« BACK  |  PRINT

RS

MEMBER DIARY

PA-12 05/18/2010 Turn-Out Percentages: D (62) – R (34) – I(4) … or why Tim Burns lost.

Maybe I missed it but in all the analyses of PA-12 that appeared on RedState afterwards, I don’t think I saw anyone mention the fact that PA-12′s Independents constituted only a tiny 4% of the electorate last week. I think that, more than anything else explains the Critz victory and its magnitude. Jay Cost highlights this rather emphatically …

This is a hugely important point to bear in mind. My back-of-the-envelope calculation of the party turnout in last night’s election indicates that a whopping 62% of the voters were Democratic, just 34% Republican, and a measly 4% were Independent or had a third party affiliation.

PA runs a closed primary system so it is certainly possible that many Independents – by far the most politically disengaged segment of the voting population – were unaware that there was a special election on in addition to the primary elections that they know that they don’t get to participate in.

If I remember correctly, Independents were polling heavily in favor of Tim Burns in the last week. So Burns had almost all Republicans, a small but measurable share of Democrats and a solid majority of Independents.

And he still lost, because with a 2:1 D-R partisan registration disadvantage, he needed to turn out all of his voters to compete. If Independents constituted only 4% of the electorate last Tuesday, then he obviously failed to do so and he needs to add a superlative GOTV operation  ready to turn out Independents into his November gameplan.

So there’s good news and bad news. The bad news is that Critz is now the incumbent and the Democrats got a much-needed morale boost.

The good news is that Bill Russell is no longer on the ballot splitting the R vote and it’s highly unlikely that Independents would only be 4% of the voters in November. Better yet, the Burns’ campaign just got a confidence shaking test-run, they’ve got six months to make some corrections.

COMMENTS

  • IJB

    Actually, I have mentioned that Indies didn’t show up on Tuesday in several of my posts on PA-12.

    I think the effect is significant enough that Indies showing up in November may actually throw PA-12 back the other way, and Burns will win it.

    But I’d rather the Dems be blissfully unaware of this possibility so that they are rudely shocked in 6 months, so I’m trying to keep it on the D.L…. :)

  • jeffreywturner

    They had a high-profile, contested Senate primary to vote in and the Republicans didn’t.

  • nepanyrush

    Burns was the anointed candidate of the PA State GOP. I wish they would have selected Russell, who I think would have done much better, but fine, they had to pick someone. In the past election, the Chairman of the State GOP favored Murtha over Russell, so maybe Russell never had a chance with the political elites, who instead went with the novice, but rich Burns.

    But why support attack literature of other Republicans? The State GOP funded a vicious, last-minute email attacking the true conservative Rohrer for Governor and supported the flawed candidacy of Marino in PA-10 over a great conservative in Madeira. I didn’t see the literature sent out by Burns over Russell, but likely it fit the same scenario of a select group of elite Republicans selecting the candidates, rather than letting the people choose in the primary. But, I guess they know best. Witness their support of Specter over Toomey among other disasters.

    The PA State Government is very dysfunctional — so much so that at meetings of Republicans you hear comments like the party has been taken over by Democrats. Until the national GOP fixes the leadership here, or the people themselves rise up and do something about it (thank you tea party members for your efforts) we are going to have difficulty.

  • RedLeader

    The Dem registration advantage in that district is just too hard to overcome. If I had to guess, the RNC walks away from this one in November after all of the resources that they poured into the special. Critz is very popular in the district.

    Actually, if the GOP is smart they’ll just walk away. The 12th is gone after the 2010 census anyway.

    Oh, and Russell didn’t split the vote. They were two entirely separate elections. That argument is absurd.

    • cwilson

      The concern is (was) that Russell supporters would deliberately kneecap Burns in the special election, by leaving it blank or voting for Critz, specifically so that Burns wouldn’t be the incumbent in November. Presumably in case Russell wanted to run as an I in a 3-way race, if he lost the primary.

      This was supported, early on, by an apparent discrepancy of about 20,000 fewer votes for Burns in the special, than were cast in total in the Republican primary. This was first reported by Jay Cost, but later retracted as an error.

    • IJB

      Burns is far from toast. It is unclear if Russell’s failure to unify cost Burns votes in the special (I can’t see any evidence for that among the vote totals in the Special and the Primary, though it would be difficult to tell…).

      But Burns picked up at least 15% of Democrats in the Special (i.e. those who voted in the Dem Primary, and then voted for Burns in the Special), and if you combine that with increased turnout among Independents, and perhaps reduced turnout among Dems, in November, and Burns has a real shot to take this back.

      Do you make it a habit to ‘talk down’ GOP electoral prospects?…

      • RedLeader

        I was on the ground in the 12th for the last 2.5 months of the campaign. I live in a neighboring district and have many friends and relatives in the 12th. I’m just telling you the reality of the politics in that area. Critz didn’t even trot out Joyce Murtha for the special. You can guarantee that she’ll be out in November. Her campaigning for Critz is game, set and match against Burns. I hate it and I don’t understand it, but Murtha is absolutely adored by the voters of the 12th.

        Finally, my larger point is that this district isn’t going to matter at all after redistricting because it won’t exist anymore.

    • Martin Knight

      Happy?

      PS: Matheson of UT represents a District that has +23 R rating. He’s a Democrat.

      How does that square with your silly logic?

      • earlgrey

        If the economy gets worse by November, than I dont’ think we should count out Critz.

  • http://blog.beliefnet.com/cityofbrass/ Aziz Poonawalla

    Martin, I was trying to find your email but havent had luck. Would you be willing to drop me a line? I am apoonawa dash blog at yahoo. Wanted to ask you something and maybe get some help with something.