« BACK  |  PRINT

RS

MEMBER DIARY

TO: Steve Schmidt, Rick Davis

CC: John McCain, Sarah Palin

Sir(s),

I, one of your campaign’s supporters, need some answers from your principal candidate – John McCain. Is he in this to win, or is he more interested in being friends with the opposition? Does he want to be president or is he harboring a secret desperate longing to go back to being one of a hundred?

Personally, I’m beginning to get the impression that it’s the latter.

Your campaign’s strange decision to shy away from confronting the Democrats for their active role in preventing the GSEs from oversight and regulation all the while receiving thousands of dollars in contributions from Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac executives can only be explained by the argument that Senator McCain wanted the rescue bill to pass and he didn’t want partisan politics to stand in the way. Which would be why Governor Palin curiously avoided mentioning the real cause for the crisis during her debate with Senator Biden.

Well, the bill has passed. It’s time for partisan politics now.

Where are the ads from your (not the NRCC or some 527) campaign rightfully tying this mess around the Democrats’ necks? We have Democrats on record, many on print, and almost as many on video not only defending but praising their friends at Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac and denying that their practices posed any risks to the nation’s economy and shielding them from closer oversight and regulation despite investigations that discovered highly questionable accounting practices at the GSEs.

We even have your principal from 2005 and even the Bush Administration from 2003 warning of the danger and proposing regulations to rein in those monsters’ shenanigans and Democrats (including Obama – one of the top three beneficiaries of Fannie Mae’s ill-gotten largess) rising as one in opposition.

So where are the ads from your campaignhard-hitting and explicit – educating the American people about all this?

Because I really do not want to believe that James Pethokoukis is wrong here, that your campaign has made the decision (for three very [1] unserious, [2] cowardly, [3] asinine reasons) to kindly let the Democrats continue to wrongly blame Republicans and laughably “deregulation” (when they actually shielded the GSEs from even the most basic regulatory regimes) for a crisis that their greed and shortsightedness are primarily responsible for.

Sir(s), your decision to wall off Governor Palin, your campaign’s greatest asset, and shamefully remain silent while the Obamaphile media engaged in a three-week long character assassination campaign against her was a mistake of Bush/New Tone™ level proportions.

Trust me when I say that this would be even worse. Not only would you be allowing the opposition and their friends in the media to peel off marginally-informed (the bulk of) Independents, whose votes you need, through the endless repetition of the false information blaming Republicans as the cause of this crisis – as they have been successfully doing for the past two weeks, you will lose the active support and enthusiasm of millions of Republicans.

This is no time for bipartisanship. It’s an Election and it is four weeks away. You’re supposed to provide the people with a clear choice and that means some attempt to point out the other side’s myriad of shortcomings. You cannot afford, at this late date, to deliberately miss opportunities on the horribly mistaken assumption that voters would think you noble for staying your hand and give you their votes.

President Bush’s New Tone™ philosophy was based on this assumption, and I need not tell you that it is pure bunk – a look at his approval ratings should have been enough to tell anyone that, least of all (an) experienced hand(s) like you.

Please tell your candidate to block his ears from the siren song of “Bipartisanship” and find that fighting spirit that carried him through to victory in the Primaries after everyone had thought him dead and buried.

Else, let us know now that he never was in it to win, so we can find better things to do with our time and money (such as plan for how to live under high-taxing, high-spending, job-destroying, family undermining Democratic Administration and Congress) than spend them on someone manifestedly not worth it.

Let me see those ads.

Sincerely,
Martin A. Knight

COMMENTS

  • MiMiofTx

    [PLEASE DON'T ASK ME ABOUT ALL THE FANNIE MAE PEOPLE THAT WORK FOR OBAMA NOW RICKDAVISRICKDAVISRICKDAVIS...]

    [And that was pretty much the semantic content; besides, it had all the hallmarks of a cut-n-paste job anyway. - Moe Lane]

    • Jaded

      his lover was running the operations at Fannie but because a person in McCain’s campaign once worked as a lobbyiest he is on the hook?

      When lovers collide

      I mean it couln’t be Franklin Raines who is working for Obama right now who walked away with millions and millions..

      The thief in the henhouse

      Why no you intellectually naive troll it must be the man who got paid to lobby for John McCain….in your warped view of the world you will continue to believe your Messiah BUT for the rest of us out here we KNOW the truth.

      I suppose those two are off limits because the of sexual orientation and race of the thieves!

  • praiseyourwife

    He must hit the Dems hard every day from now until the election for bringing about the mortgage mess. And he must tell the people, “If you like the mortgage crisis, you’ll love the healthcare crisis that will come in about ten years (if the Dems pass government controlled health care).”

    And he must educate the people about Obama’s extremism on guns, abortion, etc.

    And he must lay into the do-nothing,anti-drilling, pro-defeat Democratic Congress.

    McCain evoked Truman the other day. Truman made a great comeback because he blasted the other side as well as vigorously promoted his own program. He certainly did not pull his punches. Just read any one of his speeches from the campaign of 1948. He was far from gentle.

    The newspaper articles I see could be Obama press releases. Against the combined onslaught of the press and the Democrats, McCain must stand up and fight, or go down to decisive defeat.

  • Martin_A_Knight

    My, all that verbiage and nothing on Jim Johnson? And by the way, it’s the Democrats’ very own Washington Post quoting Raines himself saying he was in contact with the Obama campaign as an adviser on housing issues.

    But let’s look at Jim Johnson, CEO of Fannie Mae, architect, along with Franklin Raines, of the subprime mess who both, along with their top executives, donated exclusively to Democrats in exchange for protection from regulatory oversight, formerly in charge of picking Obama’s vice-president and currently in Obama’s kitchen cabinet of advisers.

    Are you idiots really trying to make the case that Rick Davis (not even an employee of Fannie Mae), had more to do with Fannie Mae’s accounting practices and bribing of Democratic legislators than the two successive CEOs of Fannie Mae?

    PS: In case you didn’t know, Obama’s David Axelrod had Fannie and Freddie as clients as well. And considering the role Johnson is playing in the Obama campaign, I’d suspect that their relationship is much closer than that of Davis and Fannie, whose firm, not Davis himself had Fannie as a client from 2005 (not 2000), when Davis had disassociated himself from the firm.

    Furthermore, because you’re an idiot, you didn’t notice that despite all that bloviation about Davis influencing McCain in favor of Fannie and Freddie, McCain still sponsored legislation in 2005 to bring them under control, shooting all sorts of holes into your talking points.

  • rstreu

    n/t

  • Martin_A_Knight

    I have no idea why McCain instead wants to channel Lincoln Chaffee.

  • PaRep

    .

  • praiseyourwife

    since the beginning – focusing too much on reaching out to independents and Dems, who supposedly are attracted to bipartisanship. The campaign was right to engage heavily in that outreach, especially in such a bad year for Republicans, but not so much that the campaign couldn’t attack the other side for their faults.

    A lot of independents and moderate Dems do like bipartisanship, but the law of human nature do not change – if Obama appears strong, and McCain shies away from a fight, the people will be more attracted to the strong candidate.

    McCain should be reminded, too, since he is a man of honor (which I like very much), that it is not honorable to refuse to defend oneself from attacks, especially when they are so vicious.