« BACK  |  PRINT

RS

MEMBER DIARY

2nd Amendment Supporters Under Fee Siege in MA

Who could have guessed?

[Update: The bill has been assigned a number and is headed to committee. See the update from the NRA-ILA here.]

When the Supreme Court handed down its decision in D.C. vs. Heller, one of the first people to speak out against the ruling was Chicago mayor Richard Daley, who stated flatly that he was going to raise taxes in response. It’s worth talking about the fact that the sales tax in Chicago is already so outrageous, but that’s another discussion.

[Update: I partially misquoted Daley. Actually he said:

"If the result of this ruling is more guns on the street it's going to make it more challenging for law enforcement," Daley said, predicting an end to Chicago's handgun ban would spark new violence and force the city to raise taxes to pay for new police.

Emphasis mine. Deval Patrick isn't waiting for the if. He's just going to do it, because his state is strapped for cash and he needs a new victim.]

When Richard Daley speaks, the rest of the liberals listen and fall in line. Yesterday Governor Deval Patrick (D – Clinton) filed a special appropriations bill that drastically raises the fees on firearms dealers and licensees in Massachusetts. If passed, the new legislation will raise the fees for a dealer license in Massachusetts by 350%, increase the 6-year License to Carry fee by 100%, and increase the yearly non-resident LTC fee by 150%. Massachusetts is in such bad shape financially that Patrick doesn’t have the option to raise taxes on everyone in the state just because of D.C. vs. Heller, so what he’s doing instead is to take a spiked pipe to the heads of everyone in Massachusetts that sells guns, owns them, or wants to. Even if all they want to do is move here, or simply possess a license to own one.

From the NRA-ILA:

Sections 24 & 25 will increase state licensed firearm dealer’s fees from $100 for three years to $250. Then within that three-year period, licensed dealers will be charged an additional $100 inspection fee per year. This tactic would turn a $100 three-year dealer’s license into a $450 three-year license.

Section 26 would increase a resident License to Carry fee from $100 for six years to $200 for six years and Section 27 would increase a non-resident License to Carry fee from $100 for one year to $250 for one year.

As is par for the course in Massachusetts, these fee increases are purely punitive, completely arbitrary and ideologically motivated. There’s not much anyone who doesn’t live in MA can do to prevent these measures from being voted into law, but people elsewhere should be on alert that if it passes here in MA, similar measures are on the way in your home state.

The D.C. vs. Heller decision is rapidly evolving into another excuse for cash-strapped state governments (and just plain anti-gun state governments) run by Democrats to take another whack at their favorite victims. Obviously if you live in Massachusetts you should be contacting your representatives, and if you don’t, I’d like to reiterate:

Defend Liberty — Join the NRA | Live in Massachusetts? Join GOAL.

COMMENTS

  • gamecock

    later

    • kowalski

      Don’t take it personally: it’s just that whenever I talk about Massachusetts and the nutbag way this state is run, I get the usual response, which is some version of: “why don’t you move out of that crazy place?”

      Well, there are a lot of reasons why. The first reason is that I actually like where I live in Massachusetts. My family lives here, we’re starting a business here and we’re pouring our heart and souls (and all of our money) into starting one here. It’s a very pretty place with a great mix of people and I intend to keep it that way so that people 200 years from now will still find it just as beautiful as it was when my parents found it.

      The fact that Governor Deval Patrick is such an idiot and that a lot of people in this state are so used to being pushed around by the Democrat machine isn’t a reason for me to want to pack up and move: it’s a reason to stand up and tell people that they don’t have to take it any more, and shouldn’t. The Northeast in this country is the cradle of our freedom, and it’s a beautiful place to live. It’s expensive and backward because we’ve let so many people who listen to the crazy rantings of people like Da Mayor get their way, all the time, every time. For no good reason. It’s time it stopped, and I’m not moving, because as you note: all that happens when you teach people to live stupidly is that they go someplace else and live stupidly.

      I’m not into exporting stupidity and that means cutting it off at the source. :)

      • David_Hinz

        I planned on taking the safety course from GOAL this upcoming August, now from the time I complete this course to the time I file for my FID card, could this bill be signed into law?

  • jwebb

    There is no way that there are enough dealers and CCL holders in MA to seriously make a difference in revenue at these tax rates. It is obviously being done as a selective punishment for some state-perceived misbehavior by the uppity citizens. If revenue was the real reason, they could just tax each car $1/yr and make much more…or put a $0.05 tax on each mass transit trip. Or trim some spending (heresy!)

    As for leaving the state due to a lefty political climate, I would advocate just the opposite. Encourage like-minded conservatives to settle there and eventually, district by district sanity can be restored. Every state has somuch to offer in terms of natural beauty, business opportunity, etc., we shouldn’t give up so easily.

    • NightTwister

      -nt-

      • Joe_Schmo

        But you didn’t bring a bunch of liberal baggage with ya…

  • Joe_Schmo

    … which is fine by me as long as they don’t bring their cockamamy liberal nonsense with them as is happening in Colorado and Arizona. Californians, who have screwed up their state to a fair-thee-well, are moving in droves to other Western states and bringing their liberal nonsense with them.

  • kowalski

    I’m getting peeved with this answer and the rationale it’s based on. Uprooting your family and your home and business to move south because northeasten (and other Democrat) states are ideologically and fiscally craven isn’t an option for a lot of people, and nobody should be forced to move from where they live because their state government is so blinkered. The answer is to stand and fight, not turn and run.

    If we’re going to continue to let Democrats push people around by doing things like this, we deserve the kind of country we get.

  • The_Fastest_Squirrel

    Naked gun-control. That is a lot of money for just being able to carry.

  • jsteele

    … calm down, just a suggestion. If enough people and businesses abandon liberal run states then the pain will get to be untenable and maybe the rest of the people will get the idea. If not they can continue to stew in theirown juices.

  • jsteele

    … but you might find this item interesting.

  • simpson316

    The liberals in this state (being MA) are out of control. This bill, if passed, will place an undue burden upon myself and other people who live in MA, but don’t have a huge amount of disposable income to pay for the licensing. This is a constitutional right explicitly guaranteed to me and it’s being hijacked, it is akin to the poll taxes for voting. Meanwhile, they will provide financial assistance to women who want abortions which isn’t even mentioned in the Constitution. My blood is boiling…

  • kowalski

    This is happening on an EMERGENCY basis from the Governor, which tells me that it could very well be passed by August.

    From the legislation:

    Whereas, The deferred operation of this act would tend to defeat its purposes, which are forthwith to make supplemental appropriations for fiscal year 2008 and to make certain changes in law, each of which is immediately necessary to carry out those appropriations or to accomplish other important public purposes, therefore it is hereby declared to be an emergency law, necessary for the immediate preservation of the public convenience.

    I am trying to ascertain right now when this will come up for a vote and I’ll know certainly by tomorrow. In the meantime, my answer is: “Yes.”

    My best advice is to complete the course as quickly as possible and file for the license within the next few days, while the current filing fee is still in effect.

    I will update this thread tomorrow with more concrete information on when it’s coming to a vote.

  • kowalski

    My advice is to call GOAL tomorrow and find out about the closest FID course you can take. Then submit the application with the existing fee. Patrick wants this legislation passed ASAP before anyone has the chance to object to it.

  • speciallist

    And another piece of my best advice is to find the course fee immediately, take the course, and immediately present your application if you pass. If you need help in that I still think the best source of information in this state is GOAL.

    I don’t know when this emergency supplemental is going to arrive in the state house for a vote, but I will know that by tomorrow. Regardless of when it does, I expect given the demographics of Massachusetts that these fee increases will pass. So get moving.

  • Joe_Schmo

    Is not from me. Looks like some bugs with the new Redstate.

    Just for the record Kowalski, this isn’t my comment and I don’t agree with it.

  • kowalski

    The bill has received a number and is on its way to committee. See the press release from the NRA-ILA here:

    Yesterday, the Governor’s appropriations bill was assigned a number H.4971 and was referred to the House Committee on Ways & Means. As reported earlier this week, sections 24-27 will drastically increase certain firearm license fees.