are a military problem not a “law enforcement” problem. Now if they can just convince TheBoyPresident™.
The New York Times did a good piece on Andy McCarthy a couple of days ago. If you don’t know who Andy is, go read the article I can’t possibly do him justice here. I will just note that he was an official in the DoJ for years and prosecuted the blind sheik for his role in trying to blow up the WTC in the early ’90′s. He’s one of the very, very good guys.
A quote from the article says everything anybody would ever need to know about dealing with terrorists and terrorism. McCarthy is talking about the Clinton Justice Department here…
Mr. McCarthy said he understood why the [DoJ] pursued the prosecutions. “I mean that’s the ethos of the place is that you want to do the cutting-edge case.” But, looking back, he said, he questioned the focus, particularly given that Al Qaeda kept escalating its attacks. He cited the 2000 bombing of the destroyer Cole in Yemen, which killed 17 American servicemen, and Sept. 11.
“We [the DoJ] become headquarters for counterterrorism in the United States,” he said. “Not the C.I.A. Not anyplace in Washington. The U.S. attorney’s office for the Southern District of New York.”
“From the country’s perspective,” he said, “it’s not a good thing.” A prosecutor’s job, he added, “is not the national security of the United States.”
In June 1998, the office secretly indicted Osama bin Laden. Three months later, Al Qaeda blew up the two embassies.
“I mean, we could go into the grand jury and indict him three times a week,” Mr. McCarthy said. “But to do anything about it, you needed the Marines. You didn’t need us.”
That’s a pretty clear statement from the guy who was at the top of the law enforcement heap, actually doing prosecutions of terrorists, and doing them successfully – at least from a criminal justice point of view. Let’s note here that even a “successful” prosecution has it’s limits. The blind sheik was convicted and is serving time basically in a secured housing unit – in isolation – in a federal pen. He still had access to his lawyer and she happily smuggled out correspondence from him to terrorist organizations. She was convicted and got a very light sentence, she should have been tried for treason and hung, but that’s another diary.
Andy McCarthy didn’t come to the conclusion that criminal prosecution was a fool’s errand just lately. Again, from the NYT article…
In a November 1998 essay for The Weekly Standard, he offered one of his earliest public pronouncements of where his thinking was going. “In the main, international terrorism is a military problem, not a criminal-justice issue,” he wrote.
You really should read the whole article, the New York Times has done an excellent job with this one, obviously even a broken clock is right twice a day. I’m waiting for the second time.
Mr. McCarthy, thank you for your service to our country and thank you especially for your clear thinking and honesty. I’ll wrap this diary up with an appropriate (at least I think it’s appropriate) Andy McCarthy quote about the defense bar working for terrorists…
“The country’s at war and they’re volunteering their services to the enemy,” Mr. McCarthy said of the lawyers.
Yep.
Oh, and I don’t expect this is a lesson TheBoyPresident™ will assimilate or even wants to hear.
Jeff Emanuel
Neil Stevens
Reporter Benjamin Weiser
Beaglescout (Diary) Sunday, February 21st at 3:22PM EDT (link)Is a new name to me. His NYT archive is full of stories about terrorism and the law. He wrote a book about an important spy for the US and NATO against Soviet Poland who turned over a lot of valuable information about USSR plans. He seems like a more accurate than usual reporter for the NYT.
I think it is important to personalize and freeze reporters and their reporting. Make them responsible for their stories. That is the only way they will improve. My initial judgement is that Weiser is to be commended for his reporting.
“A nation which can prefer disgrace to danger is prepared for a master, and deserves one.”
Excellent point Beagle. Yours is a Franz approved comment. nt
mbecker908 (Diary) Sunday, February 21st at 3:43PM EDT (link)But didn't Bush try many terrorists in Federal Court?
antonio (Diary) Monday, February 22nd at 6:14PM EDT (link)Didn’t he see them , then, as a law enforcement problem?
Nine months two comments both defending the Won.
mbecker908 (Diary) Wednesday, February 24th at 8:13AM EDT (link)First of all antonio, you’re an ignorant, raving fool. For about seven years of the Bush Administration there either were no military tribunals or jackasses like you were bringing suit to make sure the people who want to murder us are accorded Constitutional rights under the US Constitution and are given attorneys paid for by US tax payers.
You can leave now. Go play in the fast lane of your nearest interstate highway.
antonio, look at this:
blooch Wednesday, February 24th at 10:22AM EDT (link)http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Nh1pIFql6ek
antonio? antoooonio…paging antonio.
“Lieutenant Dike wasn’t a bad leader because he made bad decisions. He was a bad leader because he made no decisions.”