<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The REAL Problem With the NLRB’s Ambush Elections Rule: Unions LIE.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.redstate.com/laborunionreport/2012/05/24/the-real-problem-with-the-nlrb%E2%80%99s-ambush-elections-rule-unions-lie/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.redstate.com/laborunionreport/2012/05/24/the-real-problem-with-the-nlrb%e2%80%99s-ambush-elections-rule-unions-lie/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 25 Apr 2013 19:12:04 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Mike Ferguson</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/laborunionreport/2012/05/24/the-real-problem-with-the-nlrb%e2%80%99s-ambush-elections-rule-unions-lie/#comment-10875</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Ferguson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 May 2012 15:30:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/laborunionreport/?p=8543#comment-10875</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Then it can be challenged again.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Then it can be challenged again.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: checkmate2012</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/laborunionreport/2012/05/24/the-real-problem-with-the-nlrb%e2%80%99s-ambush-elections-rule-unions-lie/#comment-10874</link>
		<dc:creator>checkmate2012</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 May 2012 04:02:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/laborunionreport/?p=8543#comment-10874</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[voted on this rule. Now they have a full house of 5 and 4 or 5 are Dems. No bearing as now they&#039;ll re-pass it easily with their posse.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>voted on this rule. Now they have a full house of 5 and 4 or 5 are Dems. No bearing as now they&#8217;ll re-pass it easily with their posse.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: commonsenseobserver</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/laborunionreport/2012/05/24/the-real-problem-with-the-nlrb%e2%80%99s-ambush-elections-rule-unions-lie/#comment-10873</link>
		<dc:creator>commonsenseobserver</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 May 2012 03:50:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/laborunionreport/?p=8543#comment-10873</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The NLRB will probably ignore the courts.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The NLRB will probably ignore the courts.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: garfieldjl</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/laborunionreport/2012/05/24/the-real-problem-with-the-nlrb%e2%80%99s-ambush-elections-rule-unions-lie/#comment-10872</link>
		<dc:creator>garfieldjl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 May 2012 03:40:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/laborunionreport/?p=8543#comment-10872</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If so then the NLRB could be held in contempt of court.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If so then the NLRB could be held in contempt of court.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: checkmate2012</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/laborunionreport/2012/05/24/the-real-problem-with-the-nlrb%e2%80%99s-ambush-elections-rule-unions-lie/#comment-10871</link>
		<dc:creator>checkmate2012</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 May 2012 02:23:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/laborunionreport/?p=8543#comment-10871</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[at the least is the fastest soluion w/o legislative action.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>at the least is the fastest soluion w/o legislative action.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: commonsenseobserver</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/laborunionreport/2012/05/24/the-real-problem-with-the-nlrb%e2%80%99s-ambush-elections-rule-unions-lie/#comment-10870</link>
		<dc:creator>commonsenseobserver</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 May 2012 02:19:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/laborunionreport/?p=8543#comment-10870</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The NRLB should certainly undergo drastic reforms to limit its role to that of ensuring that basic rights are protected, and that unions, employees, and employers all behave appropriately.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The NRLB should certainly undergo drastic reforms to limit its role to that of ensuring that basic rights are protected, and that unions, employees, and employers all behave appropriately.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: checkmate2012</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/laborunionreport/2012/05/24/the-real-problem-with-the-nlrb%e2%80%99s-ambush-elections-rule-unions-lie/#comment-10869</link>
		<dc:creator>checkmate2012</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 May 2012 02:12:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/laborunionreport/?p=8543#comment-10869</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Carter NRLB decision all the way to the Supremes. Why can&#039;t this be challenged by a company? 

You stated that, &quot;In its ruling, the NLRB stated:  ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Carter NRLB decision all the way to the Supremes. Why can&#8217;t this be challenged by a company? </p>
<p>You stated that, &#8220;In its ruling, the NLRB stated:  </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
