<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"><channel xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"><title>RedState</title><link>https://redstate.com/leon_h_wolf/2011/04/29/mitch-daniels-announces-intent-to-sign-hb-1210/feed/</link><description>Conservative News &amp; Politics</description><language>en-us</language><lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 Jun 2026 06:26:08 -0400</lastBuildDate><item><title>Mitch Daniels Announces Intent to Sign H.B. 1210</title><description>&lt;![CDATA[Indiana Governor Mitch Daniels has announced his intent to sign Indiana&amp;#8217;s H.B. 1210, a measure which would, among other things, prevent Title X Medicaid funds from being used facilities that provide abortions. When the bill becomes law, Indiana will become the third state to have such a provision, following Texas (which passed &amp;#8220;Rider 8&amp;#8221; in 2003) and Missouri (which passed a nearly identical law in 1999).
Although the intent of the law is laudable, it would be inaccurate to say that the bills &amp;#8220;defund Planned Parenthood,&amp;#8221; as is commonly being reported in the media. As the Alliance Defense Fund has noted (pdf warning), the overall effect of the bill will essentially merely require some administrative paper shuffling on Planned Parenthood&amp;#8217;s part. In fact, that is the central feature of the law that will likely save it from a challenge on Supremacy Clause grounds:]]&gt;</description><pubDate>Fri, 29 Apr 2011 18:40:39 -0400</pubDate><creator xmlns="dc">&lt;![CDATA[Leon H. Wolf]]&gt;</creator><enclosure url="" type="image/jpeg" length="123" /><link>https://redstate.com/leon_h_wolf/2011/04/29/mitch-daniels-announces-intent-to-sign-hb-1210-n38845</link></item></channel></rss>