« BACK  |  PRINT

RS

MEMBER DIARY

Obama & Humpty Dumpty

By: littletboca (Diary)  |  May 1st, 2012 at 12:41 PM  | 

RESIZE: AAA

The “food stamp” President is losing his “cool” and the little bit of composure he has left; he’s beginning to look like “Humpty Dumpty” because the Liberal News Media and Democrats can’t put him back together again. 4 ½ years of lies have come back to haunt him and his Administration.

Obama’s and his Administration are shriveling up one little piece at a time. David Axelrod expressed his fear and concern about Obama’s campaign the other day during his interview with Chris Wallace. David has tried every tactic under the sun and Obama ends up blowing it – David Axelrod isn’t a happy camper and don’t be surprised if he splits before the Presidential campaign is over.

Jim Messina lets everyone know that Obama isn’t getting the campaign donations as was predicted last fall and Jim realizes the one thing Obama didn’t figure in his 2012 campaign equation was the American people. Obama promised his puppeteers and Administration that he could wine and dine and smooze the dumb Americans again just like he did in 2008, but the 2012 sequel of the 2008 Presidential run is beginning to look like an X-rated movie.

Democrats realize they can’t keep putting patches on the Obamacare bill, so many of them are splitting and running faster than scat from Obama. They obeyed Pelosi, passed the bill and now they’ve read it and therein lays the problem.

There are hidden taxes, an illegal mandate and many Americans can’t keep their healthcare as promised, CBO says the total cost of the bill to taxpayers will be over 1.76 trillion dollars. Seniors are getting hit from all sides by Obamacare; they’re losing quality of care, premiums are sky rocketing and Obama chiseled a big hunk out of Medicaid to cover the cost of the ungodly bill.

Much to their chagrin Democrats are being walloped from all sides due to the “redistribution” of our stimulus package. The DOE with Chu in charge has been a disgrace and the green company scandals make headlines daily. GSA and the Secret Service are the most recent problems in Obama’s Administration along with Obama’s daily attacks against them in his Union speeches.

When Obama stopped drilling on the coast, nixed the keystone Pipeline and sicced EPA on all businesses the DEMS tried to cover his tracks, but it proved to be a futile effort. Now they’re back peddling but they’re a day late and a dollar short – unemployment is creeping up, gas prices and the sudden increase of consumer goods signals that our economy has down shifted.

The Democrats are between a rock and a hard place – if they continue trying to patch up Obama’s political blunders and economic flubs they’ll be looking for a new home in 2012. It’s too late in the game to put Hillary into the mix, so they’re stuck with Obama.

When Bill Clinton flip flops we know things are pretty darn bad in the White House. In 2008 Bill dismissed Obama in 2008 as undeserving of the Presidency and now Bill’s ready to sell his soul once again in hopes that his wife Hillary may make a run for President in 2016. One thing we know for sure is this – Bill isn’t stupid and Obama is paying dearly for good ole Bill’s services. Wonder how much one has to pay President Clinton to lie and say, Barack Obama deserves to be elected President of the United States?

The 2012 campaign that Obama is running lacks professionalism, legitimacy, class and a true agenda – Obama is running on empty. His demeanor is changing daily; he’s angry, aggressive and demonizing anyone and everyone for his many failures the past 3 ½ years. Obama isn’t a has been – Obama never was!!!!!!!

Obama is desperate, dangerous and a disgrace to our Country – he is a pathological liar lacking guilt or remorse for his actions threatens abuses others verbally and considers himself a super human being. He is totally dependent on his puppeteers financially and psychologically unable to function independently without their guidance. Yep, Obama is a “Sociopath” with a radical ideology intent on destroying our Nation.

May God Bless America
As Always,
Little Tboca

Tags: , , , , , , , , ,

COMMENTS

POSTING RULES  |  LOGIN TO COMMENT  |  REGISTER TODAY
  • Viet71

    Obama’s proving to be his own worst enemy. He’s unsure of himself and unsure how to deal with Romney. He’s stumbling.

    Exactly right about Humpty Dumpty.

    As for Bill Clinton, my guess is he’s made a deal: Hillary for the Supreme Court. Hillary to replace Ginsburg.

    • JSobieski

      Any R who fails to frame the debate will lose.

      Someone will frame the debate, and the MSM will do it if neither candidate does.

      • Viet71

        If Romney tries to do this, he will lose. The Dems are much more skillful at framing.

        Romney needs to show he’s a good person. Obama will do the rest.

        • JSobieski

          Heck, GHWB had the great comeback in 1988 BECAUSE he framed Dukakis properly.

          I don’t think a Presidential R has done a decent job of it ever since.

          Had W had any kind of media strategy and skills, 2004 should have been a landslide. Kerry was a terrible candidate, the economy was kicking, and the US was not at that point war weary.

        • garfieldjl

          If nothing else, Newt is able to frame the debate and dismantle the Dem’s talking points.

          • JSobieski

            Newt is not a good VP prospect. One of the jobs of a good VP is no baggage (“do no harm”)

            It is one thing to nominate a man with baggage for the big job, but you don’t someone with baggage to be the understudy.

            I voted for Newt over Romney and Santorum in Michigan, but I wouldn’t pick him for VP. Nor will Romney.

          • garfieldjl

            While Newt has baggage, none of it is really new baggage, so there won’t be anything new the Dems can throw around. Additionally, Obama stands a good chance of having attacks on Gingrich’s baggage to backfire.

            1. Insider Trading scandels where no one was punished vs. someone getting hit with 83 ethics violations for teaching a college class.

            I think people will look at the ethics violations as a total farce, with all the corrupt things people associate with Congress, the idea that congressmen and women are getting away with those daily, yet they hit Gingrich with tons of ethics violations for teaching a college class. Seriously, that has so much potential of making the Democrats look like corrupt slimeballs that I seriously would love to see them try that attack.

            2. Using position in senate to protect Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, vs. once been a consultant for Freddie Mac. I’d love Obama to make the mistake of attacking Gingrich on Freddie Mac, heck it doesn’t have to be Obama, his allies doing it would hurt Obama.

            3. The marital issues only go so far, there is a point when people start saying enough and it starts working against the attacker.

            4. It takes Mormonism off the table, as stupid as the attacks on Romney for being a Mormon are, I think the fact Gingrich is Catholic would help Romney deflate that song and dance routine.

            5. Gingrich is extremely effective at coming up with one-liners that stick in people’s heads. Romney doesn’t really have that ability.

            6. Gingrich is an ideas man, Romney isn’t. This isn’t about the general, this is about after we win.

            7. Gingrich is able to energize the base, and counterbalance Romney’s more leftwing tilt. Plus Gingrich does have the strong personality to keep Romney from veering left every 3 seconds.

            8. Gingrich can dismantle the MSM’s narrative quite easily and frame narratives.

          • JSobieski

            Newt has 0% chance of being selected by Romney.

            VPs are not where the ideas come from. Nor are VPs the primary spokespersons for the campaign. VP’s are not co-Presidents (which is what Ford wanted Reagan to essentially offer him).

            Everyone on RS is to some degree tone def on what motivates the middle 20% of the country.

            I can tell you that Newt starts off in a hole with such folks. There is no reason to pick a VP in such a position.

            There are far better conservative spokespersons who are also idea guys.

          • garfieldjl

            Romney has a foreign policy deficit, granted he would be better than Obama, but still that is a factor. Normally VPs are picked because they have experience that the Presidential Candidate lacks.

            Gingrich knows a lot about foreign policy, he knows how Congress should work, not the complete mess that we currently have.

            His baggage has a potential to be landminds for Obama to step on, because Obama’s baggage is such that attacking Gingrich’s baggage would be like sticking you hand into a bear trap.

            If Gingrich is unlikeable it may make Romney seem more likeable too, but I think the unlikeable factor can probably be turned around fairly quickly. People want things to get fixed, considering Congress’s approval rating is probably lower than Gingrich’s them going into blind rages that Gingrich might end up being VP will probably cause his favorability rating to shoot up like a rocket.

          • acat

            I replied to you with my Romney expectations elsewhere, but .. I don’t think he’s going to use the veep slot to shore up foreign policy experience.

            He doesn’t need to. He’s better than Obama simply by not being Obama; besides, this is not a “foreign policy” election… the issues most in the minds of the electorate aren’t “how goes the war?” or “are we going to war?” …this is a domestic policy election.

            Take a close look at 2000….

            Mew

          • JSobieski

            Look, I was one of the big New supporters on this site. If Newt was going for the top spot, I think those battles were worth fighting.

            There is no reason to have a VP nominee start off in a position where he needs to dig out of a hole.

            Face the reality that if even a large subset of the population saw the world the way you do, Obama would never have been President and people like Dole, McCain, and Romney would never have been the nominee.

            A VP can hurt far more than a VP help. Newt is the dream VP nominee . . for the dems.

          • gekster

            After all the trash talk you did about Romney, NOW you
            have advice to help him.

            I thought you were on the dim end of the stick.
            Thanks for removing all doubt.

          • garfieldjl

            Seriously, I don’t like Romney, but if we lose the Presidential, we’re probably going to lose the House, and the Senate will be even more in the hands of Democrats.

          • gekster

            The point is that you repeatedly trashed Romney on this site, and now want to offer advise.

            Best to be thought of as a fool than open your mouth and remove all doubt.

          • garfieldjl

            But hey, if you want to irritate Conservatives like myself even further, and further anger the base, fine.

            Problem is that we’re not a bunch of mindless lemmings, like the left’s base.

          • gekster

            How do you walk back all the crap you said about Romney,
            and as with most, if not all of my questons, you don’t answer.
            And I hardly doubt ‘you’ are the base, let alone conservative.

          • acat

            Gary Johnson and Chris Christie won’t build bridges to the Values Voters Romney turns off, so .. no. Gingrich, same problem.

            Santorum, on the other paw, will bring the Values Voters, but at the expense of the libertarian leaners… I view this as worthwhile only if the more libertarian-leaning States can be counted on as safe .. and if Santorum can be confined to the undisclosed location…

            The idea pick has a solid record of governance and social conservatism, without any significant “gotchas”, who can think on his or her feet, and who can bring the heat in campaign speeches.

            Palin proved that too thin a record really is a liability – not that *she’s* a liability, but because of the lack of depth, every undotted lowercase j was magnified simply because there wasn’t anything else to look at…. but too long a resume can also be a liability.

            Rubio also has a thin resume, but he puts the Dems on defense in Florida. Whether he has enough Religous-Right appeal to bring the Values Voters back, I don’t know… I haven’t heard that he’s particularly religious. Whether he brings any non-Cubans to the polls, I also don’t know .. so is Florida worth it?

            Gov. Martinez has the same problem, only with a somewhat larger geographic spread… The Canadian conservatives’ “Finally vote your values” campaign really caught fire up there, but I don’t know that Martinez is seasoned enough – yet – to run with the idea here as veep. I also don’t know whether she’s noticeably religious.

            My expectation is that Team Romney will pick a U.S. Rep, likely an Evangelical and a Tea Partier, with solid Social and Fiscal cred, and very likely from east of Houston, TX and south of Louisville, KY. I don’t have any idea *which* rep, but .. that’s Romney’s weak flank; a strong veep the southeastern religious right can relate to will let him focus on the Midwest/rust belt States.

            Mew

            * There’s no such thing as a “Hispanic bloc” – there are various blocs of Hispanics; Mexican-American, Cuban-American, Venezuelan-American, Argentinian-American .. but what works for one group may not (likely *won’t*) work for another… and while Rubio pulls the Cuban-American bloc, he won’t pull the rest any better than any other candidate from outside their bloc.

          • garfieldjl

            Closest man or woman I can think of that would fit that bill is Dick Cheney.

            Gingrich is the only Speaker of the House to have a balanced budget, unless you are suggesting that Romney have Bill Clinton be his running mate, there is no one really that was in a leadership role that gave us a balanced Federal Budget.

            Santorum brings his own baggage and can be tied to the current mess we see in Congress. Santorum is also easily distracted with social issues.

            Gingrich has been out of public office for long enough that he can fire back that when he was in Washington, things were working, and can easily seperate himself from the mess we see now. Furthermore, Gingrich’s personal baggage is harder for Obama to take shots at without getting his own baggage dragged front and center.

            Finally, Gingrich has executive experience from being Speaker of the House, no matter how disorganized people said he was, he still managed to get a balanced budget. Santorum has absolutely no executive experience. Palin despite her thin resume, has more executive experience than Santorum.

          • ww2nd95

            would be a bad pick. He does have baggage that will be used to bring down Romney and he has a tendency to go off into the wilderness with his mouth, like when he called Ryan’s plan “social right wing engineering”.. Romney doesn’t need that kind of distraction. I don’t think the VP pick is going to do much anyhow. I mean really, I just don’t see how it plays. McCain picked Palin, and she did excite the base, which is something I think Romney desperately needs, but there isn’t another Palin out there to pick up IMO.

            Honestly I think his best pick would be Bobby Jindel. He’s not a lightning rod like Gingrich and he’s young and upcoming, with little to no baggage. at all, therefore he’s safe and not a distraction to the Romney campaign.

          • gekster

            Gingrich ain’t it.
            Your still batting 0%.
            And you still havn’t answered how you walk back all that Romney crap.
            You say you are conservative, but conservatives arn’t afraid to answer questions, as you have shown to be.
            Go to HuffPo, where they don’t mind it so much.

          • garfieldjl

            Fact is part of the reason I want Gingrich to be the VP pick is to keep Romney from veering left every chance he gets. I mean what I say and I say what I mean. I think Romney is a total slimeball, however I think Obama is an even worse slimeball. So I’m voting Republican in the general.

            Romney has to earn my respect and thus far he honestly doesn’t have it.

            Also gekster, I prefer listening to Rush Limbaugh and Mark Levin, not reading or listening to Puffington Post or the Daily Kooks.

            Now if you, gekster are trying to drive people to not vote or vote for Obama, because they are so disgusted with the new batch of Mittbots such as you; you’re doing a pretty good job. If not you seriously need to revise your attitude.

            The fact that you, gekster can’t come up with a good case to support Romney, that can sell Romney based on his own merits, not fluff, and instead resort to bullying, guess what Obama will win the election, due to your and other Romney “supporters” blatent stupidity.

            You’re trying to convince me whom is a Conservative that Votes Republican to give it my all to support Romney in the general, got news for you it’s not my responsiblity to bow down and start kissing Romney’s boots. If that’s what you truely think, then you’re saying the party of Lincoln and Reagan has turned into the Democrat/Socialist Party. If you worked in retail, you would be fired in under 24 hrs if you behaved like that toward a customer.

            Otherwise, it is your RESPONSIBILITY as someone whom is saying they are supporting Romney, to be able to sell Romney to people like myself and to sell Romney to independents. If you can’t do that (and you’ve never even bothered trying to make a decent case), then we’re in serious trouble in November, and you will be to blame for Obama getting 4 more years (along with Team Romney), not me, not other Conservatives.

            Btw, I’m calling it how I see it in this post as well, I really don’t care if you find my honest opinion of the situation to be offensive (I have tried to keep it worded in a way that is respectful), however I think I’m showing more respect by telling you flat out what my honest opinion is so you can change your behavior.

          • gekster

            you ain’t worth it.
            Don’t answers questions, and just spew bs.
            And your diatribes are boring.
            Do you look in the mirror everyday and say how great you are.
            You must.

          • garfieldjl

            It’s not that I don’t care about other people, cause I honestly do. However, I value my honesty more. Like most other people on the spectrum, I’m not big on deceptions and hidden agendas, what I say, is what I’m actually thinking, what I post is what I actually think.

            Do you honestly know what it feels like for people to act as though you are defective (and this is a reason why I can’t stand the left)? I have to constantly be on my guard, because of the fact I have a hard time reading people.

            I’m guessing a lot of people on the spectrum have turned their backs on Conservatives, because people like you treat them as defective. I guess I’m lucky that I met Conservatives that treated me as a person whom had value, BEFORE I ever encountered someone like you.

            Contrary to Popular Belief, people on the Spectrum do have emotions, we do have empathy, we just can’t read people very well. Thing is people tend to miss that we often internalize things and a lot of people on the spectrum end up in depression, particularly high-functioning individuals, because of intolerant twats like you.

            I guess I’m fortunate that I have met people that accept me for who I am. Cause considering how people like me are extremely big on right and wrong, if it wasn’t for individuals whom behave like you, most people on the spectrum would probably be leaning Republican. However, people like you have gotten them to accept the Dems scams (and people on the spectrum often end up victims of scams).

            Now do you want to continue to pick I fight, or will you finally acknowledge that I’m actually a Conservative and apologize?

          • JSobieski

            but this is another example of a pie in the sky want that is barely worth mentioning.

            There is a greater probability that Romney runs on a platform of cutting spending by 50% than there is of Newt being the VP pick.

            It just isn’t going to happen. There is no chemistry between them. Newt does bring with him special obstacles that other picks do not.

            I respect you because you aren’t a fence sitter and because you speak your mind. Those are valuable traits. However, if you can’t distinguish what you want to have happen from your assessment of what is likely to happen, you really aren’t empowering yourself to have a positive impact.

          • aesthete

            I find your candor and refusal to compromise the truth for dubious political gain admirable and positive traits — but there is a difference between desiring something strongly (and for sound reasons), and fooling yourself into thinking what you desire to be reality.

  • Pingback: hier