« BACK  |  PRINT

RS

MEMBER DIARY

Joe McCain: “Free John McCain!”

The candidate's brother wants the campaign to let him speak.

Joe McCain, the candidate’s brother, wants to fire the campaign’s management because they have kept McCain, and those around him, under wraps, isolated from the media:

Joe is particularly critical of top campaign officials (unnamed) who “so tightly ‘control the message’” that they have cut the press off from those who know the candidate best (presumably including his brother). Joe McCain, who notes that he once was a reporter and has worked in campaign press shops, calls these news-management efforts “counter-intuitive, counter-experiential, and counter-productive.”

Joe goes on to say that the decision to clamp down on press contact with intimates of the Arizona senator is “causing gangrene. It has gradually bled away all the good will that this great man had from the press, for he alone among politicians would talk to them openly, without finesse, without guile.”

Reporters, he notes, once returned the affection “regardless of their political lean . . . they loved him nonetheless.”

Joe–who did not respond immediately to a request for further comment–urges the campaign to allow him and others to talk to reporters about “the John McCain we know. Some reporters will get it wrong, most will not get it perfectly, but almost all will appreciate the reopening of the gates of information and reward us for it.”

Joe says he and others “were muzzled by those (running the campaign) without the understanding that you cannot control the media by keeping them from information, but you can lose all their good will.”

Not this year, Joe. John McCain never had a chance with this version of the press.

Certainly, in 2000 when he was “Luke Skywalker coming out of the Death Star,” taking on the Republican establishment, they loved John McCain. He was the anti-Republican, to them, at least for the early GOP Primary. Had McCain somehow won the party’s nomination and gone on to face the Democrat nominee, either John Kerry or Howard Dean (YEAAARRRRGH!) in our alternate universe, the media would have dropped McCain like hot bricks.

This year, John McCain never had a chance with the media. Obama’s ideology – uncertain, possibly progressive, and insubstantial, with alternating promises – is the perfect fit, unfortunately, with today’s media, with its predilection for political flightiness.

Joe McCain is frustrated and wants his brother to win. He obviously thinks that, on the merits, his brother should be winning, and this is correct. There is nothing to recommend Obama but the back story he wrote in his two novels, the historic nature of an Obama victory (which has nothing to do with his qualifications), and the “D” on his lapel if you lean to the lefty persuasion. The press, for the most part, like good stories and lean to the left, so Obama is their man. An straight-talking war Navy pilot with a back story lauded by people who love America is cannot touch that.

Should Steve Schmidt and friend have allowed McCain to open up to the media. Intuitively, it would seem so, but we are not running this campaign. I know that John McCain reached the national position he had in large part because of his straight talk. That willingness was what separated him from so many other politicos, include Barack Obama. You don’t strip that for a campaign.

Three weeks is a long time, but it has to begin Wednesday night. John McCain has to clearly win the evening on Wednesday in such a way that the Obama-enthralled media will report it that way. That will give him a push, and with that he has to run. Schmidt could open him up to the press at that point, and we might call the guy brilliant for holding back until the right moment.

By my estimation, McCain has to be winning or close to the margins in Florida, North Carolina, Ohio, Pennsylvania, Virginia, etc. on Election Day; Sarah “GOTV” Palin will take care of the rest.

COMMENTS

  • PaRep

    & leaves a bloody carcass on the floor the will say NO KNOCKOUT PUNCH!!!

  • udtiger

    Not this year, Joe. John McCain never had a chance with this version of the press.

    Once it went from Senator John McCain (M[averick] – AZ) to Senator John McCain (R[epublican] – AZ), Republican nominee, the “love” he received from the press was OVER.

  • CroakerNorge

    Ayers? Unless he has a picture of Obama, Ayers and Dohrn sitting in a coffee house at Columbia reading Karl Marx, or without a letter of recommendation from Dohrn to the law firm that gave Obama his first job, the MSM will not touch Ayers.

    Wright? Off the table.

    Fannie/Freddie? No attempt at a knockout punch so far? Why not? Is he saving it for the debate?

    ACORN? Not so much. Socialism? Even less. Rezko? Never heard of him.

    Instead, McCain says Obama is an honorable man with whom he disagrees. A man who happens to have come in contact with some of the worst elements of Chicago politics, only to advance because of their efforts.

    McCain did more to get the bailout package passed than Obama. Will McCain get credit for the stock markets 936 points yesterday? doubt it.

    Unless McCain and the Republicans have a lot of money for ads, there won’t be a knockout punch.

    • Swamp_Yankee

      The worse part is they had a great asset they didnt utilize. Palin had the ability to speak above and over the press. Yet, they listened to conventional wisdom about the old McCain and the media and supressed Palin for about two critical weeks.

      • Mark_Kilmer

        A great performance tomorrow night will give McCain a starting point, a place from which to go. From there, perhaps we’ll see McCain talking to the press and Palin speaking over them.

        • Strelnikov

          Especially that rally in Wisconsin?

          He ignores symbolizing the outrage – in a firm but definite manner (gritting the teeth now and then might be good!) – at his peril.

          As I wrote elsewhere earlier, including these necessary attacks with a positive message on the economy, national defense, etc. is not impossible!

          Both-And thinking, not Either-Or, is what we need!

  • liberalrepublican

    I wonder sometime what would have happened if McCain picked Lieberman for VP.

    He is the guy McCain really wanted.

    It would have signaled to everyone undecided and in the middle that McCain was truly the candidate of change.

    In one fell swoop, it would have taken away Obama’s strongest argument (Bush part II) and would have allowed him to HAMMER Obama on the experience issue.

    Now, before you slam me, I’m just wondering aloud.

    • udtiger

      …half the hardcore base would have washed their hands of McCain. Plus, you would not be getting any of the Hillary refugees (every one of them is one less for Obama, so don’t downplay this). McCain would easily be double digits behind Obama in every poll.

  • marfan

    Isn’t John McCain the top gun in his campaign? Shouldn’t he be the one who decides what message he should get out to the media? While in the Navy he took orders from above but as a presidential candidate he should be the one giving the orders and taking the helm and leading his campaign to victory. If he can’t lead his campaign how can he lead a country? You can blame the staff but he is the CEO.

    • liberalrepublican

      I think a McCain/Lieberman ticket would have been attractive to more Hillary supporters.

      The MSM would have loved it – it would have given them hours of nonsense to talk about.

      Look – this was going to be a blood bath for whoever the R nominee was. I think it’s really unfair to blame McCain for tactical mis steps right now. I don’t know if there really is ANYTHING he could have done to win.

      And other R’s would also be slammed.

      Right or wrong, if the economy is tanking, its tough to win as the incumbent party.

      • Mark_Kilmer

        Well, McCain could not have won with Hillary supporters. His main problem when he picked his veep was that the Republican base was, in the greatest part, unenthusiastic. McCain need that enthusiasm: volunteers, donations, GOTV, etc. If he’d have picked Lieberman, he’d have cast aside conservatism and with it, his base — sine qua non.

        The Palin pick put McCain in the game; a Joementum pick, not so much. If the economy ends up taking them out of the game, a Lieberman pick would have made matters worse. McCain and Lieberman are not even close on economic issues.

        • leftylurker

          And Governor Palin made me afraid for two reasons: didn’t like her politics, and thought she would bring a ton of energy to the ticket (which I’ll concede she really did).

          But Lieberman is the Lincoln Chafee of the Democratic party. He’s not really a democrat.

          And you guys already beat him once!

  • Joe_Cor

    since he left the Republican convention. That is when “honor” (as in, let the cool people define the terms of debate, don’t refute their disinformation, praise your opponent, don’t challenge his disgraceful record, help the MSM keep the American people in doubt about him) kicked in. This is the real McCain. Blame the media if you want, but it’s the same media we’ll have till the end of time. If we keep nominating Bush/McCain “new toners,” look forward to a very long time in the wilderness.

    • awtherfrd

      n/t

      • johnCV

        If you do, how do you feel about how HRC got railroaded by obama and the MSM during the primaries?
        Just curious. Thanks.

        • Mark_Kilmer

          But you were not McCain’s most important target; remember, he needed his base and Palin delivered that. Lieberman might have attracted some “lefty lurkers,” but Palin scored conservative activists. If John McCain did not have those activists on board, I might have admitted after the convention that the race was over.

          For instance, Palin’s acceptance speech fired up the crowd of activists and set the stage for McCain’s. If Lieberman’s speech at the RNC had been the veep acceptance speech, I might have cried, and I can imagine the private comments coming from my fellow RS contributors. From our fellow RSers here on the blog… yikes! You’d have to pump Moe full of coffee.

          • AKSteveB

            of the press that matters. The thing is, McCain came into this with his own base, I guess at this point I’d call us “David Brooks sorta conservatives” for lack of a better term. When he was direct and outgoing, we were so happy to see SOMEONE just put it on the table, who also seemed like well .. a good human being, we became fans and supporters even if we disagreed on certain issues. Morphing into “just another candidate” and the Palin pick lost a lot of us, because in a sense, we KNOW something is rotten in Denmark. Obama at least is who he is right now. I apologize for the “concern troll” sound to this, but McCain really deserves better (as did Bob Dole btw). A presidential candidate wins by tacking to the center in a general election, especially where that is the place they are most comfortable in their own skin.

            One other point, I think the base is going to look back and realize they really hurt their cause by pushing so hard on the v.p. selection. McCain was a lot more solid on their issues than they seemed to be willing to give credit for. They would have gotten as close as possible on judges (given a Democratic congress), and of course on foreign policy. They are also going to really appreciate “The Gang of 14″ if they are close to being a vetoproof minority. I’ll admit McCain-Feingold was an abomination.

            Right now it feels like things are careening into a bad split between what I see as “classic conservatism” and populism, bad enough to push some of the first category into the Obama camp. They/we won’t stay there for long, it isn’t where we belong, but the “elite vs. us” stuff really needs to go way down.

          • rstreu

            embracing “moderates.”

          • AKSteveB

            that (obviously), but to win you can either embrace them or convince them (and no matter WHAT you will govern from the middle, see Reagan, Clinton et al). More importantly, it isn’t even a matter of conservative vs. moderate as it is the embrace of a populist ideology that values “commonness” over education, success, and curiosity.

  • Ithk4myslf

    see a great divide coming, the fiscal conservatives and the religious right.

    I see alot of strife between the too. Me I am more moderate, and think the Republican base needs to expand the tents a bit if we wanna have a chance in national elections.

    I am one of those who don’t like the pick of Palin and think she is bad for the party.

    the others love her, and who lose all enthusiasm without her.

    now here is my question what about 2012?

    Romney vs. Palin in the primaries and who wins? because I am going Romney, and don’t want Palin at the top of my ticket.

    would they get pissed at a 2012 ticket of Romney/Jindal if palin where beat and not picked for VP?

    now its 4 years away, but all the talk of people saying Palin preping for ’12 and I kept thinking “uh… you better line up behind Romney”.

    its something to ponder in the next few years, I know if McCain loses my Romney ’12 threads will be everywhere

    • Mark_Kilmer

      just such a divide for decades. (“Will conservatism’s fiscal-social dichotomy split the GOP after Reagan leaves office?”)

      We need each other. We need the big tent — albeit with a decent ringmaster.

      • AKSteveB

        Of course having said that, may I yet again flog my particular hobby horse. There need be no split, at least on the national level … if the party as a whole would embrace federalism. The 10th Amendment is the cure for the “culture wars.” Social conservatism is 90 pct abortion and gay marriage at this point. We’re never going to have national consensus on this. Leaving this stuff to the states is the only way the temperature will ever drop on this stuff.

        Romney would be great if (just like McCain SHOULD have) .. just settle into being who he is .. in his own skin. Having said that, so far I’m impressed with Bobby Jindal. He seems to have that confidence that is based in competence without being arrogant, yet at the same time, he is super bright.

        • liberalrepublican

          I don’t know if there was anything a R could have done with what happened with the economy.

          Bad year to be a R.

          But, I always remember, Jimmy Carter gave us Reagan.

          • Ithk4myslf

            Jindal impressed me with his handling of the Hurricane.

            he knew after Katrina the entire nation was focused on him and his response and he performed well.

            I seriously thought his handling of that was gonna get him a spot on the ticket.

          • leftylurker

            When Hillary got worked over by the MSM, I was mostly upset that she didn’t fight back better and more coherently.

            I liked Hillary because I thought she would bring intellect and discipline to government. Say what you want to about her ethics (shady) or her ambition (legendary), but I think that Americans from all sides of the political spectrum have to respect her willpower and tenacity.

            When she didn’t fight back against the obama momentum, or when Bill fought back so ham fistedly (I almost think he was sabotaging her like he is Obama) I knew that the right would destroy her.

            So, to answer your question, I didn’t like it, but I thought that if she couldn’t beat Obama, she would never beat McCain.

          • AKSteveB

            but apparently he didn’t want it.

          • rstreu

            “Commonness” is something I do not see as a virtue in and of itself — and certainly not one worth embracing at the cost of the virtues you mentioned.

          • AKSteveB

            but is is Palin’s main selling point, to a lot of people she seems like “one of us” rather than an “elitist.” It is just one of those human things I don’t get, I never look for someone like myself in a position of leadership, I much prefer someone with more intelligence, more success, more experience etc. She’s picking up (in a lot of ways through no fault of her own, clearly she is doing what she has been told) the mantle of the George Wallace, Pat Buchanan-ish type of populism.