reasons Republicans were swept into office at the state and national level. Why, then, are Palmetto “Republicans” now actively seeking to implement Obamacare here in South Carolina? Why is a bill “to provide for the establishment of the South Carolina Health Benefit Exchange pursuant to the federal health care act” receiving considerable Republican support in the S.C. House of Representatives?

In fact not only are efforts underway to move this bill through the “GOP-controlled” Ways and Means committee, but the legislation – which would set up a taxpayer-funded panel to implement the exchange in South Carolina – is being sponsored by numerous Republican lawmakers. Needless to say supporting the implementation of Obamacare is not the sort of leadership that tea party members are expecting from our leaders in Columbia. In fact this duplicity seems to be a repeat of the fight over Obama’s so-called “stimulus,” which saw many Republican leaders object to this bureaucratic bailout only to turn around and greedily lap up its federal largess.

A similar effort to slip Obamacare into state law in Georgia was recently exposed by tea party members, which resulted in a complete collapse of support for the legislation. Tea party efforts also led to Gov. Nathan Deal becoming the latest chief executive to go on the record stating his opposition to Obamacare’s implementation.
“The governor understands Georgians’ suspicions about any legislation associated with Obamacare,” Deal’s spokesman said. “He shares their opposition to the federal takeover of health care.”

Florida Gov. Rick Scott is also taking a principled stand against implementing the Obamacare exchanges in his state – instructing his insurance commissioner to return a $1 million federal grant requested by former Gov. Charlie Crist that would have provided a blueprint for setting up the exchange.

Louisiana Gov. Bobby Jindal is also blocking efforts to implement a health care exchange in his state.

This is the kind of leadership we need to see in South Carolina. The establishment of Obamacare exchanges is the first step in the implementation of this radical socialized medicine scheme. Accordingly, the battle over these exchanges represents the front-line of the broader fight to repeal, defund and do away with this unconstitutional abomination. In that battle there is no middle ground – lawmakers are either working to implement the legislation or they are working to keep it from being implemented.

South Carolinians have made it perfectly clear on which side of the fence we expect our leaders to be – so why are so many “Republicans” on the wrong side of the fence? Tea party supporters will not stand idly by while this legislation is shoved down our throats. In fact they may aggressively campaign against any Republican who supports the implementation of the Obamacare exchanges. The Republican party scored huge victories in November promising to protect our liberties and our tax dollars from Obama’s socialist assaults.

It is now time for them to honor that commitment – or prepare to be replaced by lawmakers who will.

Cross post from Spartanburg Tea Party

COMMENTS

  • Bartlett

    Let’s see.

    It’s “free” money (that is, it’s borrowed from China, but it’s been laundered through the feds and the state will never have to pay it back).

    It pays for the usual rounds of consultants and contractors (because let’s face it, if you’ve been around a state government long enough, you’ve eventually noticed that an unelected cadre of the same highly-paid consultants, leavened with a sampling of defeated politicians, writes pretty much everything that gets done).

    If you’re nominally FOR increased state control of private lives (and you ran on that basis), this is right in your sweet spot.

    If you’re nominally AGAINST increased state control of private lives (and you ran on that basis), you can claim “force majeure” because while Obamacare has been declared to be unconstitutional, that declaration has been stayed pending appeal, and really, who knows how THAT will come out?

    Either way, the wheels of government get greased and there’s nothing that can really stick to you, personally. What’s not to like?

    Unless, of course, you’re a conservative with principles and a backbone. I guess we’ll find out who THOSE rare birds really are.

    • Menlo
  • GregInFla

    on this Obamacare bill? Is she believing Obama when he says that SC can get out if SC sets up a plan? I surely hope not, or many of her donors are going to be very upset.

  • mspector

    Judge Vinson noted that if the states are implementing Obamacare it pretty much destroys the Constitutional objection. I don’t think he’s correct, but at the very least it undermines their credibility.

    We are in a period when serious issues confront our republic, and the people we have elected to take a certain stand on those issues seem to be withering.

  • runner12

    legislators have passes a similar bill to the one you are describing, which would have us accept 54 milion dollars to implement an exchange program which is essentially the first phase of ObamaCare.

    Our Republican Gov, Mary Fallin supports the idea. It can only be killed in the Senate now.

  • http://xmmlbchat.blogspot.com katesmith

    It doesn’t matter if a federal judge overturns ObamaCare now, because it’s mandated in states who have happily proceeded to nail down deals with ‘stakeholders.’. I knew nothing about this otherwise I wouldn’t have wasted my time caring what Michele Bachmann or anyone else said about it. Not one Republican elected last November at the state level has stood up and screamed about this crime. The states are saying they have to do it because it’s federal law and if they don’t the feds will get the deals. In Gov. Haley’s case, instead of shouting from the rooftops, she is silent, and created a ‘commission’ to study the matter for awhile. She is fully aware parties in the SC legislature are proceeding as if ObamaCare is law. South Carolina took $1 million a few months ago to get things going. Haley did not give the money back despite her exciting media appearances challenging Obama about the bill. This was supposed to be a big reason she was elected. No federal judge is going to undo it now. I will never join a so-called health exchange, I don’t care if they put me in jail.

  • runner12

    previous Dem. Governor applied for a grant of 54 million dollars. Our current Republican Governor could have turned it down, but she did not. She took the money.

    Now the State Senate has to vote on whether to use some of the money to create health care exchanges (it already passed in the House). They think that if they start the ball rolling before the federal government does, then they can control the exchanges and make them more free-market based. Gov. Fallin insists that she did her homework and that the grant does not have any federal mandates attached to it.

    Fallin’s reasoning on this is extremely flawed on so many levels, it is hard to know where to begin. But I assume that these other states are using the same flawed reasoning.

  • Menlo

    While I don’t really call the act a “law,” it does not require states to do anything. It gives them the “option” of doing things, either to keep the federal government from doing it themselves or to get federal money.

    Of course the biggest impact requires no action on the part of either. The insurance corporations (whose lobbyists wrote much of the act) are going to implement it themselves. If you have ANYTHING called “health insurance,” you will be part of the ObamaCare plan.

    Fortunately, you won’t be put in jail for not complying. The most they can do under current regulations is deny a tax refund or credit.

  • earlgrey

    In 20 minutes I am due to leave the house for our county GOP elections and I am wondering why bother. It is a gorgeous day, and the first day of spring.

    I didn’t realize how much Obamacare was the reason for my activism until now. I made a commitment and I’ll keep it, but I am struggling to find a way to justify it.

  • lineholder

    You can do it, so get it done. Stay in there, please.

  • http://www.spartanburgteaparty.org karenmartin

    As katesmith mentions below, I have not heard Nikki say anything directly, but she set up a study commission. I have spoken with a couple of her allies in the SC House and down in Columbia and they are not in support of/co-sponsoring this bill. Sometimes that indicates how she feels about an issue, but that could be a huge “read in/assumption” as well. For now I’m considering that the conservatives in Columbia … which for a red state is not all that conservative … are staying away from this bill.

  • earlgrey

    Sad, but here. Thanks for your encouragement.

  • chamberD

    for a law that is unconstitutional?

    Because we are operating in dictatorial waters. The juggernaut that is statism has overtaken the will of the people. That’s why.

  • chamberD

    Read about them.

    Washington state HB 1680 — read about it. Gist: it creates immunity for CPS staff who make false allegations — an additional class of persons who are ABOVE THE LAW — and who have the power to kidnap your children.

  • lineholder

    With rights come responsibilities. You’re there, and that means that you are taking on more of the responsibilities than the majority of us take on.

    Wear it like a badge of honor. Be glad in it. And take ‘em on for all you’re worth, sir.

  • avgjo

    what are we going to do about it in the short term? The PC project is great, but that’s gonna take a while. Meanwhile, we’re dying here.

    So, I repeat: aside from writing about the issue, what do we do?

  • acat

    Is there a way for Joe Sixpack to protest this, ideally by failing to comply in a way that is unlikely to either be detected or punished?

    I don’t see one. What’s going in at this point is the bureaucracy, not the citizen-level changes … but I’m not the best guy to ask.

    Find a way for Joe to get involved, ideally by not paying, but something like filing individual requests for exemption would also work .. they’ve given out thousands, can individuals even apply?

    Mew

  • avgjo

    if organizing chartered bus trips to D.C. to ‘meet and greet’ our own GOP reps would do any good, kinda like Congresswoman Bachmann arranged with the Dems before Obamacare passage? I interviewed a state Senator last week and he was telling me how your Reps are the easiest federal officials to deal with because they are up for reelection for so much. Perhaps an early, friendly reminder would work. How about commissioning/pooling money for a poll in Boehner and Cantor’s districts? Or doing the same to run ads there? I wonder…

  • http://www.theprecinctproject.wordpress.com ColdWarrior

    “we want to survey our Tea Party Patriot rank and file to find out whether you think it would be a good idea to have another big rally in D.C. to really show them rascals we mean business.”

    This is what they should have said:

    We took a poll a few months back on one of our national conference call and 86 per cent of the people on the call said they wanted the TPP to push The Neighborhood Precinct Committeeman Strategy. We believe the time has come to stage thousands and thousands and thousands of rallies in a different way. We believe the time has come for us to rally in a new way. That new way is to rally where it really matters. And that

  • avgjo

    go ahead and sit in on some of the meetings, get a feel for the dynamic…who knows, maybe I’ll turn out to be electable at some point in the future.

    I do like this project: it’s the strategic type of thinking that is otherwise lacking. I just hope that it and other methods are engaged; it’s like you said, it takes more than just writing about it.