« BACK  |  PRINT

RS

MEMBER DIARY

McCain beats McCain Last Night

And That's Exactly What He Needed to Do.

Last night, I listened to pundit after pundit give their post-debate analysis, from Bill Kristol to Keith Olbermann. The core of the reaction was that McCain did well, but he didn’t hit the homerun against Obama.

All of that misses the point and I think you are seeing it in the various polls taken this morning. McCain was never going to beat Obama on style. But, he didn’t have to beat Obama — he needed to beat his own anemic performances in debates 1 and 2. And, he clearly did. Finally, he delivered an impassioned reason to support his candidacy – lower taxes, economic growth, culture of life, pro-second amendment, anti-terror. This was the John McCain that should have been out there for the last six months.

While I will give a more detailed analysis soon, I make the following predictions:

  1. Joe the Plumber’s days in the spotlight aren’t over — expect to see him in a McCain ad in the days ahead. This ad alone could win the states of Ohio and Pennsylvania.

  2. McCain will be deemed to have won this debate by far greater margins in 2 or 3 days, than the immediate post-debate analysis projected.

  3. McCain will be within 2 points of Obama nationwide within 5 days.

This race is far, far from over. In fact, while I will not predict that McCain will necessarily win, I feel far more comfortable about McCain’s campaign position today, than I did just a week ago.

And, with that said, I will no longer be surprised if John McCain wins the presidency on November 4.

COMMENTS

  • Finrod

    Rasmussen is using a D 39, R 33 partisan weighting– when you consider that in an actual election the biggest advantage Ds have had has been +4, and in 2004 they were actually even 37-37, that +4 for Obama translates into a range of Obama +2 to McCain +2, depending on turnout.

  • DrJeff

    This thing is basically a tie at this point. Turnout will be the key.

  • eburke

    the number for ‘core’ voters (i.e. are certain they won’t change their minds) is 41-41 with 18% still ‘persuadable’.

    a) that’s a huge number this late in the campaign.

    b) I’m basing this on nothing but my 30 years of being a political junkie, but my guts are telling me that if the perfect storm of an economic collapse, the most blatantly one-sided coverage of a candidate in history (which considering the past biases of the MSM was not an easy task to accomplish), a gajillion dollars of advertising, and a less than articulate opponent hasn’t already put at least half of that 18% in the chosen one’s camp already, I don’t know what will.

    Sorry, Brad, this ain’t over.