« BACK  |  PRINT

RS

FRONT PAGE CONTRIBUTOR

Obama Creates His Own Luck

“Throughout history, poverty is the normal condition of man. Advances which permit this norm to be exceeded — here and there, now and then — are the work of an extremely small minority, frequently despised, often condemned, and almost always opposed by all right-thinking people. Whenever this tiny minority is kept from creating, or (as sometimes happens) is driven out of a society, the people then slip back into abject poverty. This is known as ‘bad luck.’”
– Robert Heinlein

Today in Iowa, Barack Obama proved once and for all that he does not understand how the economy works:

At a town hall meeting on his campaign-style tour of the Midwest, President Obama claimed that his economic program “reversed the recession” until recovery was frustrated by events overseas.  And then, Obama said, with the economy in an increasingly precarious position, the recovery suffered another blow when Republicans pressed the White House for federal spending cuts in exchange for an increase in the national debt limit, resulting in a deal Obama called a “debacle.”

“We had reversed the recession, avoided a depression, gotten the economy moving again,” Obama told a crowd in Decorah, Iowa.  “But over the last six months we’ve had a run of bad luck.”  Obama listed three events overseas — the Arab Spring uprisings, the tsunami in Japan, and the European debt crises — which set the economy back.

In the first place, perhaps I have been living in the wrong one of John Edwards’ Two Americas, but I don’t really remember how everything was just fine in the American economy before the the tsunami hit Japan. That really seems like the sort of thing I would have noticed but maybe I just had my head in the sand – I am sure the American people will remember it next November, though. Second, I am a little puzzled as to how the debt ceiling compromised – which was passed two weeks ago – caused the recession to persist for the better part of the last three years. It’s even more puzzling than Katrina vandenHeuvel’s assertion that the August debt compromise caused a bad jobs report for July.

All of that aside, does Obama really think “bad luck” is the reason the economy is the way it is? If he really doesn’t have a better explanation then he ought to do the country a favor and step aside in favor of someone who actually understands that jobs are created by hard working, intelligent and/or creative people that he has spent the last 4 years demonizing and punishing at every opportunity. Their ability to create jobs is hampered by pointless regulation and their ability to obtain capital to continue functioning is hampered by the uncertainty that is created by leadership that is rudderless and/or openly hostile to wealth creation. When businesses don’t know if their plans will be hampered by arbitrary regulation or their profits confiscated, they don’t grow and jobs don’t get created.

That isn’t “bad luck,” it’s bad policy. And the country can’t take any more of it.

 

COMMENTS

  • Tbone

    named “Bad Luck Barry”?

    If Obama wants to blame our problems on bad luck, then I would like to introduce you to “Lucky Ricky”. New shooter coming out.

    • wennejunk

      Or ‘BLO’.

      Has a certain, catchy, iconic ring to it.

      Kinda like Jimmy Carter’s Malaise.

      • papabear

        BLO GO (away)
        BLO GO (away)

        :-)

    • Darin_H

  • http://tomwfox.wordpress.com/ Tom Fox

    I enjoyed Robert Heinlein’s science fiction when I was a teenager, but his exceptionally opinionated fictional characters didn’t understand economics any better than some exceptionally opinionated bloggers I’ve seen. Oil prices spiking up 25% from February to May this year because of the events in Egypt and Libya had no effect on the economy? And the near total disruption of the world’s third largest economy due to natural disaster was just an isolated and inconsequential event, with no impact here? Right. Who doesn’t understand economics?

    • lineholder

      Yes, those events did influence the economy. Are they ALL that influenced the economy? NO. The policy decisions that have been made during the course of the last 2.5 years have had a destructive impact on the economy and these outside events added to it.

      The Dems want people to believe that it was ALL because of the outside events and NONE of it was because of policies put into place under their watch.

      • http://tomwfox.wordpress.com/ Tom Fox

        “The policy decisions that have been made during the course of the last 2.5 years have had a destructive impact on the economy”

        Like what? Obama’s tax cuts?

        • gekster

          Spending money we don’t have.
          Endless unemployment benefits.
          Restrictions on coal miing. (Verginia Mountain top)
          Over regulation on coal fired power plants.
          Taxpayer money on green jobs (windmill and solar) that need taxpayer money to operate.
          Diverting water from farmers in califonia to save a worthless fish.(could of put the fish in an aquarium till the water came back)
          Stopping drilling for oil 70 miles off the Alaskan coast because smoke from a single ship “might” make it to land.
          Endless upon endless regulations on business.(over 700 in July alone.
          Giving money to Brazil for oil exploration while stifeling exploration at home.
          I could go on, but whats the point.

          • lineholder

            truthfully, I kind of suspect that Tom Fox might be looking to “jerk some chains”. I’m just not up to it tonight. It’s all yours. Do it up right, gekster.

          • gekster

            PPACA is the biggest one though.
            Business is holding onto money just to see what it will cost them and to be prepared in case it doesn’t get stuck down.
            Since its full effect wont be seen until 2014, I held back on that one.

          • gunslingr45

            about his NLRB and NC? And let us not forget his bailouts:
            Get your tax refund early?mug a GM or Chrysler worker tonight.

          • cwfoster

            the criminal seizure of private property inherent in those’bailouts’ when not only the contractually required interest but the principle was blown off to give the UAW and the Government their pieces of the GM and Chrysler ‘pie’. The bond holders come before shareholders in any liquidation of assets in a bankruptcy, hoowever that little legal nicety was totally overlooked and those ‘evil rich people’ (read, elderly folks retirement funds) were robbed! Any SANE person with any sigificant assets is probably buying gold and moving it offshore where it can’t be seized ala FDR!

        • rulken

          gekster; your right on I couldn’t have said it better.
          Our government is lying to us at a rate that is only equaled by their spending. This Administration is out of control, pure and simple, they have no clue as to what needs to be done!
          All the policies of this president are exactly what we shouldn’t be doing, and he is just bringing this country down further and further.
          The only way that he will have a chance to win in the coming election, is to give amnesty to all the Illegals that are here now, just watch, that will be his next move as we near the election.

      • wapitiman

        Our American economy was severely distressed by thirty years of congress’ mismanagement. Our elected misrepresentatives should proudly step forward and accept the responsibility. Presidents do not spent tons of money without the approval of these 220(?) elitist non-performers who exempt themselves from the laws they bring forth (for our benefit!).

      • RDCook

        People throughout history have not liked to struggle to exist. Throughout the history of mankind every sane person has attempted to do those things that promoted the wellbeing and security of themselves and their families. The basic path to this hoped for security was the accumulation of wealth. Wealth is not necessarily the accumulation of some type of money; it can be stored food, more serviceable clothing, higher quality tools or property he owns for security or profit. The type of government he lives with has tremendous influence on how successfully a person?s goal of security can be realized.
        The most successful approach has always been Capitalism. Even when Communist or Socialist governments have caused devastation with their policies; Capitalism in the form of black markets has stepped in to keep the flow of goods moving. Excess wealth, as some socialists claim, is not stuffed into a mattress and hoarded. Some is saved for emergencies or to even out economic fluctuations. When those requirements have been met it is the norm for extra capitol to be invested. It is invested to grow a current enterprise or to capitalize a new investment that is expected to also return a profit. If that enterprise is successful it will draw more investment and create more employment for more individuals who can also create wealth for themselves. This is not rocket science. It is pure basic common sense and human nature.
        The whole socialistic ideology of wealth redistribution is in direct opposition to sound economic policy. The first negative result it to relieve the successful wealth builders of their investment capital and give it to those who have proved unwilling to build their own wealth and security. Secondly it places government as the middle man who redistributes the confiscated wealth of the successful. Government by its very nature is unable to respond quickly or efficiently to economic realities due to bureaucratic constraints. As a result, the costs associated with all the red tape and wages paid to the bureaucrats sometimes take a huge bite out of the confiscated wealth, further decreasing socialism?s effectiveness.

    • Bill S

      are simply due to those factors, then you have a serious pot/kettle problem going on.

    • ChicaGOP

      … then explain, please, how they’ve managed to recover so much better than we have? Because the only lesson I can take from that laughable assertion is that Obama really can do more damage than a massive earthquake, devastating tsunami, floods and even a nuclear meltdown.

      You’re free to believe differently if you like, but don’t be surpirsed by the looks it gets you.

      • renl57

        Germany’s economy came through all these crises in much better shape than America’s.

        That’s because Germany’s finances were in better shape than America’s was at the moment the tsunami hit.

        Unlike some folks here, I don’t blame it all on Obama. The underlying problem had been building for years before Obama became President.

        For decades we had built an economy based on consumer spending driven by debt. And increasingly, that became leveraged debt, with home equity lines of credit and homes bought with relatively little money down. Some of us had realized long ago that this type of economy wasn’t sustainable for the long haul.

        Japan and other nations built their economies around production and investment. While we continued to coast on our World War II and Cold War victories.

    • 6eorge Jetson

      and ObamaCare mandates.

      Obama figured his stimulus would actually jump start the economy. But looky, here, after $500 billion of stimulus work that no one was paying for on their own before the stimulus, we find out that folks still won’t pay for those goods and services on their own after the stimulus. And we’re further down the debt hole.

      Heck, the Keystone Pipeline would create ~100,000 American jobs. You would think that a President would pounce at the chance to find a month’s worth of job gains under the couch. But the President dithers, and we all know what he wants to do.

      How does a project get months behind? One day at a time.

      • beisenbise

        I’m in the solar biz in California (so sue me, I make my living off of hippies’ sense of self-loathing)… :)

        Over the past year I’ve been to a few bid conferences for several ARRA funded solar projects around the Bay Area. One library, one school, 2 police stations, etc. Since they’re non-profit they don’t qualify for the 30% tax credit. On top of that, each of these projects is ARRA funded, so it requires us to pay prevailing wage. Then, there’s all sorts of other regulations and other nonsense that we’d have to abide by in order to win the job. Due to all of the above, in every single case it cost more money over 25 years to install solar than to do nothing and continue to pay the utility.

        In other words, because the library/police station/school ISN’T SPENDING THEIR OWN MONEY, they DON’T CARE that the numbers don’t pencil out. For the city involved, it means they can erase the electricity bills off their books, because now the Feds are paying (more) for it. So each of these cities that participates is not paying their own utilities through their local taxpayer dollars, but making YOU pay for their electricity through ARRA. Isn’t Stimulus great?

        Of course, to a Keynsian, it doesn’t matter. You could dig a hole, fill it up, repeat, and as long as it cost too much, they’d be happy.

        Sigh. Looks like I need to move to Texas and find a new line of work.

        • gekster

          Go with what you got.
          It’s not your fault the Government is dumb.

      • norinosnocinos

        will also be those pubic entities with solar panels all over their roofs. They will spend the big bucks cause, hey, it’s other peoples money.

      • gunslingr45

        said it best.

        ?A friend of mine was asked to a costume ball a short time ago. He slapped some egg on his face and went as a liberal economist.? (Ronald Reagan)

    • http://tomwfox.wordpress.com/ Tom Fox

      In a letter to a fan, regarding “Stranger in a Strange Land”

      “I would never undertake to be a `Prophet,’ handing out neatly packaged answers to lazy minds. . . . anyone who takes that book as answers is cheating himself. It is an invitation to think — not to believe.”

      • romeg

        why are you peddling your simplistic crap here?

        Perhaps you should be posting on the Puffington Host.

        • http://tomwfox.wordpress.com/ Tom Fox

          “Perhaps you should be posting on the Puffington Host.”

          I have posted there, and also on another dozen different sites. Thanks for caring.

      • Repair_Man_Jack

        You should perhaps take it up. Give some thought about the magnitude of each the excuses that Mein Obama offred for his failures in comparison tot he delterious impact of his policies. Perhaps you can come up with a cogent explanation for why trillions in badly-needed venture capital stays in tax-shelters, despite the availability of many saleable assets at fire sale prices. If you can come up with a rational explanation for that successfully elides both ObamaCare and the current regulatory climate, than perhaps Jay Carney should sharpen his resume.

        • http://tomwfox.wordpress.com/ Tom Fox

          “Perhaps you can come up with a cogent explanation for why trillions in badly-needed venture capital stays in tax-shelters”

          Right offhand I’d say, lack of consumer demand. What really great new ventures are going unfunded? Like, give me an example.

          • Repair_Man_Jack

            From Seeking ALpha

            …especially as I hear Marilyn talk about, a month like October for example, that there’s not an inch of meeting square footage left in Las Vegas and as we think about limited or no supply over the next several years, being added back to Las Vegas, does it not make sense to expand your meeting square footage? I know you can do it east of country club or in that area?

            William Lerner – Deutsche Bank Securities

            Well, here’s our problem. There are a host of opportunities for expansion in Las Vegas, a host of opportunities to create tens of thousands of jobs in Las Vegas. I know that I could do 10,000 more myself and according to the Chamber of Commerce and the Visitors Convention Bureau, if we hired 10,000 employees, it would create another 20,000 additional jobs for a grand total of 30,000…But I’m afraid to do anything in the current political environment in the United States…And I’m saying it bluntly, that this administration is the greatest wet blanket to business, and progress and job creation in my lifetime. And I can prove it and I could spend the next 3 hours giving you examples of all of us in this market place that are frightened to death about all the new regulations, our healthcare costs escalate, regulations coming from left and right. A President that seems — that keeps using that word redistribution.

            – Steve Wynn, CEO Wynn Casinoes and Resorts.

          • http://tomwfox.wordpress.com/ Tom Fox

            More meeting space in Las Vegas? There is more demand for meeting space in Las Vegas than the existing supply can satisfy, and “trillions in badly-needed venture capital stays in tax-shelters?rather than build more much needed meeting space? Las Vegas is turning down bookings for meetings because it lacks enough meeting space. Really?

            I don’t believe it. It’s absurd.

          • lineholder

            to accomplish in this discussion?

          • gekster

            He asked up thread:
            Like what?
            The policy decisions that have been made during the course of the last 2.5 years have had a destructive impact on the economy?
            Like what? Obama?s tax cuts?

            I gave him a laundry list of things, and got no respnse.

          • lineholder

            Too bad RMJ excluded PPACA from his list above, because this particular piece of legislation is currently having a far more destructive influence on our economy than meets the eye.

          • 6eorge Jetson

            like here

            Reading Is Fundamental

    • Tbone

      The Japanese quake cost less than what our government spends in one lousy month.

      Leftist Liberals have absolutely no genetic ability to understand economics.

    • RichmondG30

      Doofus.

    • Darin_H

      No doubt there was nothing the president could do about oil prices spiking up 25%!!

      There is no way he could have opened up the gulf more, opened up drilling off the coast of VA and NJ, opened up ANWR. I mean gosh, just announcing those policies would lower oil/gas prices as people would start betting on oil prices declining with all the extra supply coming online…. It’s like there is a relationship between supply, demand and prices! Imagine that!

      • gunslingr45

        was a very well placed smack of truth to the face!

        If ignorance is bliss, liberal/socialist must be euphoric! I said that.

        • Darin_H

          Creating more supply at home isn’t the answer. I mean why drill in ANWR, it would just produce an insignificant amount of oil, only comparable to Libya’s production. Why would we ever want to have that on hand with all the unrest there? Next thing you know, the middle east unrest will spread to Alaska if we drill there – cause and effect!!!

          Bad luck, dontcha know?

          :)

    • romeg

      are the only contributors to the spike in oil prices and there is nothing that was done by this administration to contribute to that nor nothing that could have been done as a counter measure. And, Please, spare me the Strategic Reserves releases. At least try to be more creative than your initial post.

      As for Japan: The U.S. industry most severely affected by is the Auto Industry. So you are suggesting that the earthquake and tsunami in Japan has kept the auto industry from flourishing and that they frustrated the business friendly actions of the Obama Administration?

      Of course you can document all of this.

    • jchilborn

      While events in the world affect oil prices, I wonder if shutting down the Gulf Coast oil production in the 3d largest oil producing nation on the earth had anything to do with oil prices? This President makes his own luck — all bad.

  • makemyday

    This is all just a scheme that starts out as Bad Luck which is as we all know is bad Ju Ju that will then be spun into It’s the Evil Joooooooooooooosssss!

    That one is for you Kenny!

    • 6eorge Jetson

      ?

  • Next93

    1) This is the first time in my life I’ve been older than the sitting US President.

    2) This is the first time in my life I’m certain that I know more about economics than the sitting US President.

    Getting older kinda sucks.

    • edintexas

      At least all that experience allowed you to see the truth (even before Dear Leader gained the nomination), which most of the young came ill-prepared to understand.

      • gunslingr45

        to differ ed. These young uns knew what they were getting into. In fact a lot of them are avowed marxist.

        A wise man here on red state once said (and its true)
        United we stand?. Divided we fall.. into the pits of Socialism

  • rightwingmom52

    Maybe he realized that excuse is getting old and tired.

    • Next93

      Once the inflation from the “quantative easing” hits the common folk, he’s going to need more than “bad luck”. If he’s already used “it’s Bush’s fault” and “it’s bad luck”, the only thing left is going to be blaming the family dog.

  • Adjoran

    The perfect socialist collectivist experiment, which succeeded dramatically except for 70 consecutive years of bad weather.

    • standingonthewall

      Adjoran, your comment is so perfect I just had to say thanks for posting.

  • desertwanderer

    Just as BHO’s policies start to really kick in, the economy starts to tank. I mean, who really thinks that excessive new regulations, trillions in new debt, government takeovers of huge sectors of the economy, and Obamacare have been bad for the economy?!?!

    Oh, yeah, that’s right, anyone with even a modicum of common sense would know that BHO’s economic policies were destined to bring about the “bad luck” that we are now experiencing.

    • evas

      of the farmer who decided to train his horse not to eat, so everyday he fed him less and less. ” And shucks, just as I almost had him trained, the horse up and died!”

      • gunslingr45

        that horse must have voted for “the one.”
        And why not? If dead people can vote, why not a horse of course?

        Socialism billions dead, but liberals keep wanting to try it?..

    • norinosnocinos

      Stimulus money that was directed at state and local gubmint workers has been running out for a while which will likely increase unemployment near term. Expect Obumbler to blame terrorists in the House for standing on their promise to their constituents.

      This should add a dozen new lies to the Democrat talking points. Can hardly wait for Debbie DNC Schultz to tell us what they are.

  • http://whattoreadtoday.blogspot.com/ Paula

    Last year my son took Intro to Microeconomics at a public university and was assigned a textbook by Paul Krugmann. I was really shocked that someone would actually put in print that they believed poverty was caused by lack of education, racial discrimination and BAD LUCK. No kidding, it actually listed BAD LUCK as a cause for poverty. They start feeding this nonsense to students freshman year. No wonder most of them are socialists by the time they graduate.

    So grateful my kid gets to go to Hillsdale College.

  • mark88hosting

    …for people who don’t want to take responsibility for the negative consequences of their actions…or policies. Was the Great Depression “bad luck”? Was the Japanese bombing of Pearl Harbor “bad luck”? We live in an interconnected world — political actions and decisions beyond our borders from friend and foe alike affect our economy. Natural disasters in other parts of the world affect our economy. Every president in recent times has had to deal with that…some obviously more effective than others. Is the American economy now so fragile that the slightest shock from abroad unravels it? Is the Obama administration, and his party in general, so self-delusional that it believes it is faultless regarding the economic and social problems affecting America today? I feel like I am reliving the late 1970s-early 1980s all over again. How about a stimulus to help the traditional growth engine of our country – the private sector? Until confidence is restored, there won’t be a lot of business expansion, won’t be a lot of long term hiring, and won’t be any significant and sustainable improvements in economic growth. The national debt has always been there — but strong economic output has normally rendered it a non-issue. Only when time are bad do the politicians care — they need someone else to blame in order to help them stay in power.

  • bk

    Let’s compare what he thinks of as bad luck to how some earlier events were characterized.

    Obama’s bad luck:
    - Surge in gas prices
    - Earthquake in Japan
    - Global economic problems
    - A piece of Congress that opposes him

    Seems like just yesterday we had:
    - Surge in gas prices (2008) – Proof that Bush was in the pocket of big oil
    - Katrina – Not only did Bush get blamed for Katrina (oh, if only he’d signed onto the Kyoto protocol it would never have happened), he was accused of having guys go down and blow up levees to drown poor black people
    - 9/11 – Again he got the blame (failed to connect the dots caused by the Clinton/Gorelick wall)
    - Global economic problems – All the problems around the world were blamed on Bush, apparently because he reduced tax rates here
    - The last two years (not coincidentally when the economy started heading south) he had hard-line liberal House and Senate to deal with

    But I guess this is a sign that “blame Bush” and “blame the tea party” are starting to lose out in their constant focus groups. I’m surprised “blame bad luck” is coming out ahead though. Just think of the campaign slogans he can use next year, such as:
    “Give me four more years – this time maybe I’ll have better luck”

  • CJB68

       He heard where Obama’s been holding these campaign speeches in counties where the unemployment rate is actually lower than elsewhere in the nation.  I wonder.  Could these be government jobs?

  • SoFiMil

    Cry me a river.

    • Next93

      But only with countries that were more-or-less friendly to the US (i.e., Egypt). The revolutions in countries that are openly hostile towards us (Syria) don’t seem to rate the same treatment.

  • evas

    Rush said it

  • evas

    The tsunami is Obama’s fault, after all didn’t he promise to lower the sea levels?

  • renl57

    So Obama’s now blaming a 9% or higher unemployment rate throughout his entire Administration on “bad luck”???

    That reminds me of how the old Soviet Union’s propagandists used to blame 70 years of bad harvests on “bad weather.”

    Maybe I’m getting old, but I can remember a time when the U.S. economy was so robust and vibrant that it wouldn’t have been so shaken by a tsunami in Japan. If our economy is now so fragile that events anywhere on earth can wreck it, that’s Obama’s responsibility.

  • 6eorge Jetson

    • Darin_H

      First thing I thought of was that song.

      Obama for America’s new campaign commercial:

  • BA Cyclone

    is bad weather, then all I am saying is maybe it’s not the fault of the bad weather, but rather the person who is driving the train.

    Healthy companies, and healthy economies can weather minor storms and tempests.

    If this job is too rough and tough for Obama, why does he think we need to elect him for another term?

    • izoneguy

      Great Question! – Maybe someone can ask him that today???

      • izoneguy

        It’s becoming very obvious that the world economy is losing its ability to integrate the slower, duller, and less-flexible population. This is the downside of a high-technology information-based economy: many people simply can’t keep up. They can’t stay competitive in the job-market. That’s why some jobs go begging even in a 10%+ unemployment economy.

        I could not have said it any better myself. How many times do you go and buy fast food and the bill is let’s say $11.15 – So you hand the cashier $21.15, a twenty dollar bill, a one and 15 cents – and they look at you like you are crazy? Most of them take the 20 and hand you back the $1.15 and then give you change from the 20 when what you wanted back was a $10 bill.

      • BA Cyclone

        I have had that one in my head for about a week now with all these stupid excuses coming out of his mouth.

        Ryan Rhodes of the Iowa Tea Party represented well yesterday, here is to hoping someone can keep the hits coming!

        It’s not “heated debate” if we merely choose to call out the President on his obvious B.S. We surely can’t wait for the media to do it!

      • BA Cyclone

        I have had that one in my head for about a week now with all these stupid excuses coming out of his mouth.

        Ryan Rhodes of the Iowa Tea Party represented well yesterday, here is to hoping someone can keep the hits coming!

        It’s not “heated debate” if we merely choose to call out the President on his obvious B.S. We surely can’t wait for the media to do it!

    • cja99

      If all it takes to throw Obama’s economics off the track
      is bad weather, then all I am saying is maybe it?s not the fault of the bad weather, but rather the person who is driving the train. Hey GOP, this is something you should use.

  • gunslingr45

    hoping we can throw BAD LUCK under the bus in 2012!

    If ignorance is bliss, liberal/socialist must be euphoric! I said that.

    • Darin_H

      I hope that Barack Obama comes out on the day after the election and blames his loss on “BAD LUCK”

  • cja99

    That says it all. Obama and Emmult are together on stage yucking it up talking about wasting $800 Billion Dollars on the shovel ready jobs. If you want to get people “outraged”, keep playing that tape. Obama doesn’t have a clue about the economy and doesn’t care. It’s all about getting himself re-elected to force us into a socialist country.

  • http://www.trommetter.com/log/ Jason

    I think Barack must have been tokin’ some wacky weed lately.

    George W. had a string of bad luck too. Remember 9/11 and Hurricane Katrina? Did Bush go around blaming other people? Man Up Obama!

  • lineholder

    A friend of mine sent me an email about the “bad luck President”, saying that it reminded of the old HeeHaw skit where they sing “Gloom, Despair and Agony on me” etc.

    Wondering if anyone could put together a picture of some of our most favor-ight Dems in the Hee Haw context?

  • ihateliberals

    Obama has never taken any responsibility for the troubles of this country. The things that happen to our economy is always someone’s or something else s fault other than what he is or is not doing. this is not a leader this is a reporter.

    If I were a production manager for a large Corporation and production was down and I came to my boss and said the tsunami in Japan caused parts delays and the war in Lybia cause this unrest and etc etc I would be fired. But if I went to him and said Boss, i wasn’t able to counteract the effects of the tsunami in Japan but I am taking measures to purchase the parts we need from xyz i would l have a better chance of keeping my job. The reason being is I took responsibility for the failure. In reality it would have been my job to have contingencies for the case of a tsunami etc. In the case of Obama he never takes the blame for anything. He never has a contingency for anything except that when he finally gets caught he will blame the closet person of thing for his failure. Anyway i hope you get the jist of wht I;m saying about him. he is simply in over his hed whenit comes to America land tht he Hates.

  • SoFiMil

    According to the President: 1) anything good is because of Obama – and only Obama, 2) the American public has absolutely no grounds to take credit for even the smallest success, 3) anything bad is obviously the result of someone or something else, and most aggregious of all is 4) the inference that God has nothing to do with our Nation’s success.

    Praise God from Whom all blessings flow.

    This is some of the most arrogant spin I’ve heard – even from a politician.