« BACK  |  PRINT

RS

MEMBER DIARY

Meanwhile, Back on the Farm . . .

As a result of personal experiences with local political thuggery, I’ve decided to jump headlong into the political scene in my township. My locale is most decidedly dominated by Democrats, who, as I’ve learned put the “rats” in the word, “Democrats.” They are a nasty bunch who are used to running the show around here like kings rather than elected officials. I among several, as I’ve recently found out, have had enough and I plan on doing something about it.

I’ve started to attend town board meetings and I plan to editorialize the local politics as much as possible in order to shine the light of day on the local shenanigans . . . after all, the best antiseptic is the light of day. Finally, in about a year and half, I’ll run against the current miscreants (aka, the incumbents).

Now and again, I’ll blog on my political efforts on the local scale. If anything, some may find it an enjoyable and sometimes amusing read. Others, on the other hand, may be able and willing to share good advice . . . the RedState community is chock full of expertise and wisdom, which are just some of the many reasons that RedState, in my opinion, is the most valuable conservative website on the Internet.

Below is my first sortie in what I hope will be a relentless campaign to demonstrate to the public why the incumbents must be put out to pasture (Note, there’s no word limit in the local newspaper). Like it? Dislike it? Have any advice? Please feel free to let me know. I appreciate any help/advice/suggestions from the RedState community. It may just be a small township in rural Wisconsin, but it’s my small township and right now it’s being run into the ground by Olbermann-esque Democrats. Anyhow, here’s the first editorial:

Dear Editor

Transparency and accountability are what make for an honest government. Closed doors, secrecy, and defensiveness, whether it is by design or by simple incompetence, are what inevitably lead to distrust and suspicion. Really, the formula is pretty simple . . . as a public official, if you show all your cards, then no one can accuse you of cheating.

The three kings of Linden Township (aka, the 2 supervisors and the chairman) either never learned the benefits of public accountability or, worse, they feel they are above it. This, at least, was my impression as I attended the Linden Township Board meeting on July 8, 2009.

Accountability, by the way, is something I’m very familiar with in my professional life. I work in the UW system on just those kinds of topics. A lot of time and expense go into making sure the public has full, yet concise information on the inner workings of the university. Want to know about enrollment trends? Perhaps you have an interest in the financial health of the university? Maybe your chief concern lies with campus safety. Then again, it wouldn’t be unheard of if you were interested in the frequency of alcohol abuse on campus or even how engaged students are in the campus learning environment. If you, as a citizen, harbored any of those curiosities, well then guess what? You can find that information out and in an easy to read format too! We at the UW will not hand you a giant binder of what amounts to statistical hieroglyphics and bid you adieu by saying, “Good luck with that!” Instead, we strive to make the information clear, concise, and easily understandable to a lay audience. That folks is what you call accountability. Best of all though, accountability, if done right, is precisely what keeps public officials honest and maintains integrity in the affairs of government.

Recently, another synonym for accountability has been bandied about in the sphere of politics. “Transparency” is the new buzzword for accountability. Are the affairs of your township board transparent? Are they opaque? Or, are they screened behind an impenetrable wall of solid black? Whatever Linden Township is, it certainly isn’t transparent. I could at least see that much by attending a town board meeting.

In a computerized world, with Internet capability in even remote regions, it’s astoundingly unfathomable that the Linden Township Board can’t even produce a document that clearly explains an up to date report on the financial status of the township at each board meeting. Haven’t they ever heard of QuickBooks or Excel? Instead, and only recently I’ve been informed, the board is handing out a collection of papers detailing some of the monthly expenses. If you want to make sense of it, then go home and break out your calculator. Forget about discussing it at the same meeting it’s handed out. And, don’t bother asking for any details about revenues either. Only half the story for you serf!

How about a township web page? Nah! Too expensive! The only way they’ll do that is if it’s perfectly free. After all, they reminded the public, the town is in debt! Of course, at the same time the board makes this assertion, there, sitting right next to them, is their lawyer who is paid at taxpayer expense to attend each meeting. Her rate, I’m told, is 150 smackers per hour. At least the board seems to be getting their money’s worth. In my opinion, she fielded most of the public’s questions while the board did their very best imitation of a deer caught in the headlights.

Then, there was the “closed session” where the public was thrown out of the hall and had to wait outside. The three board members and their lawyer huddled in private. Even the elected town clerk was asked to take a hike. A closed session, of course, is allowable under Wisconsin’s Open Meetings Law. However, the reasons are quite limited and the public must be informed of the subject matter under discussion before the closed session officially begins. At least on July 8, 2009, the subject matter of the closed session remained a mystery. Were they discussing the alleged crash landing of an alien spacecraft in Roswell, New Mexico? Maybe they’ve got some inside information on the search for the Yeti? They could have discovered how many licks it takes to get to the center of a Tootsie Pop and were figuring the best way to inform America. What marvels were discussed in that closed session? The world may never know! Maybe Robert Stack, the old host of “Unsolved Mysteries” can lend us a hand?

All in all, the Linden Township Board meeting of July 8, 2009 was an embarrassing show of incompetence, ignorance, and who knows what else. One supervisor is brand new to the job. So, he might get a pass until he bones up on how to do his job properly. The other two, however . . . Supervisor Larry Wolf and Chairman Dean Liddicoat . . . are long time board members. What, pray tell, is their excuse? Did their dog eat their copy of the state statutes?

The time for accountability is today . . . right now! Business as usual in the Linden Township must come to an end. Transparency is the law. The public has a right to know how its tax dollars are being managed by its elected officials . . . or, in the case of Linden Township, mismanaged. The Linden Township Board needs to be severely reminded that they are elected officials accountable to their constituents. They are not kings.

I leave you with what, perhaps, should be the official song of Linden Township. Here’s one verse and chorus, sung to the classic carol, “We Three Kings of Orient Are.” Enjoy!

Verse 1:

We three kings of Linden Township

Bring you taxes and hardship

We’re in debt and you can bet

This is coming out of your check

Chorus:

Ohhh-OHH, Don’t go wondering how or why

That’s the kings’ business, so don’t you pry

Stop complainin’ we ain’t explainin’

Not with our lawyer by our side!

 

COMMENTS

  • aesthete

    Notwithstanding a couple of grammatical issues, good article. If I might provide some critique, though, I would provide an easy way for people to take action. After I read the article, I was pretty ticked at your town council, but found myself with no way to take action. Informing people about legislation or alternate legislators might be a good start, and voter referendums would also be great. My point, I suppose, is that channeling the emotions created by the post into constructive action may be more effective in the practical implementation of change, though certainly informational pieces are a great start.

    • mailloux

      I think your point about how to take action is a great idea! Luckily, the editorial has not been submitted yet. I have until Tuesday noon time (July 14). That will give me enought time to make some changes.

      I’ll have my wife edit the thing for grammer, which isn’t one of my strong suits. But, she’s meticulous about it, which is a good thing since she’s the main homeschool teacher!

      Thanks for the excellent tips!

      Take Care, mailloux

      • aesthete

        I agree with the main two suggested: networking, and less snark. Could you post the edited article here, too? I’d very much like to read it.

        Cheers, and God Bless1

        • mailloux

          Here is the edited version:

          Dear Editor:

          Accountability and transparency are what make for an honest government. Closed doors, secrecy, and defensiveness, whether it is by design or by simple incompetence, are what inevitably lead to distrust and suspicion. Really, the formula is pretty simple . . . as a public official, if you show all your cards, then no one can accuse you of cheating.

          Accountability, by the way, is something I?m very familiar with in my own professional life. I work in the UW system on just those kinds of topics. A lot of time and expense go into making sure the public has full, yet concise information on the inner workings of the university. Institutions and government entities call the process of opening themselves to public scrutiny ?transparency.? For example, want to know about enrollment trends? Perhaps you have an interest in the financial health of the university? Maybe your chief concern lies with campus safety. Then again, it wouldn?t be unheard of if you were interested in the frequency of alcohol abuse on campus or even how engaged students are in the campus learning environment. If you, as a citizen, harbored any of those curiosities, well then guess what? You can find that information out and in an easy to read format too! We at the UW will not hand you a giant binder of what amounts to statistical hieroglyphics and bid you adieu by saying, ?Good luck with that!? Instead, we strive to make the information complete, clear, concise, and easily understandable to a lay audience. That, folks, is what you call accountability and transparency. Best of all though, accountability and transparency, if done right, are precisely what keep public officials honest, thus maintaining integrity in the affairs of government.

          So then, are the affairs of your township board transparent? Are they opaque? Or, are they screened behind an impenetrable wall of solid black evasiveness? Whatever Linden Township is, it certainly isn?t transparent and thus not accountable. I readily arrived at that conclusion by attending the Linden Township Board meeting on July 8, 2009.

          Take for example, the simple hypothetical idea of a clear, concise financial statement that isn?t cryptic and incomplete. Instead of the aforementioned, the board handed out a collection of papers detailing some of the monthly expenses for June 2009. A good summary of revenues and expenditures, so that citizens could understand the up-to-date financial status of their town, was nowhere to be found. And, in a computerized world, it?s astoundingly unfathomable that the Linden Township Board can?t produce such a simple document. Haven?t they ever heard of QuickBooks or Excel? The technology is out there and it?s inexpensive. It should be a no brainer to provide citizens the information they are entitled to.

          Then, there was the ?closed session? where the public was thrown out of the hall and had to wait outside. The board members and their lawyer huddled in private. Even the elected town clerk was asked to step outside. Now don?t get me wrong, a closed session is indeed allowable under Wisconsin?s Open Meetings Law. However, the reasons are quite limited and the public must be informed of the subject matter under discussion before the closed session officially begins. So what subject was discussed in closed session? The printed meeting agenda labeled the closed session as ?primarily personnel.? If it was primarily personnel related, then what was it secondarily? Was there any thirdly kind of topic discussed? Further, if it was a personnel issue, then was it about a promotion? A disciplinary action? A potential new hire? The world may never know! Perhaps Robert Stack, the old host of ?Unsolved Mysteries,? could lend the citizens of Linden Township a hand. Maybe he could get some transparency around here!

          All in all, the Linden Township Board meeting of July 8, 2009 was a stellar example of how NOT to do accountability and transparency in government. One supervisor, Kerry Kligore, is brand new to the job. Maybe he?ll end up being the great reformer and bring real change to the way local government business is conducted in Linden Township. He, unfortunately though, has his work cut out for him. The other two board members have been running the show in Linden Township for quite a long time and old habits, especially bad ones, die hard. The vaudeville team of Supervisor Larry Wolf and Chairman Dean Liddicoat have brought much folly to Linden Township and have done jester?s work in making our township a laughingstock in Iowa County. From the deplorable lack of accountability, to the inability to pay the township?s bills, to potentially saddling property owners with higher taxes, the Wolf-Liddicoat team isn?t drawing laughs from the people who actually live in Linden Township . . . only moans can be heard for miles around.

          The time for accountability is today . . . right now! Transparency is the law. It?s time to draw back the blinds on town business and shine the light of day on Linden Township. The public has a right to know how its tax dollars are being managed by its elected officials . . . or, in the case of Linden Township, mismanaged. The Linden Township Board needs to be reminded that they are elected officials who are fully accountable to their constituents. They are not kings.

          July 15, 2009 at 8:00pm is the next board meeting. They will be addressing the gaping township deficit and consequently the inability of the township to pay all its bills. This is citizens? opportunity to demand what they are perfectly entitled to: transparency and accountability.

          Sincerely,

          Mark R. Mailloux

          • aesthete

            Nice to see that you took advice to heart in the second iteration of your article. Two suggestions, and then I’m off: first, nice job outlining the problems that the town council has with accountability, but for your next article, I would suggest putting in some sort of “bottom line” statement articulating exactly what is wrong with limited accountability. The advantages of accountability may seem obvious, but certainly a showing of how that would help citizens in their day-to-day lives on a practical basis would 1) refresh the minds of those who have already thought out reasons for why accountability is good, but who have forgotten through years of apathy, 2) give readers some reasons that they haven’t thought of, and 3) allow them to effectively advocate for transparency themselves. This is important, because such terms have become, through their use by pols as buzzwords, ideas that we’re supposed to like, but aren’t really sure why.

            The second thing I would suggest for next time around would be to have a finalized product on-hand to promote when issuing your “call to action”. I suppose you’ll probably have a better gauge on what that end product would be after attending the next meeting and seeing how it goes, but my observation is that people tend to respond best to calls for action when said action is straightforward and easy to accomplish, rather than open-ended and complex. Hopefully, that helps for next time!

  • http://thefallenworld.wordpress.com/ wayneinnh

    Be careful with any snark. Remember who your audience is. This letter is perfect for us here at RS, but remember the people who are putting these people into office are who you are writing to. You are definitely a cut above and want to purvey that.

    God bless and best of luck in your endeavor.

    • mailloux

      My wife, who is far wiser than I (I married up!), made exactly the same point. I have until Tuesday of next week to submit it to the local paper and I’ve already toned down the snark in a revised version.

      Thanks for your help!

      Take Care, mailloux

  • JadedByPolitics

    you are getting into politics and I think you should stay your open honest self. Don’t change anything about yourself because people are ready for change and they want honesty, integrity and REAL people. They are SICK of politicians and their bullcrap speak.

    I will look forward to your update’s SHINE THE LIGHT on those roaches :-)

    • mailloux

      Thank you for your very kind words of encouragement. I hope that I along with the group that seems to be materializing over these township issues can bring honesty, transparency, and integrity back to little Linden, Wisconsin.

      Take Care, mailloux

  • penguin2

    But you’d make a good change agent Mailloux. The only thing I would consider about the editorial, and subsequent writings like that, would be to try and shorten them. Or divide up some of the comments/bullet points you have and post them in a progressive fashion. The average reader for a newspaper is going to look quickly for the ‘gist’ of what you are saying and you don’t want anything lost in the translation.

    You are a brave soul, Mailloux.

    • mailloux

      your comments and encouragement. And, if you’re inclined, please feel free to pray for me and my family as we become involved in this local political battle.

      Your advice on shortening the article is very good indeed. My wife (and wayneinnh in the comments) recommended I reduce the sarcasm as it may turn off voters. I’ve done so, which reduced the length quite a bit. I’ll submit the final version to the local paper by Tuesday of next week.

      Thank you again!

      Take Care, mailloux

  • nessa

    Kin Hubbard

    Please keep posting your local adventures, I eagerly await the opportunity to steal any good idea you have and put them to my own use. These forums are wasted if we don’t step out there and use them. As important as the 2010 elections are, us taking our Nation back from the bottom up is much much more.

    • mailloux

      You are quite right . . . the RedState community should be viewed as both a clearinghouse of information and a grand collaboration among conservatives!

      Thank you for commenting!

      Take Care, mailloux

  • Kowalski

    And be absolutely fearless — but not heedless. Set up a website for yourself and publish it and get people talking about it. These kinds of cliques usually fester because too many people refuse to even read or think about what’s going on, much less vote on it, go to town meetings, get involved in town elections.

    My sincere belief is that at least half of smaller towns in America are run RIDICULOUSLY. Meaning that nobody cares about what is going on or who is inhabiting the Town Hall, because they’re just apathetic.

    The other suggestions about style and content here are good. Don’t make wild accusations or speculations. Don’t ramble. Be concise. Find some friends who think the way you do, go to their houses, have dinner and a bottle of wine, and talk about everything. Go through the town’s annual reports and documents and find out the names and terms of all the elected officials. Look at them carefully. Really try to understand how the power dynamics work in your locality. Know enough people to know whose friends are whose. Watch your back.

    If you want to have a positive effect, the most important thing is to not just be positive, but also to be CLEAN. Make sure that you don’t have any outstanding troubles your adversaries will throw back in your face. Other than that, kick some ass, Mailloux.

    • mailloux

      There won’t be any outstanding troubles my opposition can come up with. I think I’ve got the clean thing pretty well covered, which will serve as a nice contrast to how corrupt things are around here, politically speaking.

      Your other advice is excellent as well! And, I’ve already begun on some of that networking. The website too will be a great way to stay in touch with local supporters and get news to them quickly.

      Thank You! mailloux

  • TNJim

    But be prepared for the Wolf to try and take a bite out of you. He’s already locked horns with you, so you know what you’re up against.

    Just stay true to yourself and you’ll at least get some people thinking. That alone may be what Linden needs right now, someone with a different perspective. You’ve already gotten some good advice from earlier comments and right now I can’t add much to that. But today’s politics are just as vicious on the local level as they are in Pelosi’s House and Reid’s Senate. God will help you weather the storm, though and I wish you the best of luck.

    Prayers be with you.

    • mailloux

      hit the nail on the head. Prayer and reliance on God are exactly what will lead to positive reforms and good government in Linden Township. Sure, I?ll have to do the footwork, but God will open the doors and lead the way.

      Thank you for the encouraging words!

      Take Care, mailloux

  • Pingback: ??????????? ??????? ??????