<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"><channel xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"><title>RedState</title><link>https://redstate.com/lexington_concord/2010/11/29/the-american-idol-ization-of-abortion/feed/</link><description>Conservative News &amp; Politics</description><language>en-us</language><lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 Jun 2026 10:09:11 -0400</lastBuildDate><item><title>The American Idol-ization of Abortion</title><description>&lt;![CDATA[Last week the smut-peddlers at Gawker.com introduced us all to Pete and Alisha Arnold. Alisha Arnold is apparently 17 weeks pregnant, and the Arnolds have allegedly decided to let the Internet vote on whether Alisha will carry their son to full term or abort him. I say &amp;#8220;allegedly&amp;#8221; because I am fairly skeptical of whether the Arnolds intend to follow through with their plan. In fairness, the Arnolds have left themselves a pretty substantial loophole, declaring essentially that they have veto power over the Internet poll. This seems to be fairly transparent way of saying that the Arnolds will check the results of the poll and then do whatever their hearts desire.]]&gt;</description><pubDate>Mon, 29 Nov 2010 13:30:58 -0500</pubDate><creator xmlns="dc">&lt;![CDATA[lexington_concord]]&gt;</creator><enclosure url="" type="image/jpeg" length="123" /><link>https://redstate.com/lexington_concord/2010/11/29/the-american-idol-ization-of-abortion-n37134</link></item></channel></rss>