« BACK  |  PRINT

RS

MEMBER DIARY

The Nevada Senate race by the numbers

There are some interesting numbers in the Nevada exit polls.  Democrats were able to keep a turnout advantage of 35% compared to 33% Republican and 32% independent.  However the GOP did make some gains over 2008 when the turnout was 38% D, 30% R, and 32% I.  Republicans increased 3% at the cost of the Democrats while independents remained steady.  The difference for the Dems was probably the black vote which went from 10% of the voters in 2008 down to 6% in 2010.  Latinos held steady at 15% so that whites (and others) picked up the gain.  The gender turnout was even at 50% each, a changed from 2008 when women made up 52%.

Reid maintained more of his base, capturing 91% of Dems while Angle was able to pull only 5%.  Unfortunately Angle lost 11% of the GOP to Reid and captured only 85% of Republican voters.  She did get a plurality of independents at 48% compared to Reids 44%.  It was not enough to overcome the Democratic turnout advantage and the GOP crossovers.  The numbers are very similar to the Presidential election results.  Obama kept 93% of Democrats and pulled 11% of Republicans.  However the independents broke for Obama 54% to 41% for McCain.  Angle actually did better then McCain among independents but not enough to win.

Compare these results to the Governors race.  For the two major parties, the numbers are nearly flipped.  Sandevol (R) pulled 11% of Dems while keeping 93% of Reps.  Even more significantly, he devastated the younger Reid among independents by a margin of 60% to 32%.

As for Latinos, Obama won them over by a margin of 76% to 22% for McCain.  Despite her tougher line on illegal immigration, Angle increased the draw of Latinos to 30% while only 68% went for the pandering Reid.  Sandoval did a little better but not by much, gaining 33% compared to the younger Reid’s 64%.  Remember that there was no significant change in Latino turnout between 2008 and 2010.

The bottom line from all of this is that the GOP improved turnout but not enough to overcome a Democratic advantage.  Sandoval demonstrates that it takes a coalition of Republicans and independents to win in Nevada.  There are certainly a strong number of independents (60%) willing to vote GOP under the right conditions.  Angle pulled independents better then the supposedly more moderate and establishment candidate McCain, but in the end she came up short.

Tags: , ,
Get Alerts

COMMENTS

  • eburke

    Sharon’s hard-line against illegal immigration caused an outpouring of Hispanics to come out and vote against her.

  • treeofliberty

    had the same percentage from 2008 which was a record-high turnout in a Presidential year lets not forget, does say something.
    Also, hispanics are not the easiest group to poll because many pollsters don’t bother speaking in Spanish. Latino Decisions did and they found a much higher percentage for Reid at 91%.

    Regardless of who is right, Angle was a flawed candidate who made several strategic blunders such as barricading herself from the media and those controversial immigration ads were not necessary IMO…it at the very very least, did not help her with a demographic that will only increase in voting power in the future and I believe will be critical for GOP success in the southwest.

    I really wanted this victory too so it’s a darn shame. As said before, Reid should have been toast on Tuesday.