« BACK  |  PRINT

RS

MEMBER DIARY

“The Secretary Will Determine…”

I can’t say that I’m a John Strossel fan, but he hit the nail on the head in his recent article entitled “ObamaCare Abominations”.   The article explains why the uncertainty of Obamacare has been having such a negative impact on our economy.  And the primary underlying key to understanding that uncertainty exists in the words “the Secretary will determine…”.

Brad Anderson, CEO of Best Buy, added that Obamacare makes it impossible to achieve even basic certainty about future personnel costs:

“If I was trying to get you to fund a new business I had started and you asked me what my payroll was going to be three years from now per employee, if I went to the deepest specialist in the industry, he can’t tell me what it’s actually going to cost, let alone what I’m going to be responsible for.”

You would think a piece of legislation more than a thousand pages long would at least be clear about the specifics. But a lot of those pages say: “The secretary will determine …” That means the secretary of health and human services will announce the rules sometime in the future. How can a business make plans in such a fog?

Strossel then moves on the topic of employer mandates and the hidden tax increases in our future.

Of course, we were told that government health care would increase hiring. After all, European companies don’t have to pay for their employees’ health insurance. If every American employer paid the $2,000 penalty and their workers turned to government for insurance, American companies would be better able to compete with European ones. They might save $10,000 per employee.

That sounded good, but like so many politicians’ promises, it leaves out the hidden costs. When countries move to a government-funded system, taxes rise to crushing levels, as they have in Europe

And of course, there is also the increase in government spending as related to GDP.

“We’ve had an agreement in this country, kind of unwritten, for the last 50 years, that we would spend about 18 to 19 percent of GDP (gross domestic product) on the federal government. This is a tipping point. This takes us to 25 to 30 percent. And that money comes out of the private sector. That means fewer jobs. This is a game-changer.”

Do we the people want more jobs in our economy?  Then one of the first things we should be striving to do is to repeal Obamacare.

Sure, we’ll still have rising health care costs to contend with.  But with Obamacare gone, at least then we have a chance to identify other options that are a bit more employer-friendly and will allow growth and development in the private sector of our economy.

COMMENTS

  • quill67

    Is the most troubling line. Yes we know the economic impact, but I am very concerned with how many decisions of our government are no longer being made by congress. Liberals like to talk about “The People” are the government because the people elected our representatives. I bristle at this notion too, but what is worse is the rule by unelected agency officials.

    To recap in 2011:

    EPA regulates CO2 as a gas “dangerous to human health” because that is the only way they could bypass the will of the people.

    FTC decides to regulate internet as though it was a telephone company becaues that is the only way they could bypass the will of the people. (even though court specifically prohibited them from so doing)

    NLRB decides that being able to create a union is a “right” so they eliminate the secret ballot because that is the only way they could bypass the will of people.

    A Court decides (tonight) that showing a photo ID is too difficult and might keep people from voting (never mind that even people in India have to show photo ID to vote) because that is the only way they could bypass the will of people. (and make it possible for elections to be won by fraud rather than by the will of the people)

    Now a board is deciding what we must include in our health care insurance in a health bill that was rushed through congress because that is the only way they could bypass the will of the people.

    • quill67

      Excuse me. It was not a court that said requiring a photo ID was a problem, but the Justice Department.

      So the justice department can overrule the legislators of a state trying to prevent voter fraud? Just like they overturned the redistricting in Texas to favor Democrats?

      Our country is out of control of the people. A few judges and bureaucrats now control it. Voting is just for show. We cannot elect people to make decisions for us. Now the courts and the agencies will do it. All while Republicans sit around and worry about their next reelection rather than the decline of our country.