« BACK  |  PRINT

RS

MEMBER DIARY

Strategy Shift in Iraq Shows Significant Progress in War on Terror

Due to the great progress made by our brave men and women on the front lines, President Obama has announced the US mission in Iraq will shift from a combat role to an advisory and assistance mission for the Iraqi government and its security forces beginning August 31, 2010 and continuing for the next 17 months.

As many of you recall, the situation in Iraq in early 2007 was bleak at best.  We were losing ground on all fronts, and changes needed to be made.  The new strategy adopted by President Bush and Generals Petraeus and Odierno was a 20,000 troop surge to the country.  This strategy was controversial at the time and met with some opposition in Congress.  However, the American people joined President Bush and his commanders in their confidence in the ability and drive of our American soldiers and believed this new strategy should be given an opportunity to succeed before it was assumed it would fail.  And succeed it did.  In just three-and-a-half years since the surge was implemented, our troops on the ground have performed exactly as our commanders had hoped – bringing about the progress that allows for this new drawdown and shift.

As the role of American troops begins to shift at the end of this month, it is important to remember there is still much to do in Iraq.  However, this discussion of success and the new shift in strategy in the country would never have been possible without the hard work and sacrifice of those troops on the ground and their families back home.  This new role must only strengthen our resolve and commitment to ensuring a secure Iraq, free from oppression and terrorism.

COMMENTS

  • rbdwiggins

    of the Obama administration’s effort to cut $100 Billion from the defense budget than a prudent strategy shift enabled by significant progress in Iraq.

    Concealed by comfortable language…

    Iran is the ultimate beneficiary of this new “strategy.”

  • izoneguy

    • ywhyvon1

      Agree with him or not
      President George W. Bush said what he meant and meant what he said

      AND THEN DID HIS DA**dest TO DO IT!

      right or wrong-you knew where W stood.

      and believe me, I cursed his name often. Now, I would like someone as American as he to be back in the hot seat.

  • ywhyvon1
    • ywhyvon1

      Redstater here only please:

      Why the h*ll does a congressman who serves on the house committees for

      Agriculture
      Finance Services
      Science and Technology

      have a post regarding the war in Iraq?

      As a private citizen, say what you will, coming on Redstate as a seated congressman trying to “polotick” chaps my a** .

      Redstaters, correct me please.

      • Bill S

        Because we welcome diaries from Senators and Reps, and we usually front-page them. The fact that a Congressman doesn’t serve on a military-related committee does not disqualify him from having an opinion about it.

        • ywhyvon1

          that’s why I asked for help from Redstaters(those that have been around such as yourself)

          I’ll just get a loofah

          • ywhyvon1

            the Good Congressman has been on this sight for 1 year an d 7 months and according to his resume on Redstate, he has recently posted this article and I see n reponses.

            Oh, he can’t respond if he hasn’t posted before.

            Getting close to elections or what?

            I don’t disagree with supporting seated republicans, but don’t treat me like a rube.