« BACK  |  PRINT

RS

MEMBER DIARY

NYT Op-Ed: “Let’s Marginalize the Tea Party, Social Conservatives and Christians”

If you enjoy watching the “spin cycle” that goes on in politics, this article is indeed top-notch.

The article is an op-ed jointly written by David E. Campbell, an associate professor of political science at Notre Dame, and Robert D. Putnam, a professor of public policy at Harvard, both of whom are highly respected members of the academia.

The title of this diary basically conveys what it is that this op-ed attempts to do…marginalize the Tea Party, social conservatives, and Christians in one fell swoop.  And I have to admit that the authors did an excellent job of trying to draw a causal relationship between political unpopularity and these three groups of citizens within American society.  They manage to “clump” all three groups of citizens under the heading of Tea Partiers, and then proceed to present imagery of the Tea Party movement that contribute to their self-defined political unpopularity.  Take the charge of being both racially and ethnically biased as an example.

So what do Tea Partiers have in common? They are overwhelmingly white, but even compared to other white Republicans, they had a low regard for immigrants and blacks long before Barack Obama was president, and they still do.

Then there is also the example of public prayer.

This inclination among the Tea Party faithful to mix religion and politics explains their support for Representative Michele Bachmann of Minnesota and Gov. Rick Perry of Texas. Their appeal to Tea Partiers lies less in what they say about the budget or taxes, and more in their overt use of religious language and imagery, including Mrs. Bachmann’s lengthy prayers at campaign stops and Mr. Perry’s prayer rally in Houston.

And obviously, the attempt to discredit these two conservative Presidential candidates in the eyes of the general public by presenting a direct correlation between their appeal to Tea Party members and the so-called unpopularity of the Tea Party stands out in a very blatant way, doesn’t it?

Like I said, if you enjoy watching the “spin cycle”, this article is definitely top-notch.

Interestingly enough, it isn’t until the very last paragraph of the article that a very different implication is conveyed in what has been written by these authors.

On everything but the size of government, Tea Party supporters are increasingly out of step with most Americans, even many Republicans. Indeed, at the opposite end of the ideological spectrum, today’s Tea Party parallels the anti-Vietnam War movement which rallied behind George S. McGovern in 1972. The McGovernite activists brought energy, but also stridency, to the Democratic Party — repelling moderate voters and damaging the Democratic brand for a generation. By embracing the Tea Party, Republicans risk repeating history. (emphasis mine)

Ahh, so there it is…a not-so-subtle message from the elite of one party to whom?  The elite of the second party, perhaps?  It would not surprise me in the least if that was the intent.  After all, the elitists of both parties are facing tough times right now.  The general public no longer blindly trusts these elitists in the way that we might have in the past, and we’ve begun to question not only their actions but also their ability to make wise policy decisions for our nation’s future.  We’re becoming more proactively involved in the political process on local levels.  And we’re actually using words such as “accountability” in connection with politics.

Conservatives, primarily those who DO associate themselves with the Tea Party, have been the most vocal in expressing the need among the general public to see greater accountability displayed in the actions of those who have been elected into office, AND they have been the most adamant in bringing about  change that restores government to a limited status rather than its current bloated-beyond-all-recognition status.

This is NOT what these elitists want.  They want a restoration of the status quo, where they do their “thing” in the realm of politics unhindered and unfettered by the common citizenry (meaning you and me and other citizens of this nation who are watching them like hawks).

It’s almost as if the authors of this article are attempting to give Republican elites an “out”, isn’t it?  The elitists amongst the Democrats will take on discrediting Tea Party members (and the authors go even further by including both social conservatives and Christians into the package in the process), and all Republicans have to do is to take it and run with it.

Any remaining remnant of Tea Party influence could then be eradicated by Republican elites.  So-called sanity in the form of the status quo will be restored.  And they can get back down to “business as usual”.

Given the fact that it is “business as usual” that has brought us to where we are today, conservatives need to stay engaged, regardless of how unpopular anyone, even Republicans, portray us as being.

If there was ever a time to prove the elitists wrong, this is it!

 

Get Alerts

COMMENTS

  • http://xmmlbchat.blogspot.com katesmith

    From NY Times Editorial, 9/15/10, “For both parties and certainly the broad swath of independent voters, defeating this new crop of Tea Party nominees has become imperative to avoid the sense of national embarrassment from each divisive and offensive utterance, each wacky policy proposal.” Then they appealed to Karl Rove: “Karl Rove, long the party?s tactical mastermind, dismissed Ms. O?Donnell as ?nutty.? “… “…Primary Day 2010: The Tea Party?s Snarl.
    11/20/10, “Revolutionary Do-Over,” Wall St. Journal, John Fund
    “Former GOP Senate Majority Leader Trent Lott, now a big-time Washington lobbyist, has already told the Washington Post that
    it’s imperative for his tribe to “co-opt” the tea partiers arriving in D.C.”…

  • funwithknives

    CBS/NYT polling? Check? ( Innate Bias? NAAWWW!) Claimed trends but no footnotes, endnotes or substatial proof? Check? *Agenda* screaming from every sentence? Of course!
    Why, add it all up and ” we gots us”, a bunch of losers!
    Funny, when I go to my local TEA Meetings ,religion is rarely (if ever) discussed on the floor, but we do put GOD in the pledge. Where Have I Been?
    To the NomenKlatura at Notre Dame and HAH-VAHD: Sorry. not this time. Too bad this tripe will not come back and physically bite ‘Ya. I’d pay real money to see that. To Your Favorite Charity.

  • gregorysstewart

    The MSM and the NYT in particular are more than willing to “marginalize the Tea Party, social conservatives, and Christians” in as many swoops as it takes.

    the teapartiers are taxpayers looking for representation.

  • lineholder

    Repub elitists for months on end to “be reasonable” by attempting to reduce the influence of the Tea Party. Unfortunately, from the viewpoint of the left, being “reasonable” means maintaining the status quo that got us where we are today.

    What all of the elitists tend to overlook is that those of us on the bottom rung of political ladder, we the people, the “commoners”….we’re the ones facing the hard cold reality day in and day out of how much damage the status quo has done.

    It can’t continue the way it has. It has to change.

  • lineholder

    When it comes to evaluating an example of the left’s efforts to “spin” something to meet their own narrative, this is by far the best example I’ve seen in a long time.

  • http://www.veronicaestrada.com Veronica

    .. the nitty-gritty just came to me.

    Americans who are beginning to identify themselves with the tea party will refuse to called members of the tea party because the tea party has been associated with near-hate crimes — against muslims, gays, blacks, illegals, dogs, whatever.

    They think just because we wrote it or thunk it, it’s a hate crime. It’s like this in some countries, anyway.

    And with this identification comes the full breadth of antagonism from the international community, academia and progressive apparatus.

    This is one reason I say it’s time to move on.

    Agreement on a new president other than Obama at this juncture (who will obviously be Republican) does not mean that my religious beliefs or freedoms will be usurped.

    That’s already happening under the current administration, after all.

  • lineholder

    We’re asking (to the point of demanding) that they start acting like mature, responsible adults instead of playing games with our economy and our nation’s future.

    They don’t like it one single bit, either.

  • http://www.veronicaestrada.com Veronica

    are too far removed to get it right .. or tell the truth .. and to soundly defeat Obama, I’m willing to start telling the left that the Tea Party is old news and essentially dead.

    .. I mean, I even recall Erick saying something to the effect it served its purpose.

    It came full-bloom for the 2010 elections and any “petering” we’re seeing is because of the *addition* and *agreement* of people from the left as well as independents — a result of Obama’s horrific domestic (and foreign) policy.

    You don’t need to go beyond this paragraph:

    “The strange thing is that over the last five years, Americans have moved in an economically conservative direction: they are more likely to favor smaller government, to oppose redistribution of income and to favor private charities over government to aid the poor. While none of these opinions are held by a majority of Americans, the trends would seem to favor the Tea Party. So why are its negatives so high?”

    The negatives are so high because MORE people are identifying with “tea party” principles and those MORE people DON’T want to associate with the negative label the leftist media has worked so hard to try to imbed into the minds of the people.

    Tea partiers are racist, with mob-like mentality, they’re goons and yell and scream and shout, remember?

    I’m a liberal who can’t stand the idea of moving in with Mom because I just got laid off. My savings are near zero — and, gosh! Obama’s ruined my economy! I’m in self-survival mode and understand smaller government and a free-market *must* work, because Obama’s distributive ideas ain’t working. But I sure as hell am not a tea partier!

    Again: “the trends would seem to favor the Tea Party.”

    But just because they poll and say they don’t like the “tea party” doesn’t mean they don’t approve of every singular principle the tea party espouses.

    Another point: “While over the last five years Americans have become slightly more conservative economically, they have swung even further in opposition to mingling religion and politics. ”

    We’re just seeing a greater plethora of Americans, including former hard leftists, move to the center, maybe even the right-of center — and where you get a mix of Americans, you get a greater mix of religious beliefs with none of them wanting one belief system holding precedence over another.

    Dude — it’s a resounding “so what” to these stuffy academics.

    They can talk until they’re blue in the face, but they can’t change the opinion of every sort of American in regard to their pocketbook and the security of their job.

  • rightwingmom52

    the tea partiers are still more popular than Obama & Congress. That should tell them something, but they’re just not listening. Not to mention that I’d consider Gallup to be a more credible poll source than NYT/CBS.

    Yesterday, Gallup had Obama’s unfavorable rating of economic policies at 71% and favorable at 26%. Tuesday, Gallup had Congress at 84% unfavorable and 13% favorable. Comparatively, that 40% not favorable of the Tea Party isn’t so bad, is it?

    The elites on both sides are starting to realize that we the people think they are losers which translates into them actually losing. In the Gallup poll, only 24% of Americans said that most members of Congress deserved reelection. I’d be scared, too.

    The story from The Hill is here

  • lineholder

    So does that mean that we should just let these academics spout this nonsense and say nothing?

  • lineholder

    given your comments above about how the Tea Party “served its purpose”, it seems that you might be concerned that the somewhat slanderous comments coming out of the left might stick with certain segments of the population, that this could influence their opinions in the upcoming election against conservatives, and therefore, we should just distance ourselves from any and all association from the Tea Party?

    Is that what you’re saying, because it sure seems like that what you’re saying.

    I still don’t see any reason to let the left get away with spouting this kind of nonsense without defending ourselves.

  • http://www.veronicaestrada.com Veronica

    1. we’ve no power over what these academic losers say, we can only speak by our “clicks” and wallets by not buying the stinkin’ NYT

    2. what they’ve written these years is proof they’ve no sway over the majority of America. They’re still moving right, regardless of propaganda and disapprove of Obama’s economy.

    = so what. Academics are irrelevant. You’ve more sway with your friends, family and neighbors than they do. And, honestly, the folks here at RedState and other conservative blogs get the “spin” — let’s go talk to those who are offline and might not get the “spin” and remind them of their suffering under Obama. I guess that’s my point.

  • http://www.veronicaestrada.com Veronica

    I’m saying this is why those polled “disliked” the tea party. They can relate to it, they just don’t want to be labeled a part of it.

    I’ve always been concerned about the slander. This is related to those other links you posted. The government doesn’t discriminate when it comes to mob mentality. Safety is safety — at least they say so far — and everything that we see overseas can happen here. You know this.

    So, what I’m saying is, maybe we should let another thing organically arise — and if the newbies don’t want to be called teapartiers, okay. As a group, maybe we can call ourselves something else, or nothing at all .. just vote this guy outta office.

    I’m not at all nostalgic about names or labels, except my last name as a happily married woman.

    I’m more concerned about the vote than the sub-politics, I guess.

  • lineholder

    Just for future reference, I’m more into the societal than the political, so we may come at things from different angles sometimes.

    Yeah, as long as the underlying principles are the same and we allies for the same cause, I don’t care if someone calls themselves Twiddle-dum and Twiddle-dee

  • lineholder

    Except for one point. I came across this article entirely by chance. There could be conservatives out there who haven’t read it who are reading this diary now. They might not have been aware that this is something that could be used for the “spin cycle”. After reading this diary, hopefully they will consider that element of the NYT article.

    So, if someone out there in the general public who never comes to a site like RS starts chattering about this article, passing along the rhetoric, so to speak, then the person who has read this diary can say, “Yeah, I saw that…it’s just a “spin cycle” piece. That’s all”.

  • runner12

    threatens to end the gravy train for career politicians, those who were once enemies come together to defeat us.

    The reality is that the Tea Party is about as diverse as you can get really. There are people of faith, atheists, conservatives, agnostics, conservative Democrats, even people of different races. They are everyday people who are tired of politics as usual.

    When I talk to people about what the Tea Party is about, they agree with 90% of what I am saying regardless of political affiliation. In fact, respect is garnered because I am honest about the failings of the big government policies of Bush. It is a perfect segway into why Obama is a million times worse

  • http://www.veronicaestrada.com Veronica

    .. I’ve just learned there’s just too much to cover. And that not everyone who can help turn the vote uses the internet or reads the paper.

    And then we get our own people shooting down the kites we’re trying to put up sometimes.

    Dunno. God bless your instincts. :)

  • http://www.veronicaestrada.com Veronica

    only I’m more offline than I am online at the moment. :)

  • lineholder

    re: Bush, I mean. I’ll have to remember that.

    Call me cynical, but it’s almost creepy sometimes watching the elites trying to protect their “territory”. Worse than rabid skunks.

  • runner12

    BTW another good way to sway Independents or even people who voted for Obama but are regretting it is to talk about how Conservatives oppose NCLB. They can’t believe it! It creates a perfect opportunity to discuss how important limited government is.

  • http://thirdrailers.com/ thirdrailers

    Lineholder…. when you get a second. I’m trying to get some feedback on something.. and would love your thoughts too. My email is kiran@thirdrailers.com Shoot me a line when you get time? (If you can)

    Hope you are having an amzing week!