<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"><channel xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"><title>RedState</title><link>https://redstate.com/lexington_concord/2010/09/06/few-observers-believe-the-violence-was-due-to-racial-hatred/feed/</link><description>Conservative News &amp; Politics</description><language>en-us</language><lastBuildDate>Thu, 11 Jun 2026 02:10:02 -0400</lastBuildDate><item><title>"[F]ew observers believe the violence was due to racial hatred."</title><description>&lt;![CDATA[This post is not about crime, or violence, or racism, or even race. This is a post about the ridiculous subconscious biases that permeate the way the media covers news. Although this exact sort of absurdity has been pointed out again and again, the purveyors of the sort of obliviousness displayed below still are afforded positions of respect among too much of the voting populace. And so we must hit them again and expose who they are.]]&gt;</description><pubDate>Mon, 06 Sep 2010 09:30:58 -0400</pubDate><creator xmlns="dc">&lt;![CDATA[lexington_concord]]&gt;</creator><enclosure url="" type="image/jpeg" length="123" /><link>https://redstate.com/lexington_concord/2010/09/06/few-observers-believe-the-violence-was-due-to-racial-hatred-n36111</link></item></channel></rss>