« BACK  |  PRINT

RS

MEMBER DIARY

A Very Personal Tea Party

For my entire professional career, I’ve worked in higher education. And, I’ve seen all that the frontlines of multiculturalism have to offer. For example, just days after 9-11, I had to vociferously defend the foreign policy of the United States, the honor of our military, and the charity of the American people to coworkers who insisted on saying that the still smoking ruins of the twin towers, with its 3000 freshly dead, were, at the end of the day, our own damn fault. American hegemony, they said, was the real culprit and not Islamic jihadists bent on bringing down the ‘Great Satan’ and setting up a world Caliphate.

No doubt, my coworkers were influenced by the fact that all of the 9-11 killers were brown skinned. They had more pigmentation than all of my co-workers, and that made my coworkers squirm and question their own motives rather than be filled with righteous anger. I was certain then and am certain now that they believed, with all the religiosity of an apostle fresh from Pentecost, that racism underlay what they considered American hegemony.

In my time in academia, I’ve also been treated to full conferences, complete with travel and hotel accommodations (at taxpayer expense) on topics of multiculturalism, diversity, and inequity. Conferences such as these were mandated. I learned at them that I suffer from a permanent and incurable condition: white privilege. I learned at these affairs that there is another original sin, in white people only, which cannot be washed clean by Baptism. Alas, there’s no grace that can counter this fault. If you are white, then you are a racist, plain and simple. To deny it is to deny that you require food and water, that you have a beating heart in your chest, that you have lifeblood in your arteries rich and red with oxygen. It is what you are by virtue of how much pigment you were born with. And, there is no cure.

Race based ideology and its concomitant multiculturalism (i.e. no culture is better than any other with the one cardinal exception that western, white culture is the lesser of all others because it is inherently racist and imperialistic) are omnipresent and omniscient forces in higher education.  When you send your children to college, they will receive mammoth doses of these malignant ideas. Only a fool would believe that they will escape this treatment unaffected. Ideas are powerful. And, evil ones are like seeds planted in the immaterial mind which can sprout into full-on weeds, capable of choking truth from the human soul.

These evil ideologies . . . white privilege and multiculturalism . . . have seeped deeply into the American psyche. We are witness to their fruits when some voters were compelled to vote for the first African American to run competitively for the Presidency of the United States for no other reason than to prove their bona fides as tolerant persons, rather than basing their judgment on the qualifications and merit of the candidate. Few who actually voted in this manner will readily admit to it, but when you see how steeped they are in the mindset of white privilege, then this conclusion is not unwarranted.

And, let’s not forget the official Fort Hood report on the shootings that failed to mention Islamic radicalism and instead stressed the value of diversity. And now, of course, there’s Arizona making news on their legislation concerning the enforcement of illegal immigration laws. Arizona is also making headlines by sending a bill to the governor’s desk that would ban ethnic studies in their K-12 system. And, what is Arizona’s reward for these affronts against the dogmas of white privilege and multiculturalism? Calls for boycotts. Calls for professional baseball to pull the all star game from being played in Arizona. Calls to inflict economic pain on an entire state . . . on men, women, children, minorities, the elderly, on everyone.

So then, what is the remedy for the dogmas of white privilege and multiculturalism? The remedy is truth. And, to the best of my limited abilities, I declare the following:

1. We are all created equal by God, and in the image and likeness of God. White, western-culture people do not have an extra, irremovable stain upon their souls in the form of born-with, down-right genetic racism. Therefore, I am not inherently a racist by virtue of being born a white male in a western culture.

2. The amount of pigmentation in one’s skin is a physical trait that should carry no more weight than one’s eye color, or the length of one’s index finger.

3. Cultural differences exist and are derived from conditions such as the era in which people live, the climate, the economic conditions, religion, tribal traditions, etc. But, the differences are not caused, ipso facto, by the amount of pigmentation in their skin, nor is it caused by the length of their index fingers.

4. Not all cultures are equal. Some are indeed more virtuous than others. And some deserve to be condemned.

5. Qualifications and merit should be the driving force underlying candidacy for just about anything; political office, college entrance, that plum job. It is a crime of the multiculturalists whenever anyone looks at a minority in a position of power and wonders whether that person is there because of merit or because of affirmative action. And, I stress again that the crime lies with the multiculturalists and not with the person doing the wondering, for that person is not engaging in racism, but instead is using logic in a quite reasonable way.

6. Artificial division based on the amount of pigment in one’s skin damages the cohesion of the American people, and weakens us as a nation. A nation, by the way, which has brought more good to the world than any other in history. Multiculturalism and race-based ideologies directly threaten American Exceptionalism, which, in truth, is a key stabilizing force in the world.

7. Multiculturalism is an affront to the catholic (small ‘c’, as in universal) nature of Christianity. God is the author of diversity and each of us is a completely unique soul. However, we are also part of the oneness of humanity. Christ is the head and we are the body. The body is not composed of us and them. It’s composed of just ‘us’.  The division wrought by multiculturalism attacks this very element of Christianity. It is heretical.

8. Multiculturalism and all its trappings are themselves racist and do great harm to minority populations in the United States.

All in all, I declare my independence from the oppressions of multiculturalism and white privilege. My declaration is a tea party of the soul. I am saying no to these evil and dividing philosophies. I refuse to let them tread on me, and I refuse to cow to them. Instead, I embrace truth at whatever the cost for no other reason than truth is not a thing, but a person, fully human and fully divine. When I look at my fellow man, I see the image and likeness of God. I see Christ. I do not obsess on the amount of pigment God gave him. This I declare.

COMMENTS

  • penguin2

    But I truly love these words:

    When I look at my fellow man, I see the image and likeness of God. I see Christ. I do not obsess on the amount of pigment God gave him. This I declare.

    Yes, a “tea party of the soul.” Beautiful, Mailloux.

    • mailloux

      Sorry for the late reply. This was a pleasantly busy weekend, which included the first communion of one of my nieces. It was a great day.

      Thank you for your very kind words. I am also looking forward to seeing more diaries from you . . . they have been insightful and eye-opening!

      Take Care, mailloux

  • janis

    And for those who wish to continue to hiss “Racist” at us for not wishing to be part of Obama & Co.’s plans, go pound sand. The word itself has lost any meaning since they have so perverted it over the past three years in particular.

    There will always be those who see pigment over character, but then again, there will always be those who see financial worth over the worth of a soul, or cosmetic beauty over the beauty of a spirit devoted to the love of others.

    Thank you for writing this. It was needed.

    • mailloux

      great points. Indeed, people harbor prejudices for multitudes of reasons. Institutionalizing a race over character scheme, and then further endowing this scheme with a whole set of metaphysics, has done exactly what you say. It has rendered the word “racism” as almost completely meaningless.

      Thank you for reading, commenting, and the reco too!

      Take Care, mailloux

  • Scope

    Several years ago I read an excellent article at the Heritage Foundation website, in which the author beautifully laid out the case against multiculturalism. He talked about the impossibility of sustaining the American melting pot of differing cultures. For example, their are cultures that believe in female genital mutilation. How can that possibly blend in with America’s traditions and culture? He gave several other examples of customs and traditions practiced in different areas of the world that would horrify Americans, but they are not only acceptable to those populations, they are a part of their everyday life.

    I just went to search for that article again, but, it has apparently been removed, it was several years ago that I read it. I did find this article that fits in beautifully with your diary mailloux.

    http://www.heritage.org/Research/Commentary/2003/07/The-Myth-of-Multiculturalism.

    When I began reading your diary, the first person I thought of was Ron Paul. He too believes that we brought 9/11 on ourselves. His particular brand of hegemony doesn’t necessarily have anything to do with skin color, but rather that America and Americans are not exceptional, and if we just minded our own damn business the rest of the world would leave us alone.

    • mailloux

      Thank you for the article from heritage.org. I can certainly empathize with the writer’s experience and wholeheartedly embrace the conclusion. You would think that people who make a living out of “thinking” would immediately see the ironies pointed out by the author of the heritage article: the movement toward re-segregation . . . the insult to competent/intelligent/professional minorities, etc.

      Ron Paul is a disturbing fellow on many levels. What you pointed out is but one of them.

      Thank you for reading, taking the time to comment, and the reco too!

      Take Care, mailloux

  • E Pluribus Unum

    Could not possibly agree more, mailloux.

    With the possible exception being that I agree, but more militantly. :)

    • mailloux

      In my opinion, militant opposition is a natural reaction to something as wickedly dividing and demeaning as is multiculti theory. This awful malignancy has been with us since at least the late 80′s (when it really started to take grip on college campuses), and this particular tumor has grown exponentially over the years.

      Thanks for reading, commenting, and the reco too!

      Take Care, mailloux

  • http://thesandsinstitute.org Vassar Bushmills

    If Mailloux wrote his laundry list here, I’d probably recommend it. That is how keen is his skill with the pen.

    • mailloux

      Thank you, sir, for your much too kind words. Coming from you especially, I regard it as very high praise indeed.

      Take Care, mailloux

  • hickorystick

    Thank-You for taking the time to write it.
    -”When I look at my fellow man, I see the image and likeness of God. I see Christ.-”
    This is my starting point too. For me, it is not a color problem or race problem. People don’t need much of an excuse to treat others badly. Most of the issue that the so-called multi-culti’s express as a race problem, is really an economic problem. There will always be some group trying to rig a system so that they get more, and others get less. My ancestors are from Northern Ireland (Mine Scots), and we had no difficulty finding ways to abuse, and to be abused by the other inhabitants on the island. But we could all agree on one thing. The English sucked. And they did. The markets were rigged to maximize profit to England, and leave the unprofitable tasks to Scotland and Ireland; not even arguable to someone who takes the time to read that part of history. There was not a single brown-skinned person to be found on the island.
    The natives of the Island practiced slavery. St. Patrick was taken as a slave. Where our family ended up was in Seattle. The tribes lived in longhouses, and they practiced slavery too. Slavery is a natural thing. It takes organized religion, and an effort of will to remove the populace from practicing it.
    As far as racism, the Hudson Bay company was the first significant “British presence” in the area. Company policy encouraged the men to take native wifes. The more important men married chieftains daughters. It was good for business for all involved. It wasn’t till a stable economic presence was established, that some people found advantage in taking from others. It boiled down to an economic motive, not truly a race motive. And no, the Indians were no purer beings than anyone else. They were born with the same human heart as the rest of us.
    I do like reading about other cultures, always have. I’m proud of all my own cultures too. As a fellow american Westerner, I support Arizona in the fullest. More evil has eminated from DC do-gooders, than any other place in the country. Course DC doesn’t have a sense of place. It consists only of people from everywhere else, coming to enforce their regions foreign ideologies on others. Most of whom they have neither seen, or know anything about.

    • mailloux

      I’m 1/4th Irish, myself. My red-haired, Irish grandmother lived in the second floor tenement in my childhood home. She was a wonderful lady and a very devout Catholic.

      What you wrote about in your comment is quite true concerning the history of the Irish and the English. And, the root causes are often enough, economic rather than classic race/ethnic hatred.

      You know, I’m starting to think the blanket excuse of racism is a lot like a 3 year old’s explanation for a concept that they can’t really grasp (one of my kids is currently 3 and she comes up with some wild explanations). Underlying all forms of oppression and corruption lays our fallen nature. Evil is the absence of God. It isn’t as simple as the multiculti’s would like us to believe . . . that it’s all some born with trait of white people. Multiculti’s and 3 year olds . . . sadly similar in intellectual prowess!

      Thanks for reading and commenting!

      Take Care, mailloux

  • http://www.veronicaestrada.com/ Veronica Estrada

    You’ve experienced racism because you’re white.

    We should start calling it what it is.

    Racism against whites.

    It was Angela McGlowan who said that whites were “packin’” to prepare for “Race Wars,” but that was her term. No white person had ever uttered it.

    The truth is, there’s been a race war against the white man all this time — and the other side’s bullet is “racist!”

    In this race war, they have always gotten off with firing the first shot, and what are we left with?

    Labels. And propaganda.

    Disgraceful and dishonest.

    • mailloux

      It is quite ironic that in many places (colleges are indeed one of them), you can find institutionalized racism. Except, as you stated, it’s directed at white people who, according to theories like white privilege, are supposed to believe and feel (multiculti’s are big into emotions) that they are tainted . . . as if they are somehow marked like Cain.

      And, it’s so true that race war talk usually comes from multiculti race-baiters. Conservatives are the true keepers of Martin Luther King’s legacy of judging by character rather than the color of someone’s skin. The multiculti’s are, as you well put it, “disgraceful and dishonest.”

      Thank you for reading and for taking the time to comment!

      Take Care, mailloux

  • lineholder

    I definitely agree in believing that each and every human being has a soul of their own, and each and every soul has a worth and value of its own. The worth and value of the soul isn’t defined by skin color.

    Human character isn’t defined by skin color either. God granted each of us a scope of potential. On one side we have the potential for what is of good, i.e. honesty, integrity, courage, determination, perseverance, trustworthiness, etc. On the other side, we have the potential for what is of evil, i.e. greed, lust, envy, jealousy, malice, vengeance, the will to dominate, etc. It’s what we do with the scope of potential that defines human character, not skin color.

    One of the things I find truly amazing is that God could have imposed His own will on us and granted to us nothing other than the potential for what is of good, but it isn’t consistent with the character of who God is to make use of what authority He has in our lives this way. He gave us the potential for both good and evil, and the freedom to choose who we will become, what kind of character we choose to develop, and what kind of life we will live. I see it as being the ultimate challenge mankind faces.

    • mailloux

      absolutely true . . . it’s the ultimate challenge, because it’s the only challenge with eternal repercussions. All else pales in comparison. The multiculti’s preoccupation with skin color is a distraction from the real purpose and meaning of life . . . if I were a suspicious man, I’d even go so far as to suspect old Screwtape’s involvement!

      Thank you for reading and taking the time to comment!

      Take Care, mailloux

  • mbecker908

    Winter Solstice Party.

    Great diary. Short, precisely to the point and posted in a large enough font that crust old guys can read it without help.

    • mailloux

      I am an administrator, so I’m spared the faculty parties. But, at the cabinet’s “holiday” party, I never miss an opportunity to say, “Merry Christmas!” Often times, it looks as though I’ve administered an electric shock!

      As the main policy analyst on campus, I’ve got a great opportunity to make reasoned cases using statistics. For example, a faculty survey administered to minority faculty indicated a great deal of racism on campus. I calmly stated that the survey data is perception data and that is valuable, but we should also look at actual promotions and calculate the odds ratio of a minority promotion compared to white. This approach helps to put the brakes on what otherwise turns out to be a knee-jerk, rush to judgment reaction.

      Thanks for reading, the kind words, and the reco too!

      Take Care, mailloux

      • mbecker908
  • AKSteveB

    It was great to read this. I’ve been out of the political loop for awhile and needed some inspiration. This was what I needed.

    • mailloux

      You’re very welcome . . . and thank you for reading my diary in the first place and for your kind words.

      Take Care, mailloux

  • DefendUSA

    While taking a sociology class, I had to write a paper about how I was taught to interract with other cultures not my own, other races, religions etc…
    I wrote the paper, and the instructor kept it, apparently because there were things in it that were “profound” to her. I cannot remember what I wrote except that it centered on religion, name-calling, and skin color. Back then we used typewriters…not hard drives.

    Years later, James McBride, in his book- “The Color of Water”—posed the question to his mother-”What color is God?” She answered, “The color of water.”

    *THAT * is how my mother taught me to look at all people…because that was how God wanted it. This was a super read. Thank you!