« BACK  |  PRINT

RS

MEMBER DIARY

In Defense of Rick Santorum

Although I am not a member of the Santorum camp, I appreciate the tenacity he brought to the Republican primary.  As Dan McLaughlin mentioned earlier, Santorum trailed the GOP pack for most of the primary season.  When he won in Iowa, must of us wrote him off.  After all, he had no money and no national campaign staff.  Yet, despite the odds, Santorum continued the fight.  As of today he has won over 3 million votes and 11 states to become the dominate conservative alternative to Romney.  In the process, he has endured relentless attacks upon his character, his family, and his faith.  A quick google search of “Santorum” will reveal the level of filth directed at the man.  Until recently the top search result defined “Santorum” as a byproduct of anal sex.  Even some “conservatives” – scare quotes used intentionally – have resorted to the same level of filth.  Yet, Santorum persevered until the delegate count and the need to care for his daughter and family led him to exit the race today.

Conservatives owe a lot to Rick Santorum.  He succeeded where all the other non-Romneys failed and exposed the myth of Romney’s inevitability.  Many have made hay out of polls showing that Santorum faced a “humiliating” upset in his home state of Pennsylvania on April 24th.  The truth is that even a loss in Pennsylvania would not have been humiliating.  Humiliation is the fact that Romney can only secure the nomination through smear campaigns and massive ad buys that have often outgunned his opponents 15 to 1.  Humiliation is the fact that Romney has been running for the GOP nomination since 2006 and a upstart candidate with no name recognition, no money, and no national campaign organization actually bested him in so many states including his adopted home of Michigan.  Rick Santorum has demonstrated Romney’s weakness with the conservative base.  If Romney is smart, he will move to correct that problem.  If not, then say hello to four more years of Obama.

Some “conservatives” have even suffered from Santorum derangement syndrome or SDS.  The very mention of his name sends them into fits and convulsions.  Resolutely they declare Santorum to be beyond the pale and state their willingness to back Ron Paul over a Santorum nomination.  In their more lucid moments they boldly claim that Santorum is a pro-life statist and not a true fiscal conservative.  While Santorum has faltered in his fiscal conservatism, he has at least remained true to his social conservative values, which is a heck of a lot more than one can say of Mitt ”all my principles are negotiable” Romney.  Santorum admits to mistakes as a Senator during the Bush years and promised to hold the fiscal line as president, which is more than Mitt Romney has done. Santorum has never given cause to question his promise to repeal Obamacare, which is more than Mitt Romney has done.  Santorum may not have been the true Reagan conservative but he is a lot closer to it than either Romney or Paul.

Mr. Santorum has my thanks and respect for a well waged campaign against overwhelming odds.  My prayers are with him, his family, and especially his daughter.

COMMENTS

  • mikeymike143

    :)

    • kipling

      nt

    • briteness

      Are we supposed to be impressed by your position and your opposition to Ron Paul?

      Ain’t workin’…

      • http://impudent.edublogs.org/ kyle8

        ran over his dog.

  • aesthete

    about Santorum’s policies or campaign, but he did have a certain tenacity about him that is laudable.

    Barring a miracle, it’s very likely that his sick daughter will not survive her medical condition — it’s a miracle that she has survived for so long. Spending Easter by the side of your dying child puts things in perspective, and undoubtedly played a role in Santorum’s decision to withdraw. I hope that those who would be inclined to tear down Santorum at this point, or who would excoriate him for leaving them with no Romney alternative, will keep this in mind when writing.

    • Melody Warbington (rwm52)

      There’s certainly no need to kick a man when he’s down, although it appears some are willing to do just that. It serves no purpose and will only alienate Senator Santorum’s supporters.

  • https://www.facebook.com/HanoverHenry hanoverhenry

    …and the same sort of folk went nutty over Reagan too. Reading such attacks made me think I’d accidentally stumbled into the Media Matters or Daily Kos page where they speak the same way about the most outspoken conservatives. Appreciate your article, very “fair and balanced” on SDS, but it is more accurately CDS since they always speak so about whomever is the “conservative target of the month”.

    My take on the same subject from yesterday: http://www.redstate.com/hanoverhenry/2012/04/11/should-romney-appeal-to-santorum-voters-or-copy-ford-1976-strategy-vs-reagan/

    • acat

      then I suggest cleaning your spectacles.

      Mew

  • jeffreywturner

    It wasn’t so much the delegate count, as it was the dollar count that forced Rick Santorum to pack it in at this point.

    Also important to note, in the 2 most critical losses Santorum had, Romney beat him by a margin that was less than half of the anti-Romney votes that went to Gingrich. Anyone who says that Gingrich’s presence on the ballot did not prevent Santorum from winning is simply not being intellectually honest. Maybe you think its a good thing, and that’s fine. But just know there is no way Santorum loses those states head-to-head with Romney. Mitt Romney knows it, and his supporters should not deny it.

  • Pingback: Heriberto Woolwine

  • Pingback: Brady Twyman

  • Pingback: Hien Jou

  • Scope

    I appreciate you writing this diary. I didn’t start out supporting Santorum, though there were things that I liked about some of his positions from early on. One thing no one can take away from him was that he was a hard worker. He accomplished much with little money, little staff, and little name recognition. He truly was the definition of a “dark horse.”

    I’m unhappy with the now all but guaranteed nominee Romney, but I can’t say I am surprised at all. The Republicans still haven’t broken the bad habit of doing the same thing over and over, and always hoping for a different outcome. It is what it is, but the thoughts of 4 more years of Obama gives me night sweats and then some.

  • kipling

    I am not sure the United States can survive four more years of Obama.

  • acat

    While you know I disagreed with Santorum’s positions, I do respect how far he got…

    I’m also not happy with Nominee Romney, and although I’d argue it is conservatives, not the larger group republicans, who should shoulder the blame, I definitely agree that this is a case of insanity .. doing the same thing, expecting different results.

    Four more years of Obama is not acceptable… so we’re just going to have to make Romney work… whether he likes it or not!

    Mew