« BACK  |  PRINT

RS

MEMBER DIARY

Let Chris be Christie

Don't nitpick.

Mark Levin has a Facebook post that takes a critical look at some comments New Jersey Governor Chris Christie made in his appearance on This Week this past Sunday. Levin is concerned that Christie is soft on immigration and Obamacare.

“Regarding the former, he sounds like John McCain three years ago. ‘Commonsense path to citizenship.’ Regarding the latter, the cost of joining with the other states in challenging the health care monstrosity is minimal. That’s a poor excuse.”

Democrats and the left in New Jersey are throwing absolutely everything they can at Christie to try and blunt some of the momentum America’s Best Governor™ has been rolling up at their expense.  Remember Momentum [p] = Mass [m] X Velocity [v].  So with Christie’s considerable mass*, Dems are going to have to use a lot of force to slow him down. With all due respect to Mark Levin, our side shouldn’t be helping.

* We kid, governor. We kid because we love.

This week, Democrats produced a bogus report on next year’s budget situation, 11 months out, that claims the budget gap next year will be almost as large as this year’s $11 billion.  But the report assumes that Christie will allow all the funding he cut this year to be reinstated next year, plus allow for additional spending in each program.  Christie is calling BS.

“The new bar is set. The place to reduce from is where we are now,” he says, essentially telling Democrats to go pound sand. McCain? Hardly.

Democrats are also trying to claim that Christie balanced the budget by increasing taxes, calling a 3-quarter delay in property tax rebates a tax increase, since the promised yearly checks won’t be coming out in September.  Again, Christie says hogwash.

“First, we changed it from a property tax rebate program to a direct credit. We spent about $20 million a year in processing these checks and borrowing the money to send out to people. We’ve eliminated that.

And what we did was we skipped three-quarters of that payment in the current fiscal year as part of the shared sacrifice that everybody was going to have to make. I wasn’t going to cut just programs for the vulnerable; I wasn’t going to cut just programs for the rich, but programs for the middle class. Everything had to be cut.

But that program will be back as a direct tax credit in the fourth quarter of fiscal ’11.”

It’s as easy as swatting flies.

But the coup de grace is this attack from former governor Corzine’s running mate criticizing Christie’s communications shop for publicizing the appearances of Christie and Lt. Governor Guadagno at “partisan fundraisers.”

Weinberg said that formal notice that the Governor or Lieutenant Governor would be attending a fund raiser makes it a more attractive event for prospective contributors. Since the notification of the event is going out through the Communications Office’s official e-mail list, she raised the question of whether such use violates [Election Law Enforcement Commission] rules as an unreported in-kind contribution [!] to the sponsoring organization.

“The Governor’s press staff needs to decide whether they are working to promote their boss’s public policy initiatives or partisan fund raising activities,” said Weinberg (D-Bergen). “Promoting a fund raiser through an official governmental e-mail appears to fly in the face of established ethics rules.

Desperation, thy name is Loretta Weinberg.

Christie’s answers on immigration and Obamacare are only disappointing in light of the aggressive way in which he has taken on Democrats and their special interest friends in his first six months in office.  In other words, he’s a victim of his own success.

On immigration, Christie didn’t say anything that would preclude him coming out strong for securing the border before any discussions on “paths to citizenship.”  And he didn’t hint at what the path should be.  He could clarify that illegals would have to return home and get in line, for example.  On Obamacare, Christie said he hasn’t decided to commit state money to fighting what will surely be a year’s-long legal battle without a judgment on the likely result.  That’s not cowardice, it’s good stewardship that doesn’t come close to an endorsement of the bill.

Christie is a remarkably intelligent, sharp, and polished politician for a relative newcomer.  He is confident and unafraid. He clearly went into that interview determined to avoid any question with a hint of national implications.  It’s not in his or New Jersey’s interest right now for the governor to play up any national aspirations he may have.  Christie as governor has shown no inclination to back down from a challenge.  He didn’t go wobbly all of a sudden under Jake Tapper’s questioning.

As evidenced by their increasingly desperate and far-reaching attacks, Christie has Democrats, unions, and entrenched liberal interests in New Jersey right where he wants them.  Christie’s governorship is a boulder rolling downhill.  Democrats see the boulder coming, but they’re rooted to the ground.  Our side should just leave him alone and let Christie keep rolling.  The last thing we conservatives need to do is throw Democrats a rope by nitpicking Christie’s every word on this issue or that; at least not until he has flattened New Jersey’s Democrats.

COMMENTS

  • smagar

    We say what we think, when we feel like saying it. And, if that hurts conservativism in other places, we stand up and say indignantly “Hey! I just gotta be me!”

    The left is much better at holding their tongues, and NOT speaking up at times when doing so would hurt their ability to achieve successes in politics.

    Remember all those VA conservatives who spoke up during “macaca” and said that, in many ways, George Allen wasn’t 100% their cup of tea. All that adds up, and it added up against us on election night. Boy, wouldn’t it have been nice to have Senator George Allen to help stop Obamacare and the financial regulation bill.

    • aesthete
    • Doc Holliday

      Allen was abandoned by a bunch of cowards. Now look at the situation, a racial flub every day, mostly on the left.

  • Doc Holliday

    he is on the strategic offensive and tactical offensive, and winning. We need to figure out why we don’t have more guys making inroads; not complain about the one who is succeeding.

    • http://www.FranBaker.com frankieb

      Let Christie do his thing in NJ while we look to elect more conservatives like him!

  • kerpen

    Health insurance premium tax, hospital bed tax, and the seizure of store and restaurant gift cards if they haven’t been used in a year. Christie forced every Republican signer of the ATR tax pledge to break it. That doesn’t make you America’s best anything.

    • http://impudent.edublogs.org/ kyle8

      You can be reflexively against all taxes, but that will get you nowhere in a state drowning in red ink. If he were only using tax increases you might have a point, but he is also cutting spending.

      Those taxes you mentioned could also be looked at as user fees. Those are the best type of taxes, Much better than property taxes, or income taxes. (meaning less harmful to growth)

      • GardenStatePatriot

        Christie has not cut spending. He has cut PROPERTY TAX RELIEF. $2.56B worth. And he’s used that money to expand Trenton – $600M in nursery schools, over $100M for a public option ealth insurance program, expansion of food stamps from 135% to 185% of federal poverty levels. State spending is up 6% in the Christie budget.

        Property taxes are about to soar in NJ because of the property tax relief cuts. My brother just got his bill and it’s up almost 20%.

        • finallyhadenuff

          GSP,

          I have yet to see you link to any real evidence of your accusations. The only links I have ever seen from you are Lonegan documents or opinion pieces. I live in NJ and my tax bill next year is only going up around 3%.

          Lonegan lost. . . get over it.

          • GardenStatePatriot

            It’s common knowledge that Christie has cut property tax relief. Nice try.

            http://www.newjerseynewsroom.com/state/state-aid-cuts-threat-of-nj-property-tax-hikes-send-christies-popularity-plummeting

            http://www.nj.com/gloucester/index.ssf?/base/news-5/1268980821197430.xml&coll=8

          • finallyhadenuff

            The first link is a popularity poll while the second discusses cut state aid.

            Both are from newspapers. “Because I read it in the paper, it must be true!”

            I still do not see any proof of “. . . He has cut PROPERTY TAX RELIEF. $2.56B worth. And he?s used that money to expand Trenton – $600M in nursery schools, over $100M for a public option ealth insurance program, expansion of food stamps from 135% to 185% of federal poverty levels. State spending is up 6% in the Christie budget.”

            I’m willing to listen to and weigh any justified criticisms, but I just don’t see the evidence of what you are claiming. The only evidence I’ve seen is that my property taxes increased by ONLY 3% this year. That’s evidence that I welcome.

          • GardenStatePatriot

            http://static.taxcutsforall.com//files/AFP_Taxpayer_Budget_APRIL%202010_0.pdf

          • finallyhadenuff

            It was Steven Lonegan, Colette Campbell, and Steven J. Anderson’s analysis of the then “proposed” state budget and their counter proposal written in April of this year.

            Just so I can’t be accused of intellectual laziness, I clicked again on your link. From there I clicked to the governor’s “BIB” link and did some comparisons.

            On your link, on page 5, Lonegan et al claim “Our budget calls on the Governor to lead. The Governor?s budget allocates 10% more to the total executive Branch (see table III in BIB pg. 100″

            Table III on pg 100 shows 2010 adjusted approp. and 2011 req. and recommended as 3,556,473 and 3,359,496 which is approximately 5% LESS than 2010 and is 10% less than Corzine’s 2009 budget.

            Additionally in Christie’s BIB on pages 94 through 98, it lists all the major increases and decreases in state appropriations, and I can’t for the life of me find the numbers that you are quoting anywhere on those pages, much less the descriptors.

            As far as cutting the property tax relief fund, on page 99 of Christie’s BIB I only calculate a 943 million (rounded up) cut, not the 2.56B that you quote. Personally, I wouldn’t mind seeing the rebates go away for good. My family never qualified to receive any of them, although we paid more than our fair share of property taxes to support them.

            I’m sorry, GSP, but all of your links fail to support your claims. In fact they actually help me to dispel some of them.
            I am keeping in mind that both links were to “proposed” budgets and the actual budget may differ, so I still welcome any links that you may have which support your claims.

            -discosure: I voted for Lonegan in the primaries. In hindsight, I am thankful that I had the opportunity to vote for Christie in the general.

          • GardenStatePatriot

            The BIB you were looking at contained updated links. The original links in the AFP document were from March when the governor unveiled his budget. The budget that recently passed spends roughly $29.3B ($1B or so of which is federal stimulus). Thus, overall spending in the budget didn’t really change. The money was shifted around. Interdepartmental accounts, for example, is where a lof of money goes. This is effectively a fund that can be used for anything and where a lot of money is hidden.

            The bigger picture remains that property tax relief has been cut by over $1.2B and $1.3B in property tax rebates were eliminated. That’s $2.56B that is supposed to go to towns and municipalities and instead is being diverted to Trenton. Again, this is common knowledge. No one disputes that the cuts to state aid were the centerpiece of the governor’s budget.

            Property tax relief in NJ is funded by the entire income tax and a half cent of the sales tax. If the money hasn’t been diverted then there would be a commensurate income tax cut and that is not happening.

  • StandardCandle

    “It?s not in his or New Jersey?s interest right now for the governor to play up any national aspirations he may have.”

    Good stewardship is defined by acting within your sphere of influence and responsibility. Chris Christie will answer many questions in due time, and Jake Tapper knew what he was doing trying to rope a dope into national conversations that would undermine what Christie’s primary focus is on in New Jersey. Thank goodness there are politicians that realize that their constituents come first before their ambitions… This isn’t Christie dodging a question, it’s him resisting the temptation to take a national podium on issues to launch bigger aspirations.

  • dianecee

    I’m from NJ and can admit that all previous governors have not been nearly as powerful or as loved as our new governor, Chris Christie. We here in NJ can be very oppositional and confrontational when needed, without fear. There are no flies hanging onto this man!!! I couldn’t be more proud of our governor and his policies. He many appear weak to those wishing and hoping for freebies,,,,but, trust me, he isn’t. Governor Christie has begun chasing away all those voters who Corzine bussed in. The communist party has been very active in NJ, especially under Corzine, but lately they have been very, very quiet. I am loving each and every minute of our new governor’s time in office. I only wish my dad was still alive to enjoy the revitalization of our state. I don’t think we tax payers in NJ are going to be willing to allow Chris Chrisite to go national until he completes 2 terms.

  • Read Chesterton
  • avgjo

    I agree with him 100%.

    There’s a lot of ‘Chris Christie for President’ talk going around now. Doubtless, this stems from the fact that there is so little leadership in the GOP, so few Republicans willing to stand up to democrats on anything. And he has done it in New Jersey, no less.

    If he were president right now, pushing a ‘pathway to citizenship’ for illegals, I think many of his current fans would be singing a very different tune.

    I think he is a great governor for NJ. I think he has shown future Republican presidents how to play hardball with the democrats. But I don’t think he needs to be president. Why? I have 30 million reasons for ya…

    • NHConservative0227

      I think Levin is unfairly called out for this. No one has done a better job of going after RINO’s than the Great One.

      Yes, I agree that Christie has done a great job thus far as governor. However, just because the left is going after him with all kinds of bs, does not make him immune to legitimate criticism.

      I think Christie will continue to great as the NJ governor. However, Levin is doing all of us a great service by bringing illegal immigration and Obamacare out there to calm down everyone who keeps calling for Christie to be president.

      I thought Guiliani did a fantastic job as mayor but I did not support him for President due to him being soft on illegals.

    • Doc Holliday

      there is so little GOP leadership. Christie is winning, changing minds and working towards conservative goals in a hot bead of liberal statism. I love Levin, I have nothing against him, but he is wrong to criticize one of the few guys actually doing something. Talk is cheap, action is dear.

  • taxpayer1234

    “Remember Momentum [p] = Mass [m] X Velocity [v]. So with Christie?s considerable mass*, Dems are going to have to use a lot of force to slow him down.”

    Christie’s “mass” is his massive courage!!!

  • Oz

    But I think he’s great as governor of NJ.

    Way great.

  • http://wadingacross.wordpress.com logus

    Should we hold the bar high? Yes. Should we strive for that bar? Yes. Are people perfect? No.

    While we should strive for the best and push others towards that high bar, sometimes nitpicking just comes off as sour grapes complaining, that no one or nothing is good enough.

    No politician is perfect, certainly not Gov. Christie, but ya know, he’s stomach and waist above the prior NJ administration and many current politicians there. You count your blessings, perhaps make a brief rebuttal to some areas you disagree with, but encourage him to keep striving for the bar and play up his sucesses. Then you move on.

    Levin has a bad habit of biting after fellow conservatives. Yes, there’s reason for concern about RINOs and bringing the RNC back to its more conservative roots, but yeesh.

    He comes off as a fussy, whiny snob, and for that primary reason, I find it difficult to listen to him, no matter how much he knows about conservatism and our nation’s roots and desires for this nation.

    It’s one of the very annoying things about many talk radio shows. They beat horses dead, then continue beating that dead horse.

    • aesthete

      Chris Christie is more a Republican in the mold of Bill Weld: agnostic on social issues, pro-gun control, and very fiscally conservative. That may not win him many plaudits on the conservative side as time goes on, but we should understand that the recruiting pool for candidates on the East Coast isn’t exactly full of thundering social and cultural conservatives, and that the Bill Weld types are still better than progressives by far.

    • NHConservative0227

      Levin is not nitpicking here as Illegal Immigration and Obamacare are not exactly minor issues.

      THey are pretty cut and dry and no matter what excuses Christie or others want to make for him there really is no reason to strongly oppose both.

      It’s too bad real conservatives can’t accept the truth.

      • acat

        Illegal immigration, as Vassar has highlighted, creates an underclass almost by definition – an underclass who cannot come out into the light of Liberty and be free, who are always going to be victimized by those who control their ability to work.

        Obamacare creates an artificial and unnecessary dependency on the government for health care, and at the same time reduces my right to choose what doctor or faith healer or whatever I want to go to.

        Liberty is opposed on both fronts.

        I’m not surprised that a New England Republicrat doesn’t get this. Sad, and kinda disgusted, but not surprised.

        Mew

  • randycorporation

    on Facebook now. Is this how it’s going to be? The right consuming each other over these petty arguments?

    • ChicaGOP

      And Mark addressed Levin. Don’t act surprised when the object you are addressing decides to acknowldge that fact.

      Remember this is just a Web site, not a response-proof bunker from which to lob sniping complaints about a legimate and CORRECT point of concern.

      You’re right in that we should all be on the same side. Levin has, IMHO, correctly identified which side that is. Christie, 99 days out of 100, is there as well.

      Disagree (publically) with the Great One at your own rhetorical peril – cries for mercy and cooperation will not get you far.

      • crassus

        Christie is terrible on illegal immigration. He is a no-no for presidency. Shame because he is good on most spending issues.

        • taxpayer1234

          New Jersey’s illegals problem isn’t exactly at the level of AZ or CA, so I would guess Christie chose to put illegals at the lower end of his priority list. Good leaders know they must change their priorities according to the people’s needs. IF Christie decided to make a run for president, I believe he would reconsider his current position on immigration.

          • crassus

            THe country’S biggest two problems are the debt and the economy. The problem is not that Christie isn’t emphasizing immigration. The problem is that he has the wrong ideas for solving the problem altogether.

          • taxpayer1234

            I believe he would take a hard look at the facts and reconsider his position. I know, it’s hard to believe a politician would actually do something that sensible, but I guess I’m still hopeful.

          • StandardCandle

            Christie didn’t clarify his “official position” mainly because he doesn’t have a lot to talk about on the subject as NJ governor.

            Believe me as soon as illegal immigration becomes a drain on NJ economy and violent crime rate involving illegal immigrants goes up exponentially like in AZ he’ll have a fiscal reason to make some headway on the subject…

            but this is a bait and switch argument… they want to paint him as an ideologue to lose the good will he’s built with the constituents that lean left of center… there’s a reason they’re asking these questions… and in my view he’s humble enough not to grab the national megaphone and signal presidential bid with rhetoric especially when he’s got bigger fish to fry in the Role he’s currently Elected to… I mean we’ve seen at least 2 republican governors(see Alaska/Massachusets) leave their state battles for national personnas and a chance at presidential nominations… and they’re both saying the same things on Border Security/Obamacare….but what did they actually do as governor… well they quit when their constituents needed them the most.

        • conservativemusician

          Fiscally conservative, socially liberal candidtates drive me crazy because once they act on their socially liberal policies, it costs money to fund the stupid programs. It is a total waste of money. This is why Romney and other similar thinking RINOs are non-starters for president.

          Liberals have declared war on this country and we need serious conservative candidates at all levels who will hold the line and not get squishy just to get votes. For presidential candidates, it is no longer good enough for them to lean toward the comprehensive solution when the public has spoken loud and clear that we want the border closed. It is very simple: build the dang fence.