« BACK  |  PRINT

RS

MEMBER DIARY

The NLRB’s Assault on Religious Liberty

Catholic Universities Not Catholic Enough, According to Obama's NLRB

While the NLRB’s attack on the Boeing Company and its South Carolina employees may be viewed as an attack on the freedom to expand business in America, Catholic colleges are also under fire from Obama’s NLRB for not being Catholic enough.

Back in January, the New York regional office of the NRLB ruled against Manhattan College’s claim that, as a religious institution, it should be exempted from the National Labor Relations Act. As a result of the NLRB’s rejection of Manhattan College’s religious argument, the college must allow its faculty to unionize.

Now, in a similar case, the NLRB’s regional office in Chicago issued another decision slapping down the argument of St. Xavier University:

Last week a regional official of the National Labor Relations Board NLRB ruled that St. Xavier University in Chicago must allow adjunct professors to form a union. The ruling marked the second time this year that the NLRB has ruled that a Catholic institution of higher education lacks the distinctive religious character that would make it exempt from federal labor laws.

The NLRB ruling, following a similar decision involving Manhattan College earlier this year, underlines the complications that may arise when Catholic colleges and universities seek to increase their independence from Church authority. In making its ruling the NRLB noted that although St. Xavier College was founded by the Sisters of Mercy, the religious order now has only a small presence on campus and represents a minority on the governing board. There are no religious requirements for students, and the school’s bylaws, amended in 1993, do “not contain any reference to religion, God, Catholicism.”

[snip]

The media and Catholic leaders need to understand that the NLRB assault on Catholic colleges is not new—it has been ongoing for several decades—and it stands in clear contradiction to federal court rulings, which have instructed the NLRB to stop interfering with Catholic education,” Patrick J. Reilly [President of the Cardinal Newman Society] says.

Reilly is author of the NLRB’s Assault on Religious Liberty, which (as the title suggests) traces the National Labor Relations Board’s assault on religious freedom through multiples cases over several decades. [The article is downloadable here.]

Not that it is much comfort, but if American businesses (and their employees) are feeling persecuted at least they’re not alone. So long as you’re union free, it doesn’t seem to matter whether you’re a business, an employee, or a church, you’re a target to the NLRB.

_________________

“I bring reason to your ears, and, in language as plain as ABC, hold up truth to your eyes.” Thomas Paine, December 23, 1776

Cross-posted.

Follow laborunionrpt on Twitter

Get Alerts

COMMENTS

  • http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Elizabeth_Jacobson get2djnow

    If the religious order which founded the university has a minority presence on the board, and there are no religious requirements for students to fulfill, then aren’t these universities just using the moniker of religiosity as cover to exempt themselves from taxes & other legal requirements?

    • YnotNOW

      non-profit educational institution, so not an issue on Catholic-or-not question.
      The NLRB question is whether they qualify for exemption for their unionization rules.
      The even bigger question is whether NLRB has the authority to decide what makes an organization “Catholic”. They have a point but it is not theirs to make at all.

  • http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Elizabeth_Jacobson get2djnow

    That So and So, the only true Conservative in the race, agrees with me on this issue.

    (An homage to Roger.)

  • streiff

    many want the perceived benefits of being thought of as Catholic universities but they don’t want the icky religious stuff. Their problem is not unique. Many formerly religious universities have completed their decline into secularism.

    From the presented facts I don’t have much of a problem with the NLRB decision in this particular case.

    • http://www.laborunionreport.com LaborUnionReport

      You can’t have it both ways.

  • http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Elizabeth_Jacobson get2djnow

    The problem is not with some theoretically possible court action, its the little dictators ruling by government fiat. I continue to be certain that only So and So would want Rep. Ryan to defend the NLRB.

  • http://UnitedConservativesofVirginia Cargosquid

    question the premise of WHY we even have a NATIONAL Labor Relations Board. Why is the Fed’l gov’t involved at all? Defund the board just on general principles. We Are Broke.

  • rogershru2

    About the type of locks on your door. You say “how’d you get in here I have a deadbolt?” He says, “actually you have a door lever lock.”

    The burglar may be right, but so what?

    (and thanks get2djnow)

  • akafroman

    Many Catholic organizations have absolutely nothing to do with Catholicism. They promote a secular “social justice” agenda, and then call it “Catholicism” because they put a 89 year-old senile priest on some “advisory” board. Many “Catholic” institutions help promote the liberalization of Catholics in the Northeast (Rhode Island) who claim to be majority-Catholic, but then elect some of the most pro-abortion candidates in Congress.

    I hope that some of the “Catholic” Universities get the hell scared out of them, because even liberals now see them as non-religious institutions. It is better that they shut down than to continue their destructive influence on the culture and Catholicism.

    I’ve been pissed off at Rome for years that they are so slow to address these institutions. I never thought it would take the NLRB to make actual headway.

    • YnotNOW

      for any of us to decide what qualifies for truly “Catholic.”
      I very much agree that most Catholic universities are nominal only, and do not adhere to the faith. But for me, or anyone else, to set the standard for them on how they should enforce their own rules, is a dangerous precedent.

      Rome should address it. They are not, but we cannot step in for them.

      • akafroman

        But I also don’t feel sorry for them.