<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"><channel xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"><title>RedState</title><link>https://redstate.com/laborunionreport/2011/05/24/the-nlrbs-opening-of-pandoras-box-beyond-boeing/feed/</link><description>Conservative News &amp; Politics</description><language>en-us</language><lastBuildDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2026 11:47:06 -0400</lastBuildDate><item><title>The NLRB's Opening Of Pandora's Box Beyond Boeing</title><description>&lt;![CDATA[Since President Obama&amp;#8217;s National Labor Relations Board announced its prosecution of the Boeing Company last month, there has been much commentary around the topic and its possible effects. Some have stated that the attack on Boeing is an attack on Right-to-Work states (even though it applies to companies in all states), others have correctly stated that the NLRB wants to make unions an &amp;#8216;equal partner&amp;#8217; in the running of business. Some also add that the NLRB&amp;#8217;s actions will create further incentive for businesses to avoid union-heavy blue states as well as raise the possibility of sending more U.S. jobs overseas. What has not been addressed until now is just how the legal theories behind the NLRB&amp;#8217;s dangerous prosecution of Boeing, if successful, could apply to companies without unions, as well.]]&gt;</description><pubDate>Tue, 24 May 2011 12:00:32 -0400</pubDate><creator xmlns="dc">&lt;![CDATA[LaborUnionReport]]&gt;</creator><enclosure url="" type="image/jpeg" length="123" /><link>https://redstate.com/laborunionreport/2011/05/24/the-nlrbs-opening-of-pandoras-box-beyond-boeing-n39124</link></item></channel></rss>