<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title></title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.redstate.com/larueladue/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link></link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 04 Aug 2010 18:15:11 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language></language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>More &#8220;help&#8221; from our federal government.</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/larueladue/2010/08/04/more-help-from-our-federal-government/</link>
		<comments>http://www.redstate.com/larueladue/2010/08/04/more-help-from-our-federal-government/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Aug 2010 18:15:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><a href="/users/larueladue/">larueladue</a> (<a href="/larueladue/">Diary</a>)</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[1]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[outsourcing]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/larueladue/?p=5</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It appears that the Obama Administration is funding IT training in Sri Lanka, specifically to help them in landing outsourcing contracts from the U.S., to the tune of $22 million. The training will include programming in Java EE, as well as teaching skills in business process outsourcing, call center support, and English language proficiency. This certainly adds to The One&#8217;s previous, well-documented efforts at slowing &#124; <a class="moretext" href="http://www.redstate.com/larueladue/2010/08/04/more-help-from-our-federal-government/">Read More &#187;</a>]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It appears that the Obama Administration is funding IT training in<br />
Sri Lanka, specifically to help them in landing outsourcing contracts<br />
from the U.S., to the tune of $22 million. The training will include<br />
programming in Java EE, as well as teaching skills in business process<br />
outsourcing, call center support, and English language proficiency.</p>
<p>This certainly adds to <em>The One&#8217;s</em> previous, well-documented<br />
efforts at slowing down or reducing IT outsourcing. &lt; sarcasm off &gt; This<br />
funding of direct competition for U.S. technical workers puts the lie<br />
to all he has said about reducing &#8220;off-shoring&#8221; or &#8220;best shoring&#8221;, and<br />
the bashing of the previous administration for creating tax incentives<br />
for moving jobs overseas. This training will facilitate more movement<br />
of tech jobs offshore.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.informationweek.com/news/software/integration/showArticle.jhtml?articleID=226500202"><br />
You can read the full article here (in Information Week)</a>. (By the way,<br />
the comments are entertaining&#8230;)</p>
<p>The funding is through USAID (United States Agency for International<br />
Development), headed by Czar Rajiv Shah, and coming through this agency,<br />
the money cannot be used domestically. But this begs the question: why<br />
in the world are we (our own government!) training foreigners to take<br />
jobs from us? We have approximately 10% official unemployment (maybe<br />
more than 20% real unemployment) in this country! Perhaps those funds<br />
(even the piddling amount of $22 million) could be put to better use here<br />
at home&#8230; or, heaven forbid, perhaps we could even cut taxes a bit?</p>
<p>Why, in the midst of the worst economic recession since the Great<br />
Depression, we are continuing to send our tax money out of the country,<br />
is beyond me. Just one more reason to think seriously about your vote<br />
in the upcoming fall elections&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.redstate.com/larueladue/2010/08/04/more-help-from-our-federal-government/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Obama Administration now negotiating on behalf of the Palestinian Authority&#8230; against Israel.</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/larueladue/2010/04/08/obama-administration-now-negotiating-on-behalf-of-the-palestinian-authority-against-israel/</link>
		<comments>http://www.redstate.com/larueladue/2010/04/08/obama-administration-now-negotiating-on-behalf-of-the-palestinian-authority-against-israel/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Apr 2010 00:14:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><a href="/users/larueladue/">larueladue</a> (<a href="/larueladue/">Diary</a>)</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[1]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Israel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Palestinian Authority]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/larueladue/?p=3</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I saw this article on the Free Republic forum and couldn&#8217;t believe my eyes. The original article is here on World Net Daily. The gist is this: the Obama Administration is actively negotiating with Israel on behalf of the Palestinian Authority: not as a middle man, but on behalf of the PA. The sources for this are a senior PA negotiator (unnamed) and unnamed sources &#124; <a class="moretext" href="http://www.redstate.com/larueladue/2010/04/08/obama-administration-now-negotiating-on-behalf-of-the-palestinian-authority-against-israel/">Read More &#187;</a>]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I saw <a href="http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2489352/posts">this article</a> on the Free Republic forum and couldn&#8217;t believe my eyes. The original article is <a href="http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&amp;pageId=137793">here on World Net Daily</a>.</p>
<p>The gist is this: the Obama Administration is actively negotiating with Israel on behalf of the Palestinian Authority: not as a middle man, but on <strong>behalf</strong> of the PA. The sources for this are a senior PA negotiator (unnamed) and unnamed sources in the Israeli government.</p>
<blockquote><p>&#8230; rather than act as an intermediary, the U.S. has been negotiating with Israel on behalf of the PA, assuming all Palestinian positions and bargaining with Israel from the Palestinian side.</p></blockquote>
<p>The Obama Administration negotiating with an ally and friend, on behalf of a terrorist organization, taking the side of the terrorist organization&#8230; I don&#8217;t even know how to think about this, much less what to think. To know that our country is now actively taking the side of a despicable, blood-thirsty, cowardly, terrorist group that has nothing in common with us and our way of life, against a long-time ally, friend, with which we have a common cultural heritage and linked interests, literally takes my breath away.</p>
<p>This just keeps getting better and better&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.redstate.com/larueladue/2010/04/08/obama-administration-now-negotiating-on-behalf-of-the-palestinian-authority-against-israel/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Sarah Palin and Aerial Wolf Hunting</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/larueladue/2008/09/19/sarah-palin-and-aerial-wolf-hunting/</link>
		<comments>http://www.redstate.com/larueladue/2008/09/19/sarah-palin-and-aerial-wolf-hunting/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Sep 2008 11:45:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><a href="/users/larueladue/">larueladue</a> (<a href="/larueladue/">Diary</a>)</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Alaska]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[environmental]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Greens]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hunting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Palin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wolves]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I received an email today from a relative berating Sarah Palin for hunting wolves from airplanes, and was urged to not vote for McCain/Palin because of this. (There are a lot of emotional Democrats in my family: I think that I am the only Republican, unless someone is keeping their mouth shut&#8230;)The link to the video is here: Defenders of Wildlife Action Fund video Other &#124; <a class="moretext" href="http://www.redstate.com/larueladue/2008/09/19/sarah-palin-and-aerial-wolf-hunting/">Read More &#187;</a>]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I received an email today from a relative berating Sarah Palin for hunting wolves from airplanes, and was urged to not vote for McCain/Palin because of this. (There are a lot of emotional Democrats in my family: I think that I am the only Republican, unless someone is keeping their mouth shut&#8230;)The link to the video is here:</p>
<p><a href="http://actionfund.defenders.org/palintvwolf">Defenders of Wildlife Action Fund video</a></p>
<p>Other than the obvious issues related to this sort of email, curiousity got the better of me and I searched around for a more balanced view of this. I found this rebuttal:</p>
<p><a href="http://kswatcher.wordpress.com/2008/09/13/opposing-viewpoints-on-wildlife-management-and-aerial-hunting-in-alaska/">Kswatcher&#8217;s Weblog</a></p>
<p>Although I abhor such hunting, especially for predators (my wife and I are dog breeders, so I have a soft spot for wolves and other wild canines) I suspected that there might be more behind this than was included in the Defenders of Wildlife Action Fund video. There was&#8230;</p>
<p><span id="more-2"></span><br />
It turns out to be a wildlife management issue in Alaska, and that the National Research Council and the National Academy of Sciences has an issue with how the State of Alaska is managing their wildlife resources, i.e. not doing exactly what these councils want.</p>
<p>Wildlike management issues are very complex, controversial, difficult and painful, for both sides alike. Usually, neither side ends up getting all that they want, but the end target should be the most humane, effective, and most cost-effective management program that can be created, meeting the goals required by the law and deemed attainable by science. But to do this, both sides have to negotiate and cooperate with this in mind. It rarely happens in practice&#8230;</p>
<p>The sad part is that the radical Green/Enviro crowd used this to stir up emotions on both sides in an effort to slime a Republican/Conservative&#8230; what a surprise!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.redstate.com/larueladue/2008/09/19/sarah-palin-and-aerial-wolf-hunting/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>John McCain: A transitional Presidency?</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/larueladue/2008/09/04/john-mccain-a-transitional-presidency/</link>
		<comments>http://www.redstate.com/larueladue/2008/09/04/john-mccain-a-transitional-presidency/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Sep 2008 15:35:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><a href="/users/larueladue/">larueladue</a> (<a href="/larueladue/">Diary</a>)</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Future]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John McCain]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republican Party]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[After hearing the convention speech of Sarah Palin, it slowly became apparent to me that if (God willing) John McCain is elected President, he will be a transitional President, bridging the gap between the &#8220;old&#8221; Republican Party of the &#8217;80s and &#8217;90s, and the &#8220;new&#8221; Republican Party of the future. Sarah Palin is just one representative of the new public face of the Republican Party, &#124; <a class="moretext" href="http://www.redstate.com/larueladue/2008/09/04/john-mccain-a-transitional-presidency/">Read More &#187;</a>]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>After hearing the convention speech of Sarah Palin, it slowly became<br />
apparent to me that if (God willing) John McCain is elected President,<br />
he will be a transitional President, bridging the gap between the &#8220;old&#8221;<br />
Republican Party of the &#8217;80s and &#8217;90s, and the &#8220;new&#8221; Republican Party<br />
of the future. Sarah Palin is just one representative of the new public<br />
face of the Republican Party, along with Bobby Jindal, Tim Pawlenty,<br />
and others yet to be seen on the national scene. All of these &#8220;new&#8221;<br />
Republicans are of the post-baby boomer generations, and as such, are<br />
untainted by the turmoil, effluvia, and mentality of the the late<br />
&#8217;60s and &#8217;70s.</p>
<p>By his choice of Sarah Palin as Vice-President, he has<br />
opened the door for these new faces of the Republic Party to be seen, in<br />
spite of the MSM. If he can continue to pull these sorts of politicians<br />
into the government once he is elected, I think it is possible to start<br />
a real transformation of the Federal government, that can really start<br />
to take off once McCain&#8217;s term is complete, if all goes well.</p>
<p>It appears that this &#8220;new&#8221; Republican Party will tend to be more socially<br />
conservative; more fiscally responsible; less tolerant of the corrosive<br />
Left (socialists, communists and their ilk); more overtly religious<br />
(but at the same time not judgmental or &#8220;preachy&#8221;); more willing to<br />
identify and target true evil in the world; more appreciative<br />
of the uniqueness and greatness of the United States; and overall just<br />
more like the bulk of us &#8220;normal&#8221; people. In a word: conservative.</p>
<p>I think I now have more reasons to be optimistic for the direction our country<br />
now has the opportunity to take. Now, if only people will sit back and<br />
think before they pull the lever in the November election&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.redstate.com/larueladue/2008/09/04/john-mccain-a-transitional-presidency/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
