“It’s hard to understand sarcasm and hyposcrisy when you’re a DailyKos-ter”


One of my lowly RedState diary posts was honored by an attack from a DailyKos diarist truthhurtsaz.

If I was targeted for ridicule by a DailyKos-ter, I must be doing something right.
:-)

But then again, later-on, in the “echo chamber” comments section, ALL RedState diarists are defamed.

Billboard

 Red State diarist is indignant (excerpted below)

 

I occassionally check out Red State to further buoy my opinion that they are all quite insane. I’m never disappointed.
So, I came across this on my perusal.

From a poster who’s screen name is … Lech Dharma

A new “anti-racism” organization (UNfairCampaign.org) is kicking-off a billboard campaign in Duluth, MN,  impling that “white” people are either inherently racist—or are too ignorant to recognize “racism.”

In this spot is the picture. Since posting pics is above my pay grade, here is the link to the diary from the red stater. It depicts a white woman’s face over which are written the words “It’s hard to see racism when you’re white”
Then, the diarist continues …

I realize I am simply an “ignorant” white man, but an “anti-racism” organization that singles-out “white people”—like this one does—seems a little racist to me. Watch the short FOX21News video and decide for yourself

And then the DailyKos-ter delivered his fatal blow in “proving” I was “too white” to understand just how racist I really am, by posting the title to my diary post: “It’s hard to see “fairness”—when you’re puffing on a crack pipe or you’re busy looking for a scapegoat to blame.”

 

Apparently he/she assumes that only non-white people smoke crack or play the blame-game—or else he/she wouldn’t consider that to be a “racist” statement.

But then again, liberals generally only do see the world in terms of themselves and racists.


Is “Islamophobia” actually the more “rational” viewpoint?


“The greatest deception the devil ever pulled-off was to convince the world he didn’t exist.”

 

Selected excerpts from Islamization and Jihad:

What is ISLAM?

 

ISLAM is a self-propagating, theocratic ideology that’s anchored to the belief that Mohammed (Muhammad, Mohamet) was the last true prophet of God (Allah); and that the true Word and Will of Allah was gradually revealed to him by the Angel Gabriel (Jibrīl), over the course of 23 years.

 

Muslims believe that these revelations were “channeled” by Mohammad and written down by his entourage (Sahabah). Following his death in 632 AD, his dictations were eventually gathered into one official compilation known as the Holy Quran (Koran, Qur’an). The content of the Quran, along with anecdotal and biographical texts about Mohammed, known as the Sunnah and the Hadiths, became the doctrinal source of Islamic civil Law known as Sharia.

 

Sharia Law encompasses, regulates, and prescribes every aspect of human activity: from what to eat, what to say, what to do, and wear—to how to deal with non-Muslims (Dhimmi and Kafir) and apostates (those who turn away from the Faith).  It is the implementation of Islamic religious doctrine through political enforcement.

 

What does the term ISLAMIZATION mean?

 

In a nutshell, ISLAMIZATION is the transformation of a regional population into an Islamic state. In essence, an Islamic state is any nation whose population (Muslim and non-Muslim alike) is regulated by Sharia Laws: such as the crime of blaspheming Allah or his Holy Prophet, Mohammed.

 

The self-propagating mandate of Islam is to continually strive to transform the entire world into a unified Islamic society.  For Islamists (Muslims), this religious duty of manifesting such a society is called jihad.

Black Flag of Jihad

For Muslims,  jihad is a fundamental religious mandate to manifest the expansion of the Ummah—and Dar al-Islam—by various other methods, as well: including proselytization, propaganda, stealth jihad, and cultural invasion.

ISLAMIC EXPANSIONISM

In today’s world,  jihad is typically implemented by local Muslim groups within a specific nation, but often it is organized, funded, and directed through international Islamic organizations like the Muslim Brotherhood and the OIC.

 

read the rest==> Islamization and Jihad 

 


It’s hard to see “fairness”—when you’re puffing on a crack pipe or you’re busy looking for a scapegoat to blame


Anti-Racism Campaign Draws Mixed Reactions

A new “anti-racism” organization (UNfairCampaign.org) is kicking-off a billboard campaign in Duluth, MN,  impling that “white” people are either inherently racist—or are too ignorant to recognize “racism.”

unfaircampaign.org billboard

 I realize I am simply an “ignorant” white man, but an “anti-racism” organization that singles-out “white people”—like this one does—seems a little racist to me.

Watch the short FOX21News video and decide for yourself


The Obama Generation: “We Won’t Get Fooled Again”


After four years of learning what what they have wrought, will the Obama Generation ACTIVELY correct the mistake they naively made in 2008? I sincerely hope so.


The Attacks Against Arizona are an Attack Against America


Despite what is being said publicly, the recent nationwide protests and violent demonstrations “against AZ’s recent legislation” are not REALLY about Arizona’s “new” law (a state law that basically just reflects Federal immigration law, and allows and directs local law agencies to arrest illegal aliens). In reality, these protests and demonstrations are an assault against America’s immigration laws.

The protests are a condemnation of the fact that the United States of America is a sovereign nation that has the legitimate right to defend its recognized borders and lawfully determine who may enter the country—and who must leave once they’ve entered. Such laws are nothing “new” or unique to America; all sovereign nations have immigration laws.
carlos montes at rally

Just because someone from another country WANTS to enter America—or wants to live here—does not mean they have a “fundamental right” to do so. If they enter America’s borders without government permission, or if they overstay their temporary permission, they are not “immigrants”—they are foreign invaders.

illegal immigrant rights?

If a stranger wants to enter your house—or live on your property—does that mean that he or she has some “human right” to do that? Would you refer to someone who has broken into your house as an “undocumented” guest or an “undocumented” resident?

Yet, the liberal media, the neo-marxists, the reconquistadors, and liberal politicians trading on racial-identity politics, all love to use euphemisms like “migrants” and “immigrants” and “undocumenteds” to describe those foreigners who have invaded our borders or have over-stayed their temporary permission to live here. By using such euphemisms, open-borders “progressives” blur the actual issues, and then demonize anyone who wants America’s borders protected and our immigration laws enforced, as being anti-”immigrant.” Then, it’s just a small step to calling them “racists” and “xenophobes.”

America is (or at least was) a nation of assimilated immigrants.

America was not intended to be a nation of unassimilated minority “communities” clinging to their ethnicity and trying to impose their cultural view upon the rest of American society. However, due to massive illegal immigration from Mexico and Central America we now have the sort of ethnic-based, La Raza “mentality” in this country that is spurring-on these demonstrations against Arizona’s enforcement of American immigration laws.

The protests against AZ enforcing immigration law in its state are actually a protest against America having any immigration laws; and amounts to a protest against American patriotism itself.


Remember, Remember, the Month of December


December 2009 was an historic month for the future direction of America: 

Despite very heated Congressional debate—and a vocal public outcry against it in the form of Tea Parties—the Democrats managed to advance their ”transformative” Health Care Reform plan one step closer to reality. In order to get the necessary votes to end debate in the Senate—and to get the Senate version passed—Reid and the Dems had to resort to political “bribery” in the form of massive earmark-spending for the states of Louisiana and Nebraska.

As the French author Tocqueville warned in the early 19th century, [this new] “American republic will endure, until politicians realize they can bribe the people with their own money.”  In the case of the Senate Healthcare Bill, Democrats bribed politicians in their own Party with our money.

December 2009 was also the month that “progressive” Democrats in the House introduced yet another Bill (CIR ASAP) that would grant amnesty to the millions of illegal aliens that have invaded and plundered our country.  Instead of introducing a Bill that would simply increase border security, coordinate nationwide enforcement, and remove the incentives for foreigners to come (and remain) here illegally, this “comprehensive reform” Bill seeks to legitimize, accomodate, and reward illegal immigration. 

It mandates better treatment and quartering of detainees, provides a “shortcut” pathway to legal residency for the illegals already here, forbids “discrimination” against illegal aliens, and repeals the 287(g) program that allows local police agencies to enforce immigration law.  In effect, this Bill would turn all of America into a “sanctuary nation” for illegal immigrants.

Add to THAT a failed attempt by a Nigerian muslim terrorist to blow-up a passenger plane in Detroit, on Christmas Day,  and December has been a memorable month for American politics.