« BACK  |  PRINT

RS

MEMBER DIARY

We Need A Conservative Not Mitt Romney

Another Republican straw poll and another win for the ever present RINO Mitt Romney. Now I know that straw polls are somewhat fixed since the winner is the candidate who has the most people available to vote for them when the poll is taken but give me a break, I am tired of all the media and commentary discussing a Mitt Romney run and pundits saying he is the front runner for the 2012 Republican nomination.

We don’t need nor want Mitt Romney, period! We need a real conservative not someone who says he is for the sake of garnering the conservative vote. We have already had one RINO run for President recently and the result was Barack Obama. Do we really want another one in 2012 to see the imbecilic Obama reelected because Republicans chose the wrong candidate again and shied away from a true conservative which is what this country needs and wants?

I almost cringe whenever I see Romney in interview after interview espousing how conservative he is when his record as Governor of Massachusetts is FAR from stellar from a conservative point of view. He may have been a decent business man and did a good job running the winter Olympics but neither make this RINO a good choice for President and do not give him the credentials which meet true conservative standards for the 2012 election cycle. Plus the guy has already LOST one nomination and in a head to head CANNOT beat Barack Obama.

For those who are so willing to jump on the Mitt Romney band wagon let me remind you what this RINO did when he had the opportunity to govern in an executive position which many believe gives him the experience to be President. He failed on almost all accounts as a conservative and his record in the Massachusetts Governors mansion as with any State Chief Executive who moves to the Oval Office will follow suit.

The crowning achievement during the Romney years in Massachusetts was his push and passage of health care reform which has been tagged Romneycare after the passage of Obamacare on the national level. Since Obamacare was passed in 2009, Romney has been extremely quiet about his state government health care bill which is a complete reversal from his braggadocios prideful rantings about it BEFORE Obamacare was passed and its unpopularity became very obvious. Since then Romney has distanced himself from his own debacle by avoiding direct answers when asked about his state nightmare.

Romneycare is the state version of Obamacare though not a total government take over it is complete with a mandate to purchase health care that penalizes citizens with escalating taxation and the loss of any personal income tax exemptions if some form of health care is not purchased. The, “call,” for state health care also patterned the lie perpetrated on the national level by greatly overstating the number of people without health care in Massachusetts. In actuality when the numbers were truly scrutinized they like the national numbers did not match the scare hype as a nominal 6% of the states citizens were uninsured. Even after Romeycare was initiated the real number only dropped by 2% as most chose even with the penalties to not participate in the program.

Romneycare also assessed an annual, “fair,” fee to business not exceeding $295 dollars per employee for every business in the state with more than ten employees who did not voluntarily contribute to the state health care fund. In other words a business tax from the man who claims to be pro – business and cries foul over government taxation of small business. This assessment or voluntary contribution is in addition to business costs for employee health care already provided by the business.

Romney and Ted Kennedy were bitter opponents in 1994 during the Senate race when many thought Kennedy was very vulnerable in light of the conservative surge with the Contract with America. Romney lost and he and Kennedy still remained cool to one another. After Romney jumped on the health care band wagon as Governor embracing Kennedy’s dream he and Romney became good friends as Kennedy endorsed Romenycare since it met with his standards of government sponsored health care. Since its passage it has cost the state millions and placed an extreme financial burden on Massachusetts.

Romney also calls himself a fiscal conservative who does not believe in tax increases. But again his record as Governor proves otherwise. Romney inherited a $3 billion dollar deficit upon entering office and though he did not penalize Massachusetts citizens to pay for this deficit by direct taxation he did increase fees across the board on licenses etc. which directly affected nearly every citizen. Additionally he hit the citizens pocket books by increasing the gasoline tax to attack the deficit. He did cut spending but his first move was to increase fees and the gas tax rather than first enacting drastic spending cuts to combat the state deficit.

Romney also raised taxes on business to combat the state deficit. Although he called it closing tax loopholes, state business considered the measures tax increases and as such expressed their anger toward their so called pro – business Governor. He also increased the Capital Gains Tax as an additional revenue source and implemented a state tax on all Internet services. The so called anti tax Governor also signed legislation increasing all commercial property taxes in the state which was another financial attack against business.

Now that his record is behind him and many are not scrutinizing it as he makes his move toward 2012 Mitt Romney is trying to show himself as a fiscal conservative who is against any tax increases, continually talking a good game as a pro business candidate and complaining about the affects of Obamacare on our Nation. Yet as Governor of Massachusetts he was far from the conservative mantra that he is now claiming implementing taxation through fees and gasoline, attacking business by increasing business costs through government intervention and the author of the states universal health care bill.

The bottom line is this. Romney is not a conservative he is at best a moderate who has shown that as a Chief Executive his governing policy will be more liberal than conservative. He may try and talk a good game about being conservative but his record shows otherwise and that record will, if elected, follow him to The White House and the same RINO policy will follow suit. We do not need nor want another of his type as the Republican choice against Barack Obama in 2012. The country has shown by the result of the 2010 election a starvation for conservative leadership and Mitt Romney has not nor ever will fit that bill.

Ken Taylor  The Liberal Lie, The Conservative Truth

COMMENTS

  • izoneguy

    Mitt is a guaranteed loser in the 2012 election.

    He might have had a chance – except he pushed “Romney Care” on Mass.
    and it is a disaster. He has no standing when talking about the repeal of ObamaCare. Of course Romney will run on a platform of “Improving ObamaCare” not repealing it. That is a lose-lose proposition.

    And of course the MSM will use his religion against like they did in 2008.

    The man can’t win – even against our current horrible, Marxist President.

  • atlasshrugs

    but I just got a feeling that the caucuses will be rigged in his favor.

    we need to get out the vote.

  • slider55

    Because he is flexible enough to be seen as a Moderate and a Conservative. He is not an Ideologue like Obama, and he is “electable” because he is a known quantity. He has good business acumen, Obama has none. If he were pitted against Obama in debate, instead of McCain, he would have won handily. He can turn his experiment with healthcare into a positive. He has been there, done that and can lead the debate.
    Nominating anyone else will mean four more years of a Marxist Regime.

    • JSobieski

      but his strength as a candidate in a general election is way overrated.

      Romney’s current poll numbers are based on placeholder name recognition. There is no enthusiasm for him–his support is more shallow than with any other candidate. McCain actually had some die hard supporters (as annoying as those folks are).

  • Tbone

    I mean other than Romney being more liberal and having more hair?

    • JSobieski

      but I agree with you, Romney is close to the bottom of my list.

      The only two candidates who could get me to vote for Romney would be Huckabee or McCain.

  • thomasburkby

    Those who blast Romney for his departure (technically not a “loss”) from the 2008 primaries should remember that Ronald Reagan lost the nomination for president in 1976, but came back in 1980 to win the nomination and the presidency. Sometimes a person has to go through the experience once as a “shakedown cruise.”

    In the meantime, much of the public has wised up and has come to realize that the Presidency requires someone with more executive experience and acumen in the financial world that either John McCain or Obama possessed. A proposal to put another financial neophyte in the Oval Office, whether it’s Sarah Palin or Mike Huckabee, will do nothing to gain the confidence of the independent voters who provide the margin of victory in presidential elections. People are ready for a grownup like Romney to take the reins of the national CEO.

    Obamacare will not be an issue because repeal will be decided in the Senate after the 2012 elections. Romney realizes the critical need to shrink the size of the federal government and will sign a repeal bill immediately. The states can do what they want — that’s what federalism is all about.

    • JSobieski

      Obamacare will have to be a campaign issue if the Rs are to mobilize sufficient support in the Senate. Politics is dynamic. If the R presidential candidate doesn’t mention Obamacare during the campaign and campaign against Obamacare in 2012, the RINOs in the Senate will not repeal and no Ds will join in.

      Romney might not be such a bad President, but he is a terrible candidate. Moreover, he has a tendancy to pander in campaigns (see 2008 Michigan primary).

      Romney is not going to be the nominee.

      • silentcal2012

        So I don’t know why he wouldn’t mention it. Its a federalist matter at the national level anyway.

        While many think its a huge albatross, I think its an asset. No one uderstands tehe issue like Romney. He’d be like Paul Ryan, running cirlces around the press and Obama in debates. Plus, a blanket repeal looks unlikely as the Senate will not get 60 votes, but a smart CEO who understands it will know how to disembowel it piecemeal and make it unviable.

        • JSobieski

          Romney is the wrong guy to dismember it, in part because he believes in it.

          Why would a guy who says Romneycare is great for Mass want to dismember the national version of Romneycare.

          Many people understand health care better than Romney. If he understood health care better, he would never have defended Romneycare in the first place.

          He thinks Romneycare is good. If he knew healthcare better, he would say “Romneycare stinks, my apologies, but the Legislature gave me no choice”.

          The Romneycare model stinks at any level of government, be it federal, state, county, or city. It simply stinks.

          • silentcal2012

            He is committed to repeal. Its that simple. People can tie themselves into knots trying to avoid the truth, but he is committed to repeal. I thought conservatives believed in the Constitution and the 10th amendment anyway. Understanding that one size doesnt fit all is a reason he wants to repeal it. There were many dynamics of RomneyCare that people dont understand. The Mass legislature was going to pass a bill anyway. They simply overrode all his vetoes. The people wanted it and still support it.

          • Tbone

            Along with the guy who ran second in the straw poll. who did they survey, insane Democrats?

          • JSobieski

            So the nuanced, “its good at the state level but an attrocity at the federal level” is not going to be persuasive.

            If he said, “it stinks, but I did the best I can” he might have a chance.

            Instead, he defends it consistently.