« BACK  |  PRINT

RS

MEMBER DIARY

Well, this is certainly going to be interesting…

HT to Hotair…

We need more nerdy wonks. We’ve grown fat and stupid on a red meat diet.

I don’t know if TPaw should be our candidate, but I think this is a good start. He got bad reviews at CPAC for a red meat speech that he didn’t carry off particularly well. Hopefully he’ll fight the urge to repeat that fiasco. In this two minutes of pre-announcement, he seems to be setting the stage for a serious run. And he notes several important things. First, he served two terms as Governor of a Democratic state. Second, he governed as a solid conservative and moved the state to the right. Proof of that is that after two terms of conservative, and sometimes pretty hostile, governance the people of Minnesota turned both houses of their legislature over to Republicans and many of those are pretty conservative. Third, he understands the issues – the deficit, the overreach of government and jobs.

I think this is a good start. By the end of today, it could be an excellent start.

Tags:

COMMENTS

  • bk

    He can turn his nerdishness into a benefit.

    BTW great closing line in that video!

  • http://www.nighttwister.com NightTwister

    Humble beginnings, solid record, extensive experience, and keen focus on the most important issues.

    • Jim Tomasik

      nt

      • http://www.examiner.com/x-1597-Charlotte-Law--Politics-Examiner Mike gamecock DeVine
        • red_oakster

          He’s smart and disciplined and thus far has gotten the breaks he’s needed (Huckabee and Daniels out of the race).

          If he can do well in Iowa, Pawlenty can turn the nomination battle into a 2-man fight with Romney. That’s a fight Pawlenty would be the favorite to win.

          Pawlenty’s Achilles heel remains that populist social conservatives like Bachmann and Palin (if she runs) bury him in Iowa and he never gets to New Hampshire. But with Daniels and Huckabee gone, TPaw has a better chance of preventing that from happening.

          • http://www.examiner.com/x-1597-Charlotte-Law--Politics-Examiner Mike gamecock DeVine

            I really now fear that Paws will screw this up….kidding becker….Paws looks solid to me, esp after his ethanol phase out plan. I don’t think there is a state he can’t win from Iowa to NH to Nevada to SC…Super Tuesday and beyond. I just don’t see Romney breaking thru the 30% ceiling he had in 2008 BEFORE the RomneyCare disaster and his refusal to call it such…and I was for Mitt until Fred in 08.

  • cordpt

    Very well produced video.

  • http://theminorityreportblog.com Repair_Man_Jack

    as my second or third favorite candidate. He also passes my all important “If he can’t do this better than Sarah Palin Test.” That is, if I were to attend the Alabama Primary, and it were a choice between ONLY Sarah Palin and X, could I justify voting for X?

    I even commented somewhere that if I had to choose between SP, Huckabee and Trump, I would feel forced to become a Palinstinian. Huckabee and Trump are no more. He just needs to stay above the SP line, and he may well take the nomination.

  • acat

    His major weakness is the lack of perceptible fire-in-the-gut. He’s not Chris Christie or Herman Cain. .. and that’s a Good Thing.

    The position of bomb-thrower and red-meat-distributor has generally been the Veep slot, allowing the top dog to be president-for-all. Bush/Cheney (insert “darth Cheney joke) .. Clinton/Gore (insert “environmental Al joke”) …

    The exceptions to this rule have been Obama/Biden and Reagan/Bush… the former an unmitigated disaster, the latter arguably set the stage for disaster for conservatives by not having a strong conservative veep…

    As long as Pawlenty can think on his feet – and he did come in 2nd in the S.C. premature debate – I think he’ll do just fine… especially if paired with a fire-breather.

    Mew

    • acat

      http://hotair.com/archives/2011/05/23/exclusive-interview-with-tim-pawlenty/

      for an interview that might help answer some of the concerns.

      I’ll take the liberty of grabbing one quote. “Don?t confuse politeness with weakness, Pawlenty told me.”

      Mew

  • clarioncaller

    That’s my take on him.Here’s a video detailing his support for Sharia….and the special program he set up for Muslims to buy houses in MN….before the public outrage forced him to drop the program.

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=b2ZoNBmMfxU

    Global Warming/Cap n Trade….he supported both before he changed his position

    http://www.minnpost.com/politicalagenda/2011/04/22/27715/will_steger_laments_the_global_warming_change_of_heart_of_tim_pawlenty

    • cordpt

      If Dick Morris-engineered “Pawlenty supports the Sharia!” absurdity is Pawlenty’s biggest weakness, he’ll run away with the nomination if nobody else enters the field.

      As for the cap’n'trade change of heart, that’s actually a positive – the right type of change.

      Plus, why do you bash the GOP and republican politicians in every single one of your posts? Do you like anyone in the right?

      • YnotNOW

        That much should be obvious. Pawlenty is off to a good start – let’s see if he has staying power.

    • http://www.hakubi.us/ Neil Stevens

      You hate Romney, you hate Huckabee, you hate Gingrich, and you hate Pawlenty.

      I smell Obama lover.

      • blooch

        http://www.redstate.com/erick/2011/05/20/the-greatest-seminar-caller-ever/#comment-110435

    • phenry

      I can’t for the life of me understand why supposed conservatives are falling head over heels for this RINO. I thought we were smarter than to fall for slick marketing campaigns. Pawlenty is arguably worse than McCain.

      http://online.wsj.com/article/SB120373223052387643.html

  • http://www.tooncesthecat.wordpress.com tooncesthecat

    someone who wants the nomination, who is qualified (has executive experience), who can unite the party after the primaries, and who can beat Obama.

    • http://908StraightSt.wordpress.com/ mbecker908

      It’s too early to tell on most of those things, but I’ll give him a good start and that’s a real positive. Also, the whining we’re seeing here is generally without much foundation. Overall, he’s a solid candidate and a solid conservative and he governed that way in a liberal state AND got reelected.

      Now let’s see how he does with staying power and communication. Rubber, meet road.

      • red_oakster

        If I were Obama, Pawlenty is the current candidate who would scare me most.

        If he’s the nominee, Minnesota comes into play. That’s a huge electoral college headache for the Democrats. Now suppose Pawlenty puts Rubio on his ticket. Florida goes red and helps in states like Nevada and Colorado with significant Hispanic populations. Add in the post-census shift of electoral votes to red states and Obama faces a very steep climb. Pawlenty would be a formidable opponent.

        • http://www.nighttwister.com NightTwister

          If he’s smart, that is.

          Rubio would be no help in Colorado. Romney is the overwhelming favorite here, and would likely win CO’s electoral votes in the General. I think Pawlenty would also do well here.

      • http://www.examiner.com/x-1597-Charlotte-Law--Politics-Examiner Mike gamecock DeVine
  • ruexperienced

    Great video and from what I hear, he sounded great on Rush

  • http://www.itsaboutliberty.com IronDioPriest

    I’ve had the opportunity to watch Pawlenty in action over the span of years – first in the MN House where he reached Majority Leader, and then his two terms as Governor.

    Pawlenty is a political insider; a politician through-and-through; a GOP establishment loyalist. He carefully views his actions and positions through that lens. Many find that to be a strength. I believe that such a man cannot win the trust of Tea Party America unless he convincingly overcomes that perception.

    How does one overcome who and what one IS? The conservative electorate is finely tuned to sniff out any whiff of inauthenticity, and even more finely tuned to root out establishment place-holders. And when T-Paw TRIES to overcome his establishment cred, it is embarrassingly obvious. I cringe on his behalf every time he tries.

    Is he a conservative? The short answer is yes, absolutely – until and unless it becomes politically expedient to tack to the Left.

    Is he a fighter? Yes – as long as he’s got legislative support to help him weather the onslaught from the media, the Democrats, and liberal special interests.

    Pawlenty is conservative in his gut, with a “bent toward government solutions” caveat. In other words, he’s a pro-government Republican. Nothing anti-establishment about the guy whatsoever.

    In the state house he was solid. As governor he began conservatively with a split legislature, but drifted Leftward when he lost both houses to the Dems. His statement is essentially true – “As Governor, I moved a Democratic state in a conservative direction.” But he has shown enough willingness to adopt liberal ideology and policy when he feels he must, to cause some justified concern.

    For instance, T-Paw’s much talked-about backtracking on Global Warming? and Cap-n-Trade. I believe that Tim Pawlenty NEVER believed in man-made Global Warming?, and never genuinely supported Cap-n-Trade. Everything I have seen him rail against over the years tells me this.

    But a couple short years ago, it seemed the wave of the future was going to be Global Warming? and all the Socialist solutions to it. Rather than standing for his conservative beliefs, Tim Pawlenty looked at the political landscape and calculated that the bandwagon was the place for him to be.

    I believe his position NOW against AGW and Cap-n-Trade is where his beliefs always resided. His true position was the conservative one.

    So do we need to worry about betrayal on Cap-n-Trade? Not now. But if it somehow becomes the political juggernaut issue it seemed to be a couple years ago, who knows? He was willing to go against his conservative beliefs and hop on the bandwagon before when it appeared politically expedient and wise, and then hop back home when it was not.

    He’s not a RINO. He just acts like one sometimes when it counts.

    Among the establishment candidates toward whom I have little positive to say, Pawlenty is one I would settle for if I must. But I do not believe the conservative electorate at large will support such a candidate through to victory against Barack Hussein Obama. If we do not end up with a nominee who shows a willingness and ability to fight hard and speak plainly in ways that convey authenticity and connection with the realities concerning the grassroots about the malfeasance of this government, than nominee will lose.

  • http://www.itsaboutliberty.com IronDioPriest

    …among ALL the candidates early on in the 2008 GOP primary field, Tim Pawlenty heartily endorsed John McCain. When the filed was wide-open, populated with candidates far more conservative than John McCain, Tim Pawlenty supported McCain and never wavered.

    Loyalty? Pah. Poor judgment.

    • http://www.itsaboutliberty.com IronDioPriest

      …not “filed”.