<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"><channel xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"><title>RedState</title><link>https://redstate.com/laborunionreport/2011/05/05/when-unions-stick-it-to-taxpayers-the-problem-with-binding-arbitration/feed/</link><description>Conservative News &amp; Politics</description><language>en-us</language><lastBuildDate>Thu, 11 Jun 2026 15:30:28 -0400</lastBuildDate><item><title>When Unions Stick It To Taxpayers: The Problem With Binding Arbitration</title><description>&lt;![CDATA[In addition to effectively eliminating secret-ballot elections, one of the other main components of the currently sidelined (and hallucinogenically-named) Employee Free Choice Act is &amp;#8220;binding arbitration&amp;#8220;—the process of letting an outside arbitrator dictate wages and benefits of a business or organization.]]&gt;</description><pubDate>Thu, 05 May 2011 14:00:41 -0400</pubDate><creator xmlns="dc">&lt;![CDATA[LaborUnionReport]]&gt;</creator><enclosure url="" type="image/jpeg" length="123" /><link>https://redstate.com/laborunionreport/2011/05/05/when-unions-stick-it-to-taxpayers-the-problem-with-binding-arbitration-n38903</link></item></channel></rss>