« BACK  |  PRINT

RS

MEMBER DIARY

What Should We Do?

Unless we can somehow dissuade the votes of two or three Republican senators, it looks like the government of Nancy Pelosi, Harry Reid and the Left in America is going to get its wish to waste $800 billion dollars of taxpayer money on a stimulus package that the Congressional Budget Office says will actually damage the economy in the long run. The Democrat-controlled Congress is going to pass a bill that implements their vision of the way economics should work, regardless of the fact that it manifestly flies in the face of economic reality.

So what can we do if that comes to pass? I think it counts as a national disaster, personally — but at least we have one advantage: we know the exact parameters of the disaster being perpetrated on us, and we know who is responsible for it, and we know where the money will be going. For the next several years, it will be our task to track that money and the manifold consequences of having spent it this way, and we must make all of those consequences crystal clear to the voters in 2010 and 2012.

That shouldn’t be very difficult because this bill is not an “economic recovery package” nor is it an “economic stimulus plan” in its current form: it is a combination of a political victory for the incoming President and a sop to the people who elected him. It’s taking $800 billion dollars and handing it to the people who got Barack Obama elected, pure and simple. It’s a payoff designed to expand the size of government. Much of it will be wasted. A great deal of it will be put to work on projects and programs that have nothing to do with economic growth, but instead are on the list because they’re ideological pet projects of the people who passed it. In other words, it is a piece of crap, not economic leadership. It’s not Change; it’s the biggest piece of The Same that ever made it out of Congress.

If the Republican Party intends to regain and retain credibility with the voters, two things have to be done in almost equal measure: The first is to continually emphasize and explain how the contents of this massive expulsion of federal money does have and will continue to have deleterious effects on America’s long term economic competitiveness. The second is to reacquaint Americans with the facts of what is really needed in order to revitalize the economy and show them why the Democrats’ ideas are the antithesis of an economic recovery plan.

Republicans need to immediately convene a summit in which they create a platform for economic recovery based on economic principles, to be used as the bedrock foundation of the 2010 and 2012 election campaigns by our candidates. We need to bring together the best economic and business minds in the country — from industry, academia and think tanks and foundations, to create a new Contract with America based on sound economic principles. It should not be advertised and promoted or organized as a political gathering: it must be an event focused on economics that can educate and inform politicians and the public in advance of the electoral campaigns that are coming. We have to put the big egos aside here: it shouldn’t be a vehicle to promote any single politician. Instead, for the good of this great country and the American people, it must be an event with a purpose: to create a platform for real economic recovery, and to educate the American public as well as assist anyone — from either party — running for office in America.

I’m very sad that this government-growth and profligate-spending bill seems likely to pass Congress and be signed into law by a President who clenches his fist and dismisses people with the callow demeanor of someone who is clearly in over his head, but cannot own up to that. I’m not a vengeful person, either: instead, I believe in allowing people to learn from their own mistakes. I believe that any sense of “victory” or “achievement” Barack Obama gets from signing this monstrosity into law will be short-lived, as people in his own party begin to suffer from the backlash they will deserve for creating a piece of bad legislation that spends this much money, while paying lip service to economic reality and doing long-term damage to our future.

However, I am in favor of sending a message of disapproval to people in our own party. I’d like to request that Redstate take some donations to send the largest versions of these three posters and/or desktoppers to Senators Collins, Snowe and Specter:

Dysfunction, Government, and Disloyalty. Maybe Irresponsibility, too. Redstate should take up a collection, the total should be under $250, and it would be the best message these three could get to honor their recent non-contributions.

Some people might retort that they could send back Blogging, but it would be a Parthian shot.

Let’s call it the “Republican Four R Initiative:”

“Regain, Retain, Respond, Renew”

1) Regain the trust of the American people by demonstrating the consquences of bad policy decisions.
2) Retain the good will of those voters by consistently emphasizing policy alternatives that are grounded in economic reality.
3) Respond to the Democrats not by emulating them, but by differing pointedly with them based on our principles and the ideas that Americans know in their bones are right.
4) Renew the Republican party by cleaning our own house and bringing new faces and new leadership to the fore.

COMMENTS

  • Rod_Patrick

    Here’s the WND article:

    http://www.worldnetdaily.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=88218

    In summary, lawmakers in Eight (8) states have introduced resolution declaring state sovereignty in defense to the resulting National Debt of Obama’s Porkhulus Bill.

    Seems to me that this Porkhulus Bill of the One is causing some unrest to the peace of the Union.

    What’s your take?

    • Rod_Patrick

      Won’t do it again.

    • Kowalski

      It really needs to be all 50, but eight is a good first step. If you look at this “stimulus” bill, the first thing that should strike anyone who isn’t accustomed to looking at federal spending is just how deeply the government has inveigled itself in state and local issues. In fact, that’s the major purpose of this spending program:

      The states are strapped and they’re ceding power to the federal government not just in terms of funding but also control over their own programs, their own budgets. They’re doing it willingly in this case because the politicians in states with badly broken budgets don’t want to have to go before the voters and explain how they got this way: they want the population of the United States to assume a large proportion of the responsibility for thier bad decisions. In order to do that, they have to spend a vast amount of money at the federal level.

      The trend will never be reversed if people think that way. Anyone who tells you otherwise is lying to you. The cash-strapped states and all those cash-strapped legislators just cannot stand to go before the voters and say: “We’re broke.” So they’re going to rely on the federal government to give them the money to make their budgets, and then next year they’re going to do even more, and even worse. That’s why this bill is such an awful idea: it’s Federalism in precise reverse, among many other things.

      The Federal Government with this bill is crossing a very serious line by asking people in so many states to pay for the expenditures being undertaken in others.

      • Kowalski

        He has the popularity to stand up in front of the American people right now and say:

        “In a time of national emergency, fiscal restraint needs to be our most important priority. It’s important that everyone realize that spending this kind of money at the federal level is not the answer to America’s problems in the way it is being proposed. We as a nation are in a crisis and I’m asking Americans instead to buckle down and tighten their belts. We’re going to work to provide emergency relief at the federal level, but states must respond to an economic downturn by reducing their budgets.”

        It’s the exact antithesis of what he’s doing. Instead he’s frightening people into coughing up 800 billion dollars to fund the growth of the federal government.

        • Kowalski

          I use it because it’s appropriate.

          Barack Obama could be doing much, much more to encourage long-term economic recovery in this country: he could be talking instead about states reducing their budgets. He could be talking about real education reform. He could be talking about depreciation schedules for capital investment. He could be talking about how, if America is to recover from this debacle, it will have to do exactly what Philip Greenspun said in the article I link to above:

          Precious little business investment is going forward worldwide. The only chance for the United States to recover is if we can capture most of this investment. How can we do that? We would have to convince businesses that this is the best country in the world in which to invest and operate.

          What we need to promise:

          At a minimum, here are the things that we need to promise business managers:

          world’s lowest percentage of GDP (among developed nations) spent on government; only with a low spend will investors have faith that taxes will stay low

          corporate governance that relieves investors from worry that profits will be siphoned off by management

          flexible capital expense depreciation schedule so that a company doesn’t have to pay taxes when it is cashflow-negative

          world’s best school system and best educated workers

          world’s cheapest transportation system and one that is virtually free from uncertainty caused by congestion

          predictable product liability system

          less labor market regulation

          immigration that encourages high earners

          Those are the most important things that will allow the American economy to recover. Not much (if anything) like that exists in this $800 billion dollar+ “stimulus” bill. In the meantime, Obama is about to go on a whistlestop tour selling his version of economics, and three or four of our Senators are too weak to do anything but capitulate. But his failure to address these problems with real leadership gives the Republican Party a tremendous opportunity to do so. Assuming there’s much left to talk about by 2010.

          It’s going to be difficult, folks. It’s not going to be the path of least resistance. But if we really want to return America to some kind of fiscal sanity in the eyes of the rest of the world, and more importantly in the eyes of people who might want to invest and run businesses here, that’s what we must do. Obama isn’t going to do it.

          • Rod_Patrick

            Geez, what can I say? It’s a damn good analysis.

            And I agree with you 100% on this.

            Now I have become a major supporter of greater “state independence” from the federal government.

            For the sake of us all, I pray that Obama see the light by starting to work as President for All Americans, and by throwing most of his partisan antics under the bus.

          • Kowalski

            And I appreciate the compliment. My belief is that America can and will recover if our new President gets the policy right and puts the politics second. I think he’s doing too little of the former, in an echo of Rod Blagojevich in Illinois.

            We know where that led. Everyone in Illinois regardless of political party got burned.

            Obama has a really enormous opporunity here: it’s his to squander. He’s probably the most popular new President in the last 100 years. If he decided to stand up and make his case for a real economic recovery in America, he could do it. Maybe he will.

            So far, I don’t see the evidence that he’s going to.

          • Freedomlover

            And you can be certain he’ll squander it. Our hope is that he will do it so dramatically that his Congressional domination will be erased in 2010.

          • rbdwiggins
      • 6eorge Jetson

        Have you ever been to a multi-table group dinner in which it’s known beforehand that the tab will be split equally? No one orders the hamburger, do they? Why would they when it has a trivial effect on their saving but a large reduction in consumption?

        • Sunnie57

          Great point!

  • Finrod

    I definitely don’t want to hijack this thread into Yet Another FairTax Discussion, but I would like to note that the FairTax was written by economists to be as pro-economic growth and as economically efficient as possible.

  • Susannah

    Recommended. :-)

    • http://hillbillypolitics.com Steph C

      nt

  • bk

    for helping Specter edge out Toomey in 2004. We know for darn sure Toomey would not have been swayed here.

    • olsmithie

      I send donations directly to candidates instead of the Rep Senatorial Committee. If I wanted to support liberals Iwould send my money to liberals.

      Nice article K.

      Regards

  • smagar

    Off the top of my head:

    1) The GOP Senate can use parliamentary tactics to stall most votes. Apparently, Sec Treasury Geleitner is now delaying the unveiling of the second round of TARP payments, until after the cloture vote on Porkulus. Geleitner knows the American people will flip once they’re told of the next round of bank spending—so the Dems want to have the stimulus bill off the front pages by then. If I understand this correctly, the GOP Senate has a number of parliamentary tactics at its disposal, to drag this out, and thus allow more sunshine to fall on this pig of a bill.

    2) This week’s vote in the Senate isn’t the last word, The bill then has to go to conference, and then be voted on again in the Senate before it can be signed.

    If we are willing for Team Mitch (as in McConnell) to throw a monkey works into the gears of the Senate—and I’m for it; I’m pretty sure my 20 month old son can’t afford his share of Porkulus—we need to start calling our GOP Senators now.

    I really think we can kill this thing, if we’re willing to fight ugly. If it means we can save several hundred billion dollars, I’m all for fighting ugly. I’m not willing to pay $780 billion dollars to keep Chuck Schumer happy; are you?

    • bk

      Is there much delaying you can use when it comes out of conference committee? Does everything start over again, i.e. you can try to filibuster and delay, or are the rules more limited than usual?

      Like you say, the more people see of it the less they like it, so we can see if public opinion mounts and puts any pressure on any of these guys.

  • Hancock

    All due respect to the excellent outside-of-the-Beltway and communications ideas presented above, which should be pursued, the sad fact of the matter is that inside Congress, there is NOTHING that can be done at this point.

    The game ended when Benedict Arlen and the Maine Sisters voted with the Democrats to end the filibuster. The bill will pass the Senate, then go to conference, where it will get refilled with even more outrageous provisions, including vastly increased spending, and probalby more of the socialized medicine precursors, along with heaven knows what else, and then come back to the House and Senate for an up or down vote.

    The bad news is that you cannot filibuster a conference report. It needs only a bare majority in both the House and Senate. The Dems only need 50 votes to pass the thing now, so what Benedict Arlen and the Maine sisters think is immaterial. The Democrats can go back on every promise made to them, Ben Nelson, or anyone else, and conceivably push the bill to 2 trillion or more if they want. There is nothing the 3 traitorous RINOs can do to stop it, nor the ‘Fake Dog’ Democrats in the House or Senate. They will pass this monstrosity into law with 50 liberal votes in the Senate and 218 House leftists. GAME OVER.

    The worst part of this is that Benedict Arlen and the Maine Sisters, as well as Nelson, know this and still allowed the bill to go forward. They are playing a game, voting for the ‘compromise’, knowing the bill will be rewritten, and then for cosmetics for the voters back home, they will vote against final passage and claim betrayal by the liberals, when they fully well know that their vote on final doesn’t matter and it was the vote to end the filibuster and proceed with the debate was really the key one.

    All the other good ideas aside, the only thing that stops this from becoming law now is 10 million Americans marching on DC with torches and pitchforks.

    Otherwise, be ready, the United Socialist States of America has been born.