« BACK  |  PRINT

RS

MEMBER DIARY

Ok I’m all done being angry at Neil

Sorry, everyone for the kerfuffle.  I was pretty steamed at Neil the other night for summarily de[publishing] my post that (really, truthfully) broke the message that Marco Rubio had endorsed Romney.  I understand why he de[published] it – it was too short, it wasn’t much of a post, and it violated the posting rules as such.  At the same time I was upset because I took a bit of “artistic license” with that post and I *intended* it to be very, very short and then talk more about it in the *comments*.  Also if Neil had just asked me either publicly or privately to expand upon it  a little, he knows I revise my diary entries and I would have absolutely done so.

I was ticked, burned, discombobulated, singed, crisped off, hacked off, pi**ed off and generally not in a good mood that he summarily de[published] me.  I took a day off and I forgive him :) .

Now, we really need to get back to talking about the serious things we’ve got ahead of us in this election cycle.  The facts are that now, both Marco Rubio and Paul Ryan have endorsed Romney and I consider his status as the nominee to be a fait accompli.  I also want to say that I like the way Marco Rubio thinks and when I see him on television, I just really think he’s a terrific person and one of the brighest stars we have.  He is potentially a Great Man and I mean that in the  profound sense of the term.  Redstate was *absolultely correct* to have supported him so strongly.  I can tell by watching him and listening to him that he and I would have great conversations based on the way our minds work.  I think that’s why he endorsed Romney, in the end.   I support him 110%.   He’s a great person. 

I was angry at being summarily de[published].  It wasn’t necessary, but I’m over it.  I won’t make the same mistake again and Neil won’t have to de[publish] me again, even though he really shouldn’t have felt he had to in the first place.  Let’s get one thing straight:  whenever I post a diary entry, I’m online – I’m logged into Redstate and also Gmail.  I don’t post from a Blackberry or a mobile device and even if Neil had just given me a warning in the thread that would have almost instantly sufficed to have me flesh it out a little more.  Instead he just [depublished] my post.  OK.  Maybe he was in a “[depublishing] mood.”  I forgive him.

Moreover anyone who knows me understands that when I write something, I usually go back and add several explanatory and/or exculpatory sentences and paragraphs after the fact.  I am bittersweet about Rubio supporting Romney but bittersweet it is.  The Sweet part is that I had a longstanding belief that Romney was eventually going to move the mountains to get the endorsements and the money, and the Bitter part is that none of our other candidates really rose to the level to challenge him effectively.   But it’s OVER.  In my mind at least.  And thank God, because now I can concentrate on some other things Redstaters might actually *agree* on.  Let’s not let Atavism turn into Onanism and mentally masturbate our way to defeat, here. 

Let’s move forward from here.   We have lots of big fish to fry, even bigger than the big Sturgeon carcass that washed up on the beach in North Carolina, and the last thing we need right now is more rancor and disunity.  As Peggy Noonan said today, it’s ours to lose ”virtual sigh”.  And she was much more charitable about Obama being “creepy” than I would have been, but mine is not to rewrite the columns of WSJ contributors.  I love her even though I disagree with her all the time.   One good thing about that column today is that she’s really got ahold of a strong *feeling* about Obama that I think is starting to take hold even among his former supporters, and with a lot of good reason.  He should have stuck with the Assistant Professorship, frankly.  But all of us know that wasn’t The Plan, Stan.

So let’s not lose, shall we?

We don’t need any more of our own circular firing squads.  Obama’s campaign is the Lonely Sinking Feeling and the most important thing we need to do is not screw up much more.  Let’s have a little solidarity here, people!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-My2AkcZeE4

 

Get Alerts

COMMENTS

  • Viet71

    Post here your thoughts.

  • http://www.hakubi.us/ Neil Stevens

    I didn’t even delete it. I just unpublished it.

    But glad you’re ready to get back to beating the Democrats. :)

    • kowalski

      Romney is a big “if” for me and for all the reasons but believe me we need to do what we can, as a party, as a group, to fight hard now through election day and emerge in good shape. I’m In. :)

    • kowalski

      Neil’s correct, he just “unpublished” it. It’s still in my private list of WordPress documents. Frankly I didn’t even check after it disappeared, that’s how cheesed off I was.

      I don’t have any intention of republishing it now, it’s very old news at this point, and yeah, in its initial form it did violate the posting rules.

    • http://www.examiner.com/x-1597-Charlotte-Law--Politics-Examiner Mike gamecock DeVine

      that we must reserve the right to be angry at Neil!
      Freedom! smile

      But seriously kowalski, when you only write two sentences we are concerned about your health! Your name means curiously long and bifurcated posts!
      God bless…

  • earlgrey

    resolved in a healthy way.

  • westcoastpatriette

    Glad you didn’t stay gone long as I am one who enjoys reading your thoughts and only now and then do I really disagree with you.

    With respect to urging everyone to accept Rubio’s endorsement of Romney and get over the resentment, frustration and flat out fury over being mostly ignored or worse — despised by the status quo in our own party — while I understand the sentiment, I just have to say let people go through their own process of coming to terms with it. Just like we had to let you stew over your diary being rejected, and we were, in the end, powerless to change your mind, we need to respect peoples’ need to get over the many betrayals and disgusting behavior of Romney in this campaign in order to get in line so to speak.

    Personally, I was disappointed with Rubio and his decision to endorse Romney (after saying he would not endorse at all) has left a bad taste in my mouth for the time being. And I question his willingness to risk his reputation at this point to support someone so many conservatives despise. Smell bad to me.

    I think most of us are pretty numb from watching Romney bully and buy his way to the nomination and the inner party discord is not going to disappear no matter how much we hate Obama. Bottom line, this primary has shown us how disgustingly corrupt our own party is. Not much to feel good about right now. And I have no answers for how to bring us together.

    • kowalski

      And I’m not going to try to stop anyone in a serious way from being upset about it but I will say this:

      You can be sure Romney wants the job. He wants it a lot – and now our task is to make sure he listens to us when he gets it. I think that can be done, and I think we need to end the sniping before the Spring so we can start building the war chest we need to get into this convention on a positive note and have some clear heads about who we’re going to be supporting in the Congress.

      • elayman

        Everybody across the board is apathetic because nobody?s satisfied and there are no real choices. The best way to frame it may be to hope that Republicans and conservative leaning Independents will be slightly more likely than Democrats to feel enthusiastic for Romney v. Obama. Although in personal terms it is going to probably take me until the first week of November to decide whether to even vote at all.

        • kowalski

          I think there are a lot of really important reasons not to be apathetic.

          OK the big cold water on most people this time around is that we’ve got a lackluster set of candidates. But there’s a lot more at stake! We’ve got the House and the Senate and all of the appointments of federal judges and also federal appointees for the next four years at stake.

          Those things are really huge, elayman. I don’t have to “frame” things to tell people what they already know: the Presidential power to appoint judges and select so many other people who populate the federal government is — all by itself — a reason not to be apathetic.

          You can be agnostic on Romney and still be enthusiastic about the rest. This election is much more imporatant than just the Presidency.

          People really should take all their “apathy” and shove it into a the little box that makes up 1/4th (or really 1/5th or 1/6th) of what is really at stake.

      • Filibuster Keaton

        He wants it as much as Gore did. That’s precisely the problem. There’s nothing creepier than someone who’ll sell out everyone on everything because he believes he’s that entitled to what he wants.

      • Flagstaff

        “Romney wants the job.” Seems to have been missed by many that he is spending a lot of his own money, and it is NOT just so he can make more (as is the case with the D occupants of 1600). He DOES have a mission.

        I think that was what Rush was getting at.

        Re: Noonan. “Devious” and “dishonest” That is the first time I’ve read that kind of description about Obie from anybody on the “fair right.” Maybe there is some hope for accurate reporting down the stretch this time.

        Paul Ryan looked very comfortable sitting next to Mitt in that interview. And I agree about Rubio. A great person. I wish I knew him personally.

    • gracie

      Romney and the establishment have sure shown us! They do not respect the opinion of conservatives or the Tea Party. They have done it without us and now owe us…NOTHING!

      So not only is it hard to get over the grief and get in line I have no confidence Kowalski that we can “keep Romney in line.” Oh I would love to think he respects us and cares about our opinion but he has shown he does not. Furthermore although we do not have personal scandals to worry about what about worrying about his integrity? His core? What is his compass?

      Somebody tell me how we can trust him enough to support him for President? I didnt say I wouldn’t; I said how?

      So yes I am disappointed in Rubio, Ryan and Mike Lee! Since Romney has been able to buy the failure of his competition who is going to represent us? Conservatives that is.

  • acat

    Anybody?

    Seriously, welcome back Kowalski. Like you, I’m not really happy with Romney as the nominee, but .. I’ve got my noseplugs, and I’ve got my pro-Romney lines memorized, and unless he seriously steps on his {wedding tackle} before May Day … he’s it.

    I agree, we need to get the sniping over and get on the same ABO page. I think Gingrich would have been better, I thought Perry would be better, I thought Pawlenty would be better. Doesn’t matter what I thought… I think Romney would be better than Obama.

    Mew

    • kowalski

      One of the good things at least about Romney (and on the flipside one of the bad things) is that we’re disagreeing about policy.

      We’re not disagreeing about the person, the man himself, his family, the baggage, the scandals, the incipient scandals, the rest of that lurid crapola. We can work with policy, we can argue about policy, we can scream and yell about policy, but Romney is **not** going to be slowed down by personal scandals. Neither would Rick Santorum have been but I’m already talking about him in the past tense and I think everyone else is also.

      • kowalski

        Do you remember Jack Ryan’s abortive candidacy in Illinois? For the Senate seat Barack Obama “voted as present” in before he became President?

        Read and remember this story very carefully.

        http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/local/chi-0406220247jun22,0,3744432.story

        It is my guess and speculation that Rick Perry bowed out of the race for a lot of reasons that were more damaging than just forgetting the names of a few government agencies he’d close down.

        Everyone remembers Jack Ryan’s wife, Jeri from Star Trek the Next Generation. She’s also all over Google Images. Warning: Moderate SafeSearch

        https://www.google.com/search?tbm=isch&hl=en&source=hp&biw=1280&bih=770&q=Jeri+Ryan&gbv=2&oq=Jeri+Ryan&aq=f&aqi=g10&aql=1&gs_l=img.3..0l10.4786l6363l0l7378l2l2l0l0l0l0l172l329l0j2l2l0.pfwe.1.

        I think Perry had a ****lot**** more baggage than anyone realizes and he got out of the race because he didn’t want it to be unpacked, just like it was for Jack Ryan’s candidacy in Illinois. That was *OBAMA’S SEAT* and they basically blew Ryan out of the water with a spray of blood and foam. Then the Republicans had to try and recruit Mike Ditka (who had the brains to stay the heck away because he knew he’d be in the same shark tank) and finally Alan Keyes from halfway across the country, who couldn’t possibly win.

        My guess is that Perry would have made it to about 30 seconds after accepting the nomination at the convention and then…BOOM. And frankly a Republican might have done it to him as easily as a Democrat. So I don’t lament losing him too badly.

        • kowalski

          To comment on Jack Ryan’s sudden revelations that were splashed all over the pages of the Chicago newspapers at the time and sunk his candidacy as surely as if someone dropped a 2000 pound bomb right down the smokestack into the boiler room.

          And he would have said exactly the same thing the day after Rick Perry had been selected as the Republican nominee. He would have dusted off the file and read this right off the Teleprompter:

          “Ryan is facing Democrat Barack Obama in the November general election to replace retiring U.S. Sen. Peter Fitzgerald (R-Illinois). Obama said it would not be “appropriate” for him to comment on the revelations. “Obviously Mr. Ryan and his supporters will be discussing this and I don’t think that’s my role,” Obama said.”

          • acat

            This is going to be a campaign for the dirty tricks hall of fame.

            Mew

        • acat

          Cheshire grin

          • kowalski

            How disembowled the Republican Party in Illinois was after George Ryan was sent to prison. And I worked for one of the law schools that helped send him to prison and I was there the day Mike Farrell gave his little speech at Northwestern University when Ryan furloughed everyone on Death Row.

            And that, in truth, is a large part of the reason we have the President we have right now.

          • kowalski

            Of course, and I’m not interested in having my life ruined. But Rick Perry bowing out of the race — I’ll wager — was not just because he bobbled a question during a Presidential debate.

          • http://www.examiner.com/x-1597-Charlotte-Law--Politics-Examiner Mike gamecock DeVine

            before the epiphany, technically

          • acat

            Barak Obama.

            The behavior of the Illinois GOP leadership convinced me to trust nobody in leadership of either party.

            Mew

        • cheetah2

          Do you have a reason for thinking Perry has “baggage”? He was tanking in the polls and probably losing his monetary support when he dropped out. Isn’t that enough to explain it?

          • kowalski

            It’s a speculation. Just that.

          • kowalski

            The money wasn’t there for a reason and although Perry had a lot of Conservative support all of a sudden he … kept … suffering … through … this … raising … money … problem…

            And frankly I speculate that there’s more to it than just bobbling a couple of questions during a debate. He was asked, I believe, whether he had anything in his past that would embarrass the Party and I have the feeling nobody believed him.

          • kowalski

            ….”Nothing in my past will embarrass you” and I don’t think people believed it. He said that to an audience of evangelicals and I don’t think they bought it. It became clear he wasn’t going to overcome the problem and he left the race.

          • kowalski

            At Prayerpallooza and I don’t think he made the case.

            http://www.texastribune.org/texas-politics/2012-presidential-election/perry-takes-pointed-questions-social-conservatives/

            Of course it could also be that he was so controversial about vaccinating girls with HPV vaccine. That could have done it too.

            Either way I think he had a vagina problem.

          • kowalski

            People were being waaaay to harsh on him about the vaccination thing but nobody took my advice, apparently. Maybe they knew something I don’t.

          • gracie

            There, I said it!

            For one…there was an ad put in the Austin paper asking anyone to come out if they had had an affair with Rick Perry and no one did.
            Rick Perry has been accused of crony capitalism for instance but not of having “vagina” problems.

            A lot of people got to know Rick Perry when we were supporting him; hey I spent hours researching him because I was deciding whether to support him with my neighbors mad about the TTC. I had made calls for him when he ran for Governator in ’10 and that is what I heard about, being as it was to come 30 miles from my little town.

            I ran into folks who did not like him for one reason or another but not for his personal life or baggage. I think money dried up because people did not think he could debate Obama and win. Look I have dozens of friends here in Texas who were for him at first but who did not hang in like a lot of us did on RedState and they said THAT was the reason.

            Oh and regarding that evangelical meeting in Texas Erick was there and said that the Perry team did not send their A team; I believe he said that Perry was not there. But you can ask him.

            Look I know you are well respected here so I guess I am debating you at my own peril. But…I just do not think this trashing is substantiated or fair. JMO>

          • greyeagle

            was my Governor for several years. I started voting for him in 1994 and did until I moved to Florida in the middle of 2010. He was a staunch conservative, pro-life, and really lived with conservative values. He did not any baggage. He was always the same. There was a web site in TX spreading lies and democrat talking points, which covered all the things he was trashed with constantly. We suspected Ron Paul developed that web site or one of his supporters. He was trashing constantly on conservative web sites with the same talking points by supporters of Palin, Bachmann, Santorum, Romney and Ron Paul. If you tell lies often enough, after awhile people believe them. He also should not have had former Bush people on his campaign team. He would have been a much stronger candidate than any of them. The GOP establishment did not want him, they wanted Romney. I think also there was pressure placed on the Evangelicals. They may be very sorry in the future that they did not support him. Sorry for the rant, I am just disgusted at the ignorance of voters.

          • kowalski

            Truth is I just don’t know what the truth is. I wonder why Perry dropped out so quickly and I also wonder why Cain dropped out so quickly. If the accusations were baseless and there was nothing there, in reality they both should be here now, but neither of them are! They both decided to get out of the race. I can suspect that both of them left because they had their backs to the wall and didn’t want anything else more damaging to emerge, but again it’s speculation.

          • acat

            “vagina problem” was in doubt, in the end.

            I thought at the time and continue to think that Romney had bought access to Karl Rove’s files from KBH’s unsuccessful run at Perry a year or three earlier…. and was able to use Karl to launch proxy attacks while using the report to dry up funds. (tell me Romney doesn’t know who the big money is…a polite “I’m looking at KBH’s report, Mr. Warbucks, and I think you should hold off…”)

            Add that to the rumbling (Ace of Spades had it up..) that Romney had bought and paid for Ames, IA ballots for Bachman supporters – even though he wasn’t competing there – as a way to bury Pawlenty.

            This is what I meant above when I said Romney is just as much a master of the proxy campaign as Obama is .. and this is going to be one for the history books.

            Mew

          • http://www.timothy-bladel.com/ center77

            its pretty good stuff, even if a tad bit to late. Wonderful analysis acat.

          • gracie

            Thank you thank you for being a truth teller about our Governor, a great conservative and a person who practices family values in his personal life!

            I have grown to respect him like never before watching his effort on the campaign trail and the good humor with which he quit the race.
            Did any of you catch him at the recent GridIron Dinner? I have searched and cannot locate the youtube but here is his halarious speech: http://www.dailykos.com/story/2012/03/25/1077660/-Rick-Perry-pretty-funny

            Not only does he not deserve the description of the “problem” he has; frankly it is Ta-kita! That would be TACKY>

          • avagreen

            Vagina problem? Be more specific.

            I can spurious comments as well.

            I think you have a space-between-the-brain-cells problem. Do I have to provide proof of that, you say?

          • kowalski

            How’s that? Rick’s problems were money and support. He was supposed to be the best Conservative candidate but somehow neither of them really materialized. He had a couple of flubs in debates but they weren’t significant in the scheme of things. So why did everything dematerialize on him?

            It’s a speculative question necessarily. I’m not saying he did or did not do anything. I’m just puzzled by the fact that he *should have* been the strongest candidate in the field and then zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzsssssssssssshhhhhhhhhhhhh (pop) went all the air out of the balloon. It doesn’t make much sense.

            But again, it’s all speculation and water under the bridge at this point.

          • BuckeyeTexan

            having a vagina problem with nothing to support that speculation other than “I wonder why …” Unconscionable, period.

            Rick Perry’s campaign problems had nothing to do with a vagina. Prior to his run for POTUS, he had never lost a campaign. One doesn’t gain that level of success with a vagina problem.

            Rick Perry’s “heartless” comment, poor debate prep and performances and Michele Bachmann’s pathetic HPV attack were the reason for his demise. Voters feared the potential embarrassment of an Obama-Perry debate.

            Governor Perry (my Gov) is a good, decent man. You should be ashamed of your baseless speculation.

            Regards,
            BuckeyeTexan

          • westcoastpatriette

            kowalski went too far with his bloviating on this one.

          • Filibuster Keaton

            Cosign!

          • Tbone

            Little k just strings random thoughts. That is why he replies to himself.

            Speculating about another person’s moral character is as dishonest as anyone can be. Little k wouldn’t do that if he had a lick of sense, would he?

          • BuckeyeTexan

            I will and did comment on his baseless speculation about my Gov. It was unconscionable.

            Rick Perry has exceptional character and I will not see him disparaged with speculation about a vagina problem.

            We Texans don’t take kindly to attacks on our honor. It might sound “country bumpkin” to others, but to proud Texans it’s serious business to disparage another Texan’s honor without cold, hard proof.

            kowalski owes Rick Perry a retraction.

            Regards,
            BuckeyeTexan

          • Tbone

            Baja Oklahoma. But don’t buckeyes come from Ohio?

          • BuckeyeTexan

            Yes, Buckeyes come from Ohio. I was born there.

          • kowalski

            Don’t read anything into the capitalization of my username. It was an inadvertence and I just decided not to change it because I didn’t think it mattered. Next time I’ll spell it in ALL CAPS. :)

          • kowalski

            As Marco Rubio and Paul Ryan.

          • kowalski

            The night after he had that big gaffe moment that he had to try and make light of and then became the central focus of the commentary during his subsequent debate appearances. I didn’t think his minor misfire was a big deal. I defended him during the HPV vaccine brouhaha and said that I thought it was crazy people were descending on him because he wanted to prevent STDs in a state the size of Texas. Later when Erick had his interview with him, I commented that I thought he did a great job, congratulated Erick on the interview and said something to the effect of:

            “He’s great at one on one interviews and I think he wants to debate Obama, not debate all the Rest.”

            I guess you didn’t read those comments.

            I never said a bad thing about Rick Perry here on this blog, but I can tell you that I was *very surprised* that he just kept falling farther and farther behind and never seemed to regain any momentum. even after promising to people that he had “nothing in his background” that would make anyone ashamed. Well, the day Jeri Ryan dropped that bomb in Chicago, Jack Ryan fought the allegations “they’re all false” etc., etc. Within a few days his campaign had folded.

            I guess the thing that would put all the speculation to bed (and believe me it’s going to come back again) is if he ever decides to run for national office again.

            I thought Jack Ryan was a man of unimpeachable character, too. I was very hopeful he’d win that contest against Obama. And then he folded up like a house of cards and disappeared.

          • BuckeyeTexan

            is irrelevant to the baseless speculation you made against him today.

            It was unconscionable, period.

          • kowalski

            I’m sorry. I apologize for it, probably I should have left it as an idle thought that was rattling around in the back of my mind.

            For the record, I wish Rick Perry had been able to stay in the race. If he had, and had regained some traction, he’d have been a better candidate than Gingrich, better than any of them. I never said anything except positive things about him here, although I did write a one line comment after he made that statement at Prayerpallooza: “For everyone’s sake, I hope it’s true.” I’m sorry for offending you with my speculation, but it’s been hard for me to shake the doubt.

            I don’t feel great about having it. I don’t feel great about this whole primary season. I feel like we’ve all been driven around the block a couple of times and that there’s a lot more going on behind the scenes. It’s been the creepiest primary season I can remember in a long time. Look at how poorly Bachmann performed in her home state, for Pete’s sake. Look at what happened to Herman Cain. He comes out of nowhere, rockets to prominence after the Florida Straw Poll, and then it’s the drip….drip….drip…. of scandal.

            I look back at this primary season and I feel like there were trap doors all over the place. The whole thing has left a lot of lingering doubts and speculations in my mind, and I think that’s why a lot of other people aren’t very enthusiastic, either.

            Finally, and this isn’t meant to “undo” my apology or anything – but I think we’ve all been lied to by so many politicians who claim that scandalous sexual allegations are false that at this point it’s almost an admission of guilt. It shouldn’t be, but the list is long, and the assurances are always the same. “It’s not true, it’s categorically false, you have nothing to worry about, I did not do this, I never did that, my wife stands behind me, let’s not let this distract us, don’t you dare believe it, I never had sex with that woman, I’ll fight this and win, my Twitter account was hacked, it’s not my baby, I never solicited anyone” etc., etc., etc.

          • BuckeyeTexan

            Your apology was gracious and is most appreciated.

          • littlehouse18

            nt

        • Flagstaff

          Some folks gave him glowing recommendations, and he has a great record at getting elected.

          In the big show, however, he gave off strange vibes. He just wasn’t ready, maybe because of that back surgery, but he was not that impressive. I really don’t think he would have gotten this nomination or would have beaten Obama if he had.

          I don’t think a scandal was necessary–he just wasn’t ready.

  • Tbone

    I was already missing you, big time, bro.

    Here ya go k. If anyone needs a theme tune, it’s you. LOL

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-xA0WM9iC-E

    • kowalski

      Thanks, Tbone. I really mean that. We all need to listen to that song a lot more and try to move past the past.

      Let’s not let the past haunt us, otherwise we have a song like this (which I also like a lot):

      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9ZGt4JVX860&ob=av2n

      Right now I oscillate between the two sometimes, but I’m not crazy with either, really. :)

      • kowalski

        Is really about being tortured by the past. The video is not my favorite part, the song is much better than the video all by itself, which is rare. I actually like that the song is better and more evocative than the video. Ozzy goes a bit over the top though, too strong.

        I’ll find another song of the day reference I think Caleb actually should put a “song of the day” into his “Daily Links” feature.

        • kowalski

          And he’s a fallen angel and one of the best metal guitarists in the world.

  • snowshooze

    Unless it is a microbrew.

  • http://www.hakubi.us/ Neil Stevens

    That title in the rec list is going to distract me for DAYS now. :)

    • http://www.nighttwister.com NightTwister

      ;-)

    • http://www.examiner.com/x-1597-Charlotte-Law--Politics-Examiner Mike gamecock DeVine

      I have tried to distract attention from this kufuffle by having a pre-anti-free trade, pro-Pat B’s The Great Betrayal 1998 redux, coming out party…we try to help here at DeVine Law…

    • westcoastpatriette

      and daring to enforce RS rules on a long-time diarist who thought he should be given an exemption from the rules due to his exceptional member status. :)

      You should be proud. After all, you are exemplifying how conservatives uphold the rule of law — impartially!

      • http://www.examiner.com/x-1597-Charlotte-Law--Politics-Examiner Mike gamecock DeVine

        feels right

      • kowalski

        I was just surprised. Usually Neil gives warnings. If he had given me a warning I would have gone back and written three or four more paragraphs in the body text right away. I had already starting commenting with you in the comments when it was depublished – so I was online and paying attention.

        When I wrote the post I didn’t think it was going to be a big issue. Then I overreacted to it being an issue. That’s all.

        • http://www.hakubi.us/ Neil Stevens

          I knew you’re an old timer here. For many moons, every time you went to the diary post page, there was a warning in a big red box, telling everyone that diaries must be original reporting, research, or substantial analysis, or be subject to deletion.

          When we upgraded to WordPress 3 a few months back the warning disappeared. But I considered the warning to have been made.

          And I didn’t even delete yours. :)

  • http://www.timothy-bladel.com/ center77

    and suddenly everyone is passing it around. Oh bother, lets suck it up and move on.

    • kowalski

      That the older you get, the more you realize politics never really goes much beyond the high school level in this country.

      And there’s a good reason for that, historically most people were not college graduates. Now there are more college graduates but most of the ones with undergraduate degrees are barely more well-educated than they used to be when they graduated high school. So our politics basically orbits the high school level. Certainly our President believes that in his speeches: I don’t think he’s given a major campaign speech that’s beyond the 10th or 11th grade level.

      You won’t find any other politicians who do in public, either. Their audience is the mainstream – the big wide area under the bell curve. It shifts around a little, early in the races they message specifically to the “base” of their respective parties and then they all move to be more “centrist” as the races tighten. It’s the only way to win big elections.

      In this election it’s going to be very important because there are more self-declared Independents than ever, and they are going to decide who wins. So if anything, this race will become more like high-school politics and more Centrist right up until election day, all other outside events notwithstanding.

      • kowalski

        And writes an angry column about why America with the “smartest this and that” and the “best of this and that” and the “capacity to understand this and that” consistently elects people who best appeal to a group of high school students or even high school dropouts.

        It’s sad to read those columns because those people already know the answer: it’s because the politican needs the votes, and the votes are in the middle – unless there is some exceptional influence that pushes it to one side or the other.

        It’s a very good system for the middle, but it’s a frustrating system for extremists and also intellectualls. Particularly for liberal intellectuals it was frustrating for a long time after Reagan was elected. They considered him to be a complete sham, an utter fabrication, but nevertheless he was wildly popular. They spent a long time studying him and developed a theory of how to deal with it and manipulate it, and they used it to great effect to get our current President elected.

        You can read about the theory in the books and other publications of George P. Lakoff, the linguist from the University of California, Berkeley. You can see it in action any time someone uses the word “narrative” or “frame” – or any time Bob Shrum writes anything other than his signature on a parking ticket.

        http://linguistics.berkeley.edu/people/person_detail.php?person=21

  • EyeofMitt

    while many here are on the verge of reliving their second childhood! So, yes. Let’s suck it up and move on with Romney as our candidate.

    • http://www.timothy-bladel.com/ center77

      hence the popularity of shows like real housewives which my girlfriend watches all the various versions.

      As for moving on to Romney being the nominee, it been one, as my friend would say. He is the nominee, and I want Obama gone. I doing like Romney, at all. But, I don’t like Obama’s policies even more. Having said that, it will be much easier to be objective this election cycle, as compared to others. I plan on just laughing when Obama runs ads that say Mitt has no core, and has been on both sides of every single issue that matters. The defense is but Obama is still wrong now, and the only hope for change is the republican nominee.

  • habeumnominee

    We are now moving on to the general election stage of this process.

    Romney-bashing will no longer be tolerated.

    Obama-bashing, however, is encouraged. : )

  • Pingback: click here

  • Pingback: Claud Sabino

  • Pingback: Claud Sabino

  • Pingback: Ross Waldenberg

  • Pingback: cheap edu links