« BACK  |  PRINT

RS

MEMBER DIARY

Hey, Florida Republicans…What’s Up With This New Civics Curriculum??

In May of 2010, the Florida House of Legislature unanimously passed a bill implementing a new emphasis on civics education.This is an act of legislation that I do support, but are Republicans in the state paying attention to exactly what the content of the new civics instruction program will include?

At least one conscientious teacher is doing so, and trying to raise the alarm before it is too late!!

The state’s new exit exams are indicative of future curriculums that will be required educational material in the public schools.Here’s an example of what is included in that curriculum:

•Describe the attempts topromote international justice
•Analyze the major factors thatdrove United States imperialism
•Analyze the effects ofdomestic terrorismon the American people.
•Examine the controversy surrounding theproliferation of nuclear technologyin the United States
•Assess key figures and organizations in shaping theBlack Power Movement.
•Analyze significant Supreme Court decisions relating toreproductive rights.
•Describe efforts by the United States and other world powers toavoid future wars
•Examine thefailureof the United Statesto support the League of Nations
•Discuss the economic outcomes ofdemobilization.

Just to jog the memory of citizens, the state of Florida passed laws earlier this year that stipulate teacher’s pay will be based more on merit than strictly on tenure, using exit exams as a mechanism by which the teacher is evaluated.It was an effort on the part of the state to improve the educational outcomes of the public school system.

However, given the kinds of changes that have taken place in the curriculum, this now puts teachers in a precarious position.

While exit exams are a vital tool in evaluating student knowledge acquisition, they force very specific aspects of curriculum into being taught as accurate and factual. Teachers, who will now be evaluated and paid according to the exit exam’s specific details and student performance therein, are all but forced into teaching children “what to think.”

(snip)

The new Florida exit exam standards are a shocking move toward what one can only equate to soviet style propaganda to create a monolithic citizenry. In the case of high school American history, a look into the specifics of the exit exam is all that is needed as proof to an agenda directed in a planned process by groups that have no problem using whatever means necessary to acquire power and promote a twisted vision of America. Florida exit exams in the social sciences need to be stopped immediately and there needs to be a serious reconsideration of the entire process before moving ahead.

If it’s any consolation to the citizens of Florida, we’re facing some of the same kinds of issues here in NC where I live.A certain portion of what is taking place regarding the content of these civics programs is due to use the acceptance of curriculums being offered by organizations such as Campaign for the Civic Mission Schools .

TheCampaign for the Civic Mission Schoolswas created to expand and improve civic learning in our schools, grades K-12. The Campaign works with its 40 coalition partners, the Campaign’s Steering Committee, to bring about changes in state, local, and national policy that promote civic learning and implement the recommendations in theCivic Mission of Schools report, published in 2003 by Carnegie Corporation of New York and CIRCLE (Center for Information and Research on civic Learning and Engagement at the University of Maryland). The report reflects a broad consensus among scholars and practitioners that most young Americans have a poor understanding of representative democracy and their role in it and that the schools need to play a major role.”

“The Campaign is hosted by theNational Council for the Social Studies.  Funding for the Campaign comes fromCarnegie Corporation of New Yorkand theJohn S. and James L. Knight Foundation, theAnnenberg Foundation, theBill and Melinda Gates Foundation, and theFord Foundation.”

 

This organization’s objectives and goals are defined within a report titled “Six Promising Approaches to Civics Education”.Here is a list of those objectives:

1. Provide instruction in government, history, law and democracy.

2. Incorporate into the classroom discussion of current local, national and international issues and events, particularly those that young people view as important to their lives.

3. Design and implement programs that provide students with the opportunity to apply what they learn through performing community service that is linked to the formal curriculum and classroom instruction.

4. Offer extracurricular activities that provide opportunities for young people to get involved in their schools or communities.

5. Encourage student participation in school governance.

6. Encourage student participation in simulations of democratic processes and procedures

 

The goals and objectives sound very positive, but it has to be considered within the context of what is included in the curriculum.If the curriculum teaches a biased view of American history with a socialist bent, this totally alters the context in which the younger generations learns about their responsibilities and rights as American citizens.The “new” scope of context being presented is one that favors acceptance of both socialism and world government as a societal norm, not something to be questioned.

 

I hope that in reading this, more citizens within in the state of Florida will pick up this alarm.Contact your local representatives.Ask them questions to determine how much know about the content of the new curriculum. Tell them what your concerns are.  Let them know that you are awake and aware of it.

Vigilance is part of our responsibility as citizens of this nation.  Let’s do it right, for all our sakes.

COMMENTS

  • http://theheartlander.wordpress.com/ heartlander

    With respect to the last half of your article, re: the NC initiative, I hope that citizen watchdogs such as yourself will be examining that curriculum closely.

    As we have seen with “global warming” and so many other issues, those who provide the funding determine the results. The list of funders of Campaign for the Civic Mission Schools sends up a lot of red flags. Ford Foundation, Bill and Melinda Gates, Annenberg, Carnegie — all have extremely troubling records, to say the least. Ford and Gates for example are rabidly obsessed with population control.

    Thanks for the heads up. I’m certain such things will be coming to all our states soon — we need to be ready for the fight.

    • lineholder

      First, be aware that the legislation passed into law was presented by Republicans in Florida, so this is going to be laid at their door.

      I posted about this subject regarding NC a while back. The program in my state is coming from UNC School of Government (which does lean left on a lot of topics).

      At the time, Florida was announcing that they would be going to a new civics program (if I recall correctly, they stated that it would be a program sponsored by former Judge Sandra Day O’Conner). I was hoping that the program being introduced in Florida would have a strong factual presentation of American history with a pro-American emphasis on civics. Apparently that isn’t the case.

      What I’m hoping has taken place is that FL Repubs in the legislature put their confidence in an organization they believed could be trusted to present an unbiased curriculum and they just haven’t followed up to review the content of that curriculum. If that is true, there is still time for them to make adjustments. If not….well, the good folks in Florida will have to decide how that influences their votes during the election of 2012.

      Unfortunately, a lot of people just aren’t seeing this issue as being all that important right now, heartlander, so it’s like trying to plow through dense mud to get their attention.

  • rightwingmom52

    2. How to legalize pot.

    4. How to become a community organizer.

    I’m going to share this with the teachers in my family who are all in Tennessee. Most of them have their degrees in history. It will be interesting to get their take on this.

  • justsayitlikeitis

    I don’t know why these things in and of themselves are bad:

    ?Describe the attempts to promote international justice
    ?Analyze the major factors that drove United States imperialism
    ?Analyze the effects of domestic terrorism on the American people.
    ?Examine the controversy surrounding the proliferation of nuclear technology in the United States
    ?Assess key figures and organizations in shaping the Black Power Movement.
    ?Analyze significant Supreme Court decisions relating to reproductive rights.
    ?Describe efforts by the United States and other world powers to avoid future wars
    ?Examine the failure of the United States to support the League of Nations
    ?Discuss the economic outcomes of demobilization.

    How are they socialist? I seriously don’t think they are. They don’t say anything or hint at any type of world government or socialism. For example, wasn’t killing OBL international justice? He’s from another nation, and was brought to justice. The things on this list do exist, and without reading the book, you don’t know what bent they will have. There should only be facts in history books without any bias from right or left. How can there not be…it either happened or it didn’t. Neither side should be rewriting history to bend minds their way. That’s not freedom. I also don’t see anything wrong with the Campaign for the Civic Mission schools. Their org’s objectives sound like worthy goals. We want a more informed public regarding how their government works so why would you not support this? Lastly, I thought we wanted exit exams to shed light on which teachers were doing their job and which aren’t. I still think the exit exams are a good idea, as long as the books used to teach from are factual.

    • lineholder

      Marxism in particular supports use of education to support the goals of socialism. In simplest terms, socialism is a scope of concepts pitted against each other, such as collectivism vs. individualism, dependency on government vs. being independent on government. But the underlying force of all the concepts is one of gaining power and control over society as a whole. This does extent to a worldwide level, which means removal or undermining of national loyalties.

      So take a look at the statement “Examine the failure of the United States to support the League of Nations”. Why is this being interpreted as a failure? Why isn’t it just stated as “What was the response of the United States to supporting the League of Nations?” and then “Why did the United States respond as it did?” The reason that this is phrased as “failure” is to present the US as being wrong, and to undermine the sense of national sovereignty and national loyalty of the citizens in our own country, which makes it easier to move remove objections to moving forward towards a world government.

      It’s subtle, but it is there all the same. And it does present significant dangers to how future generations of Americans perceive their rights and responsibilities as citizens of our country. That’s why we need to be vigilant and keep an eye on these programs.