RCP article CNN Versus the Tea Parties does an excellent job in explaining why so many in the middle class don’t like Washington’s big spending. The argument about taxes often devolves into condescending remarks from the left stating that these people obviously don’t realize that their taxes will not go up. This is then followed by rather useless statements from the right trying to drum up sympathy for the wealthy who pay a much higher percentage of taxes. Both sides miss two key point; trust and math. What many of the Tea Party participants were saying to the government was,
‘I don’t trust you with my money.’
‘Who will pay for this trillion dollar deficit?’
‘How does this colosal debt really help the country and the economy in the long run?’
‘How will you avoid massive inflation if you keep spending at this rate?’
Fairness arguments fall flat, because life’s not fair, and trying to convince people that the wealthy have a raw deal will not engender much sympathy. ‘What works,’ would be a much better tact for fiscal conservatives, as the Tea Parties showed many people do not feel that reckless government spending ‘works.’
What Ms. Roesgen and others like her do not understand is that some people are interested in more than their own narrow self-interest. Perhaps the protestor she interviewed, who was holding his 2-year-old son, is eligible for a tax rebate. And perhaps his state will get a juicy piece of the stimulus money. It is possible, just possible, that such a bribe does not influence him. Perhaps it doesn’t buy his support because he is skeptical that his taxes can remain low when the federal government is embarked on a record-shattering spending spree. He may be offended by the bailout culture, and worried that the obligations of taxpayers cannot remain low when it seems that every irresponsible borrower, failed car company, and free spending state is being rescued by the federal government. Additionally, he may be dubious that the government will spend the money wisely. It has been rumored that government spending has produced waste, fraud, inefficiency, and corruption. But he also may simply believe that engorging the government and enfeebling the private sector — no matter who is writing the checks — is not good for the economic or spiritual health of the country.
Neil Stevens
Steve Maley
If only Republicans would pay attention to this message...
JadedByPolitics (Diary) Saturday, April 18th at 6:04PM EST (link)IT WASN’T about taxes per se it was about Washington and the way those taxes are being SPENT….WE don’t TRUST the government to do the RIGHT thing….WE don’t want the government like a bedbug engorged on our sweat and blood! WE want the government to STOP the big social programs there is NO NEED to give money to Planned Parenthood for example that business made 1 Billion dollars last year….there is NO REASON to fund ACORN, there is NO REASON to give money to AIG, GM, Chrysler etc…..let them FAIL that is how business works when you live in a Republic!
Nothing and Nobody are too big to fail!
Unified Patriots – How-To:
Activists Taking Action
agreed Jaded, but I am disappointed in the failure of Armey this AM on MTP
Mike gamecock DeVine (Diary) Sunday, April 19th at 12:09PM EST (link)and other conservatives confronting this lib meme about Obama’s promise to cut taxes for 95% of Americans and or those earning under $250K, to respond with a more specific refutation of this lie than just the inpending auto repeal of the Bush tax cuts; the inevitability of tax increases to pay for the massive govt spending and even the fact (which Armey did say) that borrowing money and printing money especially has an effect that can be even worse than tax hikes
and that is
that Obama does propose a massive tax increase on all Americans, and one that is especially onerous to the poor and lower and middle income families, and that is
the carbon tax that will raise gasoline and power/heating bills and could bankrupt the coal industry.
If they can’t get it thru Congress they will impose it via EPA regs that define what we breathe out to be “pollution.”
Mike DeVine’s Examiner.com, Charlotte Observer and The Minority Report columns
“One man with courage makes a majority.” – Andrew Jackson
It isn't just the carbon tax GC WE ALL KNOW our taxes...
JadedByPolitics (Diary) Sunday, April 19th at 12:32PM EST (link)MUST go up to pay the interest on the debt that has been created in the past year! ANYONE with their thinking cap on is quite aware of the kabuki theatre that is being played upon the American people!
Unified Patriots – How-To:
Activists Taking Action
Don't forget socialized health care, if it passes
TNJim (Diary) Sunday, April 19th at 12:47PM EST (link)which it will, I’m afraid. Also, to me, anything the government does that causes us to pay more is a tax, of sorts, whether it directly or indirectly goes to the government. For example, the higher prices we’ll have to pay for goods and services as a result of higher taxes providers of those goods and services will have to pay. Also, having to buy the more expensive CFL bulbs as opposed to tungsten bulbs, to me, is a tax, because of the government mandate (has that passed, btw? A friend said he went to Home Depot to get some vanity mirror bulbs just last week and a HD associate told him tungsten bulbs would not be available after next year. Probably hidden in the unread porkulus bill).
I’ve said it before, there is NO middle class tax cut!
duh Jaded, like I said...
Mike gamecock DeVine (Diary) Sunday, April 19th at 2:14PM EST (link)….the inevitability of tax increases to pay for the massive govt spending and even the fact (which Armey did say) that borrowing money and printing money especially has an effect that can be even worse than tax hikes
amen
Mike DeVine’s Examiner.com, Charlotte Observer and The Minority Report columns
“One man with courage makes a majority.” – Andrew Jackson
Excellent points...
kmorrison (Diary) Wednesday, April 22nd at 11:21AM EST (link)on the reality that energy costs will essentially be a tax for everyone, and that the protests are also about how money is spent. That actually points out why the ‘it’s not fair argument’ is just not the best tact to take, there are much stronger arguments for fiscal conservatives.