« BACK  |  PRINT

RS

MEMBER DIARY

Why the Arkansas Runoff is Important

Unions' $10 million message to Democrats: We bought you. We own you. You buck us. We destroy you.

Union bosses suffered a seeming setback on Tuesday as Arkansas voters rejected the union attempt to make an example out of Blanche Lincoln.  But the setback is not all that it seems.



The Black Sheep Survives the Slaughterhouse
From the beginning, Tuesday’s Arkansas Showdown was really more about the national Democratic Party and who owns it  than it was about Blanche Lincoln.  Blanche Lincoln was merely the black sheep sacrificial lamb who didn’t toe the line for union bosses and, therefore, whose throat needed to be slit to ensure that all the other Democratic sheep would fall back into line.

It was a union plan hatched long before Blanche bucked the union bosses.  In fact, in 2008, the SEIU announced that it had set aside $10 million of its members’ money to “unelect” politicians who did not toe the labor line.  Blanche Lincoln was the first major test case.

While the effort failed in Arkansas, the message to the rest of the Democratic establishment is simple and clear:  We bought you. We own you. You buck us. We destroy you.

Unions work to tighten their noose on Democrats’ necks.
Notwithstanding the fact that neither the American people nor the media would stand for a corporation or group of corporations engaging in such blatant extortionate tactics, union bosses used their members’ money to make an example of Blanche Lincoln.

Although it failed in Arkansas, the fact that is, Arkansas is a Right-to-Work state and has a low number of union members compared to Forced Unionization states.  This means unions had an uphill battle to begin with.  The fact that unions wasted of $10 million of members’ money to send a message to all Democrats is the more important point.

Union bosses believe that, since they bought the Democratic Party, they own it and, therefore, Democrat politicians must obey their union masters or face the assault that Blanche Lincoln barely staved off.

The Faux-Family Feud
While the media is playing up the faux-rift between the White House and union bosses, the real story is that Labor is not licking its wounds.

Labor leaders were incensed by an undisclosed White House official’s assertion to POLITICO Tuesday night that the unions’ support of Halter amounted to “flushing $10 million” of their members’ money down the toilet on “a pointless exercise.”

“If even half that total had been well-targeted and applied in key House races across this country, that could have made a real difference in November,” the official said.

To the contrary, union bosses are pleased with the fact that they almost took Lincoln down:

…[U]nion leaders insisted Wednesday that forcing Lincoln into a runoff and coming within a few thousand votes of unseating her had achieved their goal — getting other wayward Democrats to think twice before crossing labor.

“If working families were able to accomplish this in Arkansas, imagine what they can achieve in other states,” said AFL-CIO president Richard Trumka.

Union officials were unified in praising the outcome as a strong warning to Democratic incumbents like Lincoln who have taken labor’s money and utterly defied them when it comes to votes. They are tired of the argument that Republicans would be even worse, so labor should tolerate the lesser of two evils.

“It’s been well worth it,” said American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees president Gerald McEntee. “We’ve gotten more publicity and been talked about in terms of powerful labor more than I’ve heard in the last 20 years.”

While Blanche Lincoln survived the unions and will likely fall in November, the union bosses succeeded in sending the message to the rest of the Democrat politicians who might be considering having a view independent of union bosses:  Don’t even think about it.

For those that do not want to fall under the jackboots of today’s union bosses, the message is also clear:

In order to overcome the assault that unions are going to engage in leading up to November, Americans will need to be better organized, more strongly motivated, and, most important, they need to get out and vote.

__________________
“I bring reason to your ears, and, in language as plain as ABC, hold up truth to your eyes.” Thomas Paine, December 23, 1776

For more news and views on today’s unions, go to LaborUnionReport.com.

Follow laborunionrpt on Twitter

COMMENTS

  • penguin2

    thugs trying to take over and run the country, as it is against Obama. The American people have some sense of fairness; if the information can get out there about the tyranny of the unions, let alone their thuggery, it should stir some to recall why union support declined over the years.

    As you said, LUR, GET OUT AND VOTE!

  • tngal

    Kos had pushed for Halter even before Halter was in the race. And they hired Research 2000 to do the polling. In the two polls they did just before the runoff they released numbers showing Halter as beating Lincoln by a few points. Now, Kos is on the hunt for a new research company.

    Its comforting to know that not only did the unions get taken for a hefty chunk of change in a race they lost, so did Kos and its ”kids’ . Its a warm fuzzy feeling.

    BTW, if they set aside $10 mill in 2008 for ‘races’, and they blew $10 mill on this single race we gotta wonder how much more they’re willing to lose?

    (info came from NJ’s Hotline On Call. Not Kos site. Can’t go there on an empty stomach.)

    • http://impudent.blognation.us/blog kyle8

      Sure they helped get Obama past Hilary in the dem primaries. But that is about all you can point to.

      I discount all of the 2008 elections because that was a huge Anti-Bush landslide in which Democrats were going to win big no matter what Kos did.

    • http://www.laborunionreport.combrand/brhttp://www.laborunionreport.blogspot.com LaborUnionReport
      • tngal

        does anyone else think that’s reeaal close to being a sin?

    • http://moelane.com/ Moe Lane

      Or maybe Strategic Vision: they both do accurate work.

      I’d say PPP, except that PPP might actually take the contract, and I wouldn’t wish that fate on the company.

  • Kyle-MI

    Lincoln would have probably gotten defeated in the general election anyway, but all the unions have done is weakened her further. With Arkansas being weak on unions anyway Lincoln is probably the best that Dems and unions can hope for from there. Now they will have someone much much worse. It seems to me that they picked a very poor ground on which to fight their battle. I don’t see how any of this puts fear into the hearts of any of the blue dogs.

  • itrytobenice

    People won’t keep on quietly paying their protection money unless you break some guy’s knees for standing up to you.

    And since the democrat politicians we have in DC now care a lot more about their own re-election than about the country, we can expect a lot of new legislation to benefit the union bosses (but not the union members who actually need jobs.)

    All of my other opinions on this matter have been redacted due to RS posting guidelines. :-]