« BACK  |  PRINT

RS

MEMBER DIARY

If only Akin was Torricelli …

Why am I, a New Jersey resident, furious with Todd Akin?

The Missouri Republican Senate candidate’s breathtaking ignorance and stupidity regarding rape and conception not only immediately imperiled GOP chances to pick up a winnable seat held by the unpopular Claire McCaskill, but gave Democrats ammunition to lob at Republicans up and down ballots nationwide, including Mitt Romney and Paul Ryan.

Everyone on the planet knows this. Everyone except the delusional Todd Akin, currently a congressman. He let pass a 5 p.m. Tuesday deadline that would’ve allowed him clean exit from the race, keeping this entirely unnecessary distraction front and center ahead of next week’s GOP convention.

Akin can still withdraw from the ballot, but would need a court order. So it’s still possible to salvage this potential pickup, but Akin’s obliviousness to the continued damage he’s doing gives me no hope. Here are some nuggets from radio interviews Akin did Tuesday explaining why he’s staying in the race (hat-tip to Sean Hannity for grilling Akin):

1. “My interest in this race has nothing to do with me. It has to do with who we are as a nation.”

Whenever anyone says that something of dire importance “has nothing to do with me” it usually means it has “everything to do with me.” Akin doesn’t realize that if this race truly had nothing to do with him, then there’s no reason for him to stay on the ballot. The same issues he champions can still have a voice in the Senate — an articulate voice connected to a sharp mind.

2. “I think it will help Romney and I think it’s going to help the Republican party.”

I audibly groaned upon hearing this and remember thinking “he has no clue.” Hannity asked Akin that if his continued presence indeed would help the GOP, wouldn’t the Republicans and Romney be asking him to stay on the ballot? Akin of course had no logical answer. Hannity asked Akin how many Senate Republicans asked him to stay in the race. Akin: “None, but …”

3. “Don’t you think he may have bid this thing up and made a bigger deal about it than he needed to?” Akin asked Hannity of Romney. “Why couldn’t he run his race, and I’ll run mine?”

With that final question, Akin cemented the notion behind the popular Tuesday Twitter tweet: “There is no reasoning with an idiot.” I don’t fault Hannity for not telling Akin the following because Akin clearly can’t comprehend it: “Because all of these races are interconnected. Democrats will continually link your ignorance and stupidity to Mitt Romney and Paul Ryan, who will not be able to effectively campaign in Missouri as long as you are there trying to salvage your political career. Romney and Ryan cannot campaign alongside you. Romney and Ryan cannot even be seen with you.” This gets back to Akin’s inability to grasp that he is making this race all about him. He believes Missouri exists in a bubble and that nothing he says or does will have any bearing outside of it. Savvier politicians, however, would.

So, why am I, a New Jersey resident, furious with Todd Akin? I live in a state that hasn’t elected a Republican to the U.S. Senate since the 1970s. Robert Menendez is up for re-election and likely will beat his challenger. Why? Because it’s New Jersey. We like high taxes, overspending, and ignoring the natural resources off of our shorelines. We reward our politicians who vote for huge stimulus packages and Obamacare. We believe in state Supreme Court-mandated financial redistribution to continually failing school districts. I’m mad because I wish we had a chance to pick up a senate seat in my state, but we don’t. Missouri was one of the best opportunities and unfortunately the choice is now between the unpopular incumbent and someone whose skull is an impregnable fortress protecting nothing.

One of our former corrupt senators, Robert Torricelli, was losing badly in his quest for reelection to the Senate in 2002. The Democrats forced him off the ticket with around a month to go before the election. (There was a court battle because a late deadline passed, but the state Supreme Court decided New Jersey deserved a choice.) The Democrats trotted out former U.S. Sen. Frank Lautenberg, who easily beat the GOP opponent who would’ve crushed Torricelli. I remember Torricelli’s tearful remarks upon ducking out of the race. His political career was over. But he understood what was best for his party and not him. It’s abundantly clear the Republicans in Missouri are not as fortunate.

COMMENTS

  • APA Guy

    If he cared about the country, he would step down…simple as that. There is nothing left for this man save selfish ambition, and that explains his continued presence in this race after what is statement for which there is no recovery.

    The Torricelli example is 100% spot-on. What makes some conservative resistence to Akin’s ouster even more infuriating is the complete disregard these people have for personal accountability and responsibility. When did we begin to leave those virtues at the door just because someone is conservative?

    Akin should have done the right thing…he hasn’t thus far. If he remains, not only will he toss this seat back to the Dems, but he will be a drag on the national ticket as we answer questions about rape and abortion for the next two months instead of hammering Obama on his terrible economy.

    Good Lord…only our side can so willingly grasp defeat from the jaws of such a much-needed victory. I pray that Akin will do the right thing in the end.

  • Viet71

    He does not care about his beliefs.

    He cares about number 1.

  • APA Guy

    THAT is who we are supposed to stand by no matter what as we lose the senate and the country is flushed down the toilet?

    If this man WAS a true conservative, he would put himself last and his country first.

    I am fed up with being called a “coward” by some because I won’t stand by this man who has allowed Dems to change the election narrative and take a grasp of the MO senate seat tha was all but lost. A true COWARD holds the future of the American people hostage to save his own career.

  • http://www.examiner.com/x-1597-Charlotte-Law--Politics-Examiner Mike gamecock DeVine

    If one could know (and one can’t) that Akin will definitely lose and cost the GOP the senate and thus doom America to an Obamacared-for death AND that the replacement would definitely win, then MAYBE one could beging a conversation about the state of Akin USA-Breaky heart….

    I think we are about to see a new phenomena: A Religious Right conservative resists the siren calls from the MSM and GOP Establishment and much of the rest of the GOP; sticks it out; the issue fades and looks puny to voters who want Obama and his ilk out; and he wins.

    See Cockstradamus on that and more…

    http://www.redstate.com/gamecock/2012/08/23/2822/

  • Viet71

    n/t

  • Lucas Black

    I have nothing good to say about Akin. He is behaving in a most unchristian manner.

    Obadiah 1:3 The pride of your heart has deceived you, you who live in the clefts of the rocks and make your home on the heights, you who say to yourself,

  • Viet71

    The country is not ready for the Religious Right. Except in beliefs.

    Most are Libertarian. They vote that way. And they behave that way.

    Give me what I want. Stay out of my face.

  • ddawg

    Matt, if someone had asked you last Saturday whether massive trauma, such as a rape, can induce almost immediate menstruation, would you have known the answer with certainty?

    Stress can affect a woman’s cycle. Physical trauma can contribute to miscarriage. We are now aware of research and studies that have been cited to show that trauma does not forestall conception. However, that idea doesn’t seem to be too far afield from actual relationships between stress/trauma and women’s reproductive systems.

  • http://travismonitor.blogspot.com Freedoms Truth

    You do realize this is IRRELEVENT. I am not a doctor. You are not a doctor. No, I wouldnt know that answer, and I certainly wouldnt go on TV stating false things to pretend to know something to justify a political position.

    I wouldnt say something ignorant and offensive and then expect to be forgiven, as if betraying ignorance doesnt already DISQUALIFY you from the job. You know, if you go into a job interview a MUFF IT – you dont get the job!

    Just as Akin’s comment about women’s bodies was irrelevent to the question of abortion (it doesnt matter how common or rare pregnancy from rape is, that is not a reason to support prolife or proabortion positions), all of this attempt to justify how women’s bodies might or might not work is irrelevent. You cannot justify Akin’s comments in this way. It’s Akin’s job as a candidate not to get caught saying things that are wrong, offensive and can be used against Republicans – which is happening now.

  • ddawg

    It’s relevant because it underscores the disproportionate nature of the response. Politicians betray ignorance all the time. In this case, you and others have taken a run of the mill occurrence and apparently concluded that this particular show of ignorance is of the worst variety. Yet, there’s not a lot of information available to the average person on this issue. The high level of certainty by Akin’s detractors that this instance of ignorance is extremely egregious doesn’t make sense to me.

    I agree that Akin didn’t need to say everything he said in order to answer the question. However, I’ve done two radio interviews in my life, both loosely relating to a field in which I have a master’s degree. The first one went great. The second one, I received questions I was unprepared for, and I was grasping for words to fill the air time with something that sounded halfway decent.

    You are mistaken that I am seeking to justify his comments. I don’t seek to do that, but rather to explain why I think the response to him has been disproportionate. I also hope that my efforts will help give some who read this a handle by which they can say, “You know, maybe I can still be supportive of Akin. Maybe we can still win this Senate seat.”

  • ddawg

    Meant to reply to Freedom’s Truth’s “Breathtaking irrelevence” above.

  • ArchTriumph

    Any republican candidate from President to Senate to Dog Catcher has one primary drill to run over and over again: Role Play a Liberal Media Interview!

    This is like blocking and tackling practice, passing and catching plays for Conservatives. Day in and day out you lift the heavy weights of fielding “gotcha questions.” Kissing babies and shaking hands falls apart when you make Just One mMstake.

    I don’t understand why Akin didn’t have a pat, gut level, rapid fire response to this type of question. Who the hell is running his campaign? What the hell has he been doing in the MO House all this time? Doesn’t he understand what he’s up against?

    And yet, I hate the fact that Democrats and Liberal Media can knee cap our guys by baiting them into saying stupid things. The truth is: politics is a waiting game, to see who slips up. Who ever messes up the first time and in the worst way may loose. But watch how quickly the Liberal Media will cover for the Liberal screw ups and crucify the Conservatives. And we are left with our mouths gaping wide…

    Why wasn’t Obama shamed, ridiculed and forced out of the 2008 presidential campaign for supporting infanticide? Because we don’t pouch their guys but it’s open season on ours. Not to mention all the near criminals who maintain their positions in the liberal hierarchy.

    Wake up Republicans! There is a big difference between soliciting sex with house pages and foolishly attempting to parse the horrifically fine line between rape and abortion.

  • http://www.examiner.com/x-1597-Charlotte-Law--Politics-Examiner Mike gamecock DeVine

    voters in Missouri will see that…Cockstradamus thinks…

  • http://www.examiner.com/x-1597-Charlotte-Law--Politics-Examiner Mike gamecock DeVine

    smile

  • naraht

    The fact is that the last sentence stands alone quite well. ” I think there should be some punishment, but the punishment ought to be on the rapist and not attacking the child”. If that had been the answer, no one would have thought twice about the interview.