« BACK  |  PRINT

RS

MEMBER DIARY

The True Cost of Our Rising Deficit

According to the non-partisan Congressional Budget Office, the President’s budget proposal for 2010 will produce a $9.3 trillion addition to our current deficit over the next ten years.  As with a person or company that borrows money, the federal government must pay interest on all borrowed funds.  To do this, the federal government sells U.S. Treasury bonds and bills to people, companies, even foreign countries.  Because they were considered the safest product on the market- after all, what other investment could be more sound than the United States government- the bonds were sold at a very low interest rate, giving rise to a low borrowing cost.  The United States would primarily sell these Treasury bonds and bills to Asian markets and countries in the Middle East, but in addition they were sold to companies and people all over the world. 

As the United States deficit grows, however, our need for additional borrowed money grows.  Unfortunately, our two largest customers- Asian markets and Middle Eastern countries- have also been experiencing a market decline and falling oil prices, decreasing their ability to purchase these bonds and bills.  Even more importantly, as our national debt continues to grow, investors will be less enticed to purchase bonds and bills backed by a government that seems intent on wracking up debt without paying it off.

All of this leads to one clear fact: sometime shortly, we will no longer be able to continue to sell as many Treasury bonds and bills as we need to run the government.  So what happens then?

First, the Federal Reserve could continue to purchase U.S. Treasury bonds and bills as they have already done to the tune of $300 billion, basically allowing the federal government to turn on the printing presses.  However, this option should only be used in a limited fashion because printing too much money creates inflation across our entire market, driving down the value of the dollar and increasing the cost to do business.

Second, the federal government can increase the interest rate on Treasury bonds and bills, creating a higher rate of return and an increased incentive for purchasing them.  In turn, our borrowing cost will increase significantly, raising our overall national debt.  Even more important, raising the interest rate of Treasury bonds and bills will force other lenders to raise their interest rates on variable loans and new loans.  This will have an extremely negative affect on small businesses across this country, particularly farmers and ranchers who rely primarily on credit to run their business.  And- as we all saw with the negative affects of the increased business cost on energy companies last summer- any increase in the cost to do business is passed on to American consumers in the form of increased prices.

As we continue to discuss the President’s budget proposal for 2010, we must remind ourselves of the true cost of our mounting deficit.  In addition to burdening our children and grandchildren with the debts of our poor choices, we could potentially be worsening our already fragile economy.  Instead of continuing to borrow our way out of our current financial problems, we must now- more than ever- focus on fiscal discipline.

Frank Lucas represents Oklahoma’s Third Congressional District in the United States House of Representatives.  For more Frankly Speakings, please visit Rep. Lucas’ Blog at http://www.house.gov/lucas/frankly-speaking/index.shtml.

COMMENTS

  • red4ever

    Isn’t the Federal Reserve just part of the government? So, if the Federal Reserve is buying debt, what are they using to buy the debt? At some point real money has to be used.

    • csstudent

      The governors of the federal reserve are appointed by the president, but the federal reserve system is not funded by the government. It is the central bank of the United States, but not an actual part of the federal government. Nobody in the government can tell them how to set interest rates for example.

      When they buy treasury bills they are literally printing money(or at least the electronic equivalent of that). This is what Congressman Lucas is referring to in his fourth paragraph.

      I’d suggest viewing the following 7 minute video. It was very eye opening to me. http://www.chrismartenson.com/crashcourse/chapter-8-fed-money-creation

      • red4ever

        and thanks Olsmithie below for the information.

        I always thought that it was just one part of the government buying from another part.

        Of course, printing the money to buy the debt isn’t much better.

        I love Red State. I can ask questions and get serious answers so I can understand better.

      • olsmithie
  • http://jeffemanuel.net Jeff Emanuel

    is just continued denial of the real problem.

    • Jack_Savage

      The 2009 budget deficit is so shocking and ridiculous that no one has the energy to discuss the national debt. I believe Republicans need to educate the public on the difference between the two, because Barack Obama is setting the table to brag about reducing his enormous budget deficit by half (Hey! See that window I broke? I just fixed it! Vote for me!) while conveniently not mentioning the unprecedented increase in the national debt.

      Good call on refocusing on the national debt.

    • Praveen

      China doubts dollar. “Tax Cheat” Geithner speaks today in accepting tone and we see a run on the dollar. Market nosedives. It recovered when he was coaxed into realizing his mistake.

      Treasury bonds are finding it hard to get attention. China reluctatnt to buy debt. I heard Senator Gregg mention on fox that “we might be in a situation where we spend the entire productivity of the nation into servicing interest on the debt and might go bankrupt”. I’ve been thinking that is no longer a remote possibility.

      Lynch mob mentality that we witnessed after “A.I.G. Obama Bonuses” … retroactive legislation…

      I have been hearing people around me talking about moving to non-American companies last cpl of days… There were a few callers on Rush Limbaugh’s show too talking in similar tones.

      Unless administration reverses course….

  • olsmithie

    in the middle of the night at the Jekyll Island Estate of JP Morgan.

    Bertie Charles Forbes describes it this way in

    Picture a party of the nation’s greatest bankers stealing out of New York on a private railroad car under cover of darkness, stealthily riding hundred of miles South, embarking on a mysterious launch, sneaking onto an island deserted by all but a few servants, living there a full week under such rigid secrecy that the names of not one of them was once mentioned, lest the servants learn the identity and disclose to the world this strangest, most secret expedition in the history of American finance. I am not romancing; I am giving to the world, for the first time, the real story of how the famous Aldrich currency report, the foundation of our new currency system, was written… The utmost secrecy was enjoined upon all. The public must not glean a hint of what was to be done. Senator Aldrich notified each one to go quietly into a private car of which the railroad had received orders to draw up on an unfrequented platform. Off the party set. New York’s ubiquitous reporters had been foiled… Nelson (Aldrich) had confided to Henry, Frank, Paul and Piatt that he was to keep them locked up at Jekyll Island, out of the rest of the world, until they had evolved and compiled a scientific currency system for the United States, the real birth of the present Federal Reserve System, the plan done on Jekyll Island in the conference with Paul, Frank and Henry… Warburg is the link that binds the Aldrich system and the present system together. He more than any one man has made the system possible as a working reality

    The Creature from Jekyll Island, Griffin, G. Edward (1998).

    Regards

    • olsmithie
  • redneck_hippie

    Excessive spending and borrowing on the part of the consumer helped get us into this mess, and the government has only encouraged the irresponsibility in order to “take advantage of the crisis.”

    Immediate gratification consumption and a greedy & unaccountable government are a bad combination.

    • redneck_hippie

      the radio today that the response to this week’s treasury auction was “tepid.”

      No surprise here.

  • Jack_Savage

    Please continue to do all you can to prevent America from becoming just one more subprime borrower.

  • USNJIMRET

    Outstanding call!
    If you are the first to use it, congratulations.
    If you aren’t the originator, Thanks for sharing the concept.
    This seems like an excellent argument for anyone interested in fiscal accountability to use against the tax/borrow and spend plans that are the core of the Obama agenda.
    Like people who knew, KNEW, they couldn’t afford the house they wanted, the Obama agenda can’t afford the plans he is looking to implement.
    Like the subprime borrower, who acts as if the economy is always going to improve, their income is never going to lessen, and creditors will never come calling to settle the debt, Obama acts as if everything will be all right if his plans are enacted.
    When history proves to the opposite, he claims we have no choice.
    We DO have a choice, live within your means Mr President.
    Stop this insane cruise!

  • Jack_Savage

    The trajectory we are on as a country is exactly the same trajectory as underwater homeowners. Rosy projections, excessive borrowing, financial ruin.

  • Next93

    Everything you said in this post should be painfully obvious to any reasonably astute junior high student. Unfortunately, this sort of thing is “too complex” for 52% of American voters, who feel that “cool” is qualification enough for the job of President. We’re about to learn the the penalty for ignorance.

    Since November I’ve been dealing with a nearly incpacitating sense of impending doom. I’m afraid that over the next 4 years I will be watching the beginning of the end for America. I realize that over the years a lot of people have encountered untimely death by underestimating America, but I just don’t think we’re going to be able to survive the damage that the second Carter administration is going to wreak on our economy, military, industry, and national character, not while we’re simultaneously dealing with the economic time bombs planted by the FDR, Johnson, and Clinton administrations (amazing how they’re all going to be going off at the same time, isn’t it?).

    As depressing as it’s been for me, I can’t imagine what it must be like to be a member of the House right now, outnumbered, knowing that you’re watching a monumental disaster unfold, and powerless to stop it.

    I’m glad that men and women like you are still fighting the good fight, but with trautors like Snow, Collins, and Specter in the Senate, I’m afraid the best you can do simply won’t save us.

  • johndakota

    Check this story by FOX news.

    http://www.foxnews.com/politics/first100days/2009/03/25/obama-helped-fund-carbon-scheme/

    Apparently Obama was on a charity foundation that gave grants to a Cap and Trade company. Why are all the Green-Liberals using this lie as a way to get rich and enact policies that would crush the poor and middle class in the process? Please explain, especially if you are a Green-Liberal.