« BACK  |  PRINT

RS

MEMBER DIARY

The NEW Union Agenda

Richard Trumka has just announced the new agenda AFL-CIO will be pursuing.  Here are the most pertinent comments:

In an interview with The Huffington Post, AFL-CIO President Richard Trumka called the current climate “absolutely” the worst he has seen during the course of his 40-year career in organized labor. His 11-million-plus federation has been forced to adjust, he said, and is making a concerted push to expand their campaign operation so the organization can better pressure lawmakers while in office, and not just on the campaign trail

(snip)

“What we are now focused on is doing a couple of things differently,” Trumka said. “In the past, we would build our structure six to eight months before the election,” he added. “Now we’re not going to do that. We’re going to focus our resources on building a structure that has total fidelity towards America’s working people, both union and non-union working people. We’ll do it 12 months a year, so they’ll be able to transition from electoral politics, to advocacy, to accountability with no effort. And it will continue to build greater strength for workers after the election and in between elections.”

The comments from the AFL-CIO chief provide a detailed outline of the vision he has in store for a tinkered — but still-powerful — campaign apparatus. To execute that vision, the union federation is outfitting itself with some new tools, including a super PAC that will allow it to raise unlimited funds from corporations, individuals and other unions.

The AFL-CIO doesn’t just plan to extend its political engagement, but to hyper-localize it as well

This article was posted over at the Huffington Post website.  In reading through the comments made in response to the article, apparently there are some Democrats who do understand that if our nation doesn’t have the kind of environment that actually encourages business development, the opportunity for Unions to move forward on any agenda of this type are going to be extremely limited.  In fact, many of those responding to the article actually agreed with the fairly conservative position that Unions may have served a positive purpose in our society many years ago, but what our country needs most right now is to eliminate any obstacles that get in the way of free enterprise so that we can see improvements in our overall economy.

Please note that Trumka mentions building a structure that has “total fidelity” to both union and non-union people.  He also mentions that the AFL-CIO has plans to “hyper-localize” as well.  I’m going to suggest that the means by which the Unions intend to accomplish these goals is by application of specific methods that Cold Warrior has already mentioned here.  Since his explanation of what is likely to happen is better by far than any I could present, I would recommend taking the time to read what he has presented.  If those who support Union goals succeed at this on local levels, they will have greater influence in policy decisions, even in right-to-work states.

As conservatives, we need to be able to present a coherent policy position to the general public that might persuade them that the conservative vision for our country is indeed the best option open to us in order to turn our nation around.

Rather than trying to define how this should be done, I’m going to ask each person who reads this to post who is interested in doing so to post a comment below stating how they would go about presenting a conservative point of view on these issues.

Just look at it as a sharing of conservative ideas.

 

Get Alerts

COMMENTS

  • http://thirdrailers.com/ thirdrailers

    funny… my state motto is Dum spiro spero :)

  • http://thirdrailers.com/ thirdrailers

    You know, I’m not really sure what the solution is. I tend to think that the Unionization nonsense will be what it always has been (well, at least for the past 30+years).. nonsense. The days where unions were actually a positive good have been long past… And today, there are so many laws governing work place conditions and employee rights…there’s really no use in giving away your money to a union anyway.

    And I think the only areas where they actually see growth are among certain groups in the West (particularly California) and in states (where they control the regime) that would rather stifle people’s freedoms and keep closed state shops than grow their economy through competition.

    I mean, I think (and I could be wrong) that with the economy in the state that it is in… you will see more and more businesses that choose to stay (or have to) in the US will gravitate more and more to Right to Work States. And those states happen to be in the south. One thing feeds another, more employment = increased standard of living = more growth = eventual greater political strength in DC. If those (RTW States) defend employee rights then the trend will continue. And as those close shop states lose more and more jobs…and the Union pensions and giveaways strangle their already overstretched state budgets..one will follow the other and the floor will give way on the whole nasty affair.

    Simplisitic view maybe… but I think that is where things will trend. Of course, that is the Republicans (and anyone else that actually believes in individual freedom) can fight off the thuggery the Big O is playing with the NLRB in SC. Because that is what the game they are playing is all about.. if Boeing can do it… they know others will too.. And once people begin (like a few other world examples I can think of ).. to see more and more jobs created in states that are not union strongholds…and example rights are still respected… the whole illusion of union usefulness will be gone. Of course, eliminating the Union use of member money for lobbying and campaign contributions is vitally important.

    Oh dear, I’ve went on a ramble… sorry! Have a lovely day L.

    Kiran

    • acat

      And yeah, the South absolutely is rising again.

      (If I could stand the heat, I’d live in Texas… but have you ever tried wearing fur outdoors in 100+ degrees?)

      Mew

      • http://thirdrailers.com/ thirdrailers

        hahahahah……. yes, furs in Texas…not really a good idea..

        ps get your point in re to the above statements….

    • westcoastpatriette

      Good to see you are still here.

    • lineholder

      The cause-and-effect analogy you’ve presented of business operations/locating in RTW states is very much so applicable in this case. And I think the efforts being made by the NLRB are a preemptive move to undermine businesses that are currently located in Unionized areas from moving to RTW states.

      Although I am true daughter of the South, this is one situation where I’m hoping that conservative principles and conservative ideas will become more nationally appealing than limited to the Southern sector of the US.

      I guess the key point that I was hoping to make in this diary was to get feedback from other conservatives (and libertarians) about what kind of practical policy changes they might see as being feasible, how those changes could be accomplished, etc. In this case, what’s the best way to combat or minimize Union influence, per se?

      And like I’ve stated elsewhere, it’s bothered a bit lately that we seem to be focusing so much on anti-(whatever). One of the things Reagan did exceptionally well to articulate a conservative platform , conservative principles, conservative policies, conservative ideas, etc.

      He is no longer with us, but we are here. It’s up to us to find a way to succeed in this now.

      • http://thirdrailers.com/ thirdrailers

        oh, I do so agree with you…but I think… that unfortunately that the strangehold unions have on closed shop states wont be broken till the job losses and the economic situations there are so bad… that it is misery that eventually breaks them. Which I think is sad. But like I’ve said here (and a lot of places elsewhere).. I don’t think that most people are won by reason… and are certainly not governed by it.

        Example, look at the Wisconsin trouble lately… I mean, look at the disastrous effect that unions are having on that state…and despite large electoral wins by Republicans… the unions nearly succeeded in rolling back or eliminating changes that were needed to fix a fiscal mess in that state. Reason won’t get you there…

        I think, and following your Reagan example..he strength was painting the big picture. He didnt miss the forest for the trees… he painted a big beautiful picture and pulled in people’s passions on getting there….and the details he filled in along the way. I’m not saying you don’t need a plan… just that, what made Reagan and his style great was that he laid out a vision…and didnt get bogged down in the minutia. Which I think we have a tendency to do.

        I think, as for policy… just keep focusing and highlighting what works… you know? And as the economies in states like California, Michigan, (Wisconsin), Pennsylvania, and so on… grind to a halt and the people actually begin to suffer… that will open them up to the “vision” thing.

        I get what you are saying though… sorry about not filling in specifics. (And I agree with you about the anti- thing… but you keep the “vision” thing going… personal freedom, your money is your own (not the governments), and saying what you believe in… and as economic reality forces people to understand that… it will deliver itself.

        As a side note, I think you will always have people who are anti something… not sure whether that is genetic or a personal disposition towards misery or what…. But, like the old saying goes: you can lead a horse to water :)

        @acat :) hehehee

        @ westcoast :) thank you

  • wonkish1

    Its not something you should be worried about. Instead it is something that you should applaud.

    First of all, Cold Warrior’s strategy involves conservatives taking the party. Trumpka is talking about taking money and people out of the party and directing them into separate structure. Think the “tea party of the left” except their’s will be completely top down built instead of lose coalition of grassroots organizations.

    Keep in mind the Tea Party’s primary duty these days is to make sure that the GOP fields quality conservatives and that they don’t stray once they get elected. Its most powerful weapon is *the primary*.

    What Trumpka is saying is that they are taking money out of general elections and driving it into primaries and attacking Dems that don’t hold the line. Essentially they are withholding money from all but the most progressive candidates and incumbents.

    This is great news because conservatives win elections, moderates occasionally win elections, and bat s*** crazy liberals consistently lose elections. They are spending money to lose more.

  • http://thirdrailers.com/ thirdrailers

    Lineholder, I wanted to thank you, geckster, wonkish & the others that lent advice and support after my initial intro to blogging at RS. You consideration and understanding were very much appreciated and welcomed. I have tried to follow your suggestions but I think that my impression of ppl @ RS was off. I thought, perhaps wrongly that it was a hotbed of knowledge and commitment to conservative principles. And maybe a little human kindness that you would think fellow travelers in a movement would display towards one another.

    Maybe I’m just a conservative with too many libertarian leanings. In any event, I think after today’s response… that maybe I’ve wandered into the wrong reservation. I’m not really thick skinned at all… nor do I tend to be spiteful.

    Anyway, wanted you (and geckster esp.) to know how much I love your posts, appreciate your spirit and value your contributions to the “movement”. THANK YOU again for you kindness.

  • acat

    The problem is not that you’re a libertarian (or a libertine – sorry, inside joke) it’s that some folk aren’t sure what to make of you.

    Humor is far from universal. I once watched a decent documentary on the process of translating “Everybody loves Raymond” for Russian audiences.

    I never found the show funny; it was actually more enjoyable to watch the explanations of trying to hit the Russian ideas of funny than to watch an episode…

    Anyway, community is the key – and why I brought up the translation above – ya gotta come to an understanding of what the audience wants before you start laying out your wares. There’s little point in trying to sell Tupperware at a bowling alley or fresh pork ribs outside a synogogue or mosque, right?

    Take a look at what Red State reader and cartoonist TobyToons has done – google (or bing, for Neil) “tobytoons site:redstate.com” and see how he approaches the community.

    One point on that – the diary you replied to is not about any of this, so .. it’s a bit of a threadjack. I’m reasonably certain lineholder won’t mind it, though, and if he does, he’ll say so.

    Keep trying, but .. do it smart. A good trader – and anyone who is selling something is a trader, whether they’re offering Cutco or gasoline or comentary – knows the market.

    Mew

  • lineholder

    Here’s some things you have to keep in mind in dealing with conservatives in general right now, okay?

    (1) They’re ticked off.
    (2) We have to find a way to restore some sense of balance to over-bloated government or our nation is going to be in big, big trouble
    (3) # 2 is an issue most folks at RS take very, very seriously. A lot of the talk that goes on RS right now is focused on the issues involved in restoring that balance. In other words, if people don’t seem to be receptive to some of your articles right now, don’t take that part of it as a rejection of you personally, okay?
    (4) We’re ticked off.

    I’ve been in and out during the past week, so I haven’t had really followed the reception you’ve gotten. Sorry about that, TR.

    acat’s comments to you below are solid.

    If you can find a way to hang around, please do so.

  • lineholder

    You don’t know I’m a she not a he? LOLOLOL!!!

  • acat

    I usually try to avoid gender-specific pronouns for this very reason.

    No offense was intended.

    Mew

  • rightwingmom52

    I assume since you’re posting that you’re safe and dry.

  • lineholder

    I don’t offend easily. And in this environment, who can tell the difference, right? It just tickled my funny-bone for a second, that’s all.

  • acat

    to get a laugh. At least, it sure seems that way….

    Mew

  • http://thirdrailers.com/ thirdrailers

    but I always feel like I’m defending myself here. I seem to be violating rules like the President violates spending guidelines.

    I didnt intend to hijack your post either. I just couldn’t find your email and this was the only way I knew to get in touch. :/ (I actually liked the post). And just so you know…I’m not offended if people don’t like my posts. We all have our tastes…and where i can adjust I will. So in that sense I don’t mind advice.

    Maybe in addition to being a libertine… I mean libertarian (@acat. I think I got it.. if not, I get it in my own way :) ) ..I’m at heart an idealist and a snob… I don’t mind constructive advice and criticism… that’s the only way man has crawled out of the primordial ooze.. I mean, created the world we have today. However, I don’t like seeing my comment deleted without explanation or someone attack me as a spammer/not having read the rules (like I’m 5) when they didnt take the time to read the post itself.

    You know, like we discussed in the beginning… I’ve been doing this like 2 weeks… two weeks. And its the automatic treating me like an inferior… ooops, sorry … temporary Python flashback. But when it comes to how you treat other ppl.. I am very thin skinned… which goes back to why I am a conservative in the first place. But that’s another matter.

    @Acat Agreed… I get it.. I do. But maybe therein lies my own problem. Maybe people just don’t get the humor… and maybe I’m peddling my wares in the wrong place.

    Totally get EVERYTHING you say (both of you)… I do.

    Anyway, not trying to hijack.threadjack your post. if you get a chance, i would like to get some feedback though… my email kiran@thirdrailers.com

    Hope you both have an AMAZING WEEKEND!!

  • acat

    We have got to laugh.

    As Conservatives, watching close to a century of creeping socialism pushing our country to the point where we either prove Karl Marx right* or we win and start to make some major cultural changes, we’re all … a little uptight.

    Laughter helps. Remembering that tomorrow’s another day, and any day on the green side** is good helps. While I draw breath, I can fight .. and while I can fight, I need to laugh to remember what I’m fighting for. I’m sure I’m not alone in this …

    The trouble is, humor is not universal. I find Monty Python hilarious, not everybody does. Many of my family find “Everybody loves Raymond” or “Seinfeld” funny, I think they’re a waste of time.

    Therefore, while we all need a laugh, and we’re all politically in the same chapter if not on the same page, the humor is not always going to resonate.

    The other point is that, and I’ll grant that you didn’t know this, your initial postings did violate a rule that’s *routinely* violated by both spammers and hack writers trying to drive up their own hit counts. You got landed on about that, and I think its’ coloured some perceptions.

    Stick around. Post stuff, see what the reaction is. Do market research. See what happens. Persist! ***

    Mew

    * Marx wrote that communism is the end evolution of capitalism, Lenin tried to skip the intermediate with poor results, and left a model of communism as a dictatorship that’s alive and well in many third world hellholes …

    ** A landlord is showing a young couple around a house, there’s some work going on outside but it’s listed and ready to go. As they walk from room to room, the landlord opens the window and yells “Green side up!”, closes the window, and then talks about the spacious closets, ceiling fans, mirrors, etc. Finally, the wife asks “Why do you keep yelling green side up out the window?” The landlord replies “I hired my idiot brother-in-law to put in the sod, he’d install it upside down if I didn’t stay on top of him!”

    *** Nothing in the world can take the place of Persistence. Talent will not; nothing is more common than unsuccessful men with talent. Genius will not; unrewarded genius is almost a proverb. Education will not; the world is full of educated derelicts. Persistence and determination alone are omnipotent. The slogan ‘Press On’ has solved and always will solve the problems of the human race. Calvin Coolidge

  • http://thirdrailers.com/ thirdrailers

    TOTALLY get what you say… but the absurd thing… if it is to be believed..is this started over 1 video link yesterday. 1 I would tend to think that trivial.. And as much as I love MP.. that is only 1 POST. 90% of my content is non-MP. Granted, the satire/dry wit may be similar… but in the end, this started over one post.

    #2 as for what happened in the beginning I get it. I didnt before but after been mightily shamed, I self-adjusted. But if someone takes the time to simply look at the 30+other posts I have in my own diary..they will see the articles are complete. no “teasers”.

    Anyhoo, I do get and do appreciate the advice…. I really do always welcome positive advice & constructive criticism. Problem..I keep saying problem… :/ is that it’s pretty obvious don’t get it…the community here. you know? hmmmm

    Always food for thought though…and I value yours and Lineholder’s wisdom. :)

  • acat

    Take a month. Post no diaries. Read everything, every diary, every comment, every jot and tilde written by Moe Lane and Bill S. That ought to give you a parallax of the community.

    Mew

  • http://www.theprecinctproject.wordpress.com ColdWarrior

    In hopes that maybe I could encourage thirdrailers and others to attend their local Party committee meeting( assuming they have not already), I thought I’d mention that acat’s “lurking” advice also applies when attending one’s first (and maybe first few) committee meetings. If the committee has a web site, read everything on it. If the bylaws are published online, read them. If there’s a “how to become a voting member of the Party” guide online, read it. Then go to the meeting and observe. Try to find out who the other conservatives are. And then introduce yourself to the officers running the meeting and let them know you’re new and that you want to try to help the committee reach its goal of electing more Republicans. Tell them you’d like to know how you can become a voting member of your (and it is yours) Party committee.

    For example, if you happened to live here in Arizona, within the boundaries of Legislative District 20, before your first meeting you could take a look at their web site. Lots of good information there about “how it works”:

    http://ld20gop.com/

    Then take a look at the Maricopa County Republican Committee web site, which has more good info:

    http://www.maricopagop.org/

    Dittos for the Arizona GOP web site:

    http://www.azgop.org/

    I hope those who read this find the information useful.

    Thank you.

    ColdWarrior

  • http://thirdrailers.com/ thirdrailers

    The only thing I lurk these days is something sweet and tasty… like say a nice cream cheese danish in the morning. I have 9,999 things going on… and my humor, if I can call it that won’t change. I’m like an old dog… and the style I’ve staked out is what helps me deal the 10,000 lbs of nonsense I have to deal with every day from the MSM, liberal entertainers and people who fancy themselves members of the let and let live free spirit crowd that mimic in practice the very people they purport to disdain. Honestly, makes my stomach hurt. (much like any Obama speech does).

    I get what you’re saying though… I do. But like I said before, the nasty comments I picked up here (and here is the only place where they have been nasty) were over trivial matters that didnt critique the content of the posts themselves. So, that leaves me at a loss. As for Moe Lane, etc. I have no interest in being an imitator. I’m beginning to sound like a contrarian but I’m not.

    Besides, then I’d end up being another Moe Lane light clone… And unlike a lot of other bloggers… almost all of my content is original. I don’t swipe or peddle other people’s work. I only occasionally repost an article I’ve found somewhere else thatt I particularly liked or thought someone else could get use out of….
    I mainly post my stuff here as information… information that you can take or leave. It if lightens the strain on the uber seriousness of the day..then Amen. If not, then people are free to pass by it like the President does unemployed (non-union) Americans.

    See, told you was a snob. :) In any event, all good advice..certainly as part of a larger picture in making the blog (mine) more accessible to others. Because in the end, my main intent is not to preach to the choir but to convert those outside the flock.

    Anyhoo, love your posts (and lineholders)…. will certainly think about everything you said…

    Have an amazing day!!!

  • rightwingmom52

    I don’t recall if it was you or someone else, but about the same time I discovered redstate, I read similar advice. It has served me well.

  • http://thirdrailers.com/ thirdrailers

    thank you… :)

  • lineholder

    I live far enough inland that we didn’t see much impact from Irene. Just cloudy and windy with sporadic rain.

    I do have family living in Hampton, VA. We’re still waiting this A.M. to hear how they are doing.

  • acat

    My point wasn’t to encourage anyone to emulate Moe’s style. It was, instead, because reading Moe gives a very good, and enjoyably caustic understanding of site standards.

    You’ll notice I also mentioned reading Bill S. Different style, but same goal – understand site standards. They’re both funny, but in very different ways. At least, I find them funny. Your mileage, naturally, will vary.

    Mew

  • acat

    I ran across it at another site and its’ served me well ever since, both online and in “meatspace”. (a.k.a. “the big blue room” or “real life”)

    Mew