If only we had a world where people could or would refrain from planning terrorism we wouldn’t need to use techniques like waterboarding, or “walling,” or other scary but non-lethal measures of interrogation. But we don’t. People are just going to plan terrorism because they simply want to plan terrorism. It’s human nature. It’s the way things are in the “real world.” Those religious fanatics have got to get over their ridiculous ideals that we can have a world where no one plans terrorism, but that’s just not realistic. At least by using techniques like waterboarding we can avoid the punishment on society of fully realized acts of terrorism.

It illustrates the insanity in those who want to “protect” the “right” to kill millions of unborn children each year, while getting all worked up about water boarding those who would slit their throats and record it on video.

… are those left-wing feminist nuts who are out there bombing the waterboarding facilities. These waterboarders are just minding their own business, enhancing their interrogations, when BAM!, someone throws a pipe bomb into their clean, well-lit waterboarding parlor. Or some left-wing feminist nut drops an F-bomb on their blog. That’s the true terrorism.

and “waterboarding Plan B,” in which the waterboarded person ingests 45 gallons of water immediately after capture.

Ever have a colonoscopy?

Freedom To Waterboard Act - - make it clear that there can be no restrictions on waterboarding, that it’s a fundamental right. Oh yeah, we need to eliminate conscience clauses that allow interrogators to refuse to waterboard based on religious convictions. And, while we are on religion, shame on the Church for calling out politicians who are personally opposed to waterboarding but recognize everyone’s right to choose.

Deciding to exercise one’s Constitutional right to waterboard is a highly personal decision. Some restrictions on activities that might be seen as interfering with that personal decision are needed. Any group that wants to stand outside waterboarding clinics in order to pass out allegedly “educational” or “informational” materials or to engage in alleged “counseling” of waterboard practitioners must be forced away to such a distance that they are not seen as interfering with the free exercise of waterboarding.

Instead of “waterboarding”, we should employ abortion “providers” and use techniques such as those approved by pro-choice advocates (that would be democrats) on the unwanted cell masses that they deal with every day. You know, like chopping their limbs off.

Please don’t try to speak for all of us when you advocate toture with phrases such as “we conservatives will work to make sure that waterboarding remains safe, legal, and rare”. It’s hard enough trying to get support for this party without people voicing support for those acts which we would dispise in others.

Please don’t try to speak for all of us when you advocate toture with phrases such as “we conservatives will work to make sure that waterboarding remains safe, legal, and rare”. It’s hard enough trying to get support for this party without people voicing support for those acts which we would dispise in others.

is that by plugging in waterboarding for abortion, a clear dissonance of argument made by the left is well illustrated.

If that is the case then to be pro-abortion would mean you would be pro- waterboarding, for consistency’s sake. So by the same reasoning shouldn’t those that are pro-life be anti-waterboarding?

weekend update editorial. Too bad they’d never use it.

Great job, Leon.

Sean Hannity let an easy one get by him this evening. Democrat Steve Murray claimed that “we prosecuted the Japanese for waterboarding [after WWII] because we thought it was torture, and it was.” Sean just ignored it and went on with his own talking points.

What should have happened was for Sean to point out that what the Japanese did during WWII was far removed from the procedure we do now that is called waterboarding. Until we start correcting the misstatements, obfuscations, and outright lies of the unscrupulous or uninformed left, we are simply abdicating the field and letting them win without a fight.

Conservative spokesmen must get all the facts, study the claims that have been made in Democrat talking points, and learn how to refute them. The ones that are based on falsehoods of one kind or another should be easy to counter. It’s unconscionable to let them go without protest.

“waterboarding is not torture.”

But I still say that it’s also key to not let the misstatements and outriight lies get by without correction. By accepting the statement, he left the impression it was valid, which it wasn’t. That’s not the first time I’ve heard that claim, either, and it was challenged that time, which is the only reason I knew it was wrong.

I did like the woman, Pamela Geller, of Atlasshrugs.com. She was brief and to the point. Greg Buttle was pretty good, too–”Cane ‘em.” And I missed the name of the Democrat. It was Steve Murphy.

I would also like to see one of us, whether Sean or Glenn or anybody, volunteer to be waterboarded on TV. It would pretty much shut up the claims of both being “chicken-hawks” and that waterboarding is torture.