« BACK  |  PRINT

RS

MEMBER DIARY

The Georgia Legislative Black Caucus and the Theory of White Flight

In this crazy, mixed up environment we are living in of late, it is difficult to tell which claims may be legitimate and which ones aren’t. Sometimes, in the process of trying to find truth, we learn something new.

That’s pretty much so the case for me when it comes to the recent lawsuit that the Georgia Legislative Black Caucus has filed against the State of Georgia and the theory of “white flight”.

The Georgia Legislative Black Caucus filed a lawsuit Monday against the state of Georgia seeking to dissolve the city charters of Dunwoody, Sandy Springs, Johns Creek, Milton and Chattahoochee Hills. Further, the lawmakers, joined by civil rights leader the Rev. Joseph Lowery, aim to dash any hopes of a Milton County.

The lawsuit, filed in a North Georgia U.S. District Court Monday, claims that the state circumvented the normal legislative process and set aside its own criteria when creating the “super-majority white ” cities within Fulton and DeKalb counties. The result, it argues, is to dilute minority votes in those areas, violating the Voting Rights Act of 1965 and the Fourteenth and Fifteenth Amendments to the Constitution.

“This suit is based on the idea that African Americans and other minorities can elect the people of their choice,” said Democratic State Sen. Vincent Fort.

According to these sources (here, here and here), the facts of this case are as follows:

Fulton County is 44.5% white and 44.1% black.

DeKalb County is 54% black and 33.3% white.

Sandy Springs, created in 2005, currently part of Fulton County, is 65% white and 20% black

Milton, formed a year later, currently part of Fulton County, is 76.6% white and 9% black

Johns Creek, also formed that year, currently part of Fulton County, is 63.5% white and 9.2% black

Chattahoochee Hills, formed in 2007, currently in Fulton County, is 68.6% white and 28% black

Dunwoody, created in 2008, currently in DeKalb County, is 69.8% white and 12.6% black

(These statistics are based on the 2010 census results)

Sandy Springs, Milton, Johns Creek, Dunwoody and Chattahoochee Hills want to withdraw from Fulton and DeKalb County and establish a new county called Milton County. In light of recent census evaluations, this could be an opportunity for them to do so.

At this point, it appears that establishment of a new county, Milton County, might require that the state go through the process of preclearance defined in the Voting Rights Act of 1965 to obtain approval from the Department of Justice, but the GLBC could have difficulty in proving its claim that the state has violated any laws.

Emory University law professor Michael Kang said the case is unique because the Voting Rights Act focuses on redistricting, whereas this lawsuit challenges the legality of cities. Kang, who has not reviewed the case in its entirety, said the plaintiffs will likely have to show evidence of discriminatory purpose to have a strong claim. (emphasis mine)

What evidence of discriminatory purpose could the GLBC present that would cause the court to rule in their favor? That depends on whether or not the theory of “white flight” is taken into consideration as evidence in the case.

The simple definition of “white flight” is that it is “the sociological and demographic term denoting a trend wherein whites leave urban communities as the minority population increases.”

The theory of “white flight” originates from the 1950s and 1960s. It contends that financial institutions owned or operated primarily by white people were willing to lend housing funds to white people seeking to live in the suburbs but refused to do the same for black people. This led to redlining, mortgage discrimination, racially-restrictive covenants, and environmental racism , “all of which deny black people their chance to obtain the American dream”.

The theory of “white flight” also supports the belief that suburbanization by white people leads to urban decay. Urban decay is described as “the sociological process whereby a city, or part of a city, falls into disrepair and decrepitude — depopulation, economic restructuring, abandoned buildings, high local unemployment, fragmented families, political disenfranchisement, crime, and a desolate, inhospitable city landscape. White flight’s draining of a city’s tax base is one cause” (emphasis mine)

Even more telling of how much emphasis is being placed on the theory of “white flight” is this description of a book written by Kevin Kruse entitled White Flight: Atlanta and the Making of Modern Conservatism.

Challenging the conventional wisdom that white flight meant nothing more than a literal movement of whites to the suburbs, this book argues that it represented a more important transformation in the political ideology of those involved. In a provocative revision of postwar American history, Kruse demonstrates that traditional elements of modern conservatism, such as hostility to the federal government and faith in free enterprise, underwent important transformations during the postwar struggle over segregation. Likewise, white resistance gave birth to several new conservative causes, like the tax revolt, tuition vouchers, and privatization of public services. Tracing the journey of southern conservatives from white supremacy to white suburbia, Kruse locates the origins of modern American politics. (emphasis mine)

If the theory of “white flight” is taken into consideration as fact in the lawsuit that has been filed by the GLBC, does this imply that the white citizens of Dunwoody, Sandy Springs, Johns Creek, Milton and Chattahoochee Hills deliberately conspired with the State of Georgia to violate the law? If the theory of “white flight” is used as evidence to support a claim by the GLBC, could it also be said in counter-arguments that the GLBC is resistant to the establishment of Milton County because of the impact that “white flight” would have on the county’s tax base?

What implications might the “white flight” theory have for other white citizens in this country? Does it mean a white person has to gain permission before they move from a certain area?

I still have many questions that are unanswered about this topic, but I’ll be watching to see what takes place as this case unfolds in Georgia.

COMMENTS

  • averagevoterdotcom

    worthy of summary judgment.

    answer to the white flight – high speed rail !!!

  • bk

    It’s actually ‘middle class flight’. Then again, under Obama/Holder it seems that blacks are automatically assumed to be victims of whites.

    BTW when is someone going to go after states like Vermont that are over 95% white and so OBVIOUSLY must have a state-level conspiracy to keep out blacks and Hispanics?

    • lineholder

      and put the last of this into a diary. Racial discrimination is wrong, regardless of the forces or individuals involved.

  • blooch

    Or “The Problem THat Won’t Stay Put”. Or both…I don’t know anymore:

    “White flight? In a reversal, America?s suburbs are now more likely to be home to minorities, the poor and a rapidly growing older population as many younger, educated whites move to cities for jobs and shorter commutes.”

    http://newsone.com/nation/associated-press/as-minorities-move-in-young-educated-whites-flee-suburbs-for-cities/

    Looks like two “Theories” competing for the title of Settled Science. My own “theory” is that the GLBC reeks of flop-sweat on the issue of Milton County and is trying a Hail Mary pass to Holder’s DoJ before time runs out.

    Now the Nanny State wants to dictate where we live? My wife is from China, and her family moved three times when she was growing up. Not because they wanted to move, but because the government told them to move where it needed them. Is that where we are headed?

    • lineholder

      It’s the opposite of “white flight”. Gentrification is when white people move into the city, proceed to fix it up, which increases property values. The increase in property values supposedly contributes to homelessness for minorities because they get evicted from their homes due to inability to pay higher rents and higher property taxes.

      Yeah, this could be an act of desperation on the part of the GLBC, but the idea that these theories are becoming so prevalent is more a bit disturbing.

      • blooch

        The “gentrifiers” only last as long as they are childless. Then they’re done pretending that they’re Peace Corps workers in the third world, and it’s White Flight, Baby. Maybe the GLBC is just trying to break this vicious cycle of mobility.

        Or maybe they’re quite content to let whitey move on out to their Alabastervilles as long as the Justice Department can collect some sort of reparations from them, until such time as these cities are deemed to be in compliance with established proportional population regulations, or are deemed to be in compliance with any changes made to those regulations which do not result in a reduction in revenues to whichever entity or entities that are tasked with redistribution of those revenues.

        • lineholder

          present in these kinds of activities. There are all sorts of subtle messages involved in it when politicians engage in actions of this sort. In this particular situation, one of those subtle messages is that a black person isn’t capable of succeeding on their own and therefore has to be dependent on white people to provide for them.

          I’m not black, but if I was, this kind of message would tick me off to no end. It would set up my back to an extreme, and I would be determined to prove them wrong.

          They are wrong, blooch. Skin color does not predetermine what a person is capable of accomplishing and achieving.

  • renny

    Our fearless leaders would like us to adopt Agenda 21, the “smart building” plan to stop suburban deveopment, force all areas to go to high density housing (apartments and condos, no yards), import more minorities and “poor” everywhere–social justice, and dilute any pattern of suburban conservative voting.

    It is like all lib. things and sounds goodie goodie on the outside. Preserve wildnerness and farms from development, prevent concentrations of lands for one use, conserve energy for commutes and driving, and live happiy ever after.

    However, in the 60s, the projects were the magic bullet: low-income housing, concentration of workers nearer jobs, preserve energy use, yadda yadda, and we know what happened to them. Viable neighborhoods were bulldozed to build the projects, destroying the jobs the apartment dwellers were supposed to have, concentration of patholofies like drugs and crime, booming business for no one except the police and social workers, and eventually collapse everywhere.

    Bork Agenda 21.

    • lineholder

      Agenda 21 theories at work.

      http://www.iclei.org/

      And here is a list of American city members of ICLEI

      http://www.iclei.org/index.php?id=11454

      Then think about some of the high $$ programs we have here…urbanization revitization, mass transit, homeland security for urban areas, etc. etc.

      • rightwingmom52

        to articles that explain the dangers of Agenda 21 and the ICLEI? Thankfully, only 1 city here in Alabama is on the list, but I was sick to see so many cities in my home state of TN on the list. I would like to provide my friends and family there with info, but just don’t know enough about it. I really try to pay attention to what’s going on and have heard about Agenda 21, but there are so many attacks on our way of life coming from all fronts, it’s difficult to keep up. Sometimes I’m tempted to go to work, spend time with my family, go to church and just bury my head in the sand about all the rest of it, but I won’t.

        I heard about this GLBC tactic on a local radio show yesterday. It really doesn’t surprise me. We lived in Dunwoody in the late ’80′s before moving to Cobb County for a few years and worked in Sandy Springs & Midtown until we were fortunate enough to move to AL. Sandy Springs started trying to incorporate years ago when Atlanta tried to force annexation through a state law that the GA Supreme Court eventually ruled unconstitutional. Atlanta & Fulton County are hotbeds of corruption and are all about the money.

        • lineholder

          I have this link about a previous diary that I wrote about the Office of Sustainability.

          http://www.redstate.com/lineholder/2011/02/26/do-we-really-need-local-offices-of-sustainabilty/

          As you read down through the diary, it provides links to Agenda 21 and the Millenium Project. It also provides a link to a brief video by a Democrat in SC. Watch the video if you can, because it provides the basic information about what is taking place.

          • rightwingmom52
  • http://theminorityreportblog.com Repair_Man_Jack

    The Atlanta problem will ultimately revolve around the money and the schools. As long as schools resegregate and tax revenues fall, people in Dunwoody will be blamed and held in suspicion.

    • lineholder

      does play a significant role in this situation. A few articles that I read about the lawsuit made the link between the actions of GLBC and the “white flight” theory or phenomenon. The comments made in those articles conveyed that the GLBC may be saying that they are doing this protect voting rights of minorities, but that isn’t the only reason by any stretch of the imagination. They are looking at the impact that it will have if they lose this tax base.

      But I really didn’t know that this theory of “white flight” was so prevalent. It’s being used all across Europe to support various forms of legislation. I couldn’t help but wonder if we might be seeing the same trend starting here.

      • http://theminorityreportblog.com Repair_Man_Jack

        aim for ways to make the communities the proport to represent self-sustaining. That would be win-win. They could then tell the whites what their constituents dearly want to – “fly, be free, don’t poop on the sidewalk now that you’ve taken wing!”

        They can’t do that, becasue the rump left behind has not attained the financial, social or intellectual capital to run a major modern city. The problems that Mayor Bing, one of the best smartest actual leaders the Dem Party has produced, testify to that problem.

        Essentially, the GLBC wants to have the resources owned by non-blacks, while not having to cater to any of their demands. This is a fundamental contradiction. Contradictions lead to major disputes. This is a shame.

  • Finrod

    The current Fulton County is so oddly shaped because it was formed by the merger in 1932 of old Fulton County with the county to the west (Campbell) and the county to the north (Milton), because those two counties went bankrupt during the Great Depression. Fulton County as it exists today has a greater population than six entire states.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Milton_County,_Georgia

    The odd thing about this story is that north Fulton has wanted to return to being Milton County for a while now, but the last I had heard was that it was being blocked because of part of the Georgia constitution that prohibits increasing the number of counties (Georgia has 159 counties, more than any state but Texas).

    • lineholder

      may have opened the door to consider re-establishment of Milton county w/o violating state constitution?

      • Finrod

        What’s really opened up the possibility of Milton County returning is the takeover of control of the Georgia Congress by Republicans a few years back. That’s why Sandy Springs and all the rest got to become cities in the first place. Reading wikipedia, there’s an effort to modify the Georgia Constitution to get around that cap in the number of counties; I figure with enough time they’ll get it done eventually.

        For reference, the congressional district that covers north Fulton/old Milton also covers the northern half of Cobb; it’s currently Tom Price’s district, and before that was Newt Gingrich’s district, so as you can imagine it’s solidly conservative, as opposed to central Fulton which like most inner cities is solidly liberal.